[liberationtech] Any TSF people subscribed?

2013-01-17 Thread Bernard Tyers - ei8fdb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi there,

Is anyone from TSF, Télécoms sans frontières, subscribed to the list?

thanks,
Bernard

- --
Bernard / bluboxthief / ei8fdb

IO91XM / www.ei8fdb.org

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ98YjAAoJENsz1IO7MIrr4X0H/2Din6TvweRms7GBoA2jHvNz
qTx0njpzjTf3vVgg9KIZifgdKjphGRjtJJ5yWsYgyvzYYPBiiNMfYy61Q1iHQICL
8EV6XJGeqUf++hQ4nlFXVb0tvbSFaWf8AXryoZIazmTZpYtWEOWFEB6j0uAWXhyh
ov8+9NTnRetaRQAY0tGewP12V9NozqRgCStC+N49ySwngF41uZFuIBiebWJ+ga0h
gn5SiWET0XdDgLlbjyzkCwCtvuI5qwrSIsaNw4nDMPZlQNZ1Fb/qlJt+LtWK3M3x
qIaChc+s0YwymYDwNEhf3l8XRkTfVU7fQeje/KqSKVCj/ef9UzHiNX3W9dBSE0E=
=eniH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech


[liberationtech] Somewhat off topic [and a bit silly]: Petition Obama Administration to close a github issue

2013-01-17 Thread Uncle Zzzen
As promised, it's a bit silly, but it *does* deal with data freedom, so
perhaps some of you folks can find it in your hearts to help reach the 100K
signatures required for an official response to a petition created by a
non-AmCit. Even better: maybe some of you know the Obama admins
personally :)

http://wh.gov/mOQx
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

[liberationtech] CfP: Internet and International Politics: Comparing Opportunities and Rising Challenges Panel - 7th ECPR General Conference, 4th-7th September 2013 Bordeaux

2013-01-17 Thread Calderaro, Andrea

Sorry for cross-posting


7th ECPR General Conference
4th - 7th September 2013
Sciences Po, Bordeaux

Deadline 1st February 2013

Call for Papers for the Panel:

Internet and International Politics: Comparing Opportunities and Rising 
Challenges

Chair: Andrea Calderaro (European University Institute)

Discussant: Ben Wagner (European University Institute)

The consolidation of worldwide Internet practices calls for research looking at 
the influence that this scenario has on politics from a comparative and 
transnational perspective of analysis. We can observe a growing scholarly 
interest in how the Internet is increasingly influencing International 
Politics, especially by empowering local actors in the development of and the 
coordination around contentious issues – both locally and internationally. 
Recent key international events have illustrated this empirically. The recent 
streams of protests challenging authoritarian regimes have generated interest 
in the potentialities of the Internet in transition countries. Furthermore, new 
tools have been developed to support the rising of local voices and to connect 
these to a global audience. Within this framework, the debate on the 
opportunities offered by the Internet to protect Human Rights is rich of 
contributions addressing new opportunities and new challenges. However, despite 
a general agreement that the Internet influences International Politics along 
this line, further effort is demanded to clarify the nature and dynamics of 
such an influence.
This panel calls for papers addressing novel research and empirical cases that 
capture the influence of the Internet on International Politics, as well as 
comparative research strategies exploring the use of internet-mediated 
communication across countries and political systems. The goal is to establish 
clear lines of dialogues between empirical research and innovative 
methodological approaches to new media and International Politics, with a main 
focus on contentious politics.

For further information, please contact:
andrea.calder...@eui.eumailto:andrea.calder...@eui.eu

How to propose a paper
After having logged in,  select the panel's title, and submit an abstract of 
300 max words via:
http://bit.ly/TXEWbp

Further information on the Internet and Politics  Program at the ECPR:
http://new.ecprnet.eu/Events/PanelList.aspx?EventID=5SectionID=83


_

Andrea Calderaro, PhD | European University Institute


Center for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom | European University Institute

Guest Editor Policy and Internet special issue: Online Collective Action and 
Policy Change - CfP at:http://t.co/YWe2a7ya

Chair Internet and Politics Standing Group - European Consortium of Political 
Research (ECPR)

---

Personal Page: 
www.eui.eu/Personal/Researchers/calderaro/http://www.eui.eu/Personal/Researchers/calderaro/

Twitter: @andreacalderaro



The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or other use 
of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or 
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited without the express 
permission of the sender. If you received this communication in error, please 
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

Re: [liberationtech] Skype letter strategy

2013-01-17 Thread Maxim Kammerer
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Andre Rebentisch tabe...@gmail.com wrote:
 Definitely not. It is an organisation that does not care at all about its
 public image in the field of public policy. Quite exceptional, I may add.

Could you please be more specific? For instance, from what I remember,
whenever someone sets up an interview with a Microsoft employee, that
person is briefed by a team of professional PR people whose purpose is
to dig any information they can find on the interviewer, and design a
complete interview behavior / answers strategy based on that. That
doesn't come across as a behavior of a company that does not care
about its public image in some area.

 Of course there are exceptions to the scheme, e.g. an ip enforcement case in
 Russia a few years ago to which the company applied very professional damage
 control.

Are you referring to the the time when police would accuse people and
companies of using pirated Microsoft software, and Microsoft would
then distance itself from the investigation and claim they don't have
direct demands against the accused? I think all companies do that,
it's a win-win for them. Even Adobe “withdrew its support for the
criminal complaint against Dmitry Sklyarov” in 2001.

-- 
Maxim Kammerer
Liberté Linux: http://dee.su/liberte
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech


Re: [liberationtech] Skype letter strategy

2013-01-17 Thread Ali-Reza Anghaie
There is no harm in taking Kate's advice to heart - they also do care, you
may perceive a complete lack of care through their
legal wrangling and maneuverings and I wouldn't suggest anyone there is a
warm heart about these issues - but just like Security issues and Linux
before, they care because the sysadmins and cloud architects of tomorrow
care - and Microsoft needs them (just like a period before when concerns
about Office licensing waiving).

Targeting the Board, major journalists, major Fortune 100 companies that
use the services - it's all sound and worthwhile and costs nothing. Worst
case, nothing changes - everything from there is an improvement. -Ali



On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:46 AM, André Rebentisch tabe...@gmail.comwrote:

 Am 17.01.2013 15:31, schrieb Maxim Kammerer:
  Could you please be more specific?
 Hiring the worst tobaccos, disrespectful communication about
 competition authorities, mass-taking over standard committees by ISV,
 unreasonable communication, undue interference in non-domestic nations,
 bullying tactics.

 Just take DCI as an example.
 http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=DCI_Group
 It became wider known to a general audience when the McCain campaign was
 alluded to their lobbying for Burma.

 --- A


 --
 Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at:
 https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

Re: [liberationtech] Iran can develop the software to control social networks?

2013-01-17 Thread Amin Sabeti
Based on my experience, it's nearly impossible same as the National/Hala
internet.

On 17 January 2013 17:43, The Doctor dr...@virtadpt.net wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 On 01/17/2013 11:27 AM, Amin Sabeti wrote:

  *Is Iran capable of developing the software it would need to
  control social networks?*
 
 http://storify.com/smallmedia/is-iran-capable-of-developing-the-software-it-woul

 Iran?
 
 I do not know.

 Contractors hired by the government of Iran?  Very likely.

 - --
 The Doctor [412/724/301/703] [ZS|Media]
 Developer, Project Byzantium: http://project-byzantium.org/

 PGP: 0x807B17C1 / 7960 1CDC 85C9 0B63 8D9F  DD89 3BD8 FF2B 807B 17C1
 WWW: https://drwho.virtadpt.net/

 Squeal like a dialup for daddy! --Jason

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

 iEYEARECAAYFAlD4ODUACgkQO9j/K4B7F8FAvwCg7tghan3vmcjBbxkZFHpFx0RN
 cqcAnRuNT4XbWRvRWKnF2HBN2+9qIXi0
 =0iGH
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 --
 Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at:
 https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

Re: [liberationtech] might be of interest... zombie tweets in Azerbaijan

2013-01-17 Thread David Johnson
That reminds me of work that journalist Ken Silverstein did on Azerbaijan's
aggressive lobbying efforts (I helped with some of it) ...

http://harpers.org/blog/2008/07/worldwide-strategic-shakedown-partners/

http://harpers.org/blog/2008/07/lobbyist-arranged-op-eds/

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Katy P katyca...@gmail.com wrote:

 Here's some analysis I did in Azerbaijan this week.

 http://www.katypearce.net/cv/khadijautan-something-is-strange-here/

 and for more context


 http://www.katypearce.net/cv/protestbaku-now-that-the-weekend-is-over-what-happened/

 --
 Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at:
 https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech




-- 

David V. Johnson
Web Editor
Boston Review
Website: http://www.bostonreview.net
Twitter: http://twitter.com/BostonReview
Tumblr: http://bostonreview.tumblr.com
Cell: (917)903-3706
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

[liberationtech] The Truth About Disruptive Development

2013-01-17 Thread Sam de Silva
Hi,

Would love to hear feedback from the LT community on the following article by 
Ken Banks.

Reposted from Stanford Social Innovation Review.

The Truth About Disruptive Development

The West shouldn’t create solutions to problems we don’t understand using 
fashionable mobile technologies. 

Ten years ago, I was preparing for my first contribution to mobile 
technology—the result of two years of work that would lead to the development 
of a conservation service called wildlive!, and which would mark the release of 
one of the earliest reports on the application of mobile technology in 
conservation and development. A lot has happened since then. There’s been an 
explosive interest and excitement—and, yes, hype—in mobile, and a sense that 
the technology can be the savior of, well, everything.

Back in 2003, you’d be able to fit everyone working in mobile for development 
(m4d) into a small cafe. Today you’d need at least a football stadium. m4d—and 
its big brother, ICT4D (information communication technologies for 
development)—have become big business. Although I didn’t need more proof of 
mobile’s supreme status in development, last month I attended Vodafone’s Mobile 
for Good summit in London. It was a high profile affair, and an extremely 
upbeat one. Yet I left with mixed feelings about where m4d is headed.

My five takeaways after a day of talks, debates, and demonstrations were:

Everyone is still excited by the potential of mobile.
The same projects surface over and over again as proof that mobile works.

Mobile is still largely seen as a solution, not a tool.
It’s up to the developed world to get mobile working for the poor.

The top-down mindset is alive and well.
Suffice to say, all of these conclusions troubled me as I sat on the train home.

I’ve been thinking for some time about the future of m4d, and how far we’ve 
come over the past decade. I’ve written frequently about the opportunities 
mobile technology offers the development community and my fears that we may end 
up missing a golden opportunity. I’ve long been a champion of platforms and of 
understanding how we might build tools for people to take and deploy on their 
own terms. Yes, we should provide local entrepreneurs and grassroots nonprofits 
with tools—and where appropriate and requested, expertise—but we shouldn’t 
develop solutions to problems we don’t understand. We shouldn’t take ownership 
of a problem that isn’t ours, and we certainly shouldn’t build “solutions” from 
thousands of miles away and then jump on a plane in search of a home for them.

But this is still, on the whole, what seems to be happening. And this, I’m 
beginning to believe, is rapidly becoming ICT4D’s inconvenient truth.

A fulfilled future for ICT4D (of which m4d is an increasingly dominant part) is 
not the one I see playing out today. Its future is not in the hands of Western 
corporations or international NGOs meeting in high profile gatherings, and it’s 
not in American and European education establishments that busily train 
computer scientists and business graduates to fix the problems of “others.”

The whole development agenda is shifting. I predict we will see a major 
disconnect between what “we” think needs to be done, and what those closest to 
the problems think needs to be done. Call it disruptive development, if you 
like. As I told the UK Guardian in a December 2012 interview, “The rise of 
homegrown solutions to development problems will be most crucial in future. 
That means African software developers increasingly designing and developing 
solutions to African problems, many of which have previously been tackled by 
outsiders. This, I think, will be the biggest change in how development is 
‘done.’”

I’m not the only person saying this. Many working at the intersection of 
African development and technology have been making the same argument for some 
time. The real change, and the big difference, is that this transition is 
finally happening. ICT4D is changing, and the balance of power is changing with 
it.

FrontlineSMS, a free, open source software I developed that has been used by 
developing world NGOs to distribute and collect information via text messages, 
is, I believe, part of this story. It started with field research in South 
Africa and the idea that users should be empowered to develop solutions to 
their own problems, if they so wish. There are many reasons why FrontlineSMS 
continues to work. One primary one is the decision of the new management team 
to shift software development to Nairobi, allowing us to tap into a rich vein 
of local developer and user talent. But fundamentally, FrontlineSMS’s platform 
continues to resonate with innovators, entrepreneurs, nonprofits, and problem 
owners across the developing world because it allows them to problem solve 
locally and effectively.

This local context is becoming increasingly powerful—as university students 
across Africa graduate with computer science and 

Re: [liberationtech] The Truth About Disruptive Development

2013-01-17 Thread André Rebentisch
Am 17.01.2013 23:26, schrieb Sam de Silva:
 needs to be done. Call it disruptive development, if you like. As I
 told the /UK Guardian/ in a December 2012 interview
 http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development-professionals-network/2012/dec/05/information-technology-connecting-developing-world,
 “The rise of homegrown solutions to development problems will be most
 crucial in future. That means African software developers increasingly
 designing and developing solutions to African problems, many of which
 have previously been tackled by outsiders. This, I think, will be the
 biggest change in how development is ‘done.’”

African cinema meant film makers originating from Afrika, graduated in
art schools in France, they get awarded French foundation grants, do
their movie in Africa, present an African perspective, have it shown
in an African theatre demo and win an award at an international film
festival. Of course a unique voice and movie language of Africa was
searched for, the movie makers were supposed to make de-colonial
statements. There is a great book from Oliver Barlet, African Cinemas -
decolonizing the gaze, New York 1996

Ironically, African cinema emerged in West Africa. Nollywood. It does
not meet the preconceptions and quality standards of the movie art
community. But you can't doubt it is unique and presents African views
and life in fascinating details. Sure the digital effects, the pace and
stories are quite special.

--- A
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech


[liberationtech] One Year Anniversary of SOPA/PIPA #InternetFreedomDay

2013-01-17 Thread Yosem Companys
From: Jessica Lawrence jess...@nytm.org

 Dear NY Tech Meetup Community –

Tomorrow, January 18, marks the one-year anniversary of the day when our
community came together to help stop the now infamous SOPA/PIPA legislation
that threatened Internet freedom and the growth of New York's tech enabled
innovation economy. Thousands of us took to the streets in protest and the
images from our demonstration and our voices were seen and heard around the
world. Between our physical presence, the thousands of websites blacked out
in protest, and the millions of calls and emails sent to Congress, the
bills were stopped, for now.


However, this anniversary is also bittersweet with the sad passing of Aaron
Swartz this past weekend. Aaron was an active member of our community and
was the closing speaker at our SOPA/PIPA rally last year (you can hear his
words here, at 37:27 - http://new.livestream.com/nytm2012/nytm2012).


Aaron was a passionate advocate for access to information and for a free
and open Internet, and contributed significantly to the dialogue and push
for progress in these key areas that have an impact on all of us.  Friends
of Aaron are planning a public memorial service for him this Saturday,
January 19, at Cooper Union. Visit http://aaronswnyc.eventbrite.com/ for
details and to RSVP.


With Aaron in our memory, the coalition of organizations and individuals
that came together last year to defeat SOPA and PIPA are declaring tomorrow
#InternetFreedomDay. Help spread the word by joining this Thunderclap:
https://www.thunderclap.it/projects/1039-internet-freedom-day and linking
to *www.internetfreedomday.net*

NY Tech Meetup will continue to be vigilant to not only protect the open
Internet but to also make sure that the environment for growth of the NY
tech community is as strong as possible.



Thank you again for all that you do to make our community great.



Best,

The NYTM Team
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

[liberationtech] Stanford staff position on cybersecuritty

2013-01-17 Thread Terry Winograd
I write to ask for your help in identifying candidates for a new
research staff member
position at the Center for International Security and Cooperation
(CISAC) at Stanford
University. The new hire will help lead CISAC’s growing program in cybersecurity
and the future of the Internet, conducting research and designing
scholarly and outreach
activities to build the young undertaking. This is a three-year,
fixed-term, non-faculty
appointment.

The research staff member must have a deep appreciation for and knowledge of the
international security and cooperation dimensions of cybersecurity as
well as a deep
appreciation of the mix of complex problems within the field of
cybersecurity, such as
threats to domestic and cross-border critical infrastructure, choices
about the evolving
architecture of the Internet, and trade-offs involving privacy and
identity management.
He or she should hold a PhD in a relevant field or a JD, along with an
outstanding record
of peer-reviewed research and scholarly publications, as well as a
substantial interest
or proven expertise in making, advising or implementing policy. He or
she must have
the ability to conduct his/her own research in the field, publish
scholarly work in peer-
reviewed journals and place policy-oriented work in general interest
publications. Rank
and salary will be commensurate with qualifications and experience.

Would you please forward this letter to individuals whom you believe
would be well-
suited for this position, or others whom you believe may be able to
identify candidates?
Please also feel free to contact me directly to discuss any candidates
you have in mind.
Candidates should send a copy of their c.v., a bibliography, and a
statement of research
interests to ahmadhom...@gmail.com electronically, or to CISAC 616 Encina Hall,
Stanford CA 94503 Attn: Ahmad Homidi room E206. A copy of the job description is
enclosed.

Stanford is an equal opportunity employer and is committed to
increasing the diversity
of its faculty and research staff. We welcome nominations of and
applications from
women and members of minority groups, as well as others who would
bring additional
dimensions to the University’s research and teaching missions.

To learn more about CISAC, please visit our web site at
http://cisac.stanford.edu/. Many
thanks for your help.
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech


[liberationtech] Fwd: [lau...@vortex.com: [ NNSquad ] Facebook changes reportedly expose at least 10 million accounts to public search that had previously been excluded]

2013-01-17 Thread Rich Kulawiec
[ Perhaps some precautions might be appropriate for those using FB in
less than hospitable circumstances. ---rsk ]

- Forwarded message from Lauren Weinstein lau...@vortex.com -

 Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:05:22 -0800
 From: Lauren Weinstein lau...@vortex.com
 To: nnsq...@nnsquad.org
 Subject: [ NNSquad ] Facebook changes reportedly expose at least 10 million
   accounts to public search that had previously been excluded
 
 
 Facebook changes reportedly expose at least 10 million accounts to
 public search that had previously been excluded
 
 http://j.mp/10D1gMz  (ars technica)
 
 Such profiles would hinder the progress of graph search, which relies
  on profile content to cull information (for instance, women who like
  the TV show Homeland or Thai restaurants my friends have been to.)
  Facebook asserts that a single-digit percentage of profiles had
  previously opted out of being searchable. As Quartz points out, even
  one percent is now 10 million people, so the change does affect a
  large absolute swath of users.
 
  - - -
 
 Exposing profile information to public searching that was previously
 excluded, without the affirmative consent of the parties involved, is
 inexcusable even if only 10 million or so accounts were affected!
 
 --Lauren--
 Lauren Weinstein (lau...@vortex.com): http://www.vortex.com/lauren 
 Co-Founder: People For Internet Responsibility: http://www.pfir.org/pfir-info
 Founder:
  - Network Neutrality Squad: http://www.nnsquad.org 
  - PRIVACY Forum: http://www.vortex.com/privacy-info
  - Data Wisdom Explorers League: http://www.dwel.org
  - Global Coalition for Transparent Internet Performance: http://www.gctip.org
 Member: ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy
 Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com
 Google+: http://vortex.com/g+lauren / Twitter: http://vortex.com/t-lauren 
 Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 / Skype: vortex.com

- End forwarded message -
--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech


Re: [liberationtech] might be of interest... zombie tweets in Azerbaijan

2013-01-17 Thread Volodymyr Lysenko
To ignite/coordinate these attacks they could also use a website similar to
ka-2.ru which was recently developed by a Russian pro-Kremlin youth
organization MGER to attack/spoil oppositional tweets and to promote the
pro-Putin ones.

More context here (in Russian):
http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2106191/print


On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Katy P katyca...@gmail.com wrote:

 Here's some analysis I did in Azerbaijan this week.

 http://www.katypearce.net/cv/khadijautan-something-is-strange-here/

 and for more context


 http://www.katypearce.net/cv/protestbaku-now-that-the-weekend-is-over-what-happened/

 --
 Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at:
 https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

--
Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech