RE: Future of openLilyLib
> -Original Message- > From: David Kastrup > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 8:12 AM > To: Karsten Reincke > Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org; Carl Sorensen > Subject: Re: Future of openLilyLib > > Karsten Reincke writes: > > > Summary: > > > > If I wrote a piece of music using LilyPond Code (for being interpreted > > by the Lilypond interpreter) and if I included OpenLilyLib into my > > code, > > If you include OLL code by copy into your source code. If you use its > advertised interfaces, however, that does not make it part of your code. I'm not saying I disagree with your interpretation, I'm just curious: are you aware of any legal precedent (in the common-law sense) or law code supporting it? DR
RE: [Off-topic] A question about opera scores
> -Original Message- > From: Lukas-Fabian Moser [mailto:lukasfabianmo...@googlemail.com] On > Behalf Of Lukas-Fabian Moser > Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2020 1:15 PM > To: Daniel Rosen ; lilypond-user Mailing List (lilypond- > u...@gnu.org) > Subject: Re: [Off-topic] A question about opera scores > > Hi Daniel, > > The opera conductors I asked agree that they prefer the vocal parts above > the strings. > > Best > Lukas Thanks so much for asking them on my behalf! DR
[Off-topic] A question about opera scores
I just sent the following question in an email to my local orchestra's[1] music director[2]-he has a side gig with a small opera company a few towns over[3], and I wanted an opera conductor's opinion. Reposting here to see if there are any opera conductors on this list, just in case he's unable to get back to me for some reason. :-) > I am in the midst of engraving a full opera score, and my question is this: > do you as a conductor > prefer to see the vocal parts above the strings, or within the strings > (between the violas and > cellos)? Elaine Gould's Behind Bars (generally accepted as the definitive > reference work on music > notation) prescribes the former for mixed-forces works in general, but is > silent about opera > scores specifically; and most of the random sampling of scores that I've > looked at on IMSLP have > the latter. DR [1] https://philorch.org [2] https://yannicknezetseguin.com [3] https://metopera.org
RE: StaffSymbol stops short of end-of-\score TimeSignature or KeySignature
> -Original Message- > From: Noeck [mailto:noeck.marb...@gmx.de] > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 6:33 PM > To: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Subject: Re: StaffSymbol stops short of end-of-\score TimeSignature or > KeySignature > > You could add an invisible spacer rest in both cases: > \time 4/4 s > and > \key b \major s } > > Would that be a solution for you or just in the example? That does fix the issue with the StaffSymbol ending too far left. I've also been able to adjust the \tweak X-extent value manually to imitate the default spacing, so my issue is solved for now. However, for this solution to work X-extent value has to change depending on the width of the grob—so \tweak X-extent #'(0 . 2.1) works for 4/4, but not for 12/8, and certainly not for a five-sharp KeySignature. It'd be great if there were another way to do it that wasn't so kludgy.
StaffSymbol stops short of end-of-\score TimeSignature or KeySignature
The following example shows two movements of a work which are to be performed
without pause (imagine an "attacca" instruction at the end of the first \score
block). My question: how can I get the StaffSymbol to continue through the 4/4
marking at the end of the first \score (and through the key change at the end
of the second), as it does through the 2/4 at the end of the line above?
This question is very similar to the one Harm responding to in this post from a
couple of months ago:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2020-01/msg00541.html However,
when his solution is applied here the results are still not quite right: when
everything in my example is uncommented, the cautionary TimeSignatures are no
longer vertically aligned because the 4/4 is pushed slightly to the left,
there's a little too much space between the right edge of the TimeSignature and
the end of the StaffSymbol, and the StaffSymbol itself stops just short of the
right margin (I can't figure out a way to draw a vertical line that will show
this latter point more clearly, but if you print it out and use a straight edge
it'll be very apparent).
%% Example begins
\version "2.20.0"
music = \repeat unfold 36 b'4
\book {
\paper { print-all-headers = ##t }
\score {
\header { title = "I" }
{
%\override Staff.StaffSymbol.break-align-symbols =
%#'(time-signature key-cancellation key-signature staff-bar
break-alignment)
\numericTimeSignature \time 3/4
\music \time 2/4 \break
\music \bar "||"
%\tweak X-extent #'(0.25 . 2.4)
\time 4/4
}
}
\score {
\header { title = "II" }
{ \numericTimeSignature \music \key b \major }
}
}
%% Example ends
DR
RE: Convert-ly adds line breaks
> -Original Message- > From: Martin Neubauer [mailto:mrtn...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2020 2:11 PM > To: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Subject: Re: Convert-ly adds line breaks > > Hi, > > I suspect this is a Unix vs. Windows line ending issue. That's exactly what it is. The Frescobaldi project has an open issue for this that I just commented on earlier today (before I saw that this thread existed): https://github.com/frescobaldi/frescobaldi/issues/880#issuecomment-599236580 DR
RE: Grace notes in the first measure mess up the layout
> From: Arle Lommel [mailto:fene...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2020 10:04 PM
> To: Lilypond-User Mailing List
> Subject: Grace notes in the first measure mess up the layout
>
> How can I get this to display as expected?
Just add an equivalent grace note spacer in the other voices, as shown in the
NR
(http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/special-rhythmic-concerns#grace-notes,
under "Known Issues and Warnings"):
\version "2.19.83"
vocal = \relative c'' {
\clef treble
\key aes \major
\grace s16 % <-- Here
R2.
}
upper = \relative c'' {
\clef treble
\key aes \major
\grace s16 % <-- and here
c4 ees4 g4
}
lower = \relative c' {
\clef bass
\key aes \major
\time 3/4
\grace b,16( 2.) |
}
\score {
<<
\new Voice = "mel" { \vocal }
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff = "upper" \upper
\new Staff = "lower" \lower
>>
>>
\layout {}
}
DR
Space after barline for DynamicText in Dynamics context
In the example below, modifying DynamicText.X-offset in the Voice context
forces extra space to appear after the barline so that there's no collision,
but doing the same thing in a Dynamics context does not. Is there a way to have
the Dynamics context behave the way the Voice context does in this regard?
\version "2.19.83"
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff { s1
\override DynamicText.X-offset = -4.25
f1\mf
f1 }
\new Dynamics { s1*2
\override DynamicText.X-offset = -4.25
s\mf }
\new Staff { s1*3 }
>>
DR
Default values for grob properties not listed on IR page
How do I find the default value for a grob property if that property isn't listed on the grob's IR page-for instance, the default value for Glissando.thickness? DR
RE: Clef change placement
> -Original Message- > From: Kieren MacMillan [mailto:kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca] > Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2020 11:15 AM > To: Daniel Rosen > Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List > Subject: Re: Clef change placement > > > Is there a way to achieve this placement automatically, other than by > > specifying explicit system breaks? > > Did you ever get an answer to this? > Seems like a perfect job for a [Scheme] engraver… Nope. Yours is the first response I've gotten. DR
Re: Workarounds for issue #5538
On Jan 24, 2020, at 5:22 AM, Mark Knoop wrote: > At 20:27 on 23 Jan 2020, Daniel Rosen wrote: >> Does anyone have any ideas for a workaround for Issue #5538 “bendAfter >> broken by chords”? >> (https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5538/) > > No, sorry. After reporting this bug I ended up using a TextSpanner instead. How? Can you provide an example? I’ve just been adding a TextScript saying “fall” or “doit” as a placeholder, so anything better would be welcome.
Clef change placement
>From Elaine Gould's "Behind Bars" (p. 9): > Where an instrument rests for more than a system, it is usual to return it to > its commonest clef... Place > the clef change at the end of the system after the player has finished: this > is the least disruptive position > as regards spacing. It is better than an immediate clef change before rests, > which draws unwanted > attention to the new clef at an arbitrary point. Is there a way to achieve this placement automatically, other than by specifying explicit system breaks? DR
Workarounds for issue #5538
Does anyone have any ideas for a workaround for Issue #5538 "bendAfter broken by chords"? (https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5538/) DR
RE: metronome-mark-alignment
Now that the Salzburg conference is over, I'm reiterating this question in hopes that someone may be able to help me with it now. :-) > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Rosen > Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2020 4:20 PM > To: 'Thomas Morley' ; David Nalesnik > > Cc: lilypond-user Mailing List (lilypond-user@gnu.org) u...@gnu.org> > Subject: RE: metronome-mark-alignment > > When Metronome_mark_engraver is part of a Score or Staff context, > MetronomeMarks that coincide with TimeSignatures align by default to the > TimeSignature. However, I have a couple of Dynamics contexts in my score > so that I can have MetronomeMarks centered between staves; in those > contexts, with David/Harm's function applied, MetronomeMarks that > coincide with TimeSignatures align to the accidental. How can I have it > behave the same way as in a Staff context? > > Tiny example attached. I also just made a discovery that I suspect is worth noting: this inconsistency exists even when David and Harm's function is taken away, as one can see by commenting out the two \overrides in the MWE. DR mwe.ly Description: mwe.ly
Extending manual (was Re: metronome-mark-alignment)
> -Original Message- > From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org] > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 5:39 PM > To: Thomas Morley > Cc: Daniel Rosen ; lilypond-user Mailing List (lilypond- > u...@gnu.org) ; David Nalesnik > > Subject: Re: metronome-mark-alignment > > > Ok, let me try again. > > # and $ differ in several respects. # inserts Scheme constructs in places > where LilyPond can decide how they fit into its syntax without looking at > their value first. In that case, evaluation of those Scheme expressions is > done at the time the expression is being actually used which tends to be > what one expects. In contrast, $ can be used in places where the value of > the expression will have an impact on just how LilyPond will put them into > context. For example, a $ expression evaluating to a duration may be > combined with a preceding pitch to form a note, while having it evaluate to > another pitch in the same place will form a separate note. > > This syntactic flexibility may lead to the expression getting evaluated at an > unexpectedly early point of time, namely when LilyPond needs to know its > type in order to decide that it does not actually combine with the preceding > expression. > > -- > > So no talk about lexer and parser and lookahead and tokens. This is better, but I still have trouble grasping precisely what it means, and I think that has to do with my lack of knowledge about how the program actually works. I've been using LilyPond for a long time so I have a pretty good grasp of the syntax for creating a score, and I know how to find the stuff I don't know off the top of my head; but my understanding of what happens once I've finished the text file(s) runs more or less like this: 1. Click "Compile" button in Frescobaldi (or run program from command line) 2. *magic* 3. PDF exists So it occurs to me that an overview "for Dummies(r)" of what really happens during "step 2," on a conceptual level, might be helpful for someone like me. I don't know if such an overview exists, or whether anyone has the time and ability to write one; and, moreover, depending on how much basic computer science it would need to cover, it might be outside the scope of this community---I have no idea, I'm just spitballing. But if it is doable, I suspect it would go a long way towards making the manual more readable for non-programmers. (Obviously if it does exist, someone please point me to it.) DR
RE: metronome-mark-alignment
> -Original Message- > From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org] > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 7:35 AM > To: Daniel Rosen > Cc: Thomas Morley ; lilypond-user Mailing List > (lilypond-user@gnu.org) ; David Nalesnik > > Subject: Re: metronome-mark-alignment > > That is entirely my fault. The problem was that there was no > satisfactory/exhaustive explanation of the technicalities surrounding use of # > vs $ that are caused by making LilyPond more powerful than its underlying > implementation and tools strictly allow for. That has side effects, and being > able to think about such side effects requires knowing what one is dealing > with. > > Many manual passages that I wrote up have been significantly rewritten by > people who tend to have human communication at least on par with their > ability of conversing with computers. This one hasn't. I'll readily admit > that it > is bad. It not being there, however, will likely be worse at least for some > readers. Definitely. And I never meant to imply that it shouldn't be there. > > Of course, it may be that the manual isn't meant to be aimed at a > > complete novice like myself; but if it is, then it definitely needs an > > overhaul. > > Sure, like most of what I write. But there are not many people around for > overhauling. Makes sense. I was just trying to answer Harm's question as honestly as I could. :-)
RE: metronome-mark-alignment
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Morley [mailto:thomasmorle...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2020 6:04 PM > To: Daniel Rosen > Cc: David Nalesnik ; lilypond-user Mailing List > (lilypond-user@gnu.org) > Subject: Re: metronome-mark-alignment > > Though, I've already heard about difficulties about using scheme to write > own extension pretty often. > Just like you say: > > Am So., 12. Jan. 2020 um 22:19 Uhr schrieb Daniel Rosen > : > > I want to express how grateful I am to this list for being so helpful > > with this issue, since I have zero knowledge about how to use Scheme. > > (I've tried to tackle the Extending manual on multiple occasions, but > > I find it extremely difficult to understand, probably because I have > > no programming experience.) > > I have the suspicion it's not, because guile is difficult, at least so far as > the > scheme-tutorial reaches out, but because it's difficult to find a way to > modify > LilyPond's default with scheme. In the sense of: > What am I supposed to do with my new basic guile-knowledge? > Note that most used tools in David's and my coding are _not_ native guile- > procedures, but are defined in the LilyPond-source. > Therefore I think the problem is more poor documentation of those lily- > defined tools and/or the lack of commented code-examples using them. > > Could you confirm or is it something else preventing you from starting to > code on your own? The most important thing preventing me from starting to code on my own is simple: I don't have to. LilyPond natively supports so many different notational constructs that I run into problems relatively infrequently. And in the cases when I do, between the manuals, the LSR, and this list (primarily the archives, and occasionally responses to my own submissions), I've been able to simply copy-paste my way out of practically any jam I've found myself in for as long as I've used LilyPond (which must be almost ten years). As far as the Extending manual goes, though... I could be wrong, but it seems to assume a basic working knowledge of how computer programs and programming languages work that I simply don't have. Going through it, I think to myself that I would need to have one-on-one tutoring sessions with someone in order to really understand it. Take 1.2.1 (http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/extending/lilypond-scheme-syntax) as an example. This paragraph > The hash mark # method of embedding Scheme is a natural fit for this system. > Once the lexer sees a hash mark, it calls the Scheme reader to read one full > Scheme > expression (this can be an identifier, an expression enclosed in parentheses, > or several > other things). After the Scheme expression is read, it is stored away as the > value for an > SCM_TOKEN in the grammar. Once the parser knows how to make use of this > token, it > calls Guile for evaluating the Scheme expression. Since the parser usually > requires a bit > of lookahead from the lexer to make its parsing decisions, this separation of > reading > and evaluation between lexer and parser is exactly what is needed to keep the > execution of LilyPond and Scheme expressions in sync. For this reason, you > should use > the hash mark # for calling Scheme whenever this is feasible. mostly goes over my head. I like to think I understand the basic idea, but I can never be sure because I'm unfamiliar with so much of the language: "lexer," "Scheme reader," "SCM_TOKEN," "parser." And the rest of the page is no better. So while I'm sure that you're right about the manual's ineffectiveness in helping readers transfer their knowledge of Guile into practice within LilyPond, in my case the issue lies even deeper than that---I'm never sure whether I'm really understanding what the manual is trying to tell me. Of course, it may be that the manual isn't meant to be aimed at a complete novice like myself; but if it is, then it definitely needs an overhaul. DR
RE: metronome-mark-alignment
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Morley [mailto:thomasmorle...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2020 5:37 PM > To: David Nalesnik > Cc: Daniel Rosen ; lilypond-user Mailing List (lilypond- > u...@gnu.org) > Subject: Re: metronome-mark-alignment > > Am Sa., 11. Jan. 2020 um 18:04 Uhr schrieb David Nalesnik > : > > > > Sorry, no time at the moment. Perhaps someone else can help... > > Probably: This works great. I want to express how grateful I am to this list for being so helpful with this issue, since I have zero knowledge about how to use Scheme. (I've tried to tackle the Extending manual on multiple occasions, but I find it extremely difficult to understand, probably because I have no programming experience.) That said... there's still one more problem. When Metronome_mark_engraver is part of a Score or Staff context, MetronomeMarks that coincide with TimeSignatures align by default to the TimeSignature. However, I have a couple of Dynamics contexts in my score so that I can have MetronomeMarks centered between staves; in those contexts, with David/Harm's function applied, MetronomeMarks that coincide with TimeSignatures align to the accidental. How can I have it behave the same way as in a Staff context? Tiny example attached. Thanks, DR mwe.ly Description: mwe.ly
Re: metronome-mark-alignment
On Jan 9, 2020, at 4:21 PM, Daniel Rosen wrote: >> I have a new problem. If I take away the first instance of \music in each >> staff of my original example, > Whoops, meant to say *your* example with the revised function. >> the file fails to compile, and I get this error message: >> >>> ~/example-updated.ly:13:18: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting >>> Grob_array): () >> >> Can you help me with this one? Seems like this might have fallen through the cracks, so... bump. DR
RE: metronome-mark-alignment
> my original example Whoops, meant to say *your* example with the revised function. DR
RE: metronome-mark-alignment
> Fantastic. A minor point though: while the example does compile as it should, > I also get the following text in the log during the preprocessing stage: > > > Fontconfig warning: ignoring 1033: not a valid language tag > > It doesn't say it's an error or even a warning, but I've never seen it > before--- > and, moreover, a search of the Nabble list archive for the string "language > tag" yields zero results. Any idea what this is? I have a new problem. If I take away the first instance of \music in each staff of my original example, the file fails to compile, and I get this error message: > ~/example-updated.ly:13:18: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting > Grob_array): () Can you help me with this one? DR
RE: metronome-mark-alignment
> The problem is that ly:make-simple-closure has been removed. I replaced > the old default with the new definition (found in the Internals Reference), > and the function works again. Fantastic. A minor point though: while the example does compile as it should, I also get the following text in the log during the preprocessing stage: > Fontconfig warning: ignoring 1033: not a valid language tag It doesn't say it's an error or even a warning, but I've never seen it before---and, moreover, a search of the Nabble list archive for the string "language tag" yields zero results. Any idea what this is? DR
metronome-mark-alignment
I just rediscovered David Nalesnik's metronome-mark-alignment function in this thread that I originally started years ago: https://bit.ly/2QUmi6H The function works fine as long as Metronome_mark_engraver only exists in the Score context. However, if it's added to, say, a Staff context or a Voice context, it prevents the file from compiling and yields the following error messages: > ~/example.ly:23:14: In expression (ly:make-simple-closure (quasiquote #)): > ~/example.ly:23:14: Unbound variable: ly:make-simple-closure See the attached example. Can anyone tweak this function so that it will work under these conditions? DR example.ly Description: example.ly
RE: Understanding fancy-gliss
> Harm, > > Thank you so, so much for the primer---it cleared up everything that I had > been unable to surmise for myself. I would highly recommend you update > the LSR entry to include it. Harm, one other question: is it possible to use your function in conjunction with a different style of line than the default, like 'zigzag? And if so, how? Using \override Glissando.style doesn't seem to do anything.
RE: Understanding fancy-gliss
Harm, Thank you so, so much for the primer---it cleared up everything that I had been unable to surmise for myself. I would highly recommend you update the LSR entry to include it. Thanks again! DR
Understanding fancy-gliss
I'm having a little bit of trouble understanding exactly how to use Harm's excellent fancy-gliss function, particularly when it comes to creating curves. Can someone help me get a better handle on this? DR
Overriding Script symbol with markup
What property of Script do I need to override in order to replace the symbol
with markup?
Example:
{ \override Script.? = \markup { foo }
c'1\trill }
would print "foo" instead of the trill symbol.
DR
RE: TextScript baseline in Dynamics context
I mean, that is a possibility, but it’s pretty labor-intensive.
This should be a feature of, at the very least, the Dynamics context, IMHO. Am
I right that this hasn't been requested before? (If I am I'll submit it to the
bugs list.)
DR
> From: Stefano Troncaro [mailto:stefanotronc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 27, 2019 10:50 AM
> To: Daniel Rosen
> Subject: Re: TextScript baseline in Dynamics context
> Hi Daniel, I never found a stafisfying solution for that, so I just create
> custom DynamicTexts (that are always aligned) instead of mixing DynamicTexts
> and TextScripts. See:
> text = #(make-dynamic-script (markup #:normal-text #:italic "Text"))
> <<
> \new Voice { \repeat unfold 6 { c'4 } }
> \new Dynamics { s2\f s\text s-"Text" }
> \new Voice { \repeat unfold 6 { c'4 } }
> >>
> Bear in mind that you can't place 2 simultaneous dynamic events, so if you
> want it to display "f Text" you have to create a "f Text" dynamic. Also,
> dynamics are centered on the note by default, so you might want to change
> that. For example:
> #(define make-dynamic-text (define-event-function (text) (markup?)
> #{
> \tweak self-alignment-X #-1
> \tweak extra-offset #'(-0.65 . 0)
> #(make-dynamic-script
> (markup #:normal-text #:italic text))
> #} ) )
> text = #(make-dynamic-text (markup #:normal-text #:italic "Text"))
> <<
> \new Voice { \repeat unfold 6 { c'4 } }
> \new Dynamics { s2\f s\text s-"Text" }
> \new Voice { \repeat unfold 6 { c'4 } }
> >>
> Hope this helps!
> Stéfano
> > El vie., 27 dic. 2019 a las 12:18, Daniel Rosen ()
> > escribió:
> > How do I get TextScripts to sit on the same baseline as DynamicTexts within
> > a Dynamics context? Everything I've tried leaves all or some of them
> > sitting higher or lower.
> > MWE of the problem:
> > <<
> > \new Voice { \repeat unfold 6 { c'4 } }
> > \new Dynamics { s2\f-"Text" s-"Text" s^"Text" }
> > \new Voice { \repeat unfold 6 { c'4 } }
> > >>
> > DR
TextScript baseline in Dynamics context
How do I get TextScripts to sit on the same baseline as DynamicTexts within a
Dynamics context? Everything I've tried leaves all or some of them sitting
higher or lower.
MWE of the problem:
<<
\new Voice { \repeat unfold 6 { c'4 } }
\new Dynamics { s2\f-"Text" s-"Text" s^"Text" }
\new Voice { \repeat unfold 6 { c'4 } }
>>
DR
"Winged" repeat after double bar and line break
\version "2.19.56"
\relative c'' {
c4 c c c
\bar "[|:"
c4 c c c \break
\bar ".|:-||"
c4 c c c
}
I would like the first line in the above example to end with a double bar (\bar
"||"), and the second line to begin with a winged begin-repeat bar (\bar
"[|:"). How can I accomplish this?
DR
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Potential bug: Slur begins or ends with tenuto
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Rosen
> Sent: Friday, November 11, 2016 5:54 PM
> To: lilypond-user Mailing List (lilypond-user@gnu.org) u...@gnu.org>
> Subject: Potential bug: Slur begins or ends with tenuto
>
> It appears that LilyPond is refusing to allow Slur.positions to be specified
> in
> increments smaller than 0.5 staff spaces. I can't find any mention of a
> constraint like this in any of the manuals.
It just occurred to me that the following example does a much better job of
illustrating this point than the one I previously submitted:
\version "2.19.50"
\relative c'' {
\stemUp
\override Slur.positions = #'(-1 . -1)
b( b)
\override Slur.positions = #'(-1.25 . -1)
b( b)
\override Slur.positions = #'(-1.5 . -1)
b( b)
}
DR
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Potential bug: Slur begins or ends with tenuto
I'm sending this to the user list first because I'm having trouble with the
search functionality in the new issue tracker, so I can't tell if this has
already been reported:
\version "2.19.50"
\relative c' {
\override Slur.positions = #'(-4 . -4)
c( c)
\override Slur.positions = #'(-4.25 . -4)
c( c)
\override Slur.positions = #'(-4.5 . -4)
c( c)
}
It appears that LilyPond is refusing to allow Slur.positions to be specified in
increments smaller than 0.5 staff spaces. I can't find any mention of a
constraint like this in any of the manuals.
DR
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
SVG files for MediaWiki
When I create an SVG file with LilyPond and upload it to Wikimedia Commons, it renders as a blank image (try uploading Tristan.preview.svg at https://tools.wmflabs.org/svgcheck/). Can anyone help me figure out how to fix this? I've already tried to import it into and export it from Apache OpenOffice Draw, but there must be some kind of problem with the import filter extension (obtainable at https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/SVG_Import_Filter) because a couple of grobs are missing from the program's rendering (namely, the full-measure rest in line 22, and the flags on the a8 in line 7 and the ais8 in line 8-see OOTristan.svg). DR Tristan.ly Description: Tristan.ly ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Can't access LinuxAudio server
Hello all, Whenever I try to access any page in the linuxaudio.org domain (including pages in download.linuxaudio.org), my browser (Firefox) returns a "Server not found" error, which makes it impossible for me to download the latest version of LilyPond for Windows. http://isup.me tells me that the issue is on my end, but in about 5 years of using LilyPond and downloading almost all the development versions as they've been released, this has never been a problem for me. Can anyone tell me what might be happening here? Thanks, Daniel Rosen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Can't access LinuxAudio server
> -Original Message- > From: Brian Barker [mailto:b.m.bar...@btinternet.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 4:46 PM > To: Daniel Rosen <drose...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Can't access LinuxAudio server > > At 21:11 09/12/2015 +, you wrote: > >Whenever I try to access any page in the linuxaudio.org domain > >(including pages in download.linuxaudio.org), my browser (Firefox) > >returns a "Server not found" error, which makes it impossible for me to > >download the latest version of LilyPond for Windows. > > Use http://www.lilypond.org/development.html ? > > Brian Barker - privately The page you referenced only contains links to the download files. The files themselves are hosted at LinuxAudio, hence my issue. That being said, even though I haven't changed anything about my computer or my Internet connection, I can now connect to the server. Weird. DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Apparent bug: Bracketed TupletNumber affected by Slur
The following code produces the attached output, with the TupletNumber way down
inside the Slur even though there is no apparent reason for the avoid-slur
property to matter at all-in other words, this code should produce the same
output as if the \override were commented out. (The bug appears to manifest
only when the Slur begins on the first note of the tuplet.)
Is this a bug? I can't seem to find anything like it in the bugs list archives.
\version 2.19.25
\relative c'' {
\tupletUp
\override TupletNumber.avoid-slur = #'outside
\tuplet 3/2 { b8( b b) }
}
DR
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Issue tracker
I've been scouring the list archives for the past half hour trying to find out where the new issue tracker is (now that the Google Code one has been frozen). Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks, Dan ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Assertion failed!
-Original Message- From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org] Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 5:23 AM To: Andrew Bernard Cc: Daniel Rosen; lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Assertion failed! Andrew Bernard andrew.bern...@gmail.com writes: Hi David, The one I have reported dumps core. So pretty much a fatal error. Assertion failures always dump core. The idea is that they dump core at a point of time where one is still reasonably close to the problem rather than at some arbitrary point later. A core dump can be used for analyzing the state of the program at the point of the core dump. But it is good to know the program behaviour has been altered and that accounts for why we are suddenly seeing assertion failures when they occur. The difference is just that the production version of LilyPond no longer ignores assertions and just crosses fingers. Some assertions might warrant converting into programming errors, some assertions might warrant finding the cause and either fixing it or putting up some sensible continuation strategy. At any rate, the failed assertions will not go away by themselves: making suitable small examples and reporting them on the bug reporting list will give developers a chance to look at them as they occur. -- David Kastrup Would it still be helpful for me to submit a bug report, or have you now identified an existing issue as the culprit? DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Assertion failed!
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bernard [mailto:andrew.bern...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 3:49 AM
To: Daniel Rosen; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: RE: Assertion failed!
Can you see if this works in 2.19.20? [Based on my hypothesis that 2.19.21
has regressed something, or introduced a bunch of defects.]
Using 2.19.20, I compiled
\version 2.19.20
\new Voice \with { \consists Balloon_engraver } {
\balloonGrobText #'Stem #'(3 . 3) \markup { I'm a Stem }
g1
}
While I no longer get the dialog I reported originally, I do get the attached
PDF output, which is equally problematic.
I'll go ahead and create a bug report.
DR
document.pdf
Description: document.pdf
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: \remove Time_signature_engraver + \override TextScript.self-alignment-X = error
Not a problem, just couldn't figure it out. DR Sent from my iPhone On Jun 12, 2015, at 3:21 PM, Karen Billings ksbilli...@att.netmailto:ksbilli...@att.net wrote: Daniel, I'm sorry - it's not related to your specific question. It appears that our message threads somehow got combined as one. I'm really sorry... Karen On Friday, June 12, 2015 11:22 AM, Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.commailto:drose...@gmail.com wrote: Karen, I don’t understand—is this file related to my question? DR From: Karen Billings [mailto:ksbilli...@att.net] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 12:47 PM To: Simon Albrecht; Daniel Rosen; lilypond-user Mailing List (lilypond-user@gnu.orgmailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org) Subject: Re: \remove Time_signature_engraver + \override TextScript.self-alignment-X = error Simon, Daniel, et al, Here you are... FYI, I have to force breaks to avoid getting breaks in mid-melisma... I finally managed to get a clef, but now I get two for the price of one! Karen On Friday, June 12, 2015 10:39 AM, Simon Albrecht simon.albre...@mail.demailto:simon.albre...@mail.de wrote: Tiny example? sja Am 12.06.2015 um 17:15 schrieb Daniel Rosen: DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.orgmailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.orgmailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Assertion failed!
Hello all,
When I try to attach a balloon to a whole note, like this:
%%% Snippet begins
\version 2.19.21
\new Voice \with { \consists Balloon_engraver }
{
\balloonGrobText #'Stem #'(3 . 3) \markup { I'm a Stem }
g1
}
%%% Snippet ends
I get the attached pop-up window.
Is this an issue on my end, or is it a bug?
DR
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
\remove Time_signature_engraver + \override TextScript.self-alignment-X = error
DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: \remove Time_signature_engraver + \override TextScript.self-alignment-X = error
Karen, I don’t understand—is this file related to my question? DR From: Karen Billings [mailto:ksbilli...@att.net] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 12:47 PM To: Simon Albrecht; Daniel Rosen; lilypond-user Mailing List (lilypond-user@gnu.org) Subject: Re: \remove Time_signature_engraver + \override TextScript.self-alignment-X = error Simon, Daniel, et al, Here you are... FYI, I have to force breaks to avoid getting breaks in mid-melisma... I finally managed to get a clef, but now I get two for the price of one! Karen On Friday, June 12, 2015 10:39 AM, Simon Albrecht simon.albre...@mail.demailto:simon.albre...@mail.de wrote: Tiny example? sja Am 12.06.2015 um 17:15 schrieb Daniel Rosen: DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.orgmailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.orgmailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: \remove Time_signature_engraver + \override TextScript.self-alignment-X = error
I sent the attached message to the list a couple minutes after the one below
(about an hour and a half ago), but for some reason it still hasn't shown up on
the list.
DR
From: Simon Albrecht [mailto:simon.albre...@mail.de]
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 12:39 PM
To: Daniel Rosen; lilypond-user Mailing List (lilypond-user@gnu.org)
Subject: Re: \remove Time_signature_engraver + \override
TextScript.self-alignment-X = error
Tiny example?
sja
Am 12.06.2015 um 17:15 schrieb Daniel Rosen:
DR
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.orgmailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
---BeginMessage---
Accidentally hit the send button prematurely; sorry.
This code:
\version 2.19.21
\new Staff \with { \remove Time_signature_engraver }
{
\once \override TextScript.self-alignment-X = 0
g^TextTextTextTextText
}
Yields the attached popup window (similar to the one I reported a few minutes
ago).
Is this a bug?
DR
From: Daniel Rosen
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 11:16 AM
To: lilypond-user Mailing List (lilypond-user@gnu.org)
Subject: \remove Time_signature_engraver + \override
TextScript.self-alignment-X = error
DR
---End Message---
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: One of these things just isn't the same
-Original Message-
From: Phil Holmes [mailto:m...@philholmes.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 4:00 AM
To: Phil Holmes; Daniel Rosen; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: One of these things just isn't the same
- Original Message -
From: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
To: Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.com; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 8:25 AM
Subject: Re: One of these things just isn't the same
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 9:35 PM
Subject: One of these things just isn't the same
\version 2.19.7
{ f4- fis- fes- f!- }
Why is the accent on the final note (the one with the natural sign before
it) so much farther away from its parent NoteHead than the others? Is
this a known issue?
DR
Well, the obvious and simple answer is that it's to allow space for the
natural sign. None of the other accidentals have strokes on the left of
the glyph.
Well, I suppose that makes sense, but it still looks Extremely Ugly to me. Does
anyone else agree?
That is: on the right. Never was very good with left and right.
Understandable. I still have to look at my hands sometimes. :-P
DR
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: One of these things just isn't the same
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:18 AM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.commailto:david.nales...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Daniel, On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.commailto:drose...@gmail.com wrote: Well, I suppose that makes sense, but it still looks Extremely Ugly to me. Does anyone else agree? I don't know about extremely ugly... To clarify: in the context you provide it looks rather out-of-place, but for an isolated instance I think it's OK. Perhaps there should be an option to allow accents to shift right a tiny bit in the case of a collision (i.e., to match the value of horizon-padding which would result in vertical displacement). I prefer the look gotten with \offset X-offset #0.1. --David That’s probably what I would have suggested. DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
One of these things just isn't the same
\version 2.19.7
{ f4- fis- fes- f!- }
Why is the accent on the final note (the one with the natural sign before it)
so much farther away from its parent NoteHead than the others? Is this a known
issue?
DR
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: LilyJAZZ in v2.18
From: Pierre Perol-Schneider [mailto:pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2014 5:51 AM To: MarcM Cc: lilypond-user Subject: Re: LilyJAZZ in v2.18 2014-05-15 16:05 GMT+02:00 MarcM m...@mouries.net: if the work is open source, can LilyJAZZ be integrated with Lilypond? I think we are a little far from that. Urs, can it now at least be safely included in OpenLilyLib? DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: lilypond-announce
Weird, I could have sworn that I had checked for them on Gmane and that they weren't there, but apparently I didn't because they are. However, there does appear to be a problem with Gmane's RSS feed (http://rss.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.announce): rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf=http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#; xmlns=http://purl.org/rss/1.0/; xmlns:taxo=http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/xmlns:dc=http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/; xmlns:syn=http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/; xmlns:admin=http://webns.net/mvcb/; channel rdf:about=http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.announce; titlegmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.announce/title link http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.announce /link description/ syn:updatePeriodhourly/syn:updatePeriod syn:updateFrequency1/syn:updateFrequency syn:updateBase1901-01-01T00:00+00:00/syn:updateBase items rdf:Seq rdf:li rdf:resource=http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.announce/599/ rdf:li rdf:resource=http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.announce/598/ rdf:li rdf:resource=http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.announce/597/ ... DR From: Phil Holmes [mailto:m...@philholmes.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 6:18 PM To: Daniel Rosen; lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: lilypond-announce I sent notifications for both, and I received them back from the mailing list. 07/04/14 08:18 and 21/04/14 08:34. -- Phil Holmes - Original Message - From: Daniel Rosenmailto:drose...@gmail.com To: lilypond-user Mailing List(lilypond-user@gnu.org)mailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org) Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 10:12 PM Subject: lilypond-announce I subscribe to the lilypond-announce list's RSS feed so that I can get reliable, timely notifications of new versions being released, but the list was silent for each of the two most recent releases (2.19.4 or 2.19.5). Was this just an oversight? DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.orgmailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
lilypond-announce
I subscribe to the lilypond-announce list's RSS feed so that I can get reliable, timely notifications of new versions being released, but the list was silent for each of the two most recent releases (2.19.4 or 2.19.5). Was this just an oversight? DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Newbie problem in my first or second score
That was an accepted notational practice at the time for appoggiaturas. There's
a pretty interesting discussion of this in the New Grove Dictionary of Music
and Musicians article on Ornaments, § 9.i.
DR
From: Steve Lane [mailto:sl...@soliantconsulting.com]
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 9:12 AM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Newbie problem in my first or second score
Thanks, David and Federico - easy fix! All layout engines have their
architectural weak spots, so that 's no surprise I guess.
I guess the rendering of that first sixteenth as a grace note in this piece is
somewhat arbitrary anyway, since the first measure is always playes simply as
four sixteenths. Doubtless some historical reason.
Thanks again,
SGL
From: David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.commailto:david.nales...@gmail.com
Date: Monday, April 21, 2014 8:08 AM
To: Steve Lane sl...@soliantconsulting.commailto:sl...@soliantconsulting.com
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.orgmailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org
lilypond-user@gnu.orgmailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Newbie problem in my first or second score
Hi Steve,
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Steve Lane
sl...@soliantconsulting.commailto:sl...@soliantconsulting.com wrote:
Hello all:
So I am trying to lay out the first bars of Mozart's Sonata K 333. The first
measure is a partial measure. No matter what I try so far, I'm getting an extra
time and key signature in the bass clef, in addition to the bass clef first
displaying as treble, then adding a bass clef in:
[cid:image001.png@01CF5D88.2B54B1E0]
The code is as follows (I didn't see how to make it tinier):
\version 2.18.2
\include english.lyhttp://english.ly
keyTime = { \key bf \major \time 4/4 }
upper = \relative c''' {
\partial 4 \grace g16 f8 ef16 d |
}
lower = {
\partial 4 r4 |
}
\score {
\new PianoStaff
\new Staff = upper { \clef treble \keyTime \upper }
\new Staff = lower { \clef bass \keyTime \lower }
}
Any help appreciated :-)
Welcome to LilyPond!
Sorry you had to discover so quickly perhaps the most persistent bug in the
program.
It's easily fixed, though: add a corresponding grace spacer to the other part
at the same point.
\partial 4 \grace s16 r4
--David
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: MetronomeMark aligned to accidentals
-Original Message- From: Trevor Daniels [mailto:t.dani...@treda.co.uk] Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 6:43 AM To: David Nalesnik Cc: Daniel Rosen; lilypond-user Subject: Re: MetronomeMark aligned to accidentals David, you wrote Monday, April 07, 2014 12:54 AM Well, here's something rough which appears to do the trick. The basic idea is that the function locates a PaperColumn that is related to both our MetronomeMark grob and an AccidentalPlacement grob. If it finds it, it calculates the extent of all the accidentals and sets X-offset based on this. Hope this helps. Let me know if you run into problems with it. That looks pretty good to me, thanks David. Trevor +1 ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: MetronomeMark aligned to accidentals
-Original Message- From: Trevor Daniels [mailto:t.dani...@treda.co.uk] Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 6:24 PM To: Daniel Rosen; lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: MetronomeMark aligned to accidentals Daniel, you wrote Saturday, April 05, 2014 1:44 PM I would like the MetronomeMark to be aligned with the left edge of the leftmost Accidental (almost with the BarLine, but not quite). I've been trying to manipulate the Score.MetronomeMark.non-break-align-symbols property, but to no avail (I'm not sure I quite understand how that property works; it's a little unclear to me in the IR). Can anyone steer me in the right direction? I think you'll find all you need to know in the following section. You can't align to an accidental using this, but by using an offset from an alignment to the bar line anchor you may be able to achieve the positioning you want. http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/aligning- objects#using-the-break_002dalignable_002dinterface Trevor Thanks, that should do fine as a workaround. Does anyone else agree that the behavior I'm suggesting should be the default? We've heard from Elaine Gould thanks to Brian, but she's not the end-all be-all, so I don't want to ask that this be added as a bug without some kind of consensus. DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: MetronomeMark aligned to accidentals
-Original Message-
From: Trevor Daniels [mailto:t.dani...@treda.co.uk]
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 6:24 PM
To: Daniel Rosen; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: MetronomeMark aligned to accidentals
Daniel, you wrote Saturday, April 05, 2014 1:44 PM
I would like the MetronomeMark to be aligned with the left edge of the
leftmost Accidental (almost with the BarLine, but not quite). I've been trying
to manipulate the Score.MetronomeMark.non-break-align-symbols
property, but to no avail (I'm not sure I quite understand how that property
works; it's a little unclear to me in the IR). Can anyone steer me in the
right
direction?
I think you'll find all you need to know in the following section. You can't
align
to an accidental using this, but by using an offset from an alignment to the
bar line anchor you may be able to achieve the positioning you want.
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/aligning-
objects#using-the-break_002dalignable_002dinterface
Trevor
I've tried this based on the page you linked me to above, but it's not working.
What am I missing here?
\version 2.19.3
{
R1 |
\override Score.MetronomeMark.break-align-symbols = #'(key-signature)
\tempo Tempo
as' bes'
}
DR
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
MetronomeMark aligned to accidentals
Consider the following example:
\version 2.19.3
{
R1 |
\tempo Tempo
as' bes'
}
I would like the MetronomeMark to be aligned with the left edge of the leftmost
Accidental (almost with the BarLine, but not quite). I've been trying to
manipulate the Score.MetronomeMark.non-break-align-symbols property, but to no
avail (I'm not sure I quite understand how that property works; it's a little
unclear to me in the IR). Can anyone steer me in the right direction?
DR
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: MetronomeMark aligned to accidentals
Well, yes, that is one option, but it’s not one I love for two reasons: 1) it’s
kludgy, and 2) I think that maybe LilyPond should do what I’m describing by
default. The current default output looks very odd to me (although it could be
just me).
DR
From: Pierre Perol-Schneider [mailto:pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 9:53 AM
To: Daniel Rosen
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: MetronomeMark aligned to accidentals
2014-04-05 14:44 GMT+02:00 Daniel Rosen
drose...@gmail.commailto:drose...@gmail.com:
Consider the following example:
\version 2.19.3
{
R1 |
\tempo Tempo
as' bes'
}
I would like the MetronomeMark to be aligned with the left edge of the leftmost
Accidental (almost with the BarLine, but not quite). I've been trying to
manipulate the Score.MetronomeMark.non-break-align-symbols property, but to no
avail (I'm not sure I quite understand how that property works; it's a little
unclear to me in the IR). Can anyone steer me in the right direction?
DR
I'm not sure I can help in detail...
For one shot :
\version 2.19.3
{
R1 |
\tweak X-offset #-2.5 \tempo Tempo
as' bes'
}
% or
{
R1 |
\once\override Score.MetronomeMark.self-alignment-X = #-0.3
\tempo Tempo
as' bes'
}
HTH,
Pierre
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Ties across voices
-Original Message-
From: Nick Payne [mailto:nick.pa...@internode.on.net]
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2014 11:54 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Ties across voices
On 31/03/14 10:56, Daniel Rosen wrote:
Consider the example below:
\version 2.19.3
\new Staff
\new Voice \relative c'' { \voiceOne c4~ c d, c }
\new Voice \relative c' { \voiceTwo c d8 q
How can I tie the lower voice's c d to the upper voice's c d, c?
You could use a third hidden voice:
\version 2.19.3
transOn = {
\override NoteColumn.ignore-collision = ##t
\override NoteHead.no-ledgers = ##t
\hide NoteHead
\hide Stem
\hide Flag
\hide Beam
\hide Dots
\hide Accidental
\hide TupletBracket
\hide TupletNumber
}
transOff = {
\revert NoteColumn.ignore-collision
\revert NoteHead.no-ledgers
\revert NoteHead.transparent
\revert Stem.transparent
\revert Beam.transparent
\revert Flag.transparent
\revert Dots.transparent
\revert Accidental.transparent
\revert TupletBracket.transparent
\revert TupletNumber.transparent
}
\new Staff
\new Voice \relative c'' { \voiceOne c4~ c d, c }
\new Voice \relative c' { \voiceTwo c d8 q }
\new Voice \relative c' { \voiceThree \transOn s8 c_~ d^~ q }
Aha! I was doing something similar to this without adding a third voice; the
addition of \override NoteColumn.ignore-collision = ##t (I didn't even know
that property existed) makes it work now:
\version 2.19.3
\new Staff
\new Voice \relative c'' {
\voiceOne c4~ \oneVoice c d, c
}
\new Voice \relative c' {
\voiceTwo c d8 q~
\oneVoice \once \omit Stem \once \hideNotes
\once \override NoteColumn.ignore-collision = ##t
q4
}
Thanks!
DR
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Fermata colliding with Beam
\version 2.19.3
{ \stemUp a''8[ f']\fermata }
Is this a bug?
DR
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: MetronomeMark aligned to accidentals
I should also mention that aligning the MetronomeMark with the BarLine would be
fine as a workaround for now, but I can’t figure out how to do that either.
DR
From: Daniel Rosen
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 10:25 AM
To: 'Pierre Perol-Schneider'
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: RE: MetronomeMark aligned to accidentals
Well, yes, that is one option, but it’s not one I love for two reasons: 1) it’s
kludgy, and 2) I think that maybe LilyPond should do what I’m describing by
default. The current default output looks very odd to me (although it could be
just me).
DR
From: Pierre Perol-Schneider [mailto:pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 9:53 AM
To: Daniel Rosen
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.orgmailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: MetronomeMark aligned to accidentals
2014-04-05 14:44 GMT+02:00 Daniel Rosen
drose...@gmail.commailto:drose...@gmail.com:
Consider the following example:
\version 2.19.3
{
R1 |
\tempo Tempo
as' bes'
}
I would like the MetronomeMark to be aligned with the left edge of the leftmost
Accidental (almost with the BarLine, but not quite). I've been trying to
manipulate the Score.MetronomeMark.non-break-align-symbols property, but to no
avail (I'm not sure I quite understand how that property works; it's a little
unclear to me in the IR). Can anyone steer me in the right direction?
DR
I'm not sure I can help in detail...
For one shot :
\version 2.19.3
{
R1 |
\tweak X-offset #-2.5 \tempo Tempo
as' bes'
}
% or
{
R1 |
\once\override Score.MetronomeMark.self-alignment-X = #-0.3
\tempo Tempo
as' bes'
}
HTH,
Pierre
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Issue with downloaded manuals
From: Peter Toye [mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com] Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 11:42 AM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Issue with downloaded manuals I've downloaded the big file HTML version of some manuals, and the links in the table of contents frame to the left of the window refer to the LilyPond web site, rather than the local copy. The links in the main text refer to the local copy. This is a bit of a pain if the internet's being slow (or possibly it's the servers), as well as a bit confusing. Is this meant to happen? The manuals I've tried are the learning, motation and internals. Regards, Peter mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com www.ptoye.com Try downloading the doc tarball instead (stable: http://www.lilypond.org/download/binaries/documentation/lilypond-2.18.2-1.documentation.tar.bz2; unstable: http://www.lilypond.org/download/binaries/documentation/lilypond-2.19.3-1.documentation.tar.bz2). Extract, extract again, open ~/share/doc/lilypond/html/index.html and navigate just like you would on the website. It's a lot more data to download, and it'll take a few minutes to extract, but it's probably the simplest way to do what you're asking (I won't say it's the only way since I don't know that it is). ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: MetronomeMark aligned to accidentals
-Original Message- From: Brian Barker [mailto:b.m.bar...@btinternet.com] Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 1:47 PM To: Daniel Rosen Subject: RE: MetronomeMark aligned to accidentals At 14:25 05/04/2014 +, you wrote: ... I think that maybe LilyPond should do what I'm describing by default. The current default output looks very odd to me (although it could be just me). No, its not just you; here's Elaine Gould at page 183: When a tempo marking coincides with a time signature indication, align the tempo with the left edge of the time signature. When there is no new time signature, align the tempo marking with the first element of the notation (e.g. a note or accidental) after the clef and key signature. Note that when the tempo change is at the start of the bar, the marking is not placed on the barline. Brian Barker - privately Thanks, Brian. Since you agreed with me (off-list) that this is useful information for the list to have, I'm forwarding it to them. DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: The pleasantry of Lilyponding
-Original Message- From: Simon Albrecht [mailto:simon.albre...@mail.de] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 10:42 AM To: lilypond user list Subject: The pleasantry of Lilyponding Hello Lilypond aficionados, It’s like a mixture of a logical puzzle and a strategy game, with the pleasant side effect that it is not just for fun, but you get a result which can be ported to real life and has an actual use for other people! Besides some bit of artwork continues to live in there, only it’s not achieved through handicraft as in earlier centuries, but through logics, computing and (more or less industrial) printing. While working on your files, you may enjoy some of the music you’re typesetting, plus the beauty of Lilypond’s music engraving. So after all it is not as nerdy as may seem… All the best, Simon Right, because logical puzzle and strategy video games aren't nerdy at all. :-P DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Ties across voices
Consider the example below:
\version 2.19.3
\new Staff
\new Voice \relative c'' { \voiceOne c4~ c d, c }
\new Voice \relative c' { \voiceTwo c d8 q }
How can I tie the lower voice's c d to the upper voice's c d, c?
DR
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
How do I write this in chordmode?
\version 2.19.3
{ e' g' b' e'' }
DR
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: How do I write this in chordmode?
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Kobel [mailto:n...@a-kobel.de]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 11:32 AM
To: Daniel Rosen; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: How do I write this in chordmode?
On 03/18/2014 04:25 PM, Daniel Rosen wrote:
\version 2.19.3
{ e' g' b' e'' }
\chordmode { e:m8^7 }
HTH,
Alexander
Thanks, Alex. I'm not quite sure why e:m8 includes the 7th at all, though, or
why e:m.8 is invalid...
DR
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Lilypond Snippet Repository
From: Pierre Perol-Schneider [mailto:pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 9:26 AM To: Daniel Rosen Cc: brentboylan; lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Lilypond Snippet Repository 2014-03-13 14:06 GMT+01:00 Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.com: Not for me... I see a blank page. 'still working, be patient... Not a problem. From the conversation it seemed like it was supposed to have been fixed, it just didn't appear to be. I have no urgent need to use the LSR myself. :-P DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Lilypond Snippet Repository
-Original Message- From: brentboylan [mailto:brent.boy...@outlook.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 7:16 PM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Lilypond Snippet Repository Thanks, it's working fine now. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Lilypond-Snippet-Repository- tp160345p160383.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Not for me... I see a blank page. DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: dynamics did not print
From: MING TSANG [mailto:tsan...@rogers.com] Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 12:23 PM To: lilypond-user mailinglist Subject: Re: dynamics did not print sorry, I hit send before include files. Here they are: If you try to make your example more minimal, you may figure out the issue on your own. 9 times out of 10 when I start writing an email to the list I never send it because I uncover the issue while creating a tiny example. http://www.lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html On Saturday, March 8, 2014 12:19:17 PM, MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com wrote: Hi, lilyponders, I have two Dynamics - one for choir staff (coded above soprano) and one for piano staff (coded in between right-hand and left-hand. But when I compile the .ly file I only see piano Dynamics. I cannot find chord Dynamics. I also just display the two Dynamics, they both display in .pdf. What is missing in my .ly file? Here is the sample .ly file. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Producing Strumming Pattern Examples
From: Pierre Perol-Schneider [mailto:pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 1:53 PM To: Kevin Tough Cc: LilypondMailingListGenUser Subject: Re: Producing Strumming Pattern Examples 2014-03-07 19:30 GMT+01:00 Kevin Tough ke...@toughlife.org: I suspect with markup one could make the upbow or downbow bold or not to suggest how hard to strum. No you couldn't. If one could change the color perhaps to indicate the force of the strum would also work. Yes you could. Why not indicate this with dynamics? DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: dynamics did not print
Be sure to copy the list on replies. DR From: Yming [mailto:tsan...@rogers.com] Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 5:13 PM To: Daniel Rosen Subject: RE: dynamics did not print I don't think I can code 10 lines of code too demonstrate the problem that I encounter. Sorry for the inconvenience that may cause lilyponders. Sent from my NOOK Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.commailto:drose...@gmail.com wrote: From the page that I linked you to: “Very few tiny examples exceed 10 lines of code - quite often 4 lines are enough to demonstrate the problem!” DR From: MING TSANG [mailto:tsan...@rogers.com] Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 1:37 PM To: Daniel Rosen; lilypond-user mailinglist Subject: Re: dynamics did not print Hi Daniel, I do the same. I cut down as much and still cannot discover where is the missing element. My original score has 59 measures. Emmanuel, Ming On Saturday, March 8, 2014 1:24:05 PM, Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.commailto:drose...@gmail.com wrote: From: MING TSANG [mailto:tsan...@rogers.commailto:tsan...@rogers.com] Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 12:23 PM To: lilypond-user mailinglist Subject: Re: dynamics did not print sorry, I hit send before include files. Here they are: If you try to make your example more minimal, you may figure out the issue on your own. 9 times out of 10 when I start writing an email to the list I never send it because I uncover the issue while creating a tiny example. http://www.lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html On Saturday, March 8, 2014 12:19:17 PM, MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.commailto:tsan...@rogers.com wrote: Hi, lilyponders, I have two Dynamics - one for choir staff (coded above soprano) and one for piano staff (coded in between right-hand and left-hand. But when I compile the .ly file I only see piano Dynamics. I cannot find chord Dynamics. I also just display the two Dynamics, they both display in .pdf. What is missing in my .ly file? Here is the sample .ly file. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: dynamics did not print
I think you can. The piano part is not part of the issue, so you could start by removing everything to do with that. DR From: Daniel Rosen Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 5:14 PM To: 'Yming' Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: RE: dynamics did not print Be sure to copy the list on replies. DR From: Yming [mailto:tsan...@rogers.com] Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 5:13 PM To: Daniel Rosen Subject: RE: dynamics did not print I don't think I can code 10 lines of code too demonstrate the problem that I encounter. Sorry for the inconvenience that may cause lilyponders. Sent from my NOOK Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.commailto:drose...@gmail.com wrote: From the page that I linked you to: “Very few tiny examples exceed 10 lines of code - quite often 4 lines are enough to demonstrate the problem!” DR From: MING TSANG [mailto:tsan...@rogers.com] Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 1:37 PM To: Daniel Rosen; lilypond-user mailinglist Subject: Re: dynamics did not print Hi Daniel, I do the same. I cut down as much and still cannot discover where is the missing element. My original score has 59 measures. Emmanuel, Ming On Saturday, March 8, 2014 1:24:05 PM, Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.commailto:drose...@gmail.com wrote: From: MING TSANG [mailto:tsan...@rogers.commailto:tsan...@rogers.com] Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 12:23 PM To: lilypond-user mailinglist Subject: Re: dynamics did not print sorry, I hit send before include files. Here they are: If you try to make your example more minimal, you may figure out the issue on your own. 9 times out of 10 when I start writing an email to the list I never send it because I uncover the issue while creating a tiny example. http://www.lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html On Saturday, March 8, 2014 12:19:17 PM, MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.commailto:tsan...@rogers.com wrote: Hi, lilyponders, I have two Dynamics - one for choir staff (coded above soprano) and one for piano staff (coded in between right-hand and left-hand. But when I compile the .ly file I only see piano Dynamics. I cannot find chord Dynamics. I also just display the two Dynamics, they both display in .pdf. What is missing in my .ly file? Here is the sample .ly file. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: dynamics did not print
Did you compile the example without the piano part? When I did, the choir dynamics all showed up. DR From: MING TSANG [mailto:tsan...@rogers.com] Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 5:58 PM To: Daniel Rosen Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: dynamics did not print Daniel, Thank you for challenge me to reduce the code. I manage to further reduce it to 53 lines. What a joy to know I can do it. Thank you for your encouragement. Sorry about my previous email. I use nook to do reply all. Somehow it did not include the lists. Emmanuel, Ming On Saturday, March 8, 2014 5:19:03 PM, Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.commailto:drose...@gmail.com wrote: I think you can. The piano part is not part of the issue, so you could start by removing everything to do with that. DR From: Daniel Rosen Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 5:14 PM To: 'Yming' Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.orgmailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: RE: dynamics did not print Be sure to copy the list on replies. DR From: Yming [mailto:tsan...@rogers.com] Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 5:13 PM To: Daniel Rosen Subject: RE: dynamics did not print I don't think I can code 10 lines of code too demonstrate the problem that I encounter. Sorry for the inconvenience that may cause lilyponders. Sent from my NOOK Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.commailto:drose...@gmail.com wrote: From the page that I linked you to: “Very few tiny examples exceed 10 lines of code - quite often 4 lines are enough to demonstrate the problem!” DR From: MING TSANG [mailto:tsan...@rogers.com] Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 1:37 PM To: Daniel Rosen; lilypond-user mailinglist Subject: Re: dynamics did not print Hi Daniel, I do the same. I cut down as much and still cannot discover where is the missing element. My original score has 59 measures. Emmanuel, Ming On Saturday, March 8, 2014 1:24:05 PM, Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.commailto:drose...@gmail.com wrote: From: MING TSANG [mailto:tsan...@rogers.commailto:tsan...@rogers.com] Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 12:23 PM To: lilypond-user mailinglist Subject: Re: dynamics did not print sorry, I hit send before include files. Here they are: If you try to make your example more minimal, you may figure out the issue on your own. 9 times out of 10 when I start writing an email to the list I never send it because I uncover the issue while creating a tiny example. http://www.lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html On Saturday, March 8, 2014 12:19:17 PM, MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.commailto:tsan...@rogers.com wrote: Hi, lilyponders, I have two Dynamics - one for choir staff (coded above soprano) and one for piano staff (coded in between right-hand and left-hand. But when I compile the .ly file I only see piano Dynamics. I cannot find chord Dynamics. I also just display the two Dynamics, they both display in .pdf. What is missing in my .ly file? Here is the sample .ly file. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Errors running lilypond-book
-Original Message- From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 10:09 AM To: Daniel Rosen Cc: Phil Holmes; LilyPond User Group Subject: Re: Errors running lilypond-book Since I do not have an idea about the anatomy of a Windows installation, we will depend on a) you figuring out what other copy of book_latex.py you should rather have patched b) someone else figuring this out c) a release of 2.19.3 after which we'll get more definite feedback. -- David Kastrup I've just downloaded 2.19.3 and tried again, and while the error output no longer mentions TEXINPUTS, most of the text remains the same (I've attached my original bug report for convenient comparison, and once again redacted my username from the file path): c:\Users\...\Desktop\Downloadslilypond-book --output=out --pdf lilybook.lytex lilypond-book.py (GNU LilyPond) 2.19.3 Reading lilybook.lytex... Running `pdflatex' on file `c:\users\...\appdata\local\temp\tmpi8u3bh.tex' to detect default page settings. Dissecting... lilypond-book.py: error: file not found: screech-and-boink.ly Traceback (most recent call last): File C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py, line 776, in ? main () File C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py, line 759, in main chunks = do_file (files[0]) File C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py, line 611, in do_file chunks = find_toplevel_snippets (source, global_options.formatter) File C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py, line 362, in find_toplevel_snippets snip = klass (type, m, formatter, line_number, global_options) File C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\share\lilypond\current\python\book_snippets.py, line 815, in __init__ global_options.include_path, global_options.original_dir)).read () File C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\share\lilypond\current\python\book_base.py, line 27, in find_file exit (1) TypeError: 'str' object is not callable ---BeginMessage--- I'm trying to follow the tutorial at http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/usage/an-example-of-a-musicological-document; I run Windows 7 x86. When I run the command it tells me to (lilypond-book --output=out --pdf lilybook.lytex), here's what I get (I've redacted my username from the temp file path): lilypond-book.py (GNU LilyPond) 2.18.0 Reading lilybook.lytex... Running `pdflatex' on file `c:\users\...\appdata\local\temp\tmpfvqw3p.tex' to detect default page settings. 'TEXINPUTS' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. lilypond-book.py: warning: Unable to auto-detect default settings: lilypond-book.py: warning: cannot detect textwidth from LaTeX Dissecting... lilypond-book.py: error: file not found: screech-and-boink.ly Traceback (most recent call last): File C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py, line 776, in ? main () File C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py, line 759, in main chunks = do_file (files[0]) File C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py, line 611, in do_fil e chunks = find_toplevel_snippets (source, global_options.formatter) File C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py, line 362, in find_t oplevel_snippets snip = klass (type, m, formatter, line_number, global_options) File out/book_snippets.py, line 815, in __init__ File out/book_base.py, line 27, in find_file TypeError: 'str' object is not callable How do I get this to work? DR ---End Message--- ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Errors running lilypond-book
-Original Message-
From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 12:35 PM
To: Daniel Rosen
Cc: LilyPond User Group
Subject: Re: Errors running lilypond-book
At any rate, you are apparently trying to typeset a file screech-and-boink.ly
that is not in your search path. Apart from exit
seemingly going haywire on your system, the problem is the absence of
screech-and-boink.ly. What does your lilybook.lytex look like?
--
David Kastrup
Aha, I figured it out. I copied lilybook.lytex directly from
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/an-example-of-a-musicological-document,
but I overlooked these lines:
(If needed, replace @file{screech-and-boink.ly} by any @file{.ly} file
you put in the same directory as this file.)
I did so, and it works now.
DR
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Errors running lilypond-book
-Original Message- From: Phil Holmes [mailto:m...@philholmes.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 3:35 AM To: Daniel Rosen; LilyPond User Group Subject: Re: Errors running lilypond-book - Original Message - From: Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.com To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 11:49 PM Subject: RE: Errors running lilypond-book -Original Message- From: Phil Holmes [mailto:m...@philholmes.net] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 9:16 AM To: Daniel Rosen; David Kastrup Cc: bug-lilyp...@gnu.org; lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Errors running lilypond-book Go to https://codereview.appspot.com/64380044 and click on python/book_latex.py This will show you a difference between the old version of the file and the proposed version. Edit bin/book_latex.py , adding the lines with + on the left and removing those with - -- Phil Holmes Done. Now what? Running lilypond-book again still yields errors. lilypond-book.py (GNU LilyPond) 2.18.0 Reading lilybook.lytex... Running `pdflatex' on file `c:\users\...\appdata\local\temp\tmpsw8wzn.tex' to detect default page settings. 'TEXINPUTS' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. lilypond-book.py: warning: Unable to auto-detect default settings: lilypond-book.py: warning: cannot detect textwidth from LaTeX Dissecting... lilypond-book.py: error: file not found: screech-and-boink.ly Traceback (most recent call last): File C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py, line 776, in ? main () File C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py, line 759, in main chunks = do_file (files[0]) File C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py, line 611, in do_file chunks = find_toplevel_snippets (source, global_options.formatter) File C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py, line 362, in find_toplevel_snippets snip = klass (type, m, formatter, line_number, global_options) File out/book_snippets.py, line 815, in __init__ File out/book_base.py, line 27, in find_file TypeError: 'str' object is not callable DR == Please remember always to reply-all Whoops, my mistake. I'm no expert on how -book calculates line width. -- Phil Holmes Then I'm confused as to why you had me update bin/book_latex.py at all. The output above is exactly the same as what I originally reported: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-01/msg00452.html DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Errors running lilypond-book
-Original Message- From: Phil Holmes [mailto:m...@philholmes.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 9:50 AM To: Daniel Rosen; LilyPond User Group Subject: Re: Errors running lilypond-book Then I'm confused as to why you had me update bin/book_latex.py at all. The output above is exactly the same as what I originally reported: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-01/msg00452.html DR = Because other developers are. I was talking you through how it might be possible for you to provide a testing point for one of them. -- Phil Holmes So does that mean that I can tell David I've tested his patch and it doesn't work for me? DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Errors running lilypond-book
-Original Message- From: Phil Holmes [mailto:m...@philholmes.net] Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 10:28 AM To: David Kastrup Cc: Daniel Rosen; bug-lilyp...@gnu.org; lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Errors running lilypond-book - Original Message - From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net Cc: Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.com; bug-lilyp...@gnu.org; lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 3:20 PM Subject: Re: Errors running lilypond-book Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net writes: Original Message - From: Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.com To: bug-lilyp...@gnu.org Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 2:29 PM Subject: RE: Errors running lilypond-book -Original Message- From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org] Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2014 3:08 PM To: Daniel Rosen Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org; bug-lilyp...@gnu.org Subject: Re: Errors running lilypond-book Do you have the possibility to check whether the patch in URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3874 would fix the problem for you? Are you asking whether I have the ability to compile LilyPond from source? If you are, the answer is no, I unfortunately do not. You don't need to - it would be good enough to manually edit book_latex.py in your bin directory. I am skeptical whether this would cause Python to recompile book_latex.pyc. -- David Kastrup Pretty certain it does: this is how I've experimented with the scripts in the past. -- Phil Holmes What changes need to be made, exactly? DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Errors running lilypond-book
-Original Message- From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org] Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2014 3:08 PM To: Daniel Rosen Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org; bug-lilyp...@gnu.org Subject: Re: Errors running lilypond-book Do you have the possibility to check whether the patch in URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3874 would fix the problem for you? -- David Kastrup Are you asking whether I have the ability to compile LilyPond from source? If you are, the answer is no, I unfortunately do not. DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: devs ask for feedback about RehearsalMark spacing
-Original Message- From: Janek Warchoł [mailto:janek.lilyp...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 6:45 AM To: LilyPond Users Subject: devs ask for feedback about RehearsalMark spacing Hello, we'd like to learn your opinion about issue 3875 (http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3875): should there be extra space inserted between notes when there's a RehearsalMark inside a measure? (see attachments) We'd also be grateful if you tested the change on your scores, to make sure that there are no unwanted side-effects. To do so, use this override: \override Score.RehearsalMark #'non-musical = #'() Looking forward to your feedback, Janek I don't think I've ever seen a mid-measure rehearsal mark in a traditionally-engraved piece. Can anyone provide an example? DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Where is the former manual page ? (2.16.2)
From: James Worlton [mailto:jworl...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 10:08 AM To: Server Acim Cc: lilypond-user Subject: Re: Where is the former manual page ? (2.16.2) On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Server Acim ser...@acim.name.tr wrote: Hello, I am using LilyPond 2.16.2 in my Linux Mint 16 - Cinnamon Edition. And I am not able to find Manual web page for 2.16.2. Where can I rich them from? There doesn't seem to be a link to it on the Lilypond website, but it still exists here: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/index.html James Worlton Seems like there should be a link to it at http://www.lilypond.org/all.html. (Whoever looks at this may also want to check out the link on that page to the 2.14 documentation---right now it redirects me to the home page.) DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Errors running lilypond-book
-Original Message- From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 2:11 PM To: Daniel Rosen Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Errors running lilypond-book Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.com writes: I'm trying to follow the tutorial at http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/usage/an-example-of- a-musicological-document; I run Windows 7 x86. When I run the command it tells me to (lilypond-book --output=out --pdf lilybook.lytex), here's what I get (I've redacted my username from the temp file path): lilypond-book.py (GNU LilyPond) 2.18.0 Reading lilybook.lytex... Running `pdflatex' on file `c:\users\...\appdata\local\temp\tmpfvqw3p.tex' to detect default page settings. 'TEXINPUTS' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. lilypond-book.py: warning: Unable to auto-detect default settings: lilypond-book.py: warning: cannot detect textwidth from LaTeX Dissecting... lilypond-book.py: error: file not found: screech-and-boink.ly Traceback (most recent call last): File C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py, line 776, in ? main () File C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py, line 759, in main chunks = do_file (files[0]) File C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py, line 611, in do_fil e chunks = find_toplevel_snippets (source, global_options.formatter) File C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py, line 362, in find_t oplevel_snippets snip = klass (type, m, formatter, line_number, global_options) File out/book_snippets.py, line 815, in __init__ File out/book_base.py, line 27, in find_file TypeError: 'str' object is not callable How do I get this to work? That would seem to be commit aefc5a4057a0a61f1d7e4411cc1c5061d9aea6b7 Author: Julien Rioux jri...@physics.utoronto.ca Date: Wed Jan 23 18:21:22 2013 -0500 lilypond-book: Textwidth detection with included file (issue 3136). Fix the automatic textwidth detection performed by lilypond-book. This failed for lytex files that include an external file in the preamble, when such file was compiled in an --output directory different from the working directory, because then the included file was missing. We use TEXINPUTS to let the latex process know where to look for input files. later improved by commit 39bf694ef4dedbb350960f7c37955c8fe9ce27e3 Author: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org Date: Sat Jul 27 16:44:54 2013 +0200 Issue 3467: lilypond-book 2.17.21 and spaces in file path Versions 2.17.17 and 2.17.24, respectively. Instead one probably needs to manipulate the environment directly. No idea how sticky that is. Actually, it would appear that working with subprocess.Popen would be called for here. The respective coode seems to be: progress (_ (Running `%s' on file `%s' to detect default page settings.\n) % (global_options.latex_program, tmpfile)) cmd = 'TEXINPUTS=%s:$TEXINPUTS %s %s' \ % (global_options.input_dir, global_options.latex_program, tmpfile) debug (Executing: %s\n % cmd) run_env = os.environ.copy() run_env['LC_ALL'] = 'C' ### unknown why this is necessary universal_newlines = True if sys.platform == 'mingw32': universal_newlines = False ### use os.system to avoid weird sleep() problems on ### GUB's python 2.4.2 on mingw # make file to write to output_dir = tempfile.mkdtemp() output_filename = os.path.join(output_dir, 'output.txt') # call command cmd += %s % output_filename returncode = os.system(cmd) parameter_string = open(output_filename).read() if returncode != 0: warning (_ (Unable to auto-detect default settings:\n)) # clean up os.remove(output_filename) os.rmdir(output_dir) else: proc = subprocess.Popen (cmd, env=run_env, universal_newlines=universal_newlines, shell=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE) (parameter_string, error_string) = proc.communicate () if proc.returncode != 0: warning (_ (Unable to auto-detect default settings:\n%s) % error_string) And normally one should be able to do the TEXINPUTS manipulation just like done with LC_ALL. However, that would require looking at what goes wrong with mingw32 here. I have no idea what the current GUB version of Python is. -- David Kastrup I don't know what any of that means. :-P Is there a workaround? I do know how to define an environment variable, if that's what's necessary. DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Automatic octaves
-Original Message-
From: Eluze [mailto:elu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2014 2:31 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Automatic octaves
instead of this (broken) snippet you could use dak's most elegant and short
proposal:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/quot-Octave-quot-script-in-
Frescobaldi-td152801.html#none
Eluze
That works great when the variable is invoked outside of a \relative
expression, but not within it. Is there any way to modify the function so that
it can be used this way?
\version 2.18.0
myoctavate =
#(define-music-function (parser location music) (ly:music?)
#{ \context Bottom $music \transpose c c' $music #})
\relative { \myoctavate { a b c d } e f g a }
%% Instead of
\myoctavate \relative { a b c d e f g a }
DR
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Markedly different-looking ties
-Original Message- From: Richard Shann [mailto:rich...@rshann.plus.com] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 12:49 PM To: Urs Liska Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Markedly different-looking ties Have a look here: http://lilypondblog.org/2013/07/lilypond-tie-crusade/ Ah, I missed this - is it possible to get a blog - or its titles - like this emailed to oneself ? As with mutopia (where I never see it because I only shop at IMSLP for scores) I never remember to look in these places. Richard http://lilypondblog.org/follow-by-email/ :) DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Automatic octaves
-Original Message-
From: Kieren MacMillan [mailto:kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 10:42 AM
To: Daniel Rosen
Cc: Eluze; Lilypond-User Mailing List
Subject: Re: Automatic octaves
Hi Daniel,
Does this work?
\version 2.18.0
\version 2.18.0
myoctavate =
#(define-music-function (parser location music) (ly:music?)
#{ \context Bottom $music \transpose c c' \relative $music #})
\relative { \myoctavate { a b c d } e f g a } %% Instead of \myoctavate
\relative { a b c d e f g a }
Hope this helps!
Kieren.
It does appear to work! The other thing about the broken snippet, though, is
that it allowed the user to choose both the direction of octavation and the
number of octaves. Is there any way for this kind of functionality to be added
here? E.g.
\relative { \myoctavate #-1 { ... } }
to add notes an octave below.
DR
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Automatic octaves
-Original Message-
From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 11:31 AM
To: Daniel Rosen
Cc: Eluze; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Automatic octaves
You could use dak's most elegant make-relative macro...
myoctavate =
#(define-music-function (parser location music) (ly:music?)
(make-relative (music) music
#{ \context Bottom $music \transpose c c' $music #}))
\relative { \myoctavate { a b c d } e f g a }
--
David Kastrup
That gets me the attached output.
DR
attachment: document.preview.png___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Markedly different-looking ties
-Original Message- From: Richard Shann [mailto:rich...@rshann.plus.com] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 12:51 PM To: Daniel Rosen Subject: Re: Markedly different-looking ties On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 15:44 +, Daniel Rosen wrote: -Original Message- From: Richard Shann [mailto:rich...@rshann.plus.com] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 12:49 PM To: Urs Liska Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Markedly different-looking ties Have a look here: http://lilypondblog.org/2013/07/lilypond-tie-crusade/ Ah, I missed this - is it possible to get a blog - or its titles - like this emailed to oneself ? As with mutopia (where I never see it because I only shop at IMSLP for scores) I never remember to look in these places. Richard http://lilypondblog.org/follow-by-email/ :) DR Thank you - turns out this is just a fancy way of sending Urs an email! Still it is done now, and I will be better informed in future. Richard Sure thing. DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Automatic octaves
-Original Message-
From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 12:19 PM
To: Daniel Rosen
Cc: Eluze; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Automatic octaves
Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.com writes:
-Original Message-
From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 11:31 AM
To: Daniel Rosen
Cc: Eluze; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Automatic octaves
You could use dak's most elegant make-relative macro...
myoctavate =
#(define-music-function (parser location music) (ly:music?)
(make-relative (music) music
#{ \context Bottom $music \transpose c c' $music #}))
\relative { \myoctavate { a b c d } e f g a }
That gets me the attached output.
Sick. But you'll get something similar with \relative { { { a b c d }
} e f g a
}
The \context Bottom helps to avoid the effect in the macro itself but does
not manage to extent its effect beyond itself. I don't have anything to offer
that would work better, so you just have to use explicit contexts, like
\relative \new Voice { \myoctavate { a b c d } e f g a }
--
David Kastrup
Kieren's solution worked fine:
\version 2.18.0
myoctavate =
#(define-music-function (parser location music) (ly:music?)
#{ \context Bottom $music \transpose c c' \relative $music #})
\relative { \myoctavate { a b c d } e f g a }
DR
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Errors running lilypond-book
I'm trying to follow the tutorial at http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/usage/an-example-of-a-musicological-document; I run Windows 7 x86. When I run the command it tells me to (lilypond-book --output=out --pdf lilybook.lytex), here's what I get (I've redacted my username from the temp file path): lilypond-book.py (GNU LilyPond) 2.18.0 Reading lilybook.lytex... Running `pdflatex' on file `c:\users\...\appdata\local\temp\tmpfvqw3p.tex' to detect default page settings. 'TEXINPUTS' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. lilypond-book.py: warning: Unable to auto-detect default settings: lilypond-book.py: warning: cannot detect textwidth from LaTeX Dissecting... lilypond-book.py: error: file not found: screech-and-boink.ly Traceback (most recent call last): File C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py, line 776, in ? main () File C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py, line 759, in main chunks = do_file (files[0]) File C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py, line 611, in do_fil e chunks = find_toplevel_snippets (source, global_options.formatter) File C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py, line 362, in find_t oplevel_snippets snip = klass (type, m, formatter, line_number, global_options) File out/book_snippets.py, line 815, in __init__ File out/book_base.py, line 27, in find_file TypeError: 'str' object is not callable How do I get this to work? DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: umlaut
From: Gagi Petrovic [mailto:m...@gagipetrovic.nl] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 9:36 AM To: LilyPond Users Subject: umlaut Hi group, is this umlaut supposed to be like this?? What exactly do you think should be different about it? (It looks normal to me.) DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Musical theater headers
I'm engraving pit parts for a new musical, and one of the arrangers has given me this note: To follow convention, the song number should be in large type in a box in the top-right corner of the first page of the song. Players expect this and it will help them to locate the song quickly. He references the attached example as a model. To those of you who use LilyPond for musical theater, do you do this with your parts? If so, how? If not, what would be the best way to achieve it? DR attachment: example.png___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: umlaut
From: gagig...@gmail.com [mailto:gagig...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Gagi Petrovic Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 11:35 AM To: Daniel Rosen Cc: LilyPond Users Subject: RE: umlaut Thanks for the replies guys. But like i said: it's jEdit that messes it up in its pdf viewer (not visible in the attachment, my bad). So there is no real problem. Cheers, Gagi I didn't see your second email until after I'd sent mine. Glad you figured out the issue! DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Musical theater headers
-Original Message-
From: Kieren MacMillan [mailto:kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 11:26 AM
To: Daniel Rosen
Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List
Subject: Re: Musical theater headers
Hi Daniel,
I'm engraving pit parts for a new musical
Welcome to the club! =)
Thanks! :)
and one of the arrangers has given me this note: To follow convention,
the song number should be in large type in a box in the top-right corner of
the first page of the song. Players expect this and it will help them to
locate
the song quickly. He references the attached example as a model.
1. Yuck. ;)
2. Yes, this header block is found in various scores/parts... but really,
there is
no standard, as one sees when one MDs as many shows as I do.
To those of you who use LilyPond for musical theater, do you do this with
your parts?
No. My headers are inspired by the [more elegant, IMO] model of Boosey
Hawkes West Side Story (1959 etc., not the less-attractive 2000 edition).
If not, what would be the best way to achieve it?]
It would be easy to duplicate this with a set of custom titles and header
variables.
I've been trying to do that for the past half-hour or so, and it's not working
the way I want it to. My header block is:
\version 2.18.0
\header {
piece = Piece
number = #
instrument = Instrument
date = 01/01/0101
composer = Composer
}
Right now I'm just trying to focus on getting everything in the right place
before I start changing font sizes and stuff. I'm envisioning three columns,
with the left column left-aligned, the center column centered, and the right
column right-aligned.
instrument | null | date
number | piece | null
null | null | composer
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Musical theater headers
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Rosen
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 12:43 PM
To: 'Kieren MacMillan'
Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List
Subject: RE: Musical theater headers
I've been trying to do that for the past half-hour or so, and it's not working
the way I want it to. My header block is:
\version 2.18.0
\header {
piece = Piece
number = #
instrument = Instrument
date = 01/01/0101
composer = Composer
}
Right now I'm just trying to focus on getting everything in the right place
before I start changing font sizes and stuff. I'm envisioning three columns,
with the left column left-aligned, the center column centered, and the right
column right-aligned.
instrument | null | date
number | piece | null
null | null | composer
Whoops, I goofed on the second line--the arranger wanted the number on the
right side, not the left.
instrument | null | date
null | piece | number
null | null | composer
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Musical theater headers
-Original Message-
From: Paul Scott [mailto:waterho...@ultrasw.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 1:09 PM
To: Daniel Rosen
Cc: Kieren MacMillan; Lilypond-User Mailing List
Subject: Re: Musical theater headers
I use \markup\fill-line{ left center right }
for what I think you want. I have made substitute parts for parts with that
same format.
HTH
Paul Scott
Yes, but they're not showing up the way I want them to:
Whoops, I goofed on the second line--the arranger wanted the number on the
right side, not the left.
instrument | null | date
null | piece | number
null | null | composer
Here's something along the lines of what I've been trying:
\version 2.18.0
\header {
piece = Piece
number = #
instrument = Instrument
date = 01/01/0101
composer = Composer
}
\paper {
#(set-paper-size letter)
scoreTitleMarkup = \markup {
\fill-line {
\line {
\fromproperty #'header:instrument
\null
\fromproperty #'header:date
}
\line {
\null
\fromproperty #'header:piece
\fromproperty #'header:number
}
\line {
\null
\null
\fromproperty #'header:composer
}
}
}
}
{ c' }
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Musical theater headers
-Original Message-
From: Kieren MacMillan [mailto:kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 1:22 PM
To: Daniel Rosen
Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List
Subject: Re: Musical theater headers
Hi Daniel,
Maybe start here:
\version 2.18.0
\header {
piece = Piece
number = 1
instrument = Instrument
date = 01/01/0101
composer = Composer
}
\paper {
scoreTitleMarkup = \markup \override #'(baseline-skip . 5) \column {
\fill-line {
\bold \fromproperty #'header:instrument
\fromproperty #'header:date
}
\fill-line {
\abs-fontsize #24 \fromproperty #'header:piece
\override #'(box-padding . 2) \box \abs-fontsize #18 \fromproperty
#'header:number
}
\fill-line {
\fromproperty #'header:composer
}
}
bookTitleMarkup = ##f
}
\score { c'1 }
Hope this helps!
Kieren.
Looks great, thanks!
DR
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Automatic octaves
-Original Message- From: Daniel Rosen Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 11:35 AM To: 'Mark Stephen Mrotek'; 'Pierre Perol-Schneider' Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: RE: Automatic octaves -Original Message- From: Mark Stephen Mrotek [mailto:carsonm...@ca.rr.com] Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2014 12:39 PM To: Daniel Rosen; 'Pierre Perol-Schneider' Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: RE: Automatic octaves Gentlemen, If each pitch name is enclosed in , the octaves are formed. Mark That does work for me, but it sort of defeats the purpose of having the function in the first place, which is to reduce typing. :-P Is anyone able to use this information to fix it? A sorry, disregard the above, I sent it before seeing the other replies to the thread... ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Survey: Git (G)UIs
-Original Message- From: Urs Liska [mailto:u...@openlilylib.org] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 7:54 AM To: lilypond-user Subject: Survey: Git (G)UIs Hi all Git users, I'd like to make a survey on how you are working with Git. Do you use the command line exclusively, or a GUI (which one(s))? Or a GUI for certain tasks and the command line for others? I'd be particularly interested in reports of successful or failed attempts to learn Git by starting with a GUI tool. I have a strong opinion that one should use the command line until one has a good understanding of the concepts, but I'd be interested in any differing experiences. Urs I use SourceTree for almost everything; the exceptions are a couple of commands that I can't figure out how to do in the GUI (e.g. git stash apply). I learned/am learning Git by using SourceTree, and I haven't had much difficulty understanding the concepts. What has confused me somewhat so far is the workflows, and how branching can best be incorporated into them. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Automatic octaves
-Original Message- From: Mark Stephen Mrotek [mailto:carsonm...@ca.rr.com] Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2014 12:39 PM To: Daniel Rosen; 'Pierre Perol-Schneider' Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: RE: Automatic octaves Gentlemen, If each pitch name is enclosed in , the octaves are formed. Mark That does work for me, but it sort of defeats the purpose of having the function in the first place, which is to reduce typing. :-P Is anyone able to use this information to fix it? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Survey: Git (G)UIs
-Original Message- From: Carl Peterson [mailto:carlopeter...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 12:02 PM To: Daniel Rosen Cc: Urs Liska; lilypond-user Subject: Re: Survey: Git (G)UIs On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Daniel Rosen drose...@gmail.com wrote: I use SourceTree for almost everything; the exceptions are a couple of commands that I can't figure out how to do in the GUI (e.g. git stash apply). I learned/am learning Git by using SourceTree, and I haven't had much difficulty understanding the concepts. What has confused me somewhat so far is the workflows, and how branching can best be incorporated into them. SourceTree isn't available for Linux, last time I checked...I use it on Mac/Windows for my other repos, but alas, not for LP. Carl P. That's correct. I guess I should clarify that I don't use Git to develop LilyPond itself because I'm not a developer. :-P I use it to manage a couple of my larger LilyPond projects. DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: Automatic octaves
From: Pierre Perol-Schneider [mailto:pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2014 5:42 AM To: Daniel Rosen Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Automatic octaves A standart update works fine. Here you go : Pierre, This doesn't change anything for me. Is there something I need to change on my end? I actually should have been more precise before when I described the output I was getting from the original snippet: it works on the final chord in the example, but that's all. The same thing happens with your version. DR ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
