Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Legal requirements of permissions to import into OSM
Hi, On 07/29/2015 12:39 AM, Christoph Donges wrote: 1. ask for a public domain dedication I think it's funny to ask for that which OSM is unwilling to give. Maybe you're misunderstanding. A PD dedication isn't a requirement for adding data to OSM, but it is the easiest way to go because it doesn't require the more complicated steps 2. and 3. from the message (and possibly others) that you have chosen not to quote. You seem to imply that anyone asking for PD data should also be willing to give their own data away as PD data. But the PD dedication is the exact opposite of such reciprocity. Asking for PD while not giving your own away as PD is quite standard actually - not least among most of those calling for OSM to be PD. Nothing funny about that. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33 ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Legal requirements of permissions to import into OSM
Well, I'll withdraw the suggestion; I wasn't party to those conversations and I'm finding them to be essentially unsearchable due to the license transition conversations around CC-BY-SA. I will note that CC itself soft-pedaled the significance of the attribution change in 4: http://creativecommons.org/version4 Pre-4.0 CC BY attribute requirements are clearly incompatible with common attribution for multi-source maps, practices of data consumers (including Mapbox), and both the CC 4.0 and ODbL 1.0 attribution requirements. ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Legal requirements of permissions to import into OSM
1. ask for a public domain dedication I think it's funny to ask for that which OSM is unwilling to give. ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
