Handling quoted lists
I'm feeling totally stupid, but after hours of nightly poking and ly:message "debugging" around I'm at least at a point where I can ask concrete questions instead of an MWE. In https://github.com/openlilylib/oll-core/blob/master/internal/properties.scm#L566-L611 (may not be the latest state!) I'm trying to create a macro and get messed up with quoting etc. In https://github.com/openlilylib/oll-core/blob/master/usage-examples/properties.ly#L10 a symbol list demo.props is created and properly handled. But in https://github.com/openlilylib/oll-core/blob/master/usage-examples/properties.ly#L50-L51 a (quasi)quoted list isn't managed correctly. I would now use '(demo props) here to create a regular symbol list, but this ends up as (quote (demo props)) in the macro. When used later in https://github.com/openlilylib/oll-core/blob/master/internal/properties.scm#L20 (append '(_propsets) propset-path)) will result in (list (quote _propsets) (quote quote) (list (quote demo) (quote props))) Spo the question must be simple and me stupid, but how can I add the symbol list as an argument in Scheme (in the macro invication) so the last call will result in a flat symbol list? Thanks for any pointer, hint or solution! Urs
Re: unable to install version 2.0
On Fri 04 Sep 2020 at 17:11:27 (-0400), Tom Swan wrote: > […] Yes, I do set the PATH (in my case in .bashrc) Not the best place, though many people will notice nothing wrong. When you enter a subshell, you get another modification of PATH at each and every level. Presumably you source or "dot in" .bashrc in your profile. If you want the lowdown, I always consult https://mywiki.wooledge.org/DotFiles (Neither he nor I uses a DM/DE.) > and I also use bash aliases similarly. Aliases are fine: you normally only expect them to work in interactive shells, and they don't grow like PATH and other environment variables when defined recursively. > I might have the install problem solved. Great. And thanks for posting text. Cheers, David.
Re: White background below custom dynamic mark so that bar line is partially hidden
Always useful ! Many thanks :) Claire On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 9:00 PM Pierre Perol-Schneider < pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Claire, > See also: > https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/Documentation/notation/other#index-_005cwhiteout > Cheers, > Pierre > > Le mar. 1 sept. 2020 à 15:02, Martín Rincón Botero < > martinrinconbot...@gmail.com> a écrit : > >> Great! :-) >> >> On Tue 1. Sep 2020 at 14:27 Claire Meyer < >> claire.meyer.bourhis.lilyp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Martin, >>> >>> Thank you ! It works :) >>> >>> Claire >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 2:22 PM Martín Rincón Botero < >>> martinrinconbot...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi Claire, Perhaps dolcissimo = \tweak DynamicText.self-alignment-X #LEFT #(make-dynamic-script (markup #:whiteout #:normal-text #:italic "dolcissimo")) works? On Tue 1. Sep 2020 at 14:09 Claire Meyer < claire.meyer.bourhis.lilyp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have : > > [image: image.png] > > And would like something like : > > [image: Screenshot_20200901_140443.png] > > My dynamic mark looks like : > > dolcissimo = \tweak DynamicText.self-alignment-X #LEFT > #(make-dynamic-script > (markup #:normal-text #:italic "dolcissimo")) > > Has anyone an idea of how to do that ? > > Many thanks, > Claire > > > > > -- www.martinrinconbotero.com >>> >>> -- >> www.martinrinconbotero.com >> >
Re: unable to install version 2.0
Hi David, Thanks. Yes, I do set the PATH (in my case in .bashrc) and I also use bash aliases similarly. I might have the install problem solved. I did "apt-get remove lilypond" and then I executed the install script as before. I had mistakenly run the wrong version previously, but when I tried again, v2.0 hang until I removed the older version. After that, v2.0 now runs correctly. (PS: I installed to a private ~/bin folder that I use for various things.) Thank you for your help getting me going. -- Tom
Re: unable to install version 2.0
On Fri 04 Sep 2020 at 14:09:06 (-0400), Tom Swan wrote: >I copied and executed script "lilypond-2.20.0-1.linux-64.sh" from the > Downloads page. It seems to run but afterwards, "lilypond --version" still > reports GNU LilyPond 2.18.2. What am I doing wrong? Also tried apt-get > upgrade lilypond, which reports "lilypond is already the newest version > (2.18.2-12build1)" so now I'm stuck. How do I get the newest release? Please don't post HTML, particularly without any text version. If you executed sh lilypond-2.20.0-1.linux-64.sh it will presumably have responded with: You are about to install LilyPond in /home/tom/lilypond A script in /home/tom/bin will be created as a shortcut. Press ^C to abort, or Enter to proceed. Typing lilypond --version will run the version in your PATH, which is unchanged (see ouput from apt-get). Most people won't want ~/lilypond in their PATH (along with directories for other "foreign" software), so conventionally they put ~/bin in their PATH, with either the binary (when simple/small) or a script placed in ~/bin. LP does the latter (typically four scripts plus eight symlinks). Here's my PATH: $ echo $PATH /home/david/bin:/home/david/.local/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games $ How to set it? That depends on how you login. If you run X with startx, then it's simple, put this into your ~/.bash_profile or ~/.profile or ~/.bash_login, whichever you use. ( For Desktop users, it's probably somewhere else.) export PATH="$HOME/bin:$HOME/.local/bin:$PATH" Just take care not to have any double colons, or have any colons at the beginning or end of the PATH. Cheers, David.
Re: Fingering: showing strings by dots?
Hi Harm and thank you for your detailed answer. For some reason, at the first time, I was pretty sure it looked like curved beams... My mistake! Cheers, Pierre Le dim. 23 août 2020 à 19:11, Thomas Morley a écrit : > Am So., 23. Aug. 2020 um 18:39 Uhr schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider > : > > > > Sure Harm, here you go: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YND32HckZqk=1m24s > > Cheers, > > Pierre > > > > Le dim. 23 août 2020 à 11:02, Thomas Morley > a écrit : > >> > >> Am So., 23. Aug. 2020 um 10:52 Uhr schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider > >> : > >> > > >> > Dear Andrew, > >> > > >> > Le dim. 23 août 2020 à 08:09, Andrew Bernard < > andrew.bern...@gmail.com> a écrit : > >> > > >> >> I play bass gamba - I've always wanted to do the lovely curved beams > >> >> (and for Bach,. and the lot!). No chance lilypond will ever be able > to, > >> >> I don't think! > >> > > >> > > >> > I saw Harm (T. Morley) making a short presentation (no details) of > curved beams few months ago (in german). > >> > So, yes, it's possible... > >> > > >> > Cheers, > >> > Pierre > >> > > >> > > >> > >> Could you post the link? > >> I don't remember lol > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Harm > > Hi Pierre, > > That's the video of my talk at Salzburg. > Though, the topic was not about curvy beams. I just showed some images > to demonstrate what's possible with user-code. Meant as an > introduction. > Among those were indeed wavy Beams (more attached). > Alas, the code for it is much more complicated than the one I actually > showed during the talk. > And those wavy Beams don't follow the pitches (as those in the > manuscripts by Bach etc). I developed the code for the (paid) > type-setting of some avantgarde composition - there they stand more > for only vague determined note-durations. > If you look closely you'll see that the stems need to be adjusted > frequently. > > To summarize, the code for those wavy Beams will not do what's desired > here! > Nevertheless it may be not impossible, though I've not the time to > dive into it... > > Cheers, > Harm >
Re: Google Summer of Code final submission!
Brilliant Owen, thank you. Cheers, Pierre Le mar. 1 sept. 2020 à 01:16, David Nalesnik a écrit : > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 3:33 AM Owen Lamb wrote: > > > > Hello everyone! > > > > I've just completed Google Summer of Code for this year. My work has > been on adding rudimentary support for SMuFL (a new music font standard) > and bringing Emmentaler, LilyPond's default font, closer to > SMuFL-compliance. You can take a look at a summary of my work here: > > > > http://lilypondblog.org/2020/08/google-summer-of-code-2020-smufl/ > > > > (I fixed a few regressions in my code, but it looks like there's still > one or two lurking around. I'm just going to call it here, though--there's > not much I can do about them now.) > > > > It's been wonderful working with everyone in the development community, > and I'd like to stick around if I can. I plan on continuing to improve > SMuFL in LilyPond, but in case I don't follow through, I've included in the > summary a list of what to do next. > > > > Happy LilyPonding, > > Owen Lamb > > Arizona State University > > Thank you so much for your efforts and dedication! This is important work. > > Best, > David > >
Re: White background below custom dynamic mark so that bar line is partially hidden
Hi Claire, See also: https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/Documentation/notation/other#index-_005cwhiteout Cheers, Pierre Le mar. 1 sept. 2020 à 15:02, Martín Rincón Botero < martinrinconbot...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Great! :-) > > On Tue 1. Sep 2020 at 14:27 Claire Meyer < > claire.meyer.bourhis.lilyp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Martin, >> >> Thank you ! It works :) >> >> Claire >> >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 2:22 PM Martín Rincón Botero < >> martinrinconbot...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Claire, >>> >>> Perhaps >>> >>> dolcissimo = \tweak DynamicText.self-alignment-X #LEFT >>> #(make-dynamic-script >>> (markup #:whiteout #:normal-text #:italic "dolcissimo")) >>> >>> works? >>> >>> On Tue 1. Sep 2020 at 14:09 Claire Meyer < >>> claire.meyer.bourhis.lilyp...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi, I have : [image: image.png] And would like something like : [image: Screenshot_20200901_140443.png] My dynamic mark looks like : dolcissimo = \tweak DynamicText.self-alignment-X #LEFT #(make-dynamic-script (markup #:normal-text #:italic "dolcissimo")) Has anyone an idea of how to do that ? Many thanks, Claire -- >>> www.martinrinconbotero.com >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- > www.martinrinconbotero.com >
Re: unable to install version 2.0
On 2020-09-04 11:47 am, Tom Swan wrote: PS: Output of /usr/local/bin/lilypond is "No such file or directory" What about "~/bin/lilypond --version"? -- Aaron Hill
Re: unable to install version 2.0
PS: Output of /usr/local/bin/lilypond is "No such file or directory" On September 4, 2020 2:18 PM Kevin Barry wrote: Hi Tom, It looks like you might have two versions installed: 2.18 from apt and 2.20 from the script you downloaded (although normally the downloaded on takes precedence). Can you check the output of: /usr/local/bin/lilypond --version ? Kevin On Fri, Sep 4, 2020, 19:09 Tom Swan < t...@tomswan.com> wrote: I copied and executed script " lilypond-2.20.0-1.linux-64.sh" from the Downloads page. It seems to run but afterwards, "lilypond --version" still reports GNU LilyPond 2.18.2. What am I doing wrong? Also tried apt-get upgrade lilypond, which reports "lilypond is already the newest version (2.18.2-12build1)" so now I'm stuck. How do I get the newest release? http://www.tomswan.com
Re: unable to install version 2.0
Hi Tom, It looks like you might have two versions installed: 2.18 from apt and 2.20 from the script you downloaded (although normally the downloaded on takes precedence). Can you check the output of: /usr/local/bin/lilypond --version ? Kevin On Fri, Sep 4, 2020, 19:09 Tom Swan wrote: > I copied and executed script "lilypond-2.20.0-1.linux-64.sh" from the > Downloads page. It seems to run but afterwards, "lilypond --version" still > reports GNU LilyPond 2.18.2. What am I doing wrong? Also tried apt-get > upgrade lilypond, which reports "lilypond is already the newest version > (2.18.2-12build1)" so now I'm stuck. How do I get the newest release? > > >
unable to install version 2.0
I copied and executed script "lilypond-2.20.0-1.linux-64.sh" from the Downloads page. It seems to run but afterwards, "lilypond --version" still reports GNU LilyPond 2.18.2. What am I doing wrong? Also tried apt-get upgrade lilypond, which reports "lilypond is already the newest version (2.18.2-12build1)" so now I'm stuck. How do I get the newest release?
Re: key-change-event listener in 2.20
From your answer I gather that getting this information this way is fine. The other, more implicit question: has this change been overlooked when creating the changes documentation (http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/Documentation/changes-big-page.html)? cheers Maurits > Op 3 sep. 2020, om 21:07 heeft Aaron Hill het > volgende geschreven: > > On 2020-09-03 5:03 am, Maurits Lamers wrote: >> Hi all, >> I finally figured out what goes wrong here. The issue is that I get >> the key signature and the last key signature from the context in the >> following way: >> (ly:context-property (ly:translator-context engraver) 'keySignature)) >> (ly:context-property (ly:translator-context engraver) 'lastKeySignature)) >> which works in 2.14 up to 2.18. In 2.20 these properties seem to have >> been renamed to keyAlterations and lastKeyAlterations (according to >> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.20/Documentation/internals/key_005fengraver) >> What would be the best way to support both 2.18 and 2.20? Is there a >> better / more reliable method of getting this information? > > You could check to see which symbol exists as a translator property: > > > (define (translator-property? symbol) > (memq symbol all-translation-properties)) > > ;; ... > > (ly:context-property > (ly:translator-context engraver) > (car (filter translator-property? '(keyAlterations keySignature))) > '()) > > > > -- Aaron Hill >
