Re: Fwd: Re: Images on Introduction and Features
Am 07.01.2014 10:31, schrieb Urs Liska: Original-Nachricht Betreff: Re: Images on Introduction and Features Datum: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:30:51 +0100 Von: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org An: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca Am 03.01.2014 15:37, schrieb Urs Liska: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca schrieb: On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 02:49:35PM +0100, u...@openlilylib.org wrote: The images in the first text boxes on Introduction and Features are the same. Is there any specific reason for this? nah, I was just copying material from the old website to the new website. It makes sense to use different images. IMHO the 'flat-design.png' is much more suitable for Features. On Introduction we're talking about freeing from the details of layout, and it's somewhat contradictory to display an image beside that which *is* about tiny details. I slightly disagree there; showing that we have a mathematical representation of the tiny details *does* mean that humans are freed from dealing with it (since computers can do it). But I agree that might not be an obvious conclusion for non-programmers, so I have no objection to using a different image there. Good point. Maybe that can easily be made clear through the text. I'll consider this when I'm at that text anyway. I'd be happy to keep that image on introduction - it's so beautyful. I think my current patch (https://codereview.appspot.com/48430043/) would allow to keep the flat-design.png on Introduction. Would you think one of the images on that page http://www.musicprintinghistory.org/engraving/about-music-engraving.html (I'd prefer fig. 3 or 4) would be suitable for Features? And would the Use of Information make it suitable for inclusion in our website? Any opinions? However, independently from this concrete image: What is the way to add new images to the website/docs? I suppose they somehow have to get into the lilypond-extra repo? Urs ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Fwd: Re: Images on Introduction and Features
- Original Message - From: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org However, independently from this concrete image: What is the way to add new images to the website/docs? I suppose they somehow have to get into the lilypond-extra repo? Yes, IIRC. I can do that, as can GP. I don't know who else has push access. It always takes me ages to remember how to push to that repo, though. I believe the work flow is that you must get the image into the -extra repo before pushing any changes that would use that image to staging/master. If you do this the other way round, the build of the actual website will fail. -- Phil Holmes ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Fwd: Re: Images on Introduction and Features
Original-Nachricht Betreff: Re: Images on Introduction and Features Datum: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:30:51 +0100 Von: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org An: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca Am 03.01.2014 15:37, schrieb Urs Liska: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca schrieb: On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 02:49:35PM +0100, u...@openlilylib.org wrote: The images in the first text boxes on Introduction and Features are the same. Is there any specific reason for this? nah, I was just copying material from the old website to the new website. It makes sense to use different images. IMHO the 'flat-design.png' is much more suitable for Features. On Introduction we're talking about freeing from the details of layout, and it's somewhat contradictory to display an image beside that which *is* about tiny details. I slightly disagree there; showing that we have a mathematical representation of the tiny details *does* mean that humans are freed from dealing with it (since computers can do it). But I agree that might not be an obvious conclusion for non-programmers, so I have no objection to using a different image there. Good point. Maybe that can easily be made clear through the text. I'll consider this when I'm at that text anyway. I'd be happy to keep that image on introduction - it's so beautyful. I think my current patch (https://codereview.appspot.com/48430043/) would allow to keep the flat-design.png on Introduction. Would you think one of the images on that page http://www.musicprintinghistory.org/engraving/about-music-engraving.html (I'd prefer fig. 3 or 4) would be suitable for Features? And would the Use of Information make it suitable for inclusion in our website? ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Images on Introduction and Features
The images in the first text boxes on Introduction and Features are the same. Is there any specific reason for this? If not I would suggest to replace one of them with something else. IMHO the 'flat-design.png' is much more suitable for Features. On Introduction we're talking about freeing from the details of layout, and it's somewhat contradictory to display an image beside that which *is* about tiny details. Opinions? Urs ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Images on Introduction and Features
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 02:49:35PM +0100, u...@openlilylib.org wrote: The images in the first text boxes on Introduction and Features are the same. Is there any specific reason for this? nah, I was just copying material from the old website to the new website. It makes sense to use different images. IMHO the 'flat-design.png' is much more suitable for Features. On Introduction we're talking about freeing from the details of layout, and it's somewhat contradictory to display an image beside that which *is* about tiny details. I slightly disagree there; showing that we have a mathematical representation of the tiny details *does* mean that humans are freed from dealing with it (since computers can do it). But I agree that might not be an obvious conclusion for non-programmers, so I have no objection to using a different image there. - Graham ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Images on Introduction and Features
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca schrieb: On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 02:49:35PM +0100, u...@openlilylib.org wrote: The images in the first text boxes on Introduction and Features are the same. Is there any specific reason for this? nah, I was just copying material from the old website to the new website. It makes sense to use different images. IMHO the 'flat-design.png' is much more suitable for Features. On Introduction we're talking about freeing from the details of layout, and it's somewhat contradictory to display an image beside that which *is* about tiny details. I slightly disagree there; showing that we have a mathematical representation of the tiny details *does* mean that humans are freed from dealing with it (since computers can do it). But I agree that might not be an obvious conclusion for non-programmers, so I have no objection to using a different image there. Good point. Maybe that can easily be made clear through the text. I'll consider this when I'm at that text anyway. I'd be happy to keep that image on introduction - it's so beautyful. Urs - Graham -- Urs Liska openlilylib.org ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Re: Images on Introduction and Features
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca schrieb: On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 02:49:35PM +0100, u...@openlilylib.org wrote: The images in the first text boxes on Introduction and Features are the same. Is there any specific reason for this? nah, I was just copying material from the old website to the new website. It makes sense to use different images. IMHO the 'flat-design.png' is much more suitable for Features. On Introduction we're talking about freeing from the details of layout, and it's somewhat contradictory to display an image beside that which *is* about tiny details. I slightly disagree there; showing that we have a mathematical representation of the tiny details *does* mean that humans are freed from dealing with it (since computers can do it). But I agree that might not be an obvious conclusion for non-programmers, so I have no objection to using a different image there. Good point. Maybe that can easily be made clear through the text. I'll consider this when I'm at that text anyway. I'd be happy to keep that image on introduction - it's so beautyful. Urs - Graham -- Urs Liska openlilylib.org -- Urs Liska openlilylib.org ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
