[Libertarian] Re: [ManhattanLibertarians] Re: REDLICH SUED FOR $25 MILLION
This agrees with Walter Block's view of reputation. Reputation is merely Evan's THOUGHTS about you, and you can not own his thoughts. So if a third party changes Evan's opinion of you, you have lost nothing that you previously owned. --- On Fri, 4/23/10, Evan Isaac evanisa...@gmail.com wrote: you seek to claim an ownership interest in MY thoughts about you? You seek to re-define MY thoughts as YOUR honor and then claim my changing MY thoughts about you is some form of aggression against YOUR PROPERTY? are you aware of libertarianism? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Libertarian] Re: [ManhattanLibertarians] Re: REDLICH SUED FOR $25 MILLION
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:29 AM, evanisa...@gmail.com wrote: are there any libertarians who DONT believe that things like cyber stalking and slander should be crimes? wtf has happened to our party? You make an excellent point. The Libertarian solution to problems of this nature is supposed to be to go to the courts to sue for fraud. But what if the courts are incompetent, corrupt, on the take, bought and paid for, etc. What then? Sam Sloan
