Re: Translation for musical phrase Niveau-Überschreitung or Niveau-Unterschreitung?
2011/2/1 M Watts zwy648...@gmail.com: On 01/31/2011 07:27 PM, Francisco Vila wrote: I vaguely recall this case known as 'false relation'. The listener could be fooled into hearing e' a' but the a' is sung by another voice. This would be the 'soft' case, the hard case is for 'f b' tritone sung by different voices. Don't rely too much in this... Nein, false relation is where you have two successive chords, where a note of the first is inflected with an accidental to become a note of the second chord, and this happens in different parts. So if D minor is followed by D major, the F to F# should happen in the same voice, to avoid 'false relation'. Yes, cromatic false relation. The other is tritone false relation. Anyway, Part Overlap is --I think-- the name of the game. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Bug in ties over barlines
W dniu 31 stycznia 2011 17:06 użytkownik Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu napisał: On 1/31/11 3:04 AM, Jan Warchoł lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/1/24 Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net If you use #(set-accidental-style 'modern-cautionary) then you get the parenthesised accidental automatically, as requested. Indeed, thanks for the remainder. However, in my opinion it is necessary to *change* the 'default', 'voice' and 'forget' accidental styles, because their current behaviour result in wrongly typeset music. If the last note in the following example doesn't get a natural, it's *impossible* to tell that it's not another ces: ces'1~ | ces' ces'1( | c') It may be argued that the slur looks different than the tie, but it's not enough. I'm sure that engraving books will agree with me - may someone check this? I think that it would be fine to have a rule added that says if we're across a barline, and the scale step is the same, but the accidental is different, and the slur is two notes long ending on the current note, display a cautionary accidental in order to avoid confusion with a tie. +1, except that i think it should be unparenthesized (at least in accidental styles like default and voice, that don't use parenthesized accidentals at all). 2011/1/31 Alexander Kobel n...@a-kobel.de: But IMHO the important point here is the fact that the notation can be ambigous without the accidental, and is definitely clear with it. No matter if ? or !. +1. cheers, Janek ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: cannot open for write midi error on Windows7
Jan Warchoł lemniskata.bernoulliego at gmail.com writes: Do i understand correctly that you are trying to run lilypond on a file that is located on another computer? I know that doing this is impossible for me (i mean, if i have a .ly file in a shared folder on the HDD of my Windows XP machine and i open the shared folder on my Win 7 machine and try to compile that file, it doesn't work - i get similar error). I don't know if this is intended behaviour or bug, though. hth, Janek No, it's all on the same computer. Lilypond is installed on a partitioned drive: D:\Music\Lilypond I work on my current lilypond files at this same location, using notepad and then drag-and-dropping them to the shortcut inside the lilypond folder. This used to work on my old OS I'm pretty sure, but after changing to Windows7 I get the 'cannot write file' error and nothing compiles. Strangely, once the shortcut is moved to the desktop (C:\Users\Daisy\Desktop), it works perfectly - even though the program itself is on the D drive. There's probably some instructions somewhere that say that the shortcut MUST be on the desktop - it's just a bit weird as it seems to be only Windows7 that creates this behaviour. Anyway, I'm happy working with current files on the desktop before I file them away on D: so thanks for the help all. Daisy ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
guitarist: how write chord names like Gadd5
Hello, I want to write down guitar chords and frets with extra voicings, say a G chord with an extra Fifth on the B string, 3rd fret, or Em chord with an extra G on the treble e string. As these extra notes belong to the chords, you can write g:5, but Lilypond ignores the :5 and prints only G, and the G fret diagram gets overwritten by the G:5 fret diagram. Is there any best practice how to use and print such extra chord names, anyway? TIA Jürgen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
scorio.com a WYSIWYG scorewriter with LilyPond-Export
On http://www.scorio.com/ a fully web browser based scorewriter project has started end of last year. You can interactively enter and edit your music and create PDFs for printout. There is MIDI playback and online storage for your scores. The functionality is limited but keeps growing week by week. scorio.com uses LilyPond as layout engine. You can export your score in LilyPond's format at any time. Though importing is limited to MusicXML at this point. scorio.com is a free service and may serve well for the initial entry of music and might be especially helpful for beginners. Johannes scorio Team ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
scorio.com A WYSIWYG-Editor with LilyPond-Export
On http://www.scorio.com/ a fully web browser based scorewriter project has started end of last year. You can interactively enter and edit your music and create PDFs for printout. There is MIDI playback and online storage for your scores. The functionality is limited but keeps growing week by week. scorio.com uses LilyPond as layout engine. You can export your score in LilyPond's format at any time. Though importing is limited to MusicXML at this point. scorio.com is a free service and may serve well for the initial entry of music and might be especially helpful for beginners. Johannes scorio Team ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: scorio.com a WYSIWYG scorewriter with LilyPond-Export
Great news ! With my Firefox3.6.13, it says : Une erreur système inattendue s'est produite. java.lang.NullPointerException ? Best regards JMarc Johannes Feulner a écrit : On http://www.scorio.com/ a fully web browser based scorewriter project has started end of last year. You can interactively enter and edit your music and create PDFs for printout. There is MIDI playback and online storage for your scores. The functionality is limited but keeps growing week by week. scorio.com uses LilyPond as layout engine. You can export your score in LilyPond's format at any time. Though importing is limited to MusicXML at this point. scorio.com is a free service and may serve well for the initial entry of music and might be especially helpful for beginners. Johannes scorio Team ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: guitarist: how write chord names like Gadd5
On Feb 1, 2011, at 8:13 AM, Jürgen Ibelgaufts wrote: Hello, I want to write down guitar chords and frets with extra voicings, say a G chord with an extra Fifth on the B string, 3rd fret, or Em chord with an extra G on the treble e string. As these extra notes belong to the chords, you can write g:5, but Lilypond ignores the :5 and prints only G, and the G fret diagram gets overwritten by the G:5 fret diagram. Is there any best practice how to use and print such extra chord names, anyway? Since G5 isn't really a chord (it's either redundant to specify the 5th because the 5th is already part of the chord or you want to actually play a perfect fifth double-stop rather than a chord) I am not surprised that the results are odd. What you appear to be wanting is often called a slash chord which is usually a triad or tetrad over a specific bass note. It is denoted by a slash between the chord and the bass note (different from a polychord which is usually denoted as two triads stacked, separated by a horizontal line). You'll find more in the documentation under \chordmode, but the short answer for entering the chord name with a specific bass note is: g:1/d to produce G/D e1:min/g to produce Emin/G etc. I have no idea how to get those as correct chord diagrams as I don't use that feature. Hope this helps somewhat. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: guitarist: how write chord names like Gadd5
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Jürgen Ibelgaufts juri...@gmx.de wrote: I want to write down guitar chords and frets with extra voicings, say a G chord with an extra Fifth on the B string, 3rd fret, or Em chord with an extra G on the treble e string. As these extra notes belong to the chords, you can write g:5, but Lilypond ignores the :5 and prints only G, and the G fret diagram gets overwritten by the G:5 fret diagram. Is there any best practice how to use and print such extra chord names, anyway? Are you trying to do power chords (root-5th, no 3rd)? Or do you mean having the extra 12th (which is the same note as the 5th, an octave higher)? Here's how to do powerchords: http://lilypond-s-support-for-tablatures.3383434.n2.nabble.com/Power-chords-td5524246.html -- Brett W. McCoy -- http://www.electricminstrel.com In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it, it would overturn the world. -- Jelaleddin Rumi ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: scorio.com A WYSIWYG-Editor with LilyPond-Export
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Johannes Feulner johannes.feul...@scorio.com wrote: On http://www.scorio.com/ a fully web browser based scorewriter project has started end of last year. Works here, under WinXP. I'm impressed! Pondly, Ralph -- Ralph Palmer Montague City, MA USA palmer.r.vio...@gmail.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Re: scorio.com a WYSIWYG scorewriter with LilyPond-Export
I also get this error.. running linux here, firefox 3.6.13 Op schreef Éditions IN NOMINE cont...@editionsinnomine.com: Great news ! With my Firefox3.6.13, it says : Une erreur système inattendue s'est produite. java.lang.NullPointerException ? Best regards JMarc Johannes Feulner a écrit : On http://www.scorio.com/ a fully web browser based scorewriter project has started end of last year. You can interactively enter and edit your music and create PDFs for printout. There is MIDI playback and online storage for your scores. The functionality is limited but keeps growing week by week. scorio.com uses LilyPond as layout engine. You can export your score in LilyPond's format at any time. Though importing is limited to MusicXML at this point. scorio.com is a free service and may serve well for the initial entry of music and might be especially helpful for beginners. Johannes scorio Team ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: guitarist: how write chord names like Gadd5
Am 01.02.2011 um 16:07 schrieb Brett McCoy: On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Jürgen Ibelgaufts juri...@gmx.de wrote: I want to write down guitar chords and frets with extra voicings, say a G chord with an extra Fifth on the B string, 3rd fret, or Em chord with an extra G on the treble e string. As these extra notes belong to the chords, you can write g:5, but Lilypond ignores the :5 and prints only G, and the G fret diagram gets overwritten by the G:5 fret diagram. Is there any best practice how to use and print such extra chord names, anyway? Are you trying to do power chords (root-5th, no 3rd)? Or do you mean having the extra 12th (which is the same note as the 5th, an octave higher)? Here's how to do powerchords: http://lilypond-s-support-for-tablatures.3383434.n2.nabble.com/ Power-chords-td5524246.html This is part of LilyPond 2.13.? You just have to use the command \powerChords in chordmode. HTH patrick -- Brett W. McCoy -- http://www.electricminstrel.com -- -- In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it, it would overturn the world. -- Jelaleddin Rumi ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: scorio.com A WYSIWYG-Editor with LilyPond-Export
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Ralph Palmer palmer.r.vio...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Johannes Feulner johannes.feul...@scorio.com wrote: On http://www.scorio.com/ a fully web browser based scorewriter project has started end of last year. Works here, under WinXP. I'm impressed! Pretty cool! My students might like to use this. Thanks for sharing. Jon -- Jonathan Kulp http://www.jonathankulp.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: guitarist: how write chord names like Gadd5
Hello, to be more precisely: no power chords, no slash chords. Just for example an extra fifth to the g major chord (which may be redundant but gives another voicing). When the fret diagram for the G chord is 320003 (not lilypond syntax, but you may know what I mean), the G chord with the extra fifth is 320033 which is still G with nothing added, but on the guitar it sounds very different, more straight, more energic. while Lilypond print both cords (G and, say G:5) als plain G, I want different names printed , G5 or Gadd5 or whatever. Any guitarists or jazz musicians on board? How do you do that, or does my question make no sense at all? Cheers Jürgen -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/guitarist%3A-how-write-chord-names-like-Gadd5-tp30816455p30817286.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: guitarist: how write chord names like Gadd5
Hello Jürgen, On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Jürgen Ibelgaufts juri...@gmx.de wrote: I want to write down guitar chords and frets with extra voicings, say a G chord with an extra Fifth on the B string, 3rd fret, or Em chord with an extra G on the treble e string. As these extra notes belong to the chords, you can write g:5, but Lilypond ignores the :5 and prints only G, and the G fret diagram gets overwritten by the G:5 fret diagram. Is there any best practice how to use and print such extra chord names, anyway? Perhaps you're looking for something like: g:3.5.8.13 ? HTH! Christ van Willegen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: guitarist: how write chord names like Gadd5
Hi, On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 07:47:56 -0800 (PST) Jürgen Ibelgaufts juri...@gmx.de wrote: Hello, When the fret diagram for the G chord is 320003 (not lilypond syntax, but you may know what I mean), the G chord with the extra fifth is 320033 which is still G with nothing added, but on the guitar it sounds very different, more straight, more energic. while Lilypond print both cords (G and, say G:5) als plain G, I want different names printed , G5 or Gadd5 or whatever. these aren't different G chords ... just different voicings. I have seen them notated a variety of ways the most common being: G G (type 2) 320003 320033 320003 and 320033 are the diagrams, obviously. Just like there is no difference between G (3x0003) and G (355433) -- still a G chord. David -- What is full of redundancy or formula is predictably boring. What is free of all structure or discipline is randomly boring. In between lies art. -- David Siu ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: guitarist: how write chord names like Gadd5
David,
I agree. Still an ordinary G. Anyway, what I am looking for is a way to name
them differently in order to have different chord diagrams and different
names on the printed score to make clear to the guitarist when he should use
the one or the other.
Jürgen
David Santamauro wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 07:47:56 -0800 (PST)
Jürgen Ibelgaufts juri...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello,
When the fret diagram for the G chord is 320003 (not lilypond syntax,
but you may know what I mean), the G chord with the extra fifth is
320033 which is still G with nothing added, but on the guitar it
sounds very different, more straight, more energic. while Lilypond
print both cords (G and, say G:5) als plain G, I want different names
printed , G5 or Gadd5 or whatever.
these aren't different G chords ... just different voicings. I have
seen them notated a variety of ways the most common being:
G G (type 2)
320003 320033
320003 and 320033 are the diagrams, obviously.
Just like there is no difference between G (3x0003) and G (355433) --
still a G chord.
David
--
What is full of redundancy or formula is predictably boring. What is
free of all structure or discipline is randomly boring. In between lies
art. -- David Siu
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/guitarist%3A-how-write-chord-names-like-Gadd5-tp30816455p30817656.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: guitarist: how write chord names like Gadd5
Hi,
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 08:27:17 -0800 (PST)
Jürgen Ibelgaufts juri...@gmx.de wrote:
David,
I agree. Still an ordinary G. Anyway, what I am looking for is a way
to name them differently in order to have different chord diagrams
and different names on the printed score to make clear to the
guitarist when he should use the one or the other.
Like I said, there are usually two distinct diagrams both labeled 'G'
but the second has a () or some note that it is a different voicing
(like my example below).
these aren't different G chords ... just different voicings. I have
seen them notated a variety of ways the most common being:
G G (type 2)
320003 320033
320003 and 320033 are the diagrams, obviously.
David
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: guitarist: how write chord names like Gadd5
On Feb 1, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Jürgen Ibelgaufts wrote: to be more precisely: no power chords, no slash chords. Just for example an extra fifth to the g major chord (which may be redundant but gives another voicing). When the fret diagram for the G chord is 320003 (not lilypond syntax, but you may know what I mean), the G chord with the extra fifth is 320033 which is still G with nothing added, but on the guitar it sounds very different, more straight, more energic. while Lilypond print both cords (G and, say G:5) als plain G, I want different names printed , G5 or Gadd5 or whatever. Any guitarists or jazz musicians on board? How do you do that, or does my question make no sense at all? Jazz guitarist and Lilypond user here. I would call that a G(no 3rd) but have no idea how Lilypond would accommodate that. Writing charts for jazz, open position chords just don't come into play very much. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
ANN: J. S. Bach - 371 Chorals à 4 voix + Etudes d'anamorphoses: les différentes versions d'un choral.
Hi, You'll find these 2 publications at: http://superbonus.project.free.fr/spip.php?article48 Discussing about the license on the Free Art mailing list I was forgetting to write the copyright header inside all my files! Ough! Fortunately Valentin was not far. His well-meaning has saved me. He has also given me the tip about how to include the source files inside the pdfs. Many thanks again, Valentin. Talking of which, the included source files are tar.bz2. Whether it's a problem for you (Windows or Mac users) to extract the archive from the pdf you'll find a zip archive on the site. The next step of this project is for GNU Solfege. to Michael: I plan an update when the 2.14 is out. Perhaps the midi files will be renewed at this time (see the Edition's Notes). Be aware of that if you still want to use the source. Have fun. Phil. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Problem with repetition
What is the problem with this example? The second alternative does not show.
Thanks.
%
\version 2.12.3
\score {
\new Staff {
\new Voice {
\relative c'' {
\repeat volta 2 {
a4 b d f |
c a c d |
c d e a |
}
\alternative {
{a c e d} |
{a d c e} |
}
}
}
}
\layout {}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problem with repetition
On 02/02/11 04:30, Martin Chicoine wrote:
\version 2.12.3
\score {
\new Staff {
\new Voice {
\relative c'' {
\repeat volta 2 {
a4 b d f |
c a c d |
c d e a |
}
\alternative {
{a c e d} |
{a d c e} |
}
}
}
}
\layout {}
}
You need to get rid of the barcheck between the first and second
alternatives. You can't have anything between the closing brace of one
and the opening brace of another. Move the barchecks inside the braces.
Nick
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: scorio.com a WYSIWYG scorewriter with LilyPond-Export
That's interesting, thanks for the info. I wish it would be able to import .ly files... cheers, Janek 2011/2/1 Johannes Feulner johannes.feul...@scorio.com On http://www.scorio.com/ a fully web browser based scorewriter project has started end of last year. You can interactively enter and edit your music and create PDFs for printout. There is MIDI playback and online storage for your scores. The functionality is limited but keeps growing week by week. scorio.com uses LilyPond as layout engine. You can export your score in LilyPond's format at any time. Though importing is limited to MusicXML at this point. scorio.com is a free service and may serve well for the initial entry of music and might be especially helpful for beginners. Johannes scorio Team ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ANN: J. S. Bach - 371 Chorals à 4 voix + Etudes d'anamorphoses: les différentes versions d'un choral.
2011/2/1 Phil Hézaine philippe.heza...@free.fr Hi, You'll find these 2 publications at: http://superbonus.project.free.fr/spip.php?article48 Thanks! Discussing about the license on the Free Art mailing list I was forgetting to write the copyright header inside all my files! Ough! Fortunately Valentin was not far. His well-meaning has saved me. He has also given me the tip about how to include the source files inside the pdfs. That's great! I didn't know it was possible. How can i extract it? I have arichve manager called 7-zip, that handles tar.bz2, but it doesn't want to do anything with this pdf... cheers, Janek Many thanks again, Valentin. Talking of which, the included source files are tar.bz2. Whether it's a problem for you (Windows or Mac users) to extract the archive from the pdf you'll find a zip archive on the site. The next step of this project is for GNU Solfege. to Michael: I plan an update when the 2.14 is out. Perhaps the midi files will be renewed at this time (see the Edition's Notes). Be aware of that if you still want to use the source. Have fun. Phil. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: guitarist: how write chord names like Gadd5
Many answers. Thanks to everybody.
David, Marc, I built my own predefined diagrams, like these:
\storePredefinedDiagram \chordmode {g} #guitar-tuning #3-2;x;o;o;o;x;
\storePredefinedDiagram \chordmode {g'} #guitar-tuning #3-2;x;o;o;3-3;x;
As you can't have more than one diagram with the same name, I helped myself
calling the first one g and the second one g'. Printing the score, both
diagrams will be printed as g, same name for two different diagrams. What I
need is having two different chord names in the printed output, just as if
the added redundant fifth were a chord extension (Of course I know that it
still an ordinary G chord, no power chord, no extension.
Tim, maybe I'm wrong, the chord 320033 HAS a third (B on the A string),
although I simpley don't play it in that special fingerstyle situation.
That's the reason for the x in my two predefined diagrams.
So... my question still is, how can I tell Lilypond to print another name
for the second chord diagram? I want my score to tell the guitarist, now
play the ordinary G chord 320003, and now play the G chord with the added
fifth, 320033. And I want hin to distinguish between the two voicings not
only by the fret diagram but also by a different name, like Gadd5 or G5 or
whatever may be appropriate.
Please note that I don't think of using markups, because they won't
transpose.
Hope I made myself clear, as I am not a native English or American speaker,
and describing these matters in English is, hmmm, a bit special for me.
Thank you all
Jürgen
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/guitarist%3A-how-write-chord-names-like-Gadd5-tp30816455p30821360.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: error in predefined chord diagram?
On 1/30/11 12:00 PM, bart deruyter bart.deruy...@gmail.com wrote:
I looked through the tuxguitar fret diagrams, and found this the most
interesting C#dim chordshape (I'm copying now from my own, extremely
incomplete predefined-guitar-fretboards-fix.ly
http://predefined-guitar-fretboards-fix.ly file :
\addChordShape #'c:dim #guitar-tuning #x;3-4;1-1;o;1-2;o;
\storePredefinedDiagram #default-fret-table \chordmode {cis:dim}
#guitar-tuning
#(offset-fret 1 (chord-shape 'c:dim guitar-tuning))
for D#dim I first wanted to offset :
\addChordShape #'d:dim #guitar-tuning #x;x;0;1-2;3-4;1-3; one fret higher,
but then the fingering of the first fret on the D-string doesn't show, so I
created another chordshape :
\addChordShape #'dis:dim #guitar-tuning #x;x;1-1;2-2;4-4;2-3;
Perhaps it can be offsetted with an aditional fingering notation in the
diagram but my knowledge of lilypond still is somewhat limited, and right now
I don't have the time to browse through the documentation for it. Got a book
to write and at the moment I just have to modify the diagrams I need at the
moment.
As I got ready to implement this in the LilyPond distribution, it occurred
to me that this solves your problem, but not necessarily the fundamental
problem.
The fundamental problem right now is that the current diagrams have only a
dim chord, which might be either a dim7 or a dim5 chord (and since I entered
them, I can say with a surety that I don't know which chords are which). In
my opinion it's clear that we should have both :dim and :dim7 chords in the
predefined diagram.
I'll be happy to take the responsibility of getting them in properly, but
I'd someone more qualified than me to give me the terse-format diagram
strings with fingering, based on the standard guitar tuning.
So, anybody willing to fill in the following table?
c:dimx;3-4;1-1;o;1-2;o;
c:dim7 x;x;1-1;2-3;1-2;2-4;
cis:dimx;4-4;2-3;1-1;2-2;1-1;
cis:dim7 offset c:dim7 one fret
d:dim
d:dim7 x;x;o;1-1;o;1-2;
dis:dim2-2;o;1-1;2-3;x;2-4;
dis:dim7x;x;1-1;2-3;1-2;2-4;
e:dim
e:dim7offset dis:dim7 one fret
f:dim
f:dim7x;x;o;1-1;o;1-2;
fis:dim
fis:dim7same as dis:dim7
g:dim
g:dim7x;x;5-2;6-4;5-3;3-1;
gis:dim
gis:dim7 same as f:dim7
a:dim
a:dim7 same as ees:dim7
ais:dim
ais:dim7 offset ees:dim7 one fret
b:dim
b:dim7 same as d:dim7
Thanks,
Carl
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
How do you tell tempo for indications in English
I'm setting some of O'Neill's Irish tunes, and the tempo indications are (a selection): Animated, Boldly, Cheerful, Cheerfully, Gaily, Gracefully, Moderate, Plaintive, Plaintively, Playful, Playfully, Rather slow, Slow, Slow and distinctly, Slow and mournful, Slow and tenderly, Slow and with feeling, Slow with expression, Slow and feeling, Spirited, Tenderly, Very slow, With animation, With expression, With feeling, With spirit What do you do with that? I can find tables of usual tempo ranges for italian tempo indications, but I have no idea what to do with these. I'd like them to be authentic, in that the midi file would be about as fast as the tune would usually be played in an Irish pub. Does anyone have any ideas? Patrick ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
