[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149369] EDITING Form Controls: Default anchor should be set "To Page", not "To Paragraph"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149369 --- Comment #6 from Robert Großkopf --- (In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #5) > > After some test, related code seems to be in > wizards/com/sun/star/wizards/form but I tried: > git grep -in anchor > and > git grep -in parag > it returns nothing. > > Are you sure it's about anchor type? Think it has nothing to do with the wizard. Open a form for editing. Add a control. Have a look for the anchor. Anchor is set to paragraph automatically. This is the same behavior in Writer, because default anchor could only be set for images, not for form controls. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149400] Provide more detailed info about versions in release notes
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149400 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu, ||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from V Stuart Foote --- Requested details are provided for incremental releases on project Wiki Here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Category:Release you'll need to review both the RC1 and RC2 final build for applicable fixes, and the release specific notes for any new "features" being delivered. IMHO the Wiki format is sufficient for those who want to dig into the differences of the release builds. => Invalid -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149152] I cannot insert and display a pdf into a Calc spreadsheet.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149152 --- Comment #4 from Hud Quistorff --- With version 7.2.6.2, I could not insert a pdf into a Calc spreadsheet. With version 7.3.3.2, mission accomplished! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149137] When launching Libreoffice on MacOS 12.3.1 it gives an error mentioning that soffice cannot launch.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149137 --- Comment #2 from paulflaher...@hotmail.com --- the issue is still occurring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133619] [META] Regressions from increasing column limit in Calc (mainly bug 50916)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133619 Aron Budea changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||139782 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139782 [Bug 139782] Calc crashes opening file containing "MATCH" formula referencing not yet allocated column -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148484] Conditional FORMATTING works in one range, but not in another
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148484 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149138] i am looking for an enhancement to insert multiple images in a Libre Office document
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149138 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149137] When launching Libreoffice on MacOS 12.3.1 it gives an error mentioning that soffice cannot launch.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149137 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149134] Black boxes present on document when scrolling through text in writer document
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149134 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149121] Hang when resizing a frame/table? within (complex document)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149121 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149111] Crash when attempting to add MP4 file to Impress
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149111 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149108] Edit conditional formatting prompt/confirmation dialog's "No/Yes" actions don't work as intended
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149108 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149386] formatting brackets randomly created
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149386 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1 |0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149386] formatting brackets randomly created
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149386 --- Comment #7 from QA Administrators --- [Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149359] Assertion failed: (index >= 0 && static_cast(index) < static_cast(getLength())), function operator[], file ustring.hxx, line 842.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149359 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149359] Assertion failed: (index >= 0 && static_cast(index) < static_cast(getLength())), function operator[], file ustring.hxx, line 842.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149359 --- Comment #8 from QA Administrators --- [Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145466] Application crashes when running multiple writer instances
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145466 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145466] Application crashes when running multiple writer instances
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145466 --- Comment #4 from QA Administrators --- Dear seven, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 107733] [META] Hyperlink bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107733 Bug 107733 depends on bug 145172, which changed state. Bug 145172 Summary: URL not recognised when "autocorrection > detect url" is ON (both modes) and autocorrection is on https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145172 What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145172] URL not recognised when "autocorrection > detect url" is ON (both modes) and autocorrection is on
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145172 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145172] URL not recognised when "autocorrection > detect url" is ON (both modes) and autocorrection is on
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145172 --- Comment #3 from QA Administrators --- Dear nicolas.micaux, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 134788] Inserting a table with 4000-6000 takes a long time to process since 5.1
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134788 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 134788] Inserting a table with 4000-6000 takes a long time to process since 5.1
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134788 --- Comment #10 from QA Administrators --- Dear Telesto, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145993] Data Pasted into a cell in Calc goes into the cell below
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145993 --- Comment #2 from QA Administrators --- Dear john.davieslg5, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 139978] Forced autocorrections of formulas to fractions as text, on paste into Calc
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139978 --- Comment #5 from QA Administrators --- Dear davidpbrown, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 139818] REQUEST :: Need for BETTERING - Handling of graphics / photographs / objects AND THEIR ANCHORS
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139818 --- Comment #4 from QA Administrators --- Dear Karl, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 139584] \p should be added to the possible regular expressions for search and replace
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139584 --- Comment #4 from QA Administrators --- Dear Adalbert Hanßen, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 139578] Extension do not work after updating 6.4.7 to 7.0.3
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139578 --- Comment #2 from QA Administrators --- Dear Jürgen, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 139564] Loading Styles From Another File Does Not Import Custom Page Styles
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139564 --- Comment #4 from QA Administrators --- Dear larrybradley, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 139454] Base: Open Insert table design causes memory usage bump of 600 MB with empty database
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139454 --- Comment #8 from QA Administrators --- Dear Telesto, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 139428] Libreoffice Calc freezes when copying a cell - poll([{fd=6, events=POLLIN} loop
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139428 --- Comment #8 from QA Administrators --- Dear mariobaldini, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138215] LibreOffice struggles with dark themes.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138215 --- Comment #3 from QA Administrators --- Dear bas_gommans, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 95949] Changing Display Mode using View menu does not update Display Mode
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95949 --- Comment #8 from QA Administrators --- Dear Óvári, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 94584] FILEOPEN: ODT - Pentagon shape not imported
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94584 --- Comment #9 from QA Administrators --- Dear Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired), To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 112470] EDITING: Exiting edit mode via clicking on header skewes column selection
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112470 --- Comment #4 from QA Administrators --- Dear Emil Tanev, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149388] deleting 'the' tracks the change as 'moved (deletion)'
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149388 --- Comment #3 from Justin --- Created attachment 180511 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180511=edit another example except with 'of' This time the word "of" is being accused of moving. I added "of a" at one and the same time. I didn't move anything. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 120550] Draw - Changes to table size "Optimal" features need documentation
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120550 --- Comment #15 from Commit Notification --- Seth Chaiklin committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/f2d2334b032780d97f7a95aacb8283008e91c529 tdf#121367 (related: tdf#120550) consistent labeling between modules It will be available in 7.4.0. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 120550] Draw - Changes to table size "Optimal" features need documentation
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120550 Commit Notification changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||target:7.4.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 121367] Writer - Changes to table size "Optimal" features need documentation
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121367 --- Comment #3 from Commit Notification --- Seth Chaiklin committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/f2d2334b032780d97f7a95aacb8283008e91c529 tdf#121367 (related: tdf#120550) consistent labeling between modules It will be available in 7.4.0. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 121367] Writer - Changes to table size "Optimal" features need documentation
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121367 Commit Notification changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||target:7.4.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: officecfg/registry
officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/UI/WriterCommands.xcu | 10 -- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) New commits: commit f2d2334b032780d97f7a95aacb8283008e91c529 Author: Seth Chaiklin AuthorDate: Fri May 27 00:08:33 2022 +0200 Commit: Seth Chaiklin CommitDate: Wed Jun 1 02:50:23 2022 +0200 tdf#121367 (related: tdf#120550) consistent labeling between modules There is a slight difference in the label used by Writer and the label used by Draw/Impress to refer to: .uno:SetMinimalRowHeight and uno:SetMinimalColumnWidth. This patch changes the label in Writer so that it uses the same label as Draw/Impress. Change-Id: I0469b32350bf9a57903b03929675d3b7e8abe287 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/135005 Reviewed-by: Seth Chaiklin Reviewed-by: Heiko Tietze Tested-by: Jenkins diff --git a/officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/UI/WriterCommands.xcu b/officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/UI/WriterCommands.xcu index 7c7dede5e219..a79fef9d8b5e 100644 --- a/officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/UI/WriterCommands.xcu +++ b/officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/UI/WriterCommands.xcu @@ -2536,7 +2536,10 @@ - Minimize Column Width + Minimal Column Width + + + Minimal Column Width: Adjust width of selected columns to fit content 1 @@ -2557,7 +2560,10 @@ - Minimize Row Height + Minimal Row Height + + + Minimal Row Height: Adjust height of selected rows to fit content 1
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 149414] Change submenu label for formatting textboxes and shapes in Calc and Impress
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149414 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needsUXEval Blocks||85811 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85811 [Bug 85811] [META] Main menu bar bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 85811] [META] Main menu bar bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85811 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||149414 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149414 [Bug 149414] Change submenu label for formatting textboxes and shapes in Calc and Impress -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149414] Change submenu label for formatting textboxes and shapes in Calc and Impress
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149414 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needsUXEval Blocks||85811 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85811 [Bug 85811] [META] Main menu bar bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149414] New: Change submenu label for formatting textboxes and shapes in Calc and Impress
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149414 Bug ID: 149414 Summary: Change submenu label for formatting textboxes and shapes in Calc and Impress Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.4.0.0 alpha0+ Master Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: medium Component: LibreOffice Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: sdc.bla...@youmail.dk In Calc: Format > OLE Object (using.uno:ObjectMenu), In Impress: Format > "Object and Shape" (using .uno:FormatObjectMenu). Proposal: 1. Change Label of .uno:FormatObjectMenu from "Object and Shape" -> "Text Box and Shape" (a) to be consistent with Writer, (b) because the contents of its submenu are applied only to Text Boxes and Shapes. 2. Change in Calc, .uno:ObjectMenu to .uno:FormatObjectMenu for its Format menu. (a) will make its label consistent with Writer and Impress (b) the contents of its submenu is for editing properties of text boxes and shapes, not OLE Objects, so the label will be more appropriate. https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/135162 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 90796] [META] HiDPI / Retina bugs
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90796 Bug 90796 depends on bug 126530, which changed state. Bug 126530 Summary: Tabbed Notebook Bar Usability Issues on Windows 10 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126530 What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 107237] [META] Notebookbar Tabbed
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107237 Bug 107237 depends on bug 126530, which changed state. Bug 126530 Summary: Tabbed Notebook Bar Usability Issues on Windows 10 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126530 What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 126530] Tabbed Notebook Bar Usability Issues on Windows 10
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126530 ema1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- --- Comment #7 from ema1...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #5) > Sorry for the late reply, sometimes reports just slip through. Since some > time has past by and the report consists of five different issues I'm going > to resolve it as WFM with the hope some/many/all issues have been fixed > meanwhile. If not, other reports are referenced with the meta ticket. Feel > free to reopen, of course. Hey there, I currently still have all the listed issues on my 4k PC, I've attached a screenshot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 126530] Tabbed Notebook Bar Usability Issues on Windows 10
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126530 ema1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- --- Comment #7 from ema1...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #5) > Sorry for the late reply, sometimes reports just slip through. Since some > time has past by and the report consists of five different issues I'm going > to resolve it as WFM with the hope some/many/all issues have been fixed > meanwhile. If not, other reports are referenced with the meta ticket. Feel > free to reopen, of course. Hey there, I currently still have all the listed issues on my 4k PC, I've attached a screenshot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 126530] Tabbed Notebook Bar Usability Issues on Windows 10
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126530 --- Comment #6 from ema1...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 180510 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180510=edit Squised Tabbed UI View -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 126530] Tabbed Notebook Bar Usability Issues on Windows 10
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126530 --- Comment #6 from ema1...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 180510 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180510=edit Squised Tabbed UI View -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 95958] enhancement: tune the comment box (width/padding) for visual comfort
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95958 Rafael Lima changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97 ||341 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97341] Width for document comments cannot be changed manually
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97341 Rafael Lima changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95 ||958 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148534] [META] Arrow Style
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148534 Bug 148534 depends on bug 148737, which changed state. Bug 148737 Summary: Improve label and tooltip for Arrow Styles icon in Drawing Objects Properties bar https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148737 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148737] Improve label and tooltip for Arrow Styles icon in Drawing Objects Properties bar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148737 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #13 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- Closing this ticket as FIXED, because OP was achieved. And a short status report. This ticket and bug 148736 grew out of an attempt to make UI consistency between the Arrow Styles tab in the Line dialog. And that attempt grew out of bug 126658, which tried to improve the labelling in the Arrow Styles tab. Along the way, dissatisfaction arose with the use of "Styles" throughout the "Line" dialog. That discussion was held in this ticket, perhaps with the conclusion that the Line dialog should be reworked to not use "style" (in relation to "Line", "Cap", "Corner" and "Arrow". comment 11 summarizes the situation -- pointing out that it would be better to revise all the "styles" in the Line dialog at one time -- to avoid retranslating sentences in help. That is where the story stops. There is now UI consistency (more or less) between the arrow styles tab and its popup dialogs, while the tooltip that was added for this ticket has used "arrowheads" as a first small step toward the "overhaul" of the Line dialog. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149386] formatting brackets randomly created
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149386 --- Comment #6 from Justin --- I'm confused, Rafael. I did upload part of the DOCX. Do you mean a part of the file that has not been saved in Writer? Also, I confirmed with the author of the file that he had only one known bookmark. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148534] [META] Arrow Style
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148534 Bug 148534 depends on bug 148736, which changed state. Bug 148736 Summary: Popup dialog boxes for Arrow Style tab should use consistent terminology with the main Arrow style tab https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148736 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148736] Popup dialog boxes for Arrow Style tab should use consistent terminology with the main Arrow style tab
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148736 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |sdc.bla...@youmail.dk |desktop.org | --- Comment #8 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6) > At least no one volunteered to do the work. So yes, push your patch for now. Ok. Will close this ticket as FIXED, because it provides consistent terminology between the Arrow Styles tab and its popup dialog boxes. Meanwhile comment 4 gives a detailed account of the situation, if and when a more systematic overhaul of the "Line" dialog is made, and the word "Styles" is expunged. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: cui/inc cui/uiconfig sd/inc
cui/inc/strings.hrc |2 +-
cui/uiconfig/ui/querychangelineenddialog.ui |6 +++---
cui/uiconfig/ui/querydeletelineenddialog.ui |4 ++--
sd/inc/strings.hrc |2 +-
4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 5423dfb8549743bd5045b6e3b1ebad7980e62965
Author: Seth Chaiklin
AuthorDate: Fri Apr 22 21:51:33 2022 +0100
Commit: Seth Chaiklin
CommitDate: Wed Jun 1 01:16:28 2022 +0200
tdf#148736 improve labels for Arrow style popup dialogs
Change-Id: Ifc43650a3008cbd96cac8f994675e680368a215b
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/133287
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Seth Chaiklin
diff --git a/cui/inc/strings.hrc b/cui/inc/strings.hrc
index b0dccedc413f..cea0b183e33a 100644
--- a/cui/inc/strings.hrc
+++ b/cui/inc/strings.hrc
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@
#define RID_CUISTR_ADD NC_("RID_SVXSTR_ADD",
"Add")
#define RID_CUISTR_DESC_COLOR
NC_("RID_SVXSTR_DESC_COLOR", "Please enter a name for the new color:")
#define RID_CUISTR_TABLENC_("RID_SVXSTR_TABLE",
"Table")
-#define RID_CUISTR_DESC_LINEEND
NC_("RID_SVXSTR_DESC_LINEEND", "Please enter a name for the new arrowhead:")
+#define RID_CUISTR_DESC_LINEEND
NC_("RID_SVXSTR_DESC_LINEEND", "Please enter a name for the new arrow style:")
#define RID_CUISTR_CHARNAME_NOSTYLE
NC_("RID_SVXSTR_CHARNAME_NOSTYLE", "No %1")
#define RID_CUISTR_CHARNAME_FAMILY
NC_("RID_SVXSTR_CHARNAME_FAMILY", "Family:")
#define RID_CUISTR_CHARNAME_FONT
NC_("RID_SVXSTR_CHARNAME_FONT", "Font:")
diff --git a/cui/uiconfig/ui/querychangelineenddialog.ui
b/cui/uiconfig/ui/querychangelineenddialog.ui
index 6057416728a1..5ec1567001b0 100644
--- a/cui/uiconfig/ui/querychangelineenddialog.ui
+++ b/cui/uiconfig/ui/querychangelineenddialog.ui
@@ -4,15 +4,15 @@
False
-Save
Arrowhead?
+Save Arrow
Style?
False
True
dialog
True
warning
yes-no
-The arrowhead was
modified without saving.
-Would you like to
save the arrowhead now?
+The arrow style was
modified without saving.
+Would you like to
save the arrow style now?
False
diff --git a/cui/uiconfig/ui/querydeletelineenddialog.ui
b/cui/uiconfig/ui/querydeletelineenddialog.ui
index eb1e771a246f..6917fc62422a 100644
--- a/cui/uiconfig/ui/querydeletelineenddialog.ui
+++ b/cui/uiconfig/ui/querydeletelineenddialog.ui
@@ -4,14 +4,14 @@
False
-Delete
Arrowhead?
+Delete Arrow
Style?
False
True
dialog
True
question
yes-no
-Do you really want to
delete the arrowhead?
+Do you really want to
delete the arrow style?
This action cannot be
undone.
diff --git a/sd/inc/strings.hrc b/sd/inc/strings.hrc
index c67d1c9d1579..05326f9e461a 100644
--- a/sd/inc/strings.hrc
+++ b/sd/inc/strings.hrc
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
#define STR_AUTOLAYOUT_NOTES
NC_("STR_AUTOLAYOUT_NOTES", "Notes")
#define STR_TRANSFORM NC_("STR_TRANSFORM",
"Transform")
#define STR_LINEEND NC_("STR_LINEEND",
"Line Ends")
-#define STR_DESC_LINEEND
NC_("STR_DESC_LINEEND", "Please enter a name for the new arrowhead:")
+#define STR_DESC_LINEEND
NC_("STR_DESC_LINEEND", "Please enter a name for the new arrow style:")
#define STR_WARN_NAME_DUPLICATE
NC_("STR_WARN_NAME_DUPLICATE", "The name chosen already exists. \nPlease enter
another name.")
#define STR_UNDO_ANIMATION
NC_("STR_UNDO_ANIMATION", "Animation parameters")
#define STR_UNDO_COPYOBJECTS
NC_("STR_UNDO_COPYOBJECTS", "Duplicate")
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148736] Popup dialog boxes for Arrow Style tab should use consistent terminology with the main Arrow style tab
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148736 --- Comment #7 from Commit Notification --- Seth Chaiklin committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/5423dfb8549743bd5045b6e3b1ebad7980e62965 tdf#148736 improve labels for Arrow style popup dialogs It will be available in 7.4.0. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148736] Popup dialog boxes for Arrow Style tab should use consistent terminology with the main Arrow style tab
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148736 Commit Notification changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||target:7.4.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97341] Width for document comments cannot be changed manually
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97341 Rafael Lima changed: What|Removed |Added CC||evisa.vietn...@gmail.com --- Comment #44 from Rafael Lima --- *** Bug 149405 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149405] LibreOffice Writer comment boxes are too small and should be resizable
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149405 Rafael Lima changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Rafael Lima --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 97341 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149413] New: record macro is gone
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149413 Bug ID: 149413 Summary: record macro is gone Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.2.7.2 release Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Writer Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: mul...@gmail.com after the update the macro recording is gone -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: helpcontent2
helpcontent2 |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit c2670f45252aa3642ea4fbb70a48e03e284eb60c Author: Seth Chaiklin AuthorDate: Wed Jun 1 00:29:49 2022 +0200 Commit: Gerrit Code Review CommitDate: Wed Jun 1 00:29:49 2022 +0200 Update git submodules * Update helpcontent2 from branch 'master' to b30109758ad6b6bcb8b82d6a646fc055cd3a2402 - refactor some embedvars that give a translation problem for some Change-Id: Ibb67c7dd61fe55892232bebc2280fb3faed0db37 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/help/+/135168 Reviewed-by: Seth Chaiklin Tested-by: Jenkins diff --git a/helpcontent2 b/helpcontent2 index 4bbaecd77c87..b30109758ad6 16 --- a/helpcontent2 +++ b/helpcontent2 @@ -1 +1 @@ -Subproject commit 4bbaecd77c87afee5453dc89a9e033d4048c909e +Subproject commit b30109758ad6b6bcb8b82d6a646fc055cd3a2402
[Libreoffice-commits] help.git: source/text
source/text/shared/00/0005.xhp |3 ++- source/text/swriter/guide/anchor_object.xhp |2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) New commits: commit b30109758ad6b6bcb8b82d6a646fc055cd3a2402 Author: Seth Chaiklin AuthorDate: Tue May 31 23:23:23 2022 +0200 Commit: Seth Chaiklin CommitDate: Wed Jun 1 00:29:48 2022 +0200 refactor some embedvars that give a translation problem for some Change-Id: Ibb67c7dd61fe55892232bebc2280fb3faed0db37 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/help/+/135168 Reviewed-by: Seth Chaiklin Tested-by: Jenkins diff --git a/source/text/shared/00/0005.xhp b/source/text/shared/00/0005.xhp index 4866ec144..bb23d6002 100644 --- a/source/text/shared/00/0005.xhp +++ b/source/text/shared/00/0005.xhp @@ -199,7 +199,8 @@ OLE Object Linking and Embedding (OLE) objects can be linked to a target document or may also be embedded. Embedding inserts a copy of the object and details of the source program in the target document. If you want to edit the object, simply activate the source program by double-clicking on the object. - If an OLE object is linked to a target document, then the target document must be available in the location specified in the link. Deleting or moving the target document will make it impossible to open the linked OLE object. You can use the option in the General section of Load/Save Options to configure your system to save links relative to your filesystem. + If an OLE object is linked to a target document, then the target document must be available in the location specified in the link. Deleting or moving the target document will make it impossible to open the linked OLE object. You can use the Save URLs relative to file system option in the General section of Load/Save Options to configure your system to save links relative to your filesystem. + diff --git a/source/text/swriter/guide/anchor_object.xhp b/source/text/swriter/guide/anchor_object.xhp index 5cca8c8cf..11e43ee29 100644 --- a/source/text/swriter/guide/anchor_object.xhp +++ b/source/text/swriter/guide/anchor_object.xhp @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ Changing an Anchor -To change the anchoring options of an object, right-click the object, and then choose an option from the submenu. +To change the anchoring options of an object, right-click the object, and then choose an option from the Anchor submenu.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149406] What is expected behavior of padding for characters, with and without borders?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149406 --- Comment #3 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to LeroyG from comment #2) Thanks Leroy. The first question in the OP is about the "Character" option in the "to" control in the Position and Size dialog for shape. The issue is not to align the shapes across the big letters, but to explain, for each letter, the size of the "Character" area used in the Position and Size dialog for positioning the shape, and how that area interacts with padding and borders applied to the different letters (as described above each letter). The different big letters in the attachment are provided to show examples of that interaction. (I should have made these points more explicit from the start.) Your example is interesting, but uses another positioning feature in a different dialog than the OP. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 149406] What is expected behavior of padding for characters, with and without borders?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149406 --- Comment #3 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to LeroyG from comment #2) Thanks Leroy. The first question in the OP is about the "Character" option in the "to" control in the Position and Size dialog for shape. The issue is not to align the shapes across the big letters, but to explain, for each letter, the size of the "Character" area used in the Position and Size dialog for positioning the shape, and how that area interacts with padding and borders applied to the different letters (as described above each letter). The different big letters in the attachment are provided to show examples of that interaction. (I should have made these points more explicit from the start.) Your example is interesting, but uses another positioning feature in a different dialog than the OP. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: vcl/qt5
vcl/qt5/QtWidget.cxx | 47 ++-
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit cd2ea94969b9c63b24e35e9b8e546cea0f62340e
Author: Jan-Marek Glogowski
AuthorDate: Tue May 31 21:03:39 2022 +0200
Commit: Jan-Marek Glogowski
CommitDate: Wed Jun 1 00:16:32 2022 +0200
Qt just resize the backing store on size change
... and if there is no need to create a Cairo surface if it
doesn't exists, there is no need for a fresh QImage either.
Change-Id: If607e03d246f3c31d66953b1e07a7af55659e64b
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/135209
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Jan-Marek Glogowski
diff --git a/vcl/qt5/QtWidget.cxx b/vcl/qt5/QtWidget.cxx
index 74adcc4e974c..b2451123e7e6 100644
--- a/vcl/qt5/QtWidget.cxx
+++ b/vcl/qt5/QtWidget.cxx
@@ -98,38 +98,35 @@ void QtWidget::resizeEvent(QResizeEvent* pEvent)
if (m_rFrame.m_bUseCairo)
{
-if (m_rFrame.m_pSvpGraphics)
+if (m_rFrame.m_pSurface)
{
-cairo_surface_t* pSurface
-= cairo_image_surface_create(CAIRO_FORMAT_ARGB32, nWidth,
nHeight);
-cairo_surface_set_user_data(pSurface,
SvpSalGraphics::getDamageKey(),
-_rFrame.m_aDamageHandler, nullptr);
-m_rFrame.m_pSvpGraphics->setSurface(pSurface,
basegfx::B2IVector(nWidth, nHeight));
-UniqueCairoSurface old_surface(m_rFrame.m_pSurface.release());
-m_rFrame.m_pSurface.reset(pSurface);
-
-int min_width =
qMin(cairo_image_surface_get_width(old_surface.get()), nWidth);
-int min_height =
qMin(cairo_image_surface_get_height(old_surface.get()), nHeight);
-
-SalTwoRect rect(0, 0, min_width, min_height, 0, 0, min_width,
min_height);
-
-m_rFrame.m_pSvpGraphics->copySource(rect, old_surface.get());
+const int nOldWidth =
cairo_image_surface_get_width(m_rFrame.m_pSurface.get());
+const int nOldHeight =
cairo_image_surface_get_height(m_rFrame.m_pSurface.get());
+if (nOldWidth != nWidth || nOldHeight != nHeight)
+{
+cairo_surface_t* pSurface
+= cairo_image_surface_create(CAIRO_FORMAT_ARGB32, nWidth,
nHeight);
+cairo_surface_set_user_data(pSurface,
SvpSalGraphics::getDamageKey(),
+_rFrame.m_aDamageHandler,
nullptr);
+m_rFrame.m_pSvpGraphics->setSurface(pSurface,
basegfx::B2IVector(nWidth, nHeight));
+UniqueCairoSurface old_surface(m_rFrame.m_pSurface.release());
+m_rFrame.m_pSurface.reset(pSurface);
+
+const int nMinWidth = qMin(nOldWidth, nWidth);
+const int nMinHeight = qMin(nOldHeight, nHeight);
+SalTwoRect rect(0, 0, nMinWidth, nMinHeight, 0, 0, nMinWidth,
nMinHeight);
+m_rFrame.m_pSvpGraphics->copySource(rect, old_surface.get());
+}
}
}
else
{
-QImage* pImage = nullptr;
-
-if (m_rFrame.m_pQImage)
-pImage = new QImage(m_rFrame.m_pQImage->copy(0, 0, nWidth,
nHeight));
-else
+if (m_rFrame.m_pQImage && m_rFrame.m_pQImage->size() != QSize(nWidth,
nHeight))
{
-pImage = new QImage(nWidth, nHeight, Qt_DefaultFormat32);
-pImage->fill(Qt::transparent);
+QImage* pImage = new QImage(m_rFrame.m_pQImage->copy(0, 0, nWidth,
nHeight));
+m_rFrame.m_pQtGraphics->ChangeQImage(pImage);
+m_rFrame.m_pQImage.reset(pImage);
}
-
-m_rFrame.m_pQtGraphics->ChangeQImage(pImage);
-m_rFrame.m_pQImage.reset(pImage);
}
m_rFrame.CallCallback(SalEvent::Resize, nullptr);
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: sc/source
sc/source/ui/view/tabview3.cxx |7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit c30306ad19f7ba022628f4f88ba5b92b8a1af402
Author: Eike Rathke
AuthorDate: Tue May 31 22:48:28 2022 +0200
Commit: Eike Rathke
CommitDate: Wed Jun 1 00:08:25 2022 +0200
MoveCursorAbs: it is cheaper to check for marks first and then formula mode
... so repeated travelling with cell cursor will be less affected.
Change-Id: I3f42356e66b2ec8acf60c0e0c777f8c34b9a952a
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/135211
Reviewed-by: Eike Rathke
Tested-by: Jenkins
diff --git a/sc/source/ui/view/tabview3.cxx b/sc/source/ui/view/tabview3.cxx
index b261f04e0119..ae960b0a8c1f 100644
--- a/sc/source/ui/view/tabview3.cxx
+++ b/sc/source/ui/view/tabview3.cxx
@@ -1236,13 +1236,14 @@ void ScTabView::MoveCursorAbs( SCCOL nCurX, SCROW
nCurY, ScFollowMode eMode,
}
else
{
-if (!bShift && !SC_MOD()->IsFormulaMode())
+if (!bShift)
{
// Remove all marked data on cursor movement unless the Shift is
-// locked or while editing a formula.
+// locked or while editing a formula. It is cheaper to check for
+// marks first and then formula mode.
ScMarkData& rMark = aViewData.GetMarkData();
bool bMarked = rMark.IsMarked() || rMark.IsMultiMarked();
-if (bMarked)
+if (bMarked && !SC_MOD()->IsFormulaMode())
{
rMark.ResetMark();
DoneBlockMode();
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 103437] [META] Animation deck/tab of the sidebar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103437 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||149412 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149412 [Bug 149412] Incorrect/unexpected click+drag behavior in animations list -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149412] Incorrect/unexpected click+drag behavior in animations list
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149412 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||103437 Whiteboard||NeedsUXEval Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103437 [Bug 103437] [META] Animation deck/tab of the sidebar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149412] New: Incorrect/unexpected click+drag behavior in animations list
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149412 Bug ID: 149412 Summary: Incorrect/unexpected click+drag behavior in animations list Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.4.0.0 alpha0+ Master Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: medium Component: Impress Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: eyalr...@gmx.com If I select several (consecutive) animation effects in the animations sidebar pane, then click+drag them in some direction - instead of them all being dragged, the click selects just one of them, and it alone gets dragged. Build info: Version: 7.4.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community Build ID: d9b33ed6644203141fdb0776c291425c2bc9f5ac CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.10; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-IL (en_IL); UI: en-US -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149409] Small Caps toolbar button invalidly grayed out
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149409 LeroyG changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.4.0.0 alpha0+ Master |7.2.3.2 release --- Comment #2 from LeroyG --- Reproducible with: Version: 7.2.3.2 / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 20(Build:2) CPU threads: 1; OS: Linux 5.3; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: es-MX (es_ES.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 149406] What is expected behavior of padding for characters, with and without borders?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149406 --- Comment #2 from LeroyG --- Try choosing menu Format - Paragraph - Alignment tab - Text-to-text, Alignment: If set to Bottom, all blue rectangles will be aligned vertically. Tested with version 7.2.3.2 on Linux. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149406] What is expected behavior of padding for characters, with and without borders?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149406 --- Comment #2 from LeroyG --- Try choosing menu Format - Paragraph - Alignment tab - Text-to-text, Alignment: If set to Bottom, all blue rectangles will be aligned vertically. Tested with version 7.2.3.2 on Linux. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149411] It's difficult to reach text area properties
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149411 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Often difficult to reach|It's difficult to reach |text area properties|text area properties -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 100373] [META] Style issues in Draw/Impress
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100373 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||149411 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149411 [Bug 149411] Often difficult to reach text area properties -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149411] Often difficult to reach text area properties
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149411 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added CC||heiko.tietze@documentfounda ||tion.org Whiteboard||NeedsUXEval Blocks||100373 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100373 [Bug 100373] [META] Style issues in Draw/Impress -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149411] New: Often difficult to reach text area properties
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149411 Bug ID: 149411 Summary: Often difficult to reach text area properties Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.4.0.0 alpha0+ Master Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: medium Component: Impress Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: eyalr...@gmx.com Suppose you have a box in Impress, and you want to modify the spacing between its borders and its internal text area (a.k.a. its "padding"). You can do this via the content menu > Text Attributes > Text. This is already not so great, as it's not really an "attribute of the text", but of the box. That's the minor issue. The major issue is that it's very difficult, or impossible, to get to these settings from anywhere else: * It's not on the main toolbar * It's not on the text formatting toolbar (and even if it were, the infernal app closes that on you as soon as you exist text editing mode) * It's not in the Format menu * Specifically, it's not in Format > Text, if you were somehow optimistic about menu hierarchy consistency... * It's not in any section of the properties sidebar - and you'll waste quite a bit of time looking for it in "Area" and "Position and Size" maybe. WTF?! That makes no sense at all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149369] EDITING Form Controls: Default anchor should be set "To Page", not "To Paragraph"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149369 Julien Nabet changed: What|Removed |Added CC||serval2...@yahoo.fr --- Comment #5 from Julien Nabet --- On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I could reproduce this. After some test, related code seems to be in wizards/com/sun/star/wizards/form but I tried: git grep -in anchor and git grep -in parag it returns nothing. Are you sure it's about anchor type? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149242] "Left paragraph border" -> "Left of paragraph text area" and "Right paragraph border" -> "Right of paragraph text area"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149242 --- Comment #15 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #14) > Using "Left of paragraph text area" makes me wonder how > this is different from just "Paragraph text area". A good thing imo. > we put a lot of thinking into the terminology expecting users to > understand it from a single word change. Comment 9 argued against the idea that individual labels will be sufficient for understanding positioning options and for the idea that understanding will come contextually (as elaborated in comment 12) from comparing similar options, which helps to build up a more general model of the positioning options. That you "wonder" about the relation between "left of para text area" and "para text area" is already a step in the right direction. > In the end feel free to change the label. No strong opinion and no better > idea. In any case, "border" is misleading and unhelpful. Also open to better ideas. Meanwhile, here is the patch, but will wait a little for possible further comment. https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/135161 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149410] New: When set Conditional Format in a cell (color) it changes the colour of all of the cells
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149410 Bug ID: 149410 Summary: When set Conditional Format in a cell (color) it changes the colour of all of the cells Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.3.3.2 release Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Windows (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Calc Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: feder...@installer.com.ar Description: When using LibreOffice Calc and set a new Conditional Format for a particular cell (background color) it changes the colour of all of the cells in the complete sheet. Version 7.3.3.2 (x64) Windows 10. Language of application: Spanish (español). Steps to Reproduce: 1. Formato condicional -> Condicion -> El valor de la celda es igual a ... (Any valid conditional argument) 2. Aplicar estilo: -> Estilo nuevo... -> Fondo -> Color (Choose any color) 3. Aceptar (at this step all the cells without a format become colored) Actual Results: A lot of cells has the cell color changed. Expected Results: Just the cell you have selected should be in a new color (when the condition comes true). Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: No other information. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 104428] exploded donut uses too small radius
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104428 kurt.nordb...@protonmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kurt.nordb...@protonmail.co ||m --- Comment #8 from kurt.nordb...@protonmail.com --- Created attachment 180509 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180509=edit MS Office rendering of the test case It's not clear exactly what behavior is being requested here. This image shows the MS Office rendering the analogous test case. The basic behavior is the same as that of LO (other than a difference in angular convention, which is distinct from the issue at hand). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: vcl/win
vcl/win/window/salmenu.cxx | 30 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 483f3125ecd4744cbcc2f8fd3cdf243d81a601ff
Author: Jan-Marek Glogowski
AuthorDate: Tue May 31 21:14:00 2022 +0200
Commit: Jan-Marek Glogowski
CommitDate: Tue May 31 22:45:40 2022 +0200
WIN drop effectively empty ImplDrawMenuBar
.. as VisibleMenuBar() just always returns false.
Change-Id: Ie793d84d57970cbf08b81b6ec0350b9b5fd4192c
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/135210
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Jan-Marek Glogowski
diff --git a/vcl/win/window/salmenu.cxx b/vcl/win/window/salmenu.cxx
index 6f8dc8bff283..91a15284aeb5 100644
--- a/vcl/win/window/salmenu.cxx
+++ b/vcl/win/window/salmenu.cxx
@@ -96,19 +96,6 @@ std::unique_ptr WinSalInstance::CreateMenuItem(
const SalItemParams
return std::unique_ptr(pSalMenuItem);
}
-static void ImplDrawMenuBar( SalMenu *pMenu )
-{
-if( pMenu->VisibleMenuBar() )
-{
-// redrawing the menubar all the time actually seems to be unnecessary
(it just flickers)
-/*
-WinSalMenu *pMenuBar = ImplFindMenuBar( pMenu );
-if( pMenuBar && pMenuBar->mhWnd )
-::DrawMenuBar( pMenuBar->mhWnd );
-*/
-}
-}
-
/*
* WinSalMenu
*/
@@ -166,10 +153,7 @@ void WinSalMenu::InsertItem( SalMenuItem* pSalMenuItem,
unsigned nPos )
if(!::InsertMenuItemW( mhMenu, nPos, TRUE, >mInfo ))
myerr = GetLastError();
else
-{
pWItem->mpSalMenu = this;
-ImplDrawMenuBar( this );
-}
}
}
@@ -194,7 +178,6 @@ void WinSalMenu::RemoveItem( unsigned nPos )
{
if( pSalMenuItem )
pSalMenuItem->mpSalMenu = nullptr;
-ImplDrawMenuBar( this );
}
}
}
@@ -220,7 +203,6 @@ static void ImplRemoveItemById( WinSalMenu *pSalMenu,
unsigned nItemId )
{
if( pSalMenuItem )
pSalMenuItem->mpSalMenu = nullptr;
-ImplDrawMenuBar( pSalMenu );
}
}
@@ -247,21 +229,17 @@ void WinSalMenu::SetSubMenu( SalMenuItem* pSalMenuItem,
SalMenu* pSubMenu, unsig
if(!::SetMenuItemInfoW( mhMenu, nPos, TRUE, >mInfo ) )
myerr = GetLastError();
-else
-ImplDrawMenuBar( this );
}
}
void WinSalMenu::CheckItem( unsigned nPos, bool bCheck )
{
-if( static_cast( -1 ) != ::CheckMenuItem( mhMenu, nPos,
MF_BYPOSITION|(bCheck ? MF_CHECKED : MF_UNCHECKED) ) )
-ImplDrawMenuBar( this );
+::CheckMenuItem(mhMenu, nPos, MF_BYPOSITION|(bCheck ? MF_CHECKED :
MF_UNCHECKED));
}
void WinSalMenu::EnableItem( unsigned nPos, bool bEnable )
{
-if( -1 != ::EnableMenuItem( mhMenu, nPos, MF_BYPOSITION|(bEnable ?
MF_ENABLED : (MF_DISABLED|MF_GRAYED) ) ) )
-ImplDrawMenuBar( this );
+::EnableMenuItem(mhMenu, nPos, MF_BYPOSITION|(bEnable ? MF_ENABLED :
(MF_DISABLED|MF_GRAYED)));
}
void WinSalMenu::SetItemImage( unsigned /*nPos*/, SalMenuItem* pSalMenuItem,
const Image& rImage )
@@ -298,8 +276,6 @@ void WinSalMenu::SetItemText( unsigned nPos, SalMenuItem*
pSalMenuItem, const OU
if(!::SetMenuItemInfoW( mhMenu, nPos, TRUE, >mInfo ))
myerr = GetLastError();
-else
-ImplDrawMenuBar( this );
}
}
@@ -323,8 +299,6 @@ void WinSalMenu::SetAccelerator( unsigned nPos,
SalMenuItem* pSalMenuItem, const
if(!::SetMenuItemInfoW( mhMenu, nPos, TRUE, >mInfo ))
myerr = GetLastError();
-else
-ImplDrawMenuBar( this );
}
}
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: basic/source
basic/source/sbx/sbxarray.cxx |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit bd279d30025e13125e9c5736f7baa9b00484156d
Author: Stephan Bergmann
AuthorDate: Tue May 31 20:40:55 2022 +0200
Commit: Stephan Bergmann
CommitDate: Tue May 31 22:42:34 2022 +0200
Use more appropriate index variable type
Change-Id: I0a6de93876d316a1aa094cf98dc2ee5c7eddebbf
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/135205
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann
diff --git a/basic/source/sbx/sbxarray.cxx b/basic/source/sbx/sbxarray.cxx
index 4bd933b126ad..ec95e5e10602 100644
--- a/basic/source/sbx/sbxarray.cxx
+++ b/basic/source/sbx/sbxarray.cxx
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#include
#include
+#include
#include
struct SbxVarEntry
@@ -562,7 +563,7 @@ bool SbxDimArray::StoreData( SvStream& rStrm ) const
{
assert(m_vDimensions.size() <=
sal::static_int_cast(std::numeric_limits::max()));
rStrm.WriteInt16( m_vDimensions.size() );
-for( sal_Int32 i = 1; i <= static_cast(m_vDimensions.size());
i++ )
+for( std::size_t i = 1; i <= m_vDimensions.size(); i++ )
{
sal_Int32 lb32, ub32;
GetDim(i, lb32, ub32);
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: animations/source
animations/source/animcore/animcore.cxx |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit d1cdf9a24de0d87f22e283f5cb2ed93ff6e83ee6
Author: Stephan Bergmann
AuthorDate: Tue May 31 20:35:26 2022 +0200
Commit: Stephan Bergmann
CommitDate: Tue May 31 22:42:14 2022 +0200
Also assert that nNodeType is non-negative
...given that nNodeType aka AnimationNode::mnNodeType is later used as an
index
into the AnimationNode::mpTypes array
Change-Id: Ic208fbdfaa8dcca44ff2a99cf3b169904b14a4bf
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/135203
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann
diff --git a/animations/source/animcore/animcore.cxx
b/animations/source/animcore/animcore.cxx
index c02ba3ca2878..737da604a594 100644
--- a/animations/source/animcore/animcore.cxx
+++ b/animations/source/animcore/animcore.cxx
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@
#include
+#include
#include
#include
#include
@@ -446,7 +447,7 @@ AnimationNode::AnimationNode( sal_Int16 nNodeType )
mnIterateType( css::presentation::ShapeAnimationSubType::AS_WHOLE ),
mfIterateInterval(0.0)
{
-assert(nNodeType < int(mpTypes.size()));
+assert(nNodeType >= 0 && o3tl::make_unsigned(nNodeType) < mpTypes.size());
}
AnimationNode::AnimationNode( const AnimationNode& rNode )
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: sc/source
sc/source/ui/view/tabview3.cxx |5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 93a3f142bf46eb7b4309cd168354fe2a971e196d
Author: Eike Rathke
AuthorDate: Tue May 31 20:25:37 2022 +0200
Commit: Eike Rathke
CommitDate: Tue May 31 22:40:23 2022 +0200
MoveCursorAbs: do not reset selection marks while editing a formula
i.e. when moving the cursor for reference selection, so an
existing mark is preserved for Alt+Enter or Shift+Ctrl+Enter.
Change-Id: I3a73145b4e3e299fa9eb28e2198338e76ffe5093
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/135202
Reviewed-by: Eike Rathke
Tested-by: Jenkins
diff --git a/sc/source/ui/view/tabview3.cxx b/sc/source/ui/view/tabview3.cxx
index 5c706bab5f11..b261f04e0119 100644
--- a/sc/source/ui/view/tabview3.cxx
+++ b/sc/source/ui/view/tabview3.cxx
@@ -1236,9 +1236,10 @@ void ScTabView::MoveCursorAbs( SCCOL nCurX, SCROW nCurY,
ScFollowMode eMode,
}
else
{
-if (!bShift)
+if (!bShift && !SC_MOD()->IsFormulaMode())
{
-// Remove all marked data on cursor movement unless the Shift is
locked.
+// Remove all marked data on cursor movement unless the Shift is
+// locked or while editing a formula.
ScMarkData& rMark = aViewData.GetMarkData();
bool bMarked = rMark.IsMarked() || rMark.IsMultiMarked();
if (bMarked)
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101756] [META] Table styles bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101756 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||149360 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149360 [Bug 149360] No UI for setting alternating table row backgrounds -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 100366] [META] Impress/Draw table bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100366 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||149360 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149360 [Bug 149360] No UI for setting alternating table row backgrounds -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149360] No UI for setting alternating table row backgrounds
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149360 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||100366, 101756 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100366 [Bug 100366] [META] Impress/Draw table bugs and enhancements https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101756 [Bug 101756] [META] Table styles bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: compilerplugins/clang vcl/inc vcl/jsdialog
compilerplugins/clang/badstatics.cxx |1
vcl/inc/jsdialog/jsdialogbuilder.hxx |9 +
vcl/jsdialog/jsdialogbuilder.cxx | 56 +--
3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 09847cdbd435c1f6ac8c0ac0256f8be488edd194
Author: Szymon Kłos
AuthorDate: Wed May 18 23:28:30 2022 +0200
Commit: Szymon Kłos
CommitDate: Tue May 31 22:09:42 2022 +0200
jsdialog: introduce popup management
Popup windows are managed by vcl (some moving between parents
happens on show/hide popup).
We need to access correct popup window to correctly close
popup in LOK. So remember popup instances.
Change-Id: I9e1ba18ded5a1bf675f95bd7178043eebd9bbd5a
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/134576
Tested-by: Jenkins CollaboraOffice
Reviewed-by: Mert Tumer
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/134675
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/135197
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Szymon Kłos
diff --git a/compilerplugins/clang/badstatics.cxx
b/compilerplugins/clang/badstatics.cxx
index 9539559f699e..3b80278a2f4f 100644
--- a/compilerplugins/clang/badstatics.cxx
+++ b/compilerplugins/clang/badstatics.cxx
@@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ public:
.Class("ScDocument").GlobalNamespace()) // not owning
|| name == "s_aLOKWindowsMap" // LOK only, guarded by assert,
and LOK never tries to perform a VCL cleanup
|| name == "s_aLOKWeldBuildersMap" // LOK only, similar case
as above
+|| name == "s_aLOKPopupsMap" // LOK only, similar case as above
|| name == "m_pNotebookBarWeldedWrapper" // LOK only, warning
about map's key, no VCL cleanup performed
|| name == "gStaticManager" // vcl/source/graphic/Manager.cxx
- stores non-owning pointers
|| name == "aThreadedInterpreterPool"//
ScInterpreterContext(Pool), not owning
diff --git a/vcl/inc/jsdialog/jsdialogbuilder.hxx
b/vcl/inc/jsdialog/jsdialogbuilder.hxx
index 0b0289240bf6..a25aeac55c10 100644
--- a/vcl/inc/jsdialog/jsdialogbuilder.hxx
+++ b/vcl/inc/jsdialog/jsdialogbuilder.hxx
@@ -304,6 +304,11 @@ public:
weld::Widget* pWidget);
static void RemoveWindowWidget(const std::string& nWindowId);
+// we need to remember original popup window to close it properly (its
handled by vcl)
+static void RememberPopup(const std::string& nWindowId,
VclPtr pWidget);
+static void ForgetPopup(const std::string& nWindowId);
+static vcl::Window* FindPopup(const std::string& nWindowId);
+
private:
const std::string& GetTypeOfJSON() const;
VclPtr& GetContentWindow();
@@ -700,6 +705,8 @@ public:
class JSPopover : public JSWidget
{
+vcl::LOKWindowId mnWindowId;
+
public:
JSPopover(JSDialogSender* pSender, DockingWindow* pPopover,
SalInstanceBuilder* pBuilder,
bool bTakeOwnership);
@@ -707,6 +714,8 @@ public:
virtual void popup_at_rect(weld::Widget* pParent, const tools::Rectangle&
rRect,
weld::Placement ePlace =
weld::Placement::Under) override;
virtual void popdown() override;
+
+void set_window_id(vcl::LOKWindowId nWindowId) { mnWindowId = nWindowId; }
};
class JSBox : public JSWidget
diff --git a/vcl/jsdialog/jsdialogbuilder.cxx b/vcl/jsdialog/jsdialogbuilder.cxx
index b1ca111a07f7..3648d33b3ebc 100644
--- a/vcl/jsdialog/jsdialogbuilder.cxx
+++ b/vcl/jsdialog/jsdialogbuilder.cxx
@@ -27,6 +27,14 @@
#include
#include
+static std::map& GetLOKPopupsMap()
+{
+// Map to remember the LOKWindowId <-> vcl popup binding.
+static std::map s_aLOKPopupsMap;
+
+return s_aLOKPopupsMap;
+}
+
namespace
{
void response_help(vcl::Window* pWindow)
@@ -670,6 +678,8 @@ JSInstanceBuilder::~JSInstanceBuilder()
[it](std::string& sId) {
it->second.erase(sId.c_str()); });
}
}
+
+GetLOKPopupsMap().erase(std::to_string(m_nWindowId));
}
std::map& JSInstanceBuilder::GetLOKWeldWidgetsMap()
@@ -762,6 +772,28 @@ void JSInstanceBuilder::RemoveWindowWidget(const
std::string& nWindowId)
}
}
+void JSInstanceBuilder::RememberPopup(const std::string& nWindowId,
VclPtr pWidget)
+{
+GetLOKPopupsMap()[nWindowId] = pWidget;
+}
+
+void JSInstanceBuilder::ForgetPopup(const std::string& nWindowId)
+{
+auto it = GetLOKPopupsMap().find(nWindowId);
+if (it != GetLOKPopupsMap().end())
+GetLOKPopupsMap().erase(it);
+}
+
+vcl::Window* JSInstanceBuilder::FindPopup(const std::string& nWindowId)
+{
+const auto it = GetLOKPopupsMap().find(nWindowId);
+
+if (it != GetLOKPopupsMap().end())
+return it->second;
+
+return nullptr;
+}
+
const std::string& JSInstanceBuilder::GetTypeOfJSON() const { return
m_sTypeOfJSON; }
VclPtr& JSInstanceBuilder::GetContentWindow()
@@ -1048,8 +1080,9 @@ std::unique_ptr
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149360] No UI for setting alternating table row backgrounds
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149360 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |--- See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92 ||234 Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED --- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Timur from comment #2) > This would be a dupe of bug 92234, which is Writer So, not a dupe of that yet, since it's not the same UI (and that bug is not for all of LO) > but there's bug 101802 so it should be the same. That one is: 1. About the sidebar and 2. Not resolved yet -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 92234] Table style needs UI to alter first/odd/even/last/header row background colours
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92234 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 ||9360 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101802] Consolidate Writer and Draw/Impress sidebar table design content panel
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101802 --- Comment #6 from Eyal Rozenberg --- Is this only about the sidebar, or about the table properties dialog(s) as well? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: basic/source
basic/source/classes/image.cxx |4 ++--
basic/source/inc/image.hxx |3 ++-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit b19a2dfafa366f5fea1b70a1bae2d39a76a54a8e
Author: Stephan Bergmann
AuthorDate: Tue May 31 20:39:43 2022 +0200
Commit: Stephan Bergmann
CommitDate: Tue May 31 22:03:42 2022 +0200
Use more appropriate type for SbiImage::nStringIdx
Change-Id: I1448739b373c6f7b9f5e6ee5a725fa0a129a4fb4
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/135204
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann
diff --git a/basic/source/classes/image.cxx b/basic/source/classes/image.cxx
index 229dc8058518..677e0a68c8f1 100644
--- a/basic/source/classes/image.cxx
+++ b/basic/source/classes/image.cxx
@@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ void SbiImage::MakeStrings( short nSize )
// growing in 1K-Steps
void SbiImage::AddString( const OUString& r )
{
-if( nStringIdx >= short(mvStringOffsets.size()) )
+if( nStringIdx >= mvStringOffsets.size() )
{
bError = true;
}
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ void SbiImage::AddString( const OUString& r )
memcpy( pStrings.get() + nStringOff, r.getStr(), len * sizeof(
sal_Unicode ) );
nStringOff = nStringOff + len;
// Last String? The update the size of the buffer
-if( nStringIdx >= short(mvStringOffsets.size()) )
+if( nStringIdx >= mvStringOffsets.size() )
{
nStringSize = nStringOff;
}
diff --git a/basic/source/inc/image.hxx b/basic/source/inc/image.hxx
index b33009c1e029..4bd4201a46f9 100644
--- a/basic/source/inc/image.hxx
+++ b/basic/source/inc/image.hxx
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include
#include "filefmt.hxx"
#include
+#include
#include
// This class reads in the image that's been produced by the compiler
@@ -56,7 +57,7 @@ class SbiImage {
sal_uInt16 nDimBase;// OPTION BASE value
rtl_TextEncoding eCharSet;
// temporary management-variable:
-short nStringIdx;
+std::size_tnStringIdx;
sal_uInt32 nStringOff; // current Pos in the stringbuffer
// routines for the compiler:
void MakeStrings( short ); // establish StringPool
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: slideshow/source
slideshow/source/engine/animationnodes/basecontainernode.cxx |7 ---
slideshow/source/engine/shapes/appletshape.cxx |7 ---
slideshow/source/engine/shapes/backgroundshape.cxx |7 ---
slideshow/source/engine/shapes/drawshape.cxx |7 ---
slideshow/source/engine/shapes/mediashape.cxx|7 ---
5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 4c60697daaecc8be0a00e900ba1b4b62713e43df
Author: Stephan Bergmann
AuthorDate: Tue May 31 20:47:59 2022 +0200
Commit: Stephan Bergmann
CommitDate: Tue May 31 22:03:22 2022 +0200
The return value of std::count_if is guaranteed to be non-negative
...so use o3tl::make_unsigned when comparing it against an expression of
unsigned integer type, instead of casting that expression to a signed type
Change-Id: I487fd04eafbf8c56b8b6bfce579b477d8f34a052
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/135206
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann
diff --git a/slideshow/source/engine/animationnodes/basecontainernode.cxx
b/slideshow/source/engine/animationnodes/basecontainernode.cxx
index cde434f3d7bd..709f5392ac8a 100644
--- a/slideshow/source/engine/animationnodes/basecontainernode.cxx
+++ b/slideshow/source/engine/animationnodes/basecontainernode.cxx
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#include
#include "nodetools.hxx"
#include
+#include
#include
#include
@@ -80,10 +81,10 @@ bool BaseContainerNode::init_children()
mnFinishedChildren = 0;
// initialize all children
-return (std::count_if(
+return (o3tl::make_unsigned(std::count_if(
maChildren.begin(), maChildren.end(),
-std::mem_fn(::init) ) ==
-static_cast(maChildren.size()));
+std::mem_fn(::init) )) ==
+maChildren.size());
}
void BaseContainerNode::deactivate_st( NodeState eDestState )
diff --git a/slideshow/source/engine/shapes/appletshape.cxx
b/slideshow/source/engine/shapes/appletshape.cxx
index 102dc6aaf3f4..ba7c6243b30b 100644
--- a/slideshow/source/engine/shapes/appletshape.cxx
+++ b/slideshow/source/engine/shapes/appletshape.cxx
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include "viewappletshape.hxx"
#include
+#include
#include
#include
@@ -210,12 +211,12 @@ namespace slideshow::internal
bool AppletShape::implRender( const ::basegfx::B2DRange& rCurrBounds )
const
{
// redraw all view shapes, by calling their update() method
-if( ::std::count_if( maViewAppletShapes.begin(),
+if( o3tl::make_unsigned(::std::count_if(
maViewAppletShapes.begin(),
maViewAppletShapes.end(),
[]
( const ViewAppletShapeSharedPtr& pShape )
- { return pShape->render( rCurrBounds ); } )
-!=
static_cast(maViewAppletShapes.size()) )
+ { return pShape->render( rCurrBounds ); } ))
+!= maViewAppletShapes.size() )
{
// at least one of the ViewShape::update() calls did return
// false - update failed on at least one ViewLayer
diff --git a/slideshow/source/engine/shapes/backgroundshape.cxx
b/slideshow/source/engine/shapes/backgroundshape.cxx
index b107fe4af038..d304b9f901e6 100644
--- a/slideshow/source/engine/shapes/backgroundshape.cxx
+++ b/slideshow/source/engine/shapes/backgroundshape.cxx
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include
#include
+#include
#include
#include
@@ -258,11 +259,11 @@ namespace slideshow::internal
}
// redraw all view shapes, by calling their render() method
-if( ::std::count_if( maViewShapes.begin(),
+if( o3tl::make_unsigned(::std::count_if( maViewShapes.begin(),
maViewShapes.end(),
[this]( const ViewBackgroundShapeSharedPtr&
pBgShape )
- { return pBgShape->render( this->mpMtf ); } )
-!=
static_cast(maViewShapes.size()) )
+ { return pBgShape->render( this->mpMtf ); } ))
+!= maViewShapes.size() )
{
// at least one of the ViewBackgroundShape::render() calls did
return
// false - update failed on at least one ViewLayer
diff --git a/slideshow/source/engine/shapes/drawshape.cxx
b/slideshow/source/engine/shapes/drawshape.cxx
index f8e03ebff36f..22b65bf28e21 100644
--- a/slideshow/source/engine/shapes/drawshape.cxx
+++ b/slideshow/source/engine/shapes/drawshape.cxx
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include
#include
+#include
#include
#include
@@ -146,15 +147,15 @@ namespace slideshow::internal
// redraw all view shapes, by calling their update() method
ViewShape::RenderArgs renderArgs( getViewRenderArgs()
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149409] Small Caps toolbar button invalidly grayed out
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149409 --- Comment #1 from Eyal Rozenberg --- I should mention that, in LO Writer, the toolbar button is not grayed out and works fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 147732] font effect "small caps" does not work in Impress
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147732 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 ||9409 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149409] Small Caps toolbar button invalidly grayed out
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149409 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 ||7732 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
