Re: ssh problems (can't push to staging)
James wrote: Failing all that if you send me git formatted patches, I can at least push them for you while you sort this out. We've had some checkins today, so you will probably need to make sure that it is rebased (?) from current master before you make the patches if you want me to push them for you. Well, I can't even pull from master now, so I can't rebase my patches. If you'd like, you could pull the diffs from Rietveld, rebase them yourself, and use the Description fields as the commit messages: https://codereview.appspot.com/10819043/ https://codereview.appspot.com/10700044 https://codereview.appspot.com/10774043/ Otherwise, you'll just have to wait for me to figure this out. Grr. If anyone here could help me troubleshoot ssh, that would be greatly appreciated! Thanks. - Mark p.s. just like old times... http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-08/msg00181.html ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: LilyPond internships and LilyPond graduation projects. MusicXMLexport!
- Original Message - From: Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net Cc: LilyPond Developmet Team lilypond-devel@gnu.org Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2013 1:23 AM Subject: Re: LilyPond internships and LilyPond graduation projects. MusicXMLexport! Hi Phil, i'm very sorry for this delay - it's due to my bad organization and having too many things to do, not lack of respect for you! :( 2013/6/28 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net: - Original Message - From: Janek Warchoł There is just one formal requirement: some organization or business entity (of course it should be affiliated with LilyPond in some way) has to provide a certificate after he finishes his work. Do you know who could do this? This doesn't have to be anything formal - just a note that student so-and-so worked on LilyPond during summer for estimated x hours. Although I suspect this will be difficult, since there are no organisations or business entities (AFAIK) associated with Lilypond. I would be happy to offer to do this personally - I'm a Fellow of the Institution of Engineering and Technology, and ex-CTO at BT labs and Director of Engineering at Motorola, so could quote those as indicators of ability to endorse your cousin? If you'd be able to sign this certificate in the name (i'm not sure what the correct legal term is) of the Institution of Engineering and Technology (or Engineering Department at Motorola), that would certainly do. If not, it may not be enough. thanks, Janek === I certainly couldn't reference Motorola except as a past employer. I'm a member of the IET, not a representative, and so I don't think I could sign in a representative capacity. -- Phil Holmes ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: ssh problems (can't push to staging)
- Original Message - From: Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com To: James pkx1...@gmail.com Cc: lilypond-devel lilypond-devel@gnu.org Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2013 7:47 AM Subject: Re: ssh problems (can't push to staging) James wrote: Failing all that if you send me git formatted patches, I can at least push them for you while you sort this out. We've had some checkins today, so you will probably need to make sure that it is rebased (?) from current master before you make the patches if you want me to push them for you. Well, I can't even pull from master now, so I can't rebase my patches. If you'd like, you could pull the diffs from Rietveld, rebase them yourself, and use the Description fields as the commit messages: https://codereview.appspot.com/10819043/ https://codereview.appspot.com/10700044 https://codereview.appspot.com/10774043/ Otherwise, you'll just have to wait for me to figure this out. Grr. If anyone here could help me troubleshoot ssh, that would be greatly appreciated! Thanks. - Mark p.s. just like old times... http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-08/msg00181.html === Have you tried something like git pull --verbose? -- Phil Holmes ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: ssh problems (can't push to staging)
Phil Holmes wrote: Have you tried something like git pull --verbose? Okay, it's working now. It asked for a password just as before, but this time it accepted my password. Let's hope it keeps working. Thanks for your help! - Mark ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: issue 3441: banjo example should use Staff + TabStaff (issue 10935046)
Some thoughts, otherwise LGTM. https://codereview.appspot.com/10935046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely File Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/10935046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely#newcode1864 Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely:1864: \override Staff.StringNumber.stencil = ##f I'm not sure about the \override It surely looks better. Though, our policy seems to be to put no \override into the NR, apart from situations where it's necassary. One might argue it's not. https://codereview.appspot.com/10935046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely#newcode1870 Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely:1870: \new StaffGroup Currently we have several examples with and without \new StaffGroup. That's not consistent. IMHO, we should group every \Staff with additional \TabStaff without SystemStartBracket and SpanBar, i.e. omitting \new StaffGroup. https://codereview.appspot.com/10935046/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: issue 3441: banjo example should use Staff + TabStaff (issue 10935046)
https://codereview.appspot.com/10935046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely File Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/10935046/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely#newcode1864 Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely:1864: \override Staff.StringNumber.stencil = ##f On 2013/07/07 19:54:09, thomasmorley651 wrote: I'm not sure about the \override It surely looks better. Though, our policy seems to be to put no \override into the NR, apart from situations where it's necassary. One might argue it's not. It makes a difference. At any rate, this is a case where \omit Staff.StringNumber would be less obscure. At any rate, I consider it a mistake to put the sets/overrides into the music. The problem is that they will likely create spurious staffs. https://codereview.appspot.com/10935046/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
