Re: Google Summer of Code
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes: Am 08.02.2015 um 17:35 schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes: * One of the most crucial project is missing from the list: Guile 2.0 migration. Here it is the other way round: David has explained why this actually would be a good GSoC project. I think it has ceased being a good GSoC project since I have fixed all the low-hanging fruit already. The main problem now is a fundamental change in GUILE 2.0 garbage collection that is inherently incompatible with our data structures. Getting this under control is a single quite hard task which probably, to a good degree, has to be tackled by the GUILE programmers themselves. I am currently doing preparatory work for that. Ah OK. Does that mean it's becoming more probable to have this in the foreseeable future or rather the contrary? It means that people said they wanted to take a look at it. It's not the first time, however. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Google Summer of Code
Am 08.02.2015 um 15:45 schrieb James Lowe: On 07/02/15 23:47, Urs Liska wrote: Am 08.02.2015 um 00:12 schrieb James Lowe: On 07/02/15 21:06, David Garfinkle wrote: Hi, I'm a Math, CS, and music student at McGill and I just read about the google student summer program. I would love to help develop LilyPond! How can I get involved/what projects are up for grabs/do I suggest my own project? http://lilypond.org/google-summer-of-code.html But David should note that this page is quite out-of-date. Actually it isn't at all. This page was updated December last year - 2 months ago. I was asked specifically to *update* this page and it seems it has been done. http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=5e7bd5c0a08893881d2c65d1440005455b43027f So if there is anything that is not relevant then let's remove it. OK, I have the following problems with that page. Sorry if I seem to have failed to express these when you were actually working on the page: * Is the grace notes issue up-to-date in so far as Mike Solomon and Carl Sorensen are available as mentors (I mean, without mentors a project is not really possible)? * MusicXML should definitely be considered in the context of actual development taking place in the Frescobaldi context. At least it should be harmonized with that effort. And: same question as above: Are Reinhold Kainhofer and Mike Solomon actually available as mentors? * Slurs and ties: There has been significant work by Janek Warchoł preparing the task of improving ties. OTOH David Kastrup has strongly expressed the opinion that this project isn't really suitable for GSoC. * One of the most crucial project is missing from the list: Guile 2.0 migration. Here it is the other way round: David has explained why this actually would be a good GSoC project. Urs James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Google Summer of Code
Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes: * One of the most crucial project is missing from the list: Guile 2.0 migration. Here it is the other way round: David has explained why this actually would be a good GSoC project. I think it has ceased being a good GSoC project since I have fixed all the low-hanging fruit already. The main problem now is a fundamental change in GUILE 2.0 garbage collection that is inherently incompatible with our data structures. Getting this under control is a single quite hard task which probably, to a good degree, has to be tackled by the GUILE programmers themselves. I am currently doing preparatory work for that. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Google Summer of Code
Am 08.02.2015 um 17:35 schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org writes: * One of the most crucial project is missing from the list: Guile 2.0 migration. Here it is the other way round: David has explained why this actually would be a good GSoC project. I think it has ceased being a good GSoC project since I have fixed all the low-hanging fruit already. The main problem now is a fundamental change in GUILE 2.0 garbage collection that is inherently incompatible with our data structures. Getting this under control is a single quite hard task which probably, to a good degree, has to be tackled by the GUILE programmers themselves. I am currently doing preparatory work for that. Ah OK. Does that mean it's becoming more probable to have this in the foreseeable future or rather the contrary? ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Google Summer of Code
On 07/02/15 23:47, Urs Liska wrote: Am 08.02.2015 um 00:12 schrieb James Lowe: On 07/02/15 21:06, David Garfinkle wrote: Hi, I'm a Math, CS, and music student at McGill and I just read about the google student summer program. I would love to help develop LilyPond! How can I get involved/what projects are up for grabs/do I suggest my own project? http://lilypond.org/google-summer-of-code.html But David should note that this page is quite out-of-date. Actually it isn't at all. This page was updated December last year - 2 months ago. I was asked specifically to *update* this page and it seems it has been done. http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=5e7bd5c0a08893881d2c65d1440005455b43027f So if there is anything that is not relevant then let's remove it. James ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Allow independent adjustment of minimum length for spanner siblings (issue 201140043 by david.nales...@gmail.com)
https://codereview.appspot.com/201140043/diff/20001/lily/spanner.cc File lily/spanner.cc (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/201140043/diff/20001/lily/spanner.cc#newcode394 lily/spanner.cc:394: /* On 2015/02/06 21:47:11, lemzwerg wrote: Minor nit: Please use spaces, not tabs. Done. https://codereview.appspot.com/201140043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
The status of Lilypond and Guile 2?
Hi, I was wondering what the current status of Guile 2 support in Lilypond is? The dev/guilev2 branch hasn't been touched since 2014-10-13. It is becoming more and more impossible to run Lilypond on modern Linux distributions (for example see https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10969). Is there any relief in sight? Cheers, Edward ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Clean up inconsistencies in engraver-init.ly and performer-init.ly (issue 199460043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)
please review https://codereview.appspot.com/199460043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Clean up inconsistencies in engraver-init.ly and performer-init.ly (issue 199460043 by thomasmorle...@gmail.com)
LGTM. It would be nice if David's checker script could be added, too. https://codereview.appspot.com/199460043/diff/20001/ly/performer-init.ly File ly/performer-init.ly (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/199460043/diff/20001/ly/performer-init.ly#newcode174 ly/performer-init.ly:174: \accepts ChordNames I wonder whether it makes sense to sort the many \accept lines alphabetically... https://codereview.appspot.com/199460043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
