Re: [RFC] Uploading future binaries to GitLab

2022-02-02 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 3:24 AM Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on
LilyPond development  wrote:
> I hope things are coming together for a "dual" release 2.23.6 using GUB
> and the infrastructure that I developed in the past months. For the
> final question, I'd like to propose that we upload the binaries to
> GitLab. I developed a small script which also adds direct links to the
> release, see https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1175
>
> Traditionally everything has been uploaded to lilypond.org and I
> believe we want to continue doing this for the source archives. For the
> binaries however, that are mostly downloaded by humans and not scripts,
> I think GitLab is equally good or bad (both are running on GCP), we can
> still directly link to the files, and I guess Han-Wen won't be too sad
> that he doesn't have to provide egress traffic for all the binaries.

A big +1 to all of this.

I don't care about the source archives, as downloading and building
from Git directly has become much more practical over the last years,
but they take up little space, so either way is fine.

-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanw...@gmail.com - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen



[RFC] Uploading future binaries to GitLab

2022-02-01 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development
Hi all,

I hope things are coming together for a "dual" release 2.23.6 using GUB
and the infrastructure that I developed in the past months. For the
final question, I'd like to propose that we upload the binaries to
GitLab. I developed a small script which also adds direct links to the
release, see https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1175

Traditionally everything has been uploaded to lilypond.org and I
believe we want to continue doing this for the source archives. For the
binaries however, that are mostly downloaded by humans and not scripts,
I think GitLab is equally good or bad (both are running on GCP), we can
still directly link to the files, and I guess Han-Wen won't be too sad
that he doesn't have to provide egress traffic for all the binaries.

Let me know what you think.
Jonas


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part