Re: attachments and digest mode
> Message: 9 > Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 11:26:17 -0700 > From: Flaming Hakama by Elaine> To: Lilypond-User Mailing List > Subject: Re: attachments and digest mode > Message-ID: >
Re: Lilypond error behaviour
> Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 01:48:17 -0500 (CDT) > From: msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca > To: Noeck> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Subject: Re: Lilypond error behaviour > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Noeck wrote: > > think that is what confuses most people here. The error was non-fatal > > but still after everything is done, an additional fatal error is raised > > to draw attention to previous non-fatal errors. > > Those are fatal errors. They kill the program. They're just not > instantly fatal. > > -- > Matthew Skala > msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca People before principles. > http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/ > Maybe they should be called "mortally-wounding" errors? :) Tim Reeves___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: When to Use Pound Signs
> > Message: 6 > > Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 21:55:42 -0700 > > From: Colin Campbell> > To: lilypond-user@gnu.org > > Subject: Re: When to Use Pound Signs > > Message-ID: <568c9e4e.6060...@shaw.ca> > > > > On 16-01-05 09:47 PM, Andrew Bernard wrote: > > > > I wonder if the spaces delimited by the lines are thorpes? I' also > > carpent for a living, though. > > The main problem with that theory is that there are nine such thorps. > The only things there seem to be eight of is the ends of the line segments comprising it. I also note that a sharp symbol does not have four perpendicular intersections like the hash/pound/octothorpe but rather, the horizontal lines are slanted. Tim___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: [OT} Was "Re: Rounded beams"
>"LilyPond's focus is creating good, readable scores. That's what typography is about. Not creating visual artworks. The boundary conditions for bulk manufacturing work (like engraving once was) are not that dissimilar: skilled and effective workers are not the same as artists. Typography is about rendering the content, not being it." There are obviously some different philosophies at play here, but the line between "good, readable scores" and "visual artworks" is at least a little fuzzy, isn't it? Tim Reeves___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OT: Beauty of programming languages
Well, as a hornist, I reckon my instrument of choice is a lot closer to a "vague pointing instrument" than to a keyboard instrument! Sometimes when I point it this way it goes the other way. In reality, it depends more on my lips etc. than on my fingers, of which I use four when playing normally. I am not average, I confess. :) Tim Reeves David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote on 09/14/2015 02:23:15 AM: > From: David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> > To: Alexander Kobel <n...@a-kobel.de> > Cc: Tim Reeves <tim.ree...@tokamerica.com>, lilypond-user@gnu.org > Date: 09/14/2015 02:26 AM > Subject: Re: OT: Beauty of programming languages > > Alexander Kobel <n...@a-kobel.de> writes: > > > On 2015-09-12 02:17, Tim Reeves wrote: > >> > Am 11.09.2015 um 20:17 schrieb David Bellows: > >> > > Urs, I'd still like to see a poll or at least all the answers > >> > > collected and analyzed etc. > >> > > >> > I didn't intend to drop that poll idea. > >> > But I find this thread very interesting and also touching, andit should > >> > not be just buried in the mailing list archive. We should let it fade > >> > out and then see if we can give it a decent place somewhere. > >> > > >> > Urs > >> > >> > >> So far, in the small, non-random sample we have, it looks like the > >> average user's age is somewhere around 60. I guess you can teach old > >> dogs new tricks! ;) > > > > Well, another interpretation is that to be able to spend the amount of > > time required for using LilyPond, you need to be either retired or (by > > profession) really desperately in need for its specific feature set... > > Actually, it's more like if you're trying to teach old tricks, you > better look for old dogs. > > Text-based entry is an old trick in computing terms. It appeals to > people considering a keyboard as the principal means of input and who > think of a mouse primarily as the main enemy of punch cards. > > Now I'd like to think that this should generally make sense to the > average musician, given that a lot more people play pianos, organs, > flutes and other instruments with digital 10-finger input than, say > theremins or other vague pointing instruments. > > But I have to admit that bowed strings have quite a bit of analog input, > and a trumpet does not sport more buttons than the average mouse these > days. > > -- > David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OT: Beauty of programming languages
> Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 22:22:45 +0200 > From: Urs Liska> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Subject: Re: OT: Beauty of programming languages > Message-ID: <55f33815.40...@openlilylib.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 > > > > Am 11.09.2015 um 20:17 schrieb David Bellows: > > Urs, I'd still like to see a poll or at least all the answers > > collected and analyzed etc. > > I didn't intend to drop that poll idea. > But I find this thread very interesting and also touching, and it should > not be just buried in the mailing list archive. We should let it fade > out and then see if we can give it a decent place somewhere. > > Urs > So far, in the small, non-random sample we have, it looks like the average user's age is somewhere around 60. I guess you can teach old dogs new tricks! ;)___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: OT: Beauty of programming languages
Age: 49 Amateur hornist. Typesetting of existing parts, occasionally creating simple exercises, fingering charts, etc. Not a regular user, but like to keep up on development. I use Frescobaldi every time for some time now, and I've been using LP for roughly eight years. Tim > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 19:26:24 +0200 > From: Simon Albrecht> To: Peter Bjuhr , lilypond-user@gnu.org > Subject: Re: OT: Beauty of programming languages > Message-ID: <55f1bd40.3020...@mail.de> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed > > Am 10.09.2015 um 15:00 schrieb Peter Bjuhr: > > > > > > On 2015-08-26 22:10, Urs Liska wrote: > >>> This thread makes me wonder: what's the average age of LilyPond users > >>> >and > >>> >developers? > >> Remind me in two weeks and I'll start a poll on Scores of Beauty ... > > > > I send in this reminder not because I'm especially interested in ages, > > but it would be interesting to know more about stuff like editor usage > > and if LilyPond is used for original compositions or for engraving > > existing compositions. > > Age: 22 > I?m a student of church music, but very uncertain as to where (in music) > I will end up :-) > I?ve been using LilyPond for roughly four years now, always through > Frescobaldi. > The larger part of my typesetting work is existing music, though if I do > arrangements and compositions myself I also typeset them with LilyPond. > > Best, > Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: sharping naturals
Message: 1 Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 12:07:19 +0200 From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org To: Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: sharping naturals Message-ID: 87wpxok0tk@fencepost.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk writes: On 25/07/15 08:04, David Kastrup wrote: If we wanted to support natural English note entry, it would become LilyPond's problem. As an irrelevant aside :-) Throwing another little spanner in the works - about what words mean ... I really hate it when people say English, and mean American ... (yes, we use the same names for pitch, but we do not use the same names for length ...) Because UK went metric and the US loves the royals so much they stuck with Imperial? At any rate, Americans tend to write C4 instead of c' so I am not sure why you are objecting against my characterization. -- David Kastrup --- I think he's referring to crotchets and quavers vs. quarter notes and eighth notes, but that doesn't enter into the Lilypond language directly, so it's of no consequence. Tim___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re:[OT] We need LilyPond office space...
Today's Topics: 1. Re:[OT] We need LilyPond office space... (Simon Albrecht) When I saw this subject line, I thought maybe someone wanted to make the cover sheets for their TPS reports using Lilypond! ;) If you don't get it, watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fy3rjQGc6lA Tim___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re:http://lilypond.org hs
3. http://lilypond.org hs ? (Daniel Cartron) 4. RE:Bar number after volta repeat (Klaus Blum) 5. Re:http://lilypond.org hs ? (Federico Bruni) 6. Re:http://lilypond.org hs ? (tisimst) Message: 6 Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 09:59:04 -0700 (MST) From: tisimst tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: http://lilypond.org hs ? Message-ID: CACzy+cahw75ASBAzWOjrsmgxf8h=qdc2p_vvqkvc8hjdjgz...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 I'm getting it down, too, using Chrome. - Abraham On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Federico Bruni [via Lilypond] ml-node+s1069038n172655...@n5.nabble.com wrote: 2015-03-05 17:22 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cartron [hidden email] http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=172655i=0: plus moyen d'acc?der ? la doc en ligne, Firefox ne peut trouver le serveur ? l'adresse lilypond.org. Je suis le seul ou vous aussi ? It's working fine here. When in doubt, check first this kind of websites: http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/ People who said it's working fine: refresh your browser, or follow your own advice and check http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/ It says it's not just me. Tim___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: How to handle changing transpositions
Urs, As a horn player, I can assure you that the conventional way of writing horn parts is to use the same transposition in bass clef as is used in treble clef: written a perfect fifth higher than it sounds. There is something called 'old notation', used pre-20th century, that had the bass clef parts written a fourth lower than they sound. Tim Reeves Message: 5 Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 13:52:06 +0200 From: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: How to handle changing transpositions Message-ID: 540ee9e6.8020...@openlilylib.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Am 09.09.2014 13:46, schrieb Simon Albrecht: Am 09.09.2014 um 11:46 schrieb Urs Liska: Hi list, I have a problem understanding how to efficiently deal with horn parts that change their transposition with the clef. That is: In the treble clef the part is notated as \transpose f, c while in the bass clef it is notated in concert pitch. This is extremely unusual, I should say. Normally the bass clef would be notated as \transpose f c, that is, as if it were octavating. And isn?t it rather confusing if the transposition changes with the clef? I assume that your master copy of the ?Trunkene Lied? uses this convention, but in your place I?d consider changing it, to be honest. Well, yes, that's the convention of the score. But I also recalled having learned it that way. Once. Decades ago. I'll look into documentation for current orchestration conventions. Thanks Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Happy 18th birthday, LilyPond
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 18:33:52 +0100 From: Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com To: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org Cc: LilyPond-Devel list lilypond-de...@gnu.org, LilyPond-User list lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Happy 18th birthday, LilyPond Message-ID: CACAEdyCdqPY=iceYWXf7vm95=dknj7bokueufha1tubeh5h...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2014-11-01 11:43 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org: So it's more like 19 since July for (work on?) version 1.0.1 though our git history seems rather messed up. Just out of interest: where did you get that 18-year number? You guessed it: I used the most na?ve method possible. I moved the scroll bar in gitk (without --all) at the bottom and there it was: commit 4f4ad24a3bfeb77cfd0ecca104319607bfd28a63 Author: Han-Wen Nienhuys han...@xs4all.nl Date: Wed Oct 9 14:04:46 1996 +0100 Initial. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com So Lilypond is old enough to vote in tomorrow's general election! (in the US) ;) Tim___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Bass and Treble Clef notes on the same clef
My first thought is...that's a really bad idea. But maybe there is some reason to do it that I had not considered... Tim From: lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Date: 10/16/2014 01:32 PM Subject:lilypond-user Digest, Vol 143, Issue 103 Sent by:lilypond-user-bounces+tim.reeves=tokamerica@gnu.org Send lilypond-user mailing list submissions to lilypond-user@gnu.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org You can reach the person managing the list at lilypond-user-ow...@gnu.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of lilypond-user digest... Today's Topics: 1. Bass and Treble Clef notes on the same clef (Knute Snortum) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:32:19 -0700 From: Knute Snortum ksnor...@gmail.com To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Bass and Treble Clef notes on the same clef Message-ID: CALmeJxT8q8Kc_Vknu-=a2kQAMtFX6xGzrzRMeNcr+ic=foa...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 I have a situation I don't know how to deal with in LilyPond. I have bass clef and treble clef notes on the same staff. I guess one way to do it is to create a markup and a small bass clef sign and put it next to the treble clef (and incorrect) gf which looks like a tied bf from the bass clef in the first measure. I could make a temporary ossia-type staff to hold the bf pedal tone. Any other thoughts? [image: Inline image 1] Knute Snortum (via Gmail) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: .ly to .svg - can't manage to get anything working
Message: 4 Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:33:13 +0200 From: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: .ly to .svg - can't manage to get anything working Message-ID: 53ccec69.50...@openlilylib.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Am 21.07.2014 12:27, schrieb tisimst: You can even make SVG output the default if that's something you were looking for. And you can hope for getting some level of graphical editing possibilities with the SVG output in the foreseeable (?) future :-) -- Urs Liska www.openlilylib.org What's wrong with Inkscape, and why try to make one application do everything? Tim Reeves___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: .ly to .svg - can't manage to get anything working
Ah, OK, that makes sense. When you said editing...the SVG output... I didn't get that idea. Inkscape is , IMO, one of the greatest FOSS projects , along with Lilypond, ever. Tim From: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org To: Tim Reeves tim.ree...@tokamerica.com, lilypond-user@gnu.org, Date: 07/21/2014 09:33 AM Subject:Re: .ly to .svg - can't manage to get anything working On 21. Juli 2014 18:30:09 MESZ, Tim Reeves tim.ree...@tokamerica.com wrote: Message: 4 Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 12:33:13 +0200 From: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: .ly to .svg - can't manage to get anything working Message-ID: 53ccec69.50...@openlilylib.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Am 21.07.2014 12:27, schrieb tisimst: You can even make SVG output the default if that's something you were looking for. And you can hope for getting some level of graphical editing possibilities with the SVG output in the foreseeable (?) future :-) -- Urs Liska www.openlilylib.org What's wrong with Inkscape, and why try to make one application do everything? Nothing's wrong with Inkscape. But what we're trying to achieve is graphically editing the _input code_. That is: you drag something to where you want it and Frescobaldi inserts the appropriare override into the input file. Urs Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: music
Message: 3 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:39:17 +0200 From: Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com To: keira mccook keira.mcc...@gmail.com Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: music Message-ID: d07e8d51-1752-46c2-9a0d-fd262680d...@telia.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 17 Jun 2014, at 18:12, keira mccook keira.mcc...@gmail.com wrote: I have dyslexia and i find it hard to read sheet music.I am starting uni in September to study music. I've been instructed to improve my reading but it seems impossible.is there any way you can help. You need to figure out what you need, perhaps from forums like [1], where some give a number of helping suggestions, and LilyPond might be able to do some; others say that music reading training will be enough. Yet others point out it heavily depends on the individual. 1. http://www.violinist.com/discussion/response.cfm?ID=9023 Keira, Based on the discussion I perused at the link Hans provided, Lilypond might be able to help the dyslexic musician through the use of color: Check out Coloring notes depending on their pitch as a starting point at http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/snippets/pitches Of course Lilypond is very flexible, and once you have the music entered (the hard part) you can adjust things like sizes and spacing, if that can help, too. Just my 2 cents. I am not an expert. Tim___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Bach Cello Suite for Bassoon...Typed in LilyPond!!!
Ryan, I'm not sure there's any way around that since each measure is so long and you can't break them across lines... Personally, I like the second one (ten staves, ten staves) better than the nine/eleven version but that might just be me... Tim Ryan McClure ryanmichaelmccl...@gmail.com wrote on 04/17/2014 07:33:03 PM: From: Ryan McClure ryanmichaelmccl...@gmail.com To: lilypond-user@gnu.org, Cc: Tim Reeves tim.ree...@tokamerica.com Date: 04/17/2014 07:33 PM Subject: Re: Bach Cello Suite for Bassoon...Typed in LilyPond!!! Hey Tim, Here is an updated version where I did 10 on each page. Look at the penultimate line on the last page...it seems like no matter how I do it, I always get some sort of crammed measures. Any ideas? -Ryan -Original Message- From: Tim Reeves tim.ree...@tokamerica.com To: lilypond-user@gnu.org, ryanmichaelmccl...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Bach Cello Suite for Bassoon...Typed in LilyPond!!! Date: Thursday, 17 April 2014, 19:20:37 Message: 4 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 22:00:27 -0400 From: Ryan McClure ryanmichaelmccl...@gmail.com To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Bach Cello Suite for Bassoon...Typed in LilyPond!!! Message-ID: 20140417220027.5926af75@RyansLinuxBox Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello all! I'm currently arranging the Bach Cello Suites for Bassoon. I'm arranging them to be more playable on the bassoon (breathing, articulations, etc.) with the help of my private teacher. Attached is the Praeludium of the first suite--How does it look? I want to make this the best edition that I can. Ryan McClure ryanmichaelmccl...@gmail.com Music Education Major, Shepherd University Luna Music Engraving -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Suite1.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 108858 bytes Did you try it with ten systems on both pages, instead of nine on the first page, eleven on the second page? Might look more even. Just a thought. I really like the cover page. I play the Bach Cello Suites frequently at home, transcribed for horn (by Wendell Hoss), so I can appreciate what you're doing. Tim[attachment Suite1.pdf deleted by Tim Reeves/OAI] ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Bach Cello Suite for Bassoon...Typed in LilyPond!!!
Message: 4 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 22:00:27 -0400 From: Ryan McClure ryanmichaelmccl...@gmail.com To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Bach Cello Suite for Bassoon...Typed in LilyPond!!! Message-ID: 20140417220027.5926af75@RyansLinuxBox Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello all! I'm currently arranging the Bach Cello Suites for Bassoon. I'm arranging them to be more playable on the bassoon (breathing, articulations, etc.) with the help of my private teacher. Attached is the Praeludium of the first suite--How does it look? I want to make this the best edition that I can. Ryan McClure ryanmichaelmccl...@gmail.com Music Education Major, Shepherd University Luna Music Engraving -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Suite1.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 108858 bytes Did you try it with ten systems on both pages, instead of nine on the first page, eleven on the second page? Might look more even. Just a thought. I really like the cover page. I play the Bach Cello Suites frequently at home, transcribed for horn (by Wendell Hoss), so I can appreciate what you're doing. Tim___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 133, Issue 102
Message: 2 Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:45:41 -0800 From: Jim Long lilyp...@umpquanet.com To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 133, Issue 102 Message-ID: 20131212224541.ga11...@ns.umpquanet.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 07:24:51AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes: I was brainstorming an orchestration teaching tool, where one could find the distribution of notes in an instrument across an entire score, to show students where [good] composers tend to have their instruments play. How hard would that be to implement as a function? Probably easiest done as an engraver as then you have the timing information (absolute and bar number) available. Perhaps I misunderstand Kieren and/or David, but I took Kieren's idea to be a sort of 'spectral' analysis, whereas David's reply seems to imply a 'temporal' analysis. At least, I understand Kieren to be wondering what is the distribution of pitches assigned to a given instrument throughout this score? or less technically, what portion of each instrument's range does this score utilize? This is somewhat like a weighted ambitus as shown perhaps by a bell curve which shows not only the highest and lowest pitches, but also includes the weighting of which pitches are used more frequently than others. David's comment makes me wonder, what group of instruments are likely to be playing [at all; and how loudly] during any given moment of the score, and how does the instrumentation (possibly including the relative density [note count, dynamics]) change through the timeline of the score? This makes my mind's eye envision a line graph with dynamics as a dependent variable of time, and differently colored (or dotted/dashed) lines showing the relative amplitude (dynamics) of each instrument or group of instruments (strings/brass/woodwinds/percussion, kazoo/washtub/spoons, whatever). Not that I'm putting this on anyone's to-do list! I just wanted to compliment both brainstormers for posing some interesting questions. Jim, Have you seen the 'musanim' music animations on YouTube? Here is an example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSCXB-zwiJg (Beethoven Pastoral Symphony, first mvmt.) The creator of the videos, and the software used to make the videos, makes the software (MAM) available (for Windows only?): http://www.musanim.com/all/ - it uses a MIDI file as input They are a moving graphical representation of the score with different colors representing different instruments, and some of them represent dynamics as well, and pitch represented by vertical position. If you could somehow print the entire thing out, it would accomplish the temporal analysis part. This is not intended to be a solution to your problem, but it is related and interesting. Tim Reeves___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Automatic generation of scores skeletons
Jacques, This sounds like a great idea to me. I'm surprised no one else has commented. Tim Reeves Message: 1 Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 18:15:15 +0200 From: Jacques Menu jacques.m...@epfl.ch To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Users lilypond-user@gnu.org Cc: Jacques Menu jacques.m...@epfl.ch Subject: Automatic generation of scores skeletons Message-ID: f1291479-40e4-46ed-a095-f91aa1f91...@epfl.ch Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello Folks, After struggling with irregular bars, I've been working on a Python3 tool that transforms a spec such as: { title : Thema allegro, composer : Ludwig van Beethoven (1808 -1854), tagline : J. Menu - September 2013, enteredby : Jacques Menu, instrumentName: Bassoon, clef : bass, key : g \\major, time : 2/4, initialUpBeat : 8*1, firstBarNumber: 129, lastBarNumber : 150, finalBarPosition : 150:4/8, barNumbersAtBeginningOflines : [135, 142, 146], tempoMarks: { 129:1/8:Thema allegro, 144: 1/8:Coda}, repeats : [{128:4/8-136:3/8, 1, []}, {136:4/8-144:3/8, 2, [144:1/8-144:3/8, 144:1/8-144:4/8]}], partName : bassoonPart } into a ready-to-compile Lilypond source file. The latter contains either actual notes (all the same pitch) to check the layout, or lines merely containing the %nnn comment at the end, ready to be filled with the actual notes by whichever means. The spec is in JSON format, which avoids writing a specific parser. 136:4/8-144:3/8 denotes a range starting at the 4th eight in measure 136 and ending at the 4rd eight in measure 144, inclusive. There are still issues regarding the description of alternatives, as you can see. barNumbersAtBeginningOflines can be used optionally to force line breaks, to help check the score comparing it with the original. There's also the possibility to specify doubleBarsPositions. The score described by the spec above is part of Beethoven's Trio X WoO37 for flute, bassoon and piano: The same skeleton could be used for the other instruments, of course. Also, entering the spec data could be done in a GUI window as an extension. Do you think there could be interest in such a tool for anyone else than its author? JM -- Jacques Menu Ch. de la Pierre 12 1023 Crissier mailto:jacques.m...@tvtmail.ch ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software
Message: 9 Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 01:35:47 -0700 (PDT) From: SoundsFromSound soundsfromso...@gmail.com To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software Message-ID: 1375950947119-148848.p...@n5.nabble.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I'm surprised that no one else in those comments responded to any of the LilyPond mentions. As a former SCORE user, personally I can't possibly imagine /ever /going back now that I've tried LilyPond. There truly is just no comparison. Period. With LilyPond, you're only limited by your imagination. That's funny. I always thought the one defining positive attribute of SCORE was that you *could do anything* imaginable (music notation-wise) with it. The drawback is that you *have to do everything* manually, one note at a time...requires a lot more thinking, deciding. Whereas Lilypond has the best of both worlds - very good results automatically, plus all the flexibility to do crazy stuff. Tim Reeves___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 124, Issue 124
Message: 8 Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 15:20:32 -0700 From: Sarah k Alawami marri...@gmail.com To: lilly pond discuss discuss lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: articulation simbols Message-ID: 70420b68-2597-433f-b1cc-47d884d5d...@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello to all. I was tryign to look up accents and staccato marks in lily pond. I found a lit of articulations but it just shows the image of music and the manual at least as far as I can tell does not explain what % and - and + mean etc etc etc. I thin I remember how to do it but is there text I can write? I tried accent and staccato, but that failed with a bang. i put comments on where these things should be for my own benefit so I can add them before the project is due, and just wrote the notes down for now. any thoughts on how I should go about doing this? Thanks and be blessed. + is not really an articulation, it is the symbol for a stopped note. OK, Lilypond calls it an articulation. I don't (I'm a horn player, but so is Han-Wen who I'm sure put it in originally, so go figure!) % is not an articulation, it is the symbol for a comment (in the lilypond code). - combines with other symbols to make articulations: . (staccato) (accent) - (tenuto) etc. It is quicker to type than \staccato etc. Example: d4- f- g- a g8-. e-. c-. g-. c4-- e-- d-^ f-^___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: articulation simbols
Message: 2 Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:00:40 -0700 From: Tim Reeves tim.ree...@tokamerica.com To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 124, Issue 124 Message-ID: of01d29e28.05b80cfb-on88257b32.00696897-88257b32.006de...@tokamerica.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message: 8 Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 15:20:32 -0700 From: Sarah k Alawami marri...@gmail.com To: lilly pond discuss discuss lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: articulation simbols Message-ID: 70420b68-2597-433f-b1cc-47d884d5d...@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello to all. I was tryign to look up accents and staccato marks in lily pond. I found a lit of articulations but it just shows the image of music and the manual at least as far as I can tell does not explain what % and - and + mean etc etc etc. I thin I remember how to do it but is there text I can write? I tried accent and staccato, but that failed with a bang. i put comments on where these things should be for my own benefit so I can add them before the project is due, and just wrote the notes down for now. any thoughts on how I should go about doing this? Thanks and be blessed. + is not really an articulation, it is the symbol for a stopped note. OK, Lilypond calls it an articulation. I don't (I'm a horn player, but so is Han-Wen who I'm sure put it in originally, so go figure!) % is not an articulation, it is the symbol for a comment (in the lilypond code). - combines with other symbols to make articulations: . (staccato) (accent) - (tenuto) etc. It is quicker to type than \staccato etc. Example: d4- f- g- a g8-. e-. c-. g-. c4-- e-- d-^ f-^ Sorry for messing up the thread subject. One of the drawbacks of getting the emails in digest format is you have to change the subject when you reply. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Failing UTRLs in user digest messages
What have I got wrong? I am using Outlook and IE9 with Vista Home Premium Well, there's a couple things right there ;-) Sorry, I could not resist. (WinXP Pro SP3 32-bit here...hope to upgrade soon) On a more serious note, I just copy and paste the URL into my browser (Chrome), and chop off the end, so it takes me to the archived messages, then just navigate to the one I want. Tim Reeves___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Notation of french horn
Message: 5 Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:07:42 +0200 From: Jonas Olson jol...@kth.se To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Notation of french horn Message-ID: 1335514062.13951.43.camel@appendix Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Even though I do understand the nature of the valveless horn, I do not see why one omits the key signature today. Just tradition doesn't really explain it. Could someone clarify this? Here's how I understand it so far: On the valveless horn you change crooks to give the instrument a transposition that matches the music. That way, the music is always notated in C major (assuming major mode), just like how music sounding in B? major, played on a B? clarinet, is written as C major. Rather than calling this no key signature, I'd say we have the key signature of C major. When we switch over to valves, we no longer match the transposition of the instrument to the key of the music, so it's only natural for other key signatures to appear. To continue the tradition of valveless horns, one would rather have to consider every valve press to be a change of crooks that alters the transposition of the instrument, and then write for this transposition until it's time for the next valve press. In summary, having no key signature (rather, the key signature of C major) appears natural to me when dealing with valveless horns (whose transposition match the key of the music) but not when it comes to horns with valves. I'm looking forward to getting this explained to me! Regards, Jonas Basically, I'd say the norm is to write out/typeset the horn part the way the composer originally wrote it, the exception being when the player is not [expected to be] skilled in transposition. Transposition on-the-fly is typically expected of today's horn players due to the history of the instrument and historical practice. I'll give some examples to try to illustrate the possibilities. Mozart horn concerto in D major (1791) - originally played on a natural horn with a D crook, so written with no key signature - the modern player playing on an F horn simply (!) transposes the part down a minor third as he plays it. Exception is to transpose the part for him, so write it out for horn in F. Then the key signature is two sharps (for the horn - one sharp for everyone else!) Tchaikovsky piano concerto in B flat minor (1875) - horn part originally written for valved horn, but *still* written with no key signature and accidentals instead of four flats key signature. (Nineteenth century composers were slow to change the practice of writing as if they were writing for natural horn, maybe with pressure from horn players who were unused to seeing a key signature in all their Beethoven symphonies etc.) Holst First Suite for Military Band (in E flat) (1909) - written for four horns in E flat - those were common in early twentieth century bands - horn parts have no sharps or flats in key signature - nowadays the player would get a part that said Horn in E flat and she would transpose down a whole step as she plays, or a part for horn in F (written out a whole step lower) would be provided and this would have two flats and not require thought by the player about transposing. Holst's Jupiter from The Planets (c. 1916) C major, but six horns in F still with no key signature (should be one sharp). As a comparison, the clarinet parts have two sharps, and the English horn part has one sharp. Gliere - Concerto for Horn in B flat major (1951) - horn in F, one flat in the key signature and this piece has lots of accidentals (mostly sharps and even double sharps!) Bach Suites for Unaccompanied Cello *transcribed* for horn in F - each piece has a key signature, either one more sharp or one fewer flats than the original, as needed. I'd say almost everything written after the early-mid twentieth century is going to have key signatures, but as much of what we play was written earlier, it is very common for horn players to have parts without key signatures in front of them. Hope this helps. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Notation of french horn
Jonas Olson jol...@kth.se wrote on 04/27/2012 02:06:07 PM: From: Jonas Olson jol...@kth.se To: Tim Reeves tim.ree...@tokamerica.com Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Date: 04/27/2012 02:06 PM Subject: Re: Notation of french horn Interesting to see the variations that occur. fre 2012-04-27 klockan 11:50 -0700 skrev Tim Reeves: Mozart horn concerto in D major (1791) - originally played on a natural horn with a D crook, so written with no key signature - the modern player playing on an F horn simply (!) transposes the part down a minor third as he plays it. Exception is to transpose the part for him, so write it out for horn in F. Then the key signature is two sharps (for the horn - one sharp for everyone else!) This is beside the main point, but just so I don't misunderstand something. Music in D major would have tree sharps for an instrument in F and two sharps for non-transposing instruments, wouldn't it? Jonas Yes. I changed that example and didn't correctly change the key signature description. Thanks for catching it. Tim___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: transpose with intervals?
Message: 5 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:26:00 +0100 From: Jonghyun Kim agitato...@gmail.com To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: transpose with intervals? Message-ID: CAC8jf9e_5KjcSTtXWqhvLjLBjmFQtpUTyiw7xVe2B6dAycRB=a...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Dear List, lilypond version: 2.14.2 How can I transpose with intervals? I WANT TO DO THIS: \transpose -5 {\music} note:-5 means five semitones, so it's perfect fifth. OR \transpose perfect-fifth {\music} Any suggestion? Thanks, Jong Actually, five semitones would be a perfect fourth, while seven semitones is a perfect fifth. (it's five steps away diatonically) Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Instrument line in header block - first piece only?
Message: 5 Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:05:18 +0100 From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Instrument line in header block - first piece only? Message-ID: 874nv0nj2p@fencepost.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain Brent Annable brentanna...@gmail.com writes: Actually, now that I think about it, the default 'instrument' line behaviour in the header seems a little odd to me. Does the instrument really need to be so demonstratively announced between movements or pieces if they are all part of the same document? It is common for wind instrument players to have to switch instruments between parts. -- David Kastrup It might be somewhat common for wind musicians to switch instruments during the course of a multi-movement work, or even during a movement, but it is not common to notate which instrument to play (apart from the top of the page) UNTIL one has to change. I'm a horn player, so I'm not switching physical instruments except by my own choice (and I don't), but we frequently have different transpositions (which correspond to switching horns or crooks back in the old days) within a work, and I can assure you that the normal practice is to *assume* horn in F, until told otherwise. Clarinet players switch actual instruments more than anyone I'd say, and I don't play clarinet, so I can't speak to that, but I have a feeling that they likewise assume B-flat until they are told something else. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor
Message: 7 Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 12:51:18 -0600 From: Stan Sanderson stans...@gmail.com To: trevordixon trevordi...@gmail.com Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Experimental Web-based Lilypond Editor Message-ID: 5baa1542-e5b8-497f-b717-b861edaa5...@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Feb 1, 2012, at 5:32 AM, Helge Kruse helge.kr...@googlemail.com wrote: 2012/2/1 trevordixon trevordi...@gmail.com: expected, and it will probably crash and be down at times. I've only tested it in Chrome 15 and Firefox 9. It should work in Internet Explorer 9 or 10, but will almost certainly not work in IE8 or earlier. Let me know how it works for you! It works for a simple file on my iPad2 (iOS 5.0.1) using Safari. Could be interesting! Stan Works fine for me on Chrome 16 but does not seem to work on Opera 11.61. Should be very useful I think. I agree with whomever said it would be good to be able to run the latest stable as well as the latest unstable, but I think running the latest unstable means a lot of maintenance for the webpage maintainer and might not be practical. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: caesura but not as a breath mark
Message: 3 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 02:41:34 +0100 From: Hans Aikema hans.aik...@aikebah.net To: Tim Reeves tim.ree...@tokamerica.com Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: caesura but not as a breath mark Message-ID: 4f10dd4e.6030...@aikebah.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed On 14-1-2012 0:54, Tim Reeves wrote: To be honest, I think it should be possible without using a breath mark, since a railroad tracks is not really a breath. Tim . Just made me wonder, given the 'centred on staff' nature: are you sure you want the caesura and not the simile mark? For a simile-mark as 'double railroad tracks' you would have a \repeat percent (Notation Reference: Short repeats) for a set of 16th notes Actually, what I'm trying to reproduce is this: The breath mark caesura-style, shifted down to center it, will work. I just thought there should/might be a better way. Thanks, Tim centeredcaesura.png Description: Binary data ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: caesura but not as a breath mark
Mike, Since a note or rest will add to the length of the measure which I don't want to do, could I do the same thing with another object? Maybe an object that does not have be undone later, like a clef would? Why do I have to be such a purist? Argh. Thanks, Tim m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com wrote on 01/16/2012 11:15:53 AM: From: m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com To: Tim Reeves tim.ree...@tokamerica.com Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Date: 01/16/2012 11:15 AM Subject: Re: caesura but not as a breath mark On Jan 16, 2012, at 8:10 PM, Tim Reeves wrote: Message: 3 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 02:41:34 +0100 From: Hans Aikema hans.aik...@aikebah.net To: Tim Reeves tim.ree...@tokamerica.com Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: caesura but not as a breath mark Message-ID: 4f10dd4e.6030...@aikebah.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed On 14-1-2012 0:54, Tim Reeves wrote: To be honest, I think it should be possible without using a breath mark, since a railroad tracks is not really a breath. Tim . Just made me wonder, given the 'centred on staff' nature: are you sure you want the caesura and not the simile mark? For a simile-mark as 'double railroad tracks' you would have a \repeat percent (Notation Reference: Short repeats) for a set of 16th notes Actually, what I'm trying to reproduce is this: The breath mark caesura-style, shifted down to center it, will work. I just thought there should/might be a better way. Thanks, Tim As a hack, you can use scripts.caesura.straight as the stencil for a note or rest at that staff position. Cheers, MS ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
caesura but not as a breath mark
Hi, How can I put in railroad tracks / caesura in the middle of the staff? The only example I can find in the documentation has it as a breath mark, so it's at the top of the staff. I want it vertically centered on the staff. Thanks, Tim ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: caesura but not as a breath mark
Hi, Message: 5 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:05:21 +0100 From: Hans Aikema hans.aik...@aikebah.net To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: caesura but not as a breath mark Message-ID: 4f10aaa1.2090...@aikebah.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed On 13-1-2012 21:39, Tim Reeves wrote: Hi, How can I put in railroad tracks / caesura in the middle of the staff? The only example I can find in the documentation has it as a breath mark, so it's at the top of the staff. I want it vertically centered on the staff. Tim, To align the caesura in the middle of the staff all you need to do in addition to the LSR-snippet you mentioned is to override the Y-offset of the breath mark: \relative c'' { \override BreathingSign #'text = \markup { \musicglyph #scripts.caesura.straight } \override BreathingSign #'Y-offset = #0 c8 e4. \breathe g8. e16 c4 } regards, Hans So, just like the answer to the almost identical question about breath marks asked by someone else just a few hours ago, then? :-) Thanks, Hans. To be honest, I think it should be possible without using a breath mark, since a railroad tracks is not really a breath. Tim ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: LilyPond and Python
BTW when LilyPond uninstalled, it left behind a lot of redundant entries in the Windoze registry. Not being a registry guru I have nothing constructive to add beyond commenting on this. :-( -- Hilary Also not a registry guru, but I use CCleaner ( http://www.piriform.com/ccleaner) to clean up my Win XP registry from time to time, particularly after uninstalling or upgrading a bunch of software. You might give it a try. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: divisi lyrics above and below staff
Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote on 11/01/2011 07:40:01 AM: From: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net To: lilypond-user@gnu.org, Tim Reeves tim.ree...@tokamerica.com Date: 11/01/2011 07:40 AM Subject: Re: divisi lyrics above and below staff - Original Message - From: Tim Reeves tim.ree...@tokamerica.com To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 10:53 PM Subject: divisi lyrics above and below staff Hello list, I want to make divisi lyrics as described in NR 2.1.2 and put one set of lyrics above the staff and the other set of lyrics below the staff. Is it possible? Thanks, Tim Reeves Does: \new Lyrics \with { alignAboveContext = StaffName } do what you want? -- Phil Holmes Thanks, Phil. Yes it does. sheepishly I had actually found the answer before you replied and didn't have a chance to say so yet. Tim ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: accidental in a header?
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:56:08 + From: Peekay Ex pkx1...@gmail.com To: Timothy Reeves timothyrree...@gmail.com Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: accidental in a header? Message-ID: ca+t3wfkphi38e4fymedmrggthckzujlo277h+q4m_jo+by0...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello, On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Timothy Reeves timothyrree...@gmail.com wrote: Hello list, Could someone point me to the documentation or snippet that would show me how to put a flat sign into a header (e.g. in the subtitle)? The documentation says I can just use a \markup in a header, but I get errors when I try it. I need an example. \header { instrument = \markup { \concat { Trumpet - Part 2. B \tiny \flat } } } -- -- James Thanks, James. It also works without the \concat. I don't know what I did wrong before, because I thought I was doing the same thing as what you suggested. (!) I notice that the flat (or sharp) sits low relative to the text. How would I shift it up a bit? Tim ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: accidental in a header?
Xavier, Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com wrote on 11/01/2011 10:45:11 AM: From: Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com To: Tim Reeves tim.ree...@tokamerica.com Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Date: 11/01/2011 10:45 AM Subject: Re: accidental in a header? On 1 November 2011 18:00, Tim Reeves tim.ree...@tokamerica.com wrote: Thanks, James. It also works without the \concat. I don't know what I did wrong before, because I thought I was doing the same thing as what you suggested. (!) I notice that the flat (or sharp) sits low relative to the text. How would I shift it up a bit? Use the \raise command: \raise #0.5 \tiny \flat All these markup commands are in Appendix of the notation manual: A.9 Text markup commands http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/notation/text-markup-commands.html Cheers, Xavier -- Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com Thanks. The list is so helpful. I eventually find most of the answers I'm looking for in the documentation but the list is a time and frustration-saver. I'm not a power user even though I've been using Lilypond for quite a while, mainly because I don't use it that often, and I usually do pretty conventional instrumental parts. One thing I notice about LP is that there is often several different ways to do a thing, but when you need to combine it with some other thing, you can only use one of the options for the first thing, but you don't know that until you try to do the second thing. Cheers, Tim ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
divisi lyrics above and below staff
Hello list, I want to make divisi lyrics as described in NR 2.1.2 and put one set of lyrics above the staff and the other set of lyrics below the staff. Is it possible? Thanks, Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: wind instrument transposition (was Good work, Keith!)
Message: 1 Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 09:57:58 -0700 From: Tim Roberts t...@probo.com To: lilypond-user@gnu.org lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: Good work, Keith! Message-ID: 4e8b3b16.6060...@probo.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Francisco Vila wrote: Hello all, I think this is remarkable: Keith OHara has put Dvo??k's 9th symphony in Mutopia. Kudos! http://www.mutopiaproject.org/cgibin/piece-info.cgi?id=1793 That is remarkable, indeed. There are some odd things in the key signatures. Horn I, II in E, Horn III IV in C, then E and Trumpet I II in E, then C are all notated in the key of C throughout. Mvt I starts in concert G, where an E instrument should be in the key of Eb. Mvt II is in concert Db, but the clarinet I part, for A clarinet, starts out in written Eb instead of written E, and stays there when it switches to Bb clarinet 10 bars later. Is that the way Dvo??k wrote it? Certainly, all the notes are here. -- Tim Roberts, t...@probo.com Providenza Boekelheide, Inc. Tim, Nothing odd about it at all. It would be odd if a horn part in C or E, etc. had any key signature at all. Horn in E, which is a quite common transposition for horn, means that one plays a horn crooked (having a crook - a removable section of tubing - that make the overall length of the instrument what it needs to be) in E. Nowadays, since we play valved horns, usually in F, and not natural horns with crooks, we would just play everything down a semitone from what is written, so when I play a written C (open horn, no valves) on a 'horn in E' part, I play a B natural, and since I'm playing it on a F horn, it is actually a fifth lower, so a concert E. Voila! I won't confuse you by telling you about double and triple horns! Clarinet and trumpet are similar situations, but they didn't use crooks, they just had longer or shorter instruments for different keys. Often orchestral trumpet players will play a C trumpet, rather than the standard B flat trumpet, and clarinet players sometimes play A clarinets and E flat clarinets, rather than the standard B flat clarinet. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re:High-level users?
3. Re:High-level users? (m...@apollinemike.com) Just got back home from transcribing chipmunk noises for my most recent choral work. I'll just say that being called nuts is the single greatest compliment I could possibly receive. . Cheers, MS Very funny. Love it. I'd really like to hear (and even see) a performance of some of your works. They've got to be challenging. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: voice instantiation syntax (was Re: Lilypond Lobbying)
How do you like syntax like this: e1 \ #0.25 \f #0.5 \ f2 \! #0.5 Well, it's starting to to look too much like perl, to my non-programmer eyes. That is to say, I don't particularly like it, at first glance. Although, maybe, if it makes sense, I could get used to it. Regards, Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Lilypond crashes when compiling snippet
Greetings, I tried to compile the Creating music with Scheme (music box) snippet ( http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=346 ) and when I do, Lilypond crashes with the following output: %lilypond %args C:\Documents and Settings\timr\Desktop\Bach Prelude in C major.ly Processing `C:/Documents and Settings/timr/Desktop/Bach Prelude in C major.ly' Parsing... Interpreting music... [8][16][24][32] Processing time: 4 seconds So it seems to get through compiling except it fails to generate the ps or pdf. Any idea why? I should add: I didn't know what version to tell Lilypond the snippet was, so I assumed the previous stable version, 2.12.3. Is that correct? (LP 2.15.1 on Windows XP SP3) Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: font survey: which clef do you prefer?
Message: 4 Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 22:53:51 +0200 From: Janek Warcho? lemniskata.bernoull...@gmail.com To: James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com Cc: lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: font survey: which clef do you prefer? Message-ID: cabmdzepuhvu1cfjehx+aunfxtud0aezv4s68pclbvbpvz5k...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 W dniu 6 lipca 2011 22:21 u?ytkownik James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com napisa?: Can we have some sharps and flats and perhaps some numeric signatures? There is no context for the clef otherwise (if you see what I mean). Attached. Janek I preferred the rightmost one. More compact. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: How to create and so on... snippets, examples, excerpts etc. with lilypond
Message: 1 Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 17:38:11 +0200 From: Nils n...@hammerfeste.com Subject: How to create and so on... snippets, examples, excerpts etc. with lilypond To: lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org Message-ID: 20110407173811.4ef09...@hammerfeste.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello list, I regulary create educational music sheets and need a way to indicate that the music is incomplete. In the handwriting world there are many ways to do this. I only need one :) What is the Lilypond way to do this? I created some examples in inkscape, attached. Nils Nils, Wouldn't http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=668 work? Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Favorite Lilypond-Score Printer?
Hello, Message: 5 Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:49:23 -0600 From: Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu Subject: Re: Favorite Lilypond-Score Printer? To: PMA peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu, lilypond-user@gnu.org lilypond-user@gnu.org Message-ID: c9b5ee03.1c0ff%c_soren...@byu.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 On 3/27/11 5:45 PM, PMA peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu wrote: Hi List. If you were shopping for a fine non-feature-crazy laser or inkjet printer to be used *only* for private publishing of your LilyPond scores (that trusty old dot-matrix will handle everything else), is there a make--model you would especially consider? One constraint -- it must output comfortably onto 11x17 inch card stock. As far as I'm concerned, it would be laser, not inkjet. For laser printers, it seems hard to go wrong with HP brand -- I've had a lot of different laser printers, and HP seems to be the best. The HP 5000 series seems to be well-regarded, although I've never used one. The HP 5000N is a low-cost entry point. The HP 5100DTN costs more, but will handle duplexing (automatically print on both sides of the paper). If you want double-sided printing, duplexing is marvelous (I just bought a duplexing printer, and I love it). HTH, Carl FWIW, The HP 4700DN laser printer I have used jams every time I try to print double-sided. So effectively it cannot print double-sided. Otherwise, it's alright. I do agree though that laser is better than inkjet. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: How do you tell tempo for indications in English (music question, not Lilypond question)
What you are asking, it seems is, 'what speed is 'cheerful''? Which doesn't makes much sense. I disagree... at least in part. I think that there is a range of speeds that most musicians would say Yes, that is cheerful. when they hear it. In other words it requires some musicality, some judgment, since it is less prescriptive than the Beethoven score where he writes half-note = 72. There are certainly tempos which are not cheerful (e.g. quarter-note = 52). If you get it wrong in the MIDI file, don't feel bad. I've heard, for example, performances of Tchaikovsky's Fifth by professional orchestras (I know, it's the conductors fault, not the orchestra's) where the second movement was painfully slow - just WRONG to my ears (...and it's much harder to play the horn solo well ;-) I'm sure there's more variability (of performance tempi) in Irish folk tunes than in Tchaikovsky symphonies, so it is to be expected. Besides, I don't think anyone will confuse a MIDI performance with a live performance, and place too high an expectation on authenticity. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ANN: J. S. Bach - 371 Chorals ... extracting tar.bz2 files
7-Zip (which will extract tar and tar.bz2 files) is available for Windows and should solve this problem. I use it with Windows XP. It's much better than WinZip. from www.7-zip.org : The main features of 7-Zip High compression ratio in 7z format with LZMA and LZMA2 compression Supported formats: Packing / unpacking: 7z, XZ, BZIP2, GZIP, TAR, ZIP and WIM Unpacking only: ARJ, CAB, CHM, CPIO, CramFS, DEB, DMG, FAT, HFS, ISO, LZH, LZMA, MBR, MSI, NSIS, NTFS, RAR, RPM, SquashFS, UDF, VHD, WIM, XAR and Z. For ZIP and GZIP formats, 7-Zip provides a compression ratio that is 2-10 % better than the ratio provided by PKZip and WinZip Strong AES-256 encryption in 7z and ZIP formats Self-extracting capability for 7z format Integration with Windows Shell Powerful File Manager Powerful command line version Plugin for FAR Manager Localizations for 79 languages Tim Reeves Message: 6 Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 10:05:47 +0100 From: Phil H?zaine philippe.heza...@free.fr Subject: Re: ANN: J. S. Bach - 371 Chorals ? 4 voix + Etudes d'anamorphoses: les diff?rentes versions d'un choral. To: lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org Message-ID: 4d491e6b.3030...@free.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Le 02/02/2011 08:41, Helge Kruse a écrit : Original-Nachricht Datum: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 22:13:55 +0100 Von: Jan Warchoł lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com An: Phil Hézaine philippe.heza...@free.fr CC: lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org Betreff: Re: ANN: J. S. Bach - 371 Chorals à 4 voix + Etudes d \'anamorphoses: les différentes versions d\'un choral. That's great! I didn't know it was possible. How can i extract it? I have arichve manager called 7-zip, that handles tar.bz2, but it doesn't want to do anything with this pdf... cheers, Janek When I open the file in Acrobat Reader 9 and click on the .tar.bz2 file, I get the message You have selected a file that cannotbe exported from Acrobat. What's wrong? Also, I am interested in including the source in the PDF. Where can I read how to do this. I hope should be possible, even if i just had some trouble with it. Regards, Helge Hi, I guess you have not the tools to uncompress the tar.bz2 archive. However Windows is totally out of my world here. With pdftk you can include the source in the pdf: pdftk your_input.pdf attach_files your_archive.tar.bz2 output out.pdf Have fun. Phil. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: ways of using Lilypond?
LilypondTool with jEdit (on Windows) Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Printing barnumber 1 (oh no, not again)
Message: 6 Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 07:49:22 +0100 From: Christ van Willegen cvwille...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Printing barnumber 1 (oh no, not again) To: Jan Warcho? lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com Cc: Valentin Villenave valen...@villenave.net, lilypond-user@gnu.org Message-ID: aanlkti=gxzgrf+1mslaqpphtkan-ls7eheu349yw3...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Jan WarchoÅ? lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/11/10 Valentin Villenave valen...@villenave.net Then I'm very ashamed to say I found it to be rather hilarious... :) It doesn't matter whether the joke is funny or not. Jan, you're right, it may have been too risque to put here. I mentioned it before telling, so that people would have the option to read it, or not, but perhaps more restraint would've been better in this case. Christ van Willegen As a horn player and lover of good humor, I never heard that version of the joke before. The one I've heard leaves more to the imagination and would have been more appropriate: something along the lines of trumpet players being good kissers too, but my boyfriend is a horn player and kisses very well, but I just LOVE the way he HOLDS me. There are so many good musician jokes - I just have to leave one more (it's so easy to remember): What's the difference between a musician and a large pizza?. A large pizza can feed a family of four! ba-dump-bump! Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Feature request
Message: 6 Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:48:22 +0100 From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca Subject: Re: Feature request To: Tim McNamara tim...@bitstream.net Cc: Robert Clausecker fuz...@gmail.com, lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org Message-ID: 20101027144822.ga14...@futoi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 09:06:27AM -0500, Tim McNamara wrote: On Oct 27, 2010, at 8:05 AM, Valentin Villenave wrote: On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Robert Clausecker fuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys! As we have a good support for SVG now, wouldn't it be nice to add a --svg switch to the program, so that you can write lilypond --svg fancystuff.ly I think we can safely assume that this kind of users *also* tend to know what a program's Documentation is, and where to look for it. What do you think? Hmm. This is prompting a rather harsh reaction from me which will predictably draw all kinds of flames. I am always bemused by the recurrent user-dismissive attitude that pervades Unix-based FOSS projects: Ironically, I'm the resident champinion of the shut up and read the docs, you stupid user camp for lilypond, but I thought the email was completely valid. - it was sent to bug-lilypond, which is where it should be. - it was a well-written, well-reasoned feature request. - it would unquestionably bring lilypond usage into a more consistent manner ( -f=xyz or --xyz ) Now, I recall this being discussed a few years ago, and there was some reason why it was difficult to implement -f=svg. So there's virtually no chance of it getting included before 2.14... but the feature request itself was, as far as I can tell, completely fine. The only reason why it shouldn't be in the tracker is if there's *already* a request for this precise thing. (I know it was discussed a few years ago, but I'm not certain if it got a tracker issue) We've got a bunch of arcane stuff in Lilypond, which is why we have four PDF files of documentation with a total of 1205 pages (for 12.2.3), Much more than four, BTW. I think we have 10. Cheers, - Graham Wow, Graham has gone all soft and cuddly! It must be the end of the world approaching. ;-) BTW, I know what SVG is (I love Inkscape!) and know what a CLI is, though I don't use one often, but it's just plain easier to remember, not to mention to type, lilypond --svg fancystuff.ly than the current command. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: orchestral template, please comment (horn transposition)
Message: 4 Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 06:25:50 -0400 From: David Santamauro david.santama...@gmail.com Subject: Re: orchestral template, please comment To: Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk Cc: Keith E OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net, lilypond-user@gnu.org Message-ID: 20101018062550.370d4...@debussy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:18:52 +0100 Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote: Shouldn't the music for the Horn in F be printed in D major? It is very common for key signatures to be omitted for Horn. As the notes themselves are correct transpositions, it looks ok. There is also a discrepancy between the transposition direction (down 5th or up 4th). Some scores actually place an ambitus-sort-of note at the beginning of the horn staff to indicate the transposition direction. One other comment that I think it would also be a good addition to the template is that between the differing instrument choirs (woodwinds, brass, voice, strings), there should be visual 'space' in addition to the grouping itself. David David, I am open to the possibility that I'm wrong in some cases, but in thirty-plus years of playing the horn, I've never seen any ambiguity in horn transposition like you describe. Horn in F is *always* sounding a fifth lower than notated. The only place I know of ambiguity is in parts with bass clef, where old notation means that the pitch as played is a fourth higher than what is notated, but this is limited to a certain period in history (i.e. classical period) and is generally discernible by context (e.g. if the note lower than it is possible to play for a good player, then it must be old notation). In such cases, I've never seen the ambitus-like notation that you describe, but I can see how it would be helpful for those unsure of the notation. Regards, Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Optimising output for screen
Message: 5 Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:31:09 +0100 From: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net Subject: Re: Optimising output for screen. To: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Message-ID: 9fadf3787e2141f5b5d436db4e695...@advent Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=original - Original Message - From: Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net Cc: Phil Burfitt phil.burf...@talktalk.net; Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk; lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 4:52 PM Subject: Re: Optimising output for screen. On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote: So I would conclude - if you need excellent screen display, you'll either need a carefully written PDF viewer, or a screen with a resolution of around 1000 dpi. If anybody is seriously interested in this issue, then why not look at the mailing list archives for one the discussions between developers (including Han-Wen, one of the founders of lilypond) about this PRECISE ISSUE ? This whole discussion, and any time you guys have spent making images, is simply re-hashing the previous two discussions on this topic... except without the opinions of the person who knows lilypond the best. - Graham PS if you want a hint, one of those discussions was in 2007. Thanks. Now read it. Also: http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/lilypond-de...@gnu.org/msg01792.html I was making the images for my own interest and thought it was illustrative of the way Reader works. -- Phil Holmes There was even earlier discussion in 2006, starting here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2006-06/msg00198.html Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: fermata not shown at playing parts (going OT)
Message: 9 Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 11:05:48 -0400 From: James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com Subject: RE: fermata not shown at playing parts To: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org, lilypond-user@gnu.org Message-ID: ee5ed9503d57144e895fa3d7533e9fd3ea2...@mail2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 play brass in an orchestra...you get all sorts on multi measure rests (and there are s many rests! not that I'm bitter)... particularly what we would call in lilypond world a text spanner (rit, dim etc) if that counts. But mainly markup text is always on multi measure rests in my scores. Playing 52 bars rest Largo is tough going I can tell you! Tuba part in New World Symphony? 17 notes, right? But if you're paid, that's a lot per note! Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
old vs new G clefs
I was trying to see what changes in 2.13.27 when I discovered that somewhere in 2.13 this happened: The LilyPond G clef has been rotated 1.5 degrees clockwise for improved balance. The old and new versions can be compared by looking at the documentation: old version, new version. But this doesn't let me see both at the same time. Is there an easy way to see them both on one page for comparison without installing an older version alongside the new. Also, the page doesn't tell me what X is (in 2.13.x) where the change occurs, only that it occurs in 2.13 somewhere between 2.13.0 and 2.13.27. Any way to find out exactly where the change occurred? Thanks, Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: new website 24-hour test
New page looks good in Chrome, OK in Opera as well. (missing upper left corner background image in Opera) Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Jazz chord analysis and accompaniment software
Hey, all you jazz-oriented Lilyponders - I got on the Impro-Visor (http://www.cs.hmc.edu/~keller/jazz/improvisor) mailing list (even though I don't play jazz I like listening to it and thought this was cool software) and I saw this other jazz-related software mentioned by someone. http://members.shaw.ca/akochoi/Jazz.html quote: T2G is a computer program that performs harmonic analysis on jazz chord charts. It also generates rhythm section accompaniments with a walking bass line, and piano and drums comping. I haven't played with it yet, but it looks good (there is a screenshot of a jazz chord chart on which his software has done Roman numeral style chord analysis.) Check it out. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Jazz chord analysis and accompaniment software
Hey, all you [Mac-using] jazz-oriented Lilyponders - Sorry for replying to my own post, but I just noticed the software I mentioned is available for Mac only. Guess I won't get to play with it. :-( Anyone who does, please let me know what you think. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: I just discovered the LilyPond Tool GUI Front end
Message: 3 Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 23:37:23 + (UTC) From: Charles Cave charles_c...@optusnet.com.au Subject: I just discovered the LilyPond Tool GUI Front end To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Message-ID: loom.20100520t013438-...@post.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I stumbled upon the Lilypond Tool project on Source Forge because it was mentioned in a post on this forum. http://sourceforge.net/projects/lily4jedit/reviews/ What a wonderful looking program! I can connect me MIDI keyboard and enter notes by playing on the keyboard. I am surprised this program hasnt been mentioned more frequently on this forum as it appears to be make Lilypond file creation so much easier. How many Lilypond Tool users are on this list? Thanks Charles At least one. Seriously, quite a few, I believe. It's been mentioned many times here, as its creator, Bertalan Fodor, contributes here regularly. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re:Glissandos
Message: 7 Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 16:39:49 +1000 From: Ossie Wilson Snr os...@exemail.com.au Subject: Re:Glissandos To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Message-ID: 000301caedb0$17578880$0202a...@grandpa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii My daughter is arranging a simple song to be sung by primary school children in an eisteddfod in the next few weeks and I am trying to typeset her arrangement in LP (2.12.2 on WINDOWS XP). There are non lyric passages where vocal sounds are used to indicate city noises, forest noises and ocean noises. These are to be defined by pictorial impressions of the way the sound fluctuates together with attached words like Vrmmm, bbring bbring etc on the song sheet submitted to the adjudicator before the performance and the song must presented with no deviation from that format. I have been using cross headed notes, arpeggios (with hidden notes), zigzag glissandos (also with hidden notes) etc to show these effects. However, I have struck a few problems. 1) I would like to be able to vary the width and lengthy of the zigzag on glissandos to better indicate the variation in pitch to be obtained. 2) Where noises vary from low pitch to high pitch and back down again, I have been using a series of connected glissandos (hidden notes) but there are gaps where the hidden notes are missing. I have attempted to close these gaps by adding to the length of the individual glissandos by changing the appropriate bound-details. This does lengthen the glissandos appropriately but also raises their angle from the horizontal so that the missing note space remains but at a higher pitch. I tried to avoid this by using the same function but using X instead of Y e.g. #'(bound-details right X). This did not work but showed no error in the log and did not show the glissando at all in any shape. I realize I am completely ignorant when it comes to modifying the behaviour of LP objects and rely on what I am able to read that someone else has devised. Does anyone in the LP community have any practical advice on either or both of these problems (not just read the manuals) or can they suggest other symbols that already exist where these changes would not be required. Thanks for your interest. Ossie Wilson Ossie, Would something like this work?: \version 2.13.16 #(set-global-staff-size 24) \header { title = Clusters snippet } \layout { ragged-right = ##t \context { \Voice \override ClusterSpanner #'minimum-Y-extent = #'(-0.5 . 0.5)} } fragment = \relative c' { \time 4/4 f fis2 e' f2 | d, es c' cis } \new Staff \makeClusters \fragment \new Staff \fragment - (I tried to make the clusters thinner with no success. Maybe someone else can say how to do that. Or can you output lilypond to svg and add or fill in the glissandos you want using Inkscape? Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: a \new Score question
I know that doing \new Score is generally not recommended, but in the process of helping someone I came across a couple of questions, and the only solution I could find required me to do \new Score. First, the goal here is have a score with four separate staves, but an ambitus that encompasses all of them; it's a canon. [...] Interesting example! Using a recent development version, it is possible to print the ambitus of the whole score on the first system, by sightly adapting the example given in Documentation/snippets/new/scheme-engraver-ambitus.ly For a score containing transposing instruments, does the ambitus reflect the concert pitches of all instruments, or the pitches as written? Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: old-relative, what does it mean
Message: 2 Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:43:45 -0700 From: Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu Subject: Re: old-relative, what does it men To: Stefan Thomas kontrapunktste...@googlemail.com, lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org Message-ID: c7a3e3a1.10298%c_soren...@byu.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 On 2/19/10 6:33 AM, Stefan Thomas kontrapunktste...@googlemail.com wrote: Dear lilypond-users, I get sometimes a strange error message, that I do not understand: /usr/share/lilypond/2.12.2/ly/init.ly:29:0: Fehler: syntax error, unexpected SCM_TOKEN #(if (and (ly:get-option 'old-relative) I have no idea what that could mean. Does someone have an idea? It means that somehow this is not a place where scheme is allowed in the input file, but you have a scheme expression (i.e. starting with #). I'm surprised to see this in ly/init.ly. Can you identify when you get this error message? Thanks, Carl I have seen the syntax error, unexpected SCM_TOKEN when the file was missing a }. Tim ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: dynamic and midi velocity
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:16:05 +0100 From: Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) lilypondt...@organum.hu Subject: Re: dynamic and midi velocity To: Peter Chubb lily.u...@chubb.wattle.id.au Cc: miquel parera computer.music.n...@gmail.com, lilypond-user@gnu.org Message-ID: 4b7d1365.1030...@organum.hu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Peter Chubb wrote: miquel == miquel parera computer.music.n...@gmail.com writes: miquel I want translate the dynamics of one note (\, \ff etc) to miquel midi velocity values (0-127) I'ts possible? Lilypond uses a separate volume channel, rather than velocity, to control MIDI dynamics. There's a perl script `ConvertToVeolcity.perl' that can convert the midi output and add velocity info to each note. That's a bug then. Musically \p means velocity change and not volume. Bert, I'm curious what you mean by this comment. \p does not mean low volume but low velocity? Do you mean you use (when you play an instrument) a low velocity (air velocity, velocity of striking a key or drum, velocity of bowing, etc.) in order to create a low volume (sound level) and so it's the velocity that you have to control? AFAIK, MIDI velocity corresponds to the velocity of striking a key on a keyboard instrument (since that is what MIDI is usually controlled by, and modeled after) which is why things like pitch bends and other non-keyboard instrument specific effects are hard or impossible to represent in MIDI. When I play the horn, I don't consciously think low velocity when I see a 'p' in my part. I think 'play soft'. My body reacts by reducing the velocity (and volume) of air going into the horn, but I wouldn't say it's a bug that I think 'p'=low volume or soft. Bottom line, in *MIDI*, \p means velocity change and not volume. But *musically*, \p means low volume. MIDI is not music, but that's another discussion. ;-) (There's a book out now, 'You Are Not a Gadget', that talks briefly about the limitations of MIDI and how we're kind of stuck with them since we enshrined MIDI as a standard.) Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Circular Staff in Inkscape [was Re: Lilypond vs Score]
M Watts zwy648...@gmail.com wrote on 02/04/2010 05:18:40 AM: I have to admit - I tried it and it's not easy to get a staff to conform to a circle, for example. Maybe someone else can. My Inkscape skills are weak, though I love the software. Not sure how to wrap the entire staff in a circle, but you can easily draw a circular staff in Inkscape:- Draw a circle (F5) with Ctrl held down, 115 px in size; Get outline only by Ctrl+Shift+F, click the X under Fill, and flat color (2nd left) under Stroke paint (or click the X near bottom left of window, and Shift-click a coler for line color); Clone it 4 times (Alt + D); Hit F1 and make sure the circle and all clones are selected by drawing a selection box around the circle (the status bar will tell you if they're all selected; you anly see the top one); Open the Transform dialog (Shift+Ctrl+M), go Scale, width height both 110%, and make sure 'Scale proportionally' and 'Apply to each object separately' are both checked. Click Apply :) Btw, Inkscape has layers -- use them if you don't want to be constantly dragging the wrong notes and whatnot around. Thanks, but this I could do, if I wanted to. What I'd rather do is typeset the piece entirely in Lilypond, *then* warp and twist it, clone it, shade it, blur it, etc. with Inkscape. I know it can be done, I just lack the Inkscape-fu to do some of those things, specifically the first one. Bertalan's trick is also very cool, but requires a lot of tweaking to get the stems at the correct angles, etc., and isn't very flexible. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond vs Score
Message: 1 Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:33:07 -0800 (PST) From: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Lilypond vs Score To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Message-ID: 225545.87662...@web65612.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message: 9 Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:15:37 +0100 From: Valentin Villenave v.villen...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Lilypond vs Score To: Brett McCoy idragos...@gmail.com Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Message-ID: eefe316d1002020215q31a6d677pf2e1959189448...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Brett McCoy idragos...@gmail.com wrote: From http://www.scoremus.com/score.html Aarg. Please add a warning before posting such links :) What kind of warning? I don't understand. As far as I'm concerned: LilyPond is Free Software, Score is not. Period. Isn't life simple after all? :-) It's as simple as looking at the output examples on that website and saying, Oh, it'd be neat to have a way to do curvy staff lines in Lilypond, or whatever your particular impression is. -Jonathan If recent reports are true, that svg output from Lilypond is working well now, then this kind of thing should be no problem. Generate the svg from LP, then open it with Inkscape and sculpt away. I found this - http://freesvg.texterity.com:90/ - to convert a pdf to svg which can then be manipulated in Inkscape also. I have to admit - I tried it and it's not easy to get a staff to conform to a circle, for example. Maybe someone else can. My Inkscape skills are weak, though I love the software. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: developers developers developers
Graham wrote: For the record, **I have never recommended that somebody use lilypond**. When meeting a technically-oriented composer, especially one working on algorithmic music, I might suggest that they should check it out. But I think the original poster was entirely justified in switching back to Finale. That's why I cringe a bit whenever I hear people proudly announcing that they advertized lilypond to meeting X or conference Y. I'm surprised. What about the beautiful output and flexibility? If they don't like the learning curve, what's the loss? For me, I only use it for stuff that doesn't require much, if any, tweaking, but from the gist of what I read on the user list, maybe I'm in the minority. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re:Quit [now definitely O/T]
Jan wrote: Quitting with LilyPond seems to cost him nothing. Well, the obvious solution for that is to start charging for Lilypond, so they have a disincentive to quit. ;-) Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Problems with Lilypond Tool/JEdit
Mark Austin wrote: 2009/10/10 Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net: Mark Austin wrote: Having downloaded 2.13.4 for Windows, and not having used Lilypond for a few weks, I tried to complie a new tune. In attempting to convert to the new version, I got this error from Lilypond Tool: convert-ly.py --edit C:\Users\Mark Austin\Documents\Marks Files\Folklore\Mumming Plays\Music\Kempsford-01.ly c:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\python: can't open file 'c:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\convert-ly.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory Similarly, when trying gto compile a tune, I get: LilyPond ready. %lilypond %args C:\Users\Mark Austin\Documents\Marks Files\Folklore\Mumming Plays\Music\Kempsford-01.ly ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path: ERROR: Unable to find file ice-9/boot-9.scm in load path Processing time: 3 seconds All the files convert and compile OK under the command line, and files that used to compile return the same errors. Have these files moved or something? The 2.13.4 default install dir is now C:\Program Files\GNU_LilyPond and not C:\Program Files\LilyPond... That explains it. Is there a patch available? Yes. Go to plugin options in jedit for lilypondtool and change the lilypond path to the new location... Nick Or, easier still, though some purist might object, rename the folder back to C:\Program Files\LilyPond. That's what I did ;-) Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Failed file -- much wailing and gnashing of teeth!
Ralph, It runs fine if you remove the unknown commands \dwn and \up. You may have left out an \include or definitions of those commands. (There is a command \dwn in arabic.ly which I suspect is not what you intended.) Regards, Tim Reeves I'm trying to make a minimal example of a problem, and I can't get the minimal example to run. Can anyone tell what's wrong? + Begin Snippet + \version 2.12.2 % \include english.ly \header { instrument = Viola } VlaSndPosMusicII = { \transpose g c { \new Staff \relative c'' { %\set Staff.instrumentName = #1 \key c \major \clef alto \time 4/4 s4*1/10 \set fontSize = #-3 % to reduce Prepare size {g,4*9/10\dwn_0^\markup{ Prepare } a4\up_1 b_2 b_1 | \unset fontSize % return to default size \set Score.currentBarNumber = #1 \bar || } a4 d c e | \bar |. } } } %#(set-global-staff-size 17) % first etude \score { \VlaSndPosMusicII } +++ End Snippet ++ + begin Error message : rpal...@rlaptop:~/SheetMusic/ly/Classical/vla/etudes/positions_2$ lilypond test_1.ly GNU LilyPond 2.12.2 Processing `test_1.ly' Parsing... test_1.ly:1:0: error: syntax error, unexpected $undefined, expecting '=' ��\test_1.ly:0: warning: : no \version statement found, please add \version 2.12.2 for future compatibility error: failed files: test_1.ly ++ end Error message + I can't figure out what the expected '=' could be. -- Ralph Palmer Montague City, MA USA palmer.r.vio...@gmail.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond Speed
Frank wrote: Am Donnerstag, 3. September 2009 schrieb Tim Reeves: Mainly for my own curiosity, I compiled the Reubke Sonata score to check timing: WinXP SP3 32-bit, LP 2.13.3, LPT 2.12.869, on Intel C2D E9600 (2.8GHz), 2 GB RAM 5 min 38 seconds. A bit slower than the Linux times others got. W00t, I got only real5m47.699s user5m32.306s sys 0m11.697s on my linux system (C2D @ 2 GHz), but I'm still on 2.12.1, which gave me some error messages, though the PDF was created. Perhaps 2.13 is a little faster(?) - Frank, I forgot to mention that I also got quite a few warnings [not errors] on 2.13.3 - I think due to a missing font - but like you still got the output file. Did you also have 2GB of RAM? - I understand that the amount of physical memory available makes a big difference in compile times on a large LP file. Perhaps if I ran Linux on my machine it would really scream, but I have to have Windows XP for work. At least its not Vista! Tim ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond Speed
Mainly for my own curiosity, I compiled the Reubke Sonata score to check timing: WinXP SP3 32-bit, LP 2.13.3, LPT 2.12.869, on Intel C2D E9600 (2.8GHz), 2 GB RAM 5 min 38 seconds. A bit slower than the Linux times others got. I do have a Vista machine at home (wife's PC) I could check it on if someone is interested, but I'd have to update the LP to make it meaningful. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond Speed
Hello, I'm curious how long it takes for other people to run lilypond on the following simple score: \relative c' { c4 d e fis } I'm on winxp sp3, pentium 1.7Ghz with 512mb ram and it consistently takes 7 seconds to complete, whether I do it on the command line or in LilypondTool. -Jonathan Using LilypondTool, the first time I compiled it took 27 seconds (!), then I added the version statement (based on someone else's comment that it became shorter) and it took 0 seconds (that was the console output - I don't know how to get a more precise time - I would assume that means 0.5 sec) and then I removed the version statement and it took 0 seconds again. LP 2.13.3, LPT 2.12.869, WinXP SP3, Core2Duo 2.8GHz, 2GB RAM. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: website menus: gradient vs. solid
I'm not certain if the question was clear, so let's do this again and put it to a vote. These two images have the same top-level menu item selected. Which is easier to see?  http://lilypond.org/~graham/solid.png  http://lilypond.org/~graham/gradients.png   (ok, the background to the lily icon doesn't match the other   shades; this can be fixed easily) Please DO NOT complain that brown gradients doesn't fit the color scheme; changing the colors (either of the gradients or the rest of the page) is easy. For the record, I vote in favor of SOME kind of gradients.  (not necessarily brown) Voting will end in 48 hours. Cheers, - Graham I'm probably not helping much by saying so, but I prefer the solid - it just looks cleaner, and while the gradient version stands out more that might be just due to the darker color, and finally, I don't think it's *necessary* for it to stand out so much - it's right at the top, bold and underlined. It probably doesn't matter that much, though. Either way, it's a great improvement over the current page! ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Aphex Twin deathWaltz
I don't know what Aphex Twin is, or what it has to do with the image, but I'd guess it's the name of a rock band. Am I right? I think one of the flutists in the community orchestra I play in had that on her stand at a rehearsal once so I thought it might be some kind of inside flute joke...but on closer inspection...who knows what it is! It reminds me of stuff in Herr Professor Schmutzig's Complete Method fur der Waldhorn or der Ventilhorn booklet that I got a photocopy of from my high school horn teacher. Funny stuff. Lots of inside jokes for horn players, like the Siegfried Long Call played upside down, a new embouchure position called einschmutzen etc. see http://www.rjmartz.com/horns/Schmutzig/ unfortunately a quick search didn't turn up the musical examples inside this little gem... Tim Reeves Message: 6 Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 05:30:14 +0200 From: James E. Bailey derhindem...@googlemail.com Subject: Re: Aphex Twin deathWaltz To: Michel Villeneuve michel.villene...@gmail.com Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Message-ID: 2705e087-d7d0-4210-ac24-574e8c49a...@googlemail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 01.08.2009, at 22:24, Michel Villeneuve wrote: Ok, lilypond Gurus have a look at this : http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v60/Langer/misc/aphex-twin- deathwaltz-2.jpg Beautiful and with lots of humour inside. I'm looking for the .ly file ;-) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user Wow, this is kind of the last place I'd expect an Aphex Twin reference. Oh, and I remember first seeing this in my 10th grade orchestra class. James E. Bailey ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: new website: draft 3
On Jun 29, 2009, at 12:48 AM, chip wrote: Tim McNamara wrote: On Jun 28, 2009, at 2:55 AM, chip wrote: I think there is obviously far too much white space, also the same on the Downloads page. I disagree and find that most web pages have too much stuff crammed into them, usually so much that it's hard to find the information one is looking for. I like the simplicity of the page and I don't even think the separator lines are necessary. If you want to see the mother of layout nightmares, look at the GoDaddy.com pages. Jeebus, those suck. I agree with you, but, there is a happy medium. I think the Manuals page is it. Well, there's naturally going to be more information on the documentation pages than on the home page, the downloads pages, etc. The home page and the download page are going to have more white space as a result. How is this a problem? I thing it's also important to minimize the use of Javascript (unless you're doing Ajax), drop-down menus, etc. Most of that stuff can be done with HTML which loads faster and works with more browsers more predictably. Avoid cute for the sake of cute. Usability is the thing of key importance and not how nifty people will think the code is. Again, I agree. There are ways to get drop-down menus without javascript, which I think should be, and can be, avoided for the entire site. Usability is the number 1 priority indeed, but appearance has to be up there as well. A simple site that looks attractive and contains a well balanced design can still be a very usable site. Lilypond is a very impressive program, and an overly simplistic web site would do it no justice whatsoever. IMHO. I prefer elegant to overly simplistic. ;-) And personally I think that dropdown (and whatever one calls the same thing popping out horizontally) menus on web pages should be avoided, period. I hate the damn things. YMMV, etc. I happen to agree with Tim ;-) on this one: I'm viewing at 1900x1200 and I think the amount of white space is good in the present layout. I also generally don't like dropdown menus and rollover features. I don't like having to guess where things are or go on Easter egg hunts. Finally, I think FAQs belong in the Introduction section not Infrequent Use even though it's true that they are not something that a person refers to more than a few times. OTOH, is the AU really a regular use item? Seems more like Infrequent Use to me. I know I've looked at it about 2 or 3 times. Just my 2 cents. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Second release candidate of OOoLilyPond 0.4.0
Message: 4 Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:10:27 +0200 From: Gilles THIBAULT gilles.thiba...@free.fr Subject: Re: Second release candidate of OOoLilyPond 0.4.0 To: Samuel Hartmann samuel.hartmann...@gmail.com, lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org Message-ID: 3ab0e65510764b14ab189fdbaae93...@pc64 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=original The second release candidate is available under: http://www.hartmann-weine.ch/OOoLilyPond-0.4.0rc2.oxt Works now perfect for me. (The executable path is saved after closing). Thanks. Gilles Works for me now, too, on WinXP with OOo 3.1. Thanks for the update, Samuel!___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: good free midi player?
Does anybody know any good free midi player for windows? I mean so that intrument sounds are like the real instruments, not an awful output. Frédéric I recommend Timidity, which is available for Windows as well as Linux. You can choose the sound font which supplies the different instrument sounds and some of them sound quite good. I think the Merlin sound font is one you should try. Sorry, I don't have a link. Try googling for it. That was how I found it IIRC.___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: JEdit question
I've recently started using LilyPond. I'm enjoying it. I'm using JEdit with the LP plugins. I haven't been able to find an answer to this question in either the LP Help files or the JEdit help. I'm probably not searching the index for the right terms. In the Editor, when I enter the backslash \ the editor autofills: \melody It shouldn't do that after typing just the backslash. It should bring up a dropdown list of many available commands, from \accent to \withmusicProperty. Then when you type the next letter, say 'b', it narrows down the list to all commands starting with 'b', and so on. Do you have the lilypond.xml file from Bertalan Fodor (LPTool author) in your jEdit modes folder? You could disable the autocompletion by going to the plugin options in jEdit, and opening the general options for the Sidekick plugin, then unselecting the checkboxes within the Code Completion Options. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: JEdit question
Glad it helped. From Francisco's answer, it looks like you could see better behavior if you updated your jEdit. I'm using 4.3pre16. (Or maybe he meant updating your LilypondTool. I'm not sure which.) Tim Reeves rathcof...@comcast.net 05/14/2009 04:57 PM To Tim Reeves tim.ree...@tokamerica.com cc Subject Re: JEdit question Tim - see below. - Original Message - From: Tim Reeves tim.ree...@tokamerica.com To: lilypond-user@gnu.org Cc: rathcof...@comcast.net Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 2:43:43 PM (GMT-0500) Auto-Detected Subject: Re: JEdit question I've recently started using LilyPond. I'm enjoying it. I'm using JEdit with the LP plugins. I haven't been able to find an answer to this question in either the LP Help files or the JEdit help. I'm probably not searching the index for the right terms. In the Editor, when I enter the backslash \ the editor autofills: \melody It shouldn't do that after typing just the backslash. It should bring up a dropdown list of many available commands, from \accent to \withmusicProperty. Then when you type the next letter, say 'b', it narrows down the list to all commands starting with 'b', and so on. Do you have the lilypond.xml file from Bertalan Fodor (LPTool author) in your jEdit modes folder? Yes, it's in there. You could disable the autocompletion by going to the plugin options in jEdit, and opening the general options for the Sidekick plugin, then unselecting the checkboxes within the Code Completion Options. I think that solved it. I turned off all the auto-completion and it stopped doing it. Thanks. I didn't know where to look! Mike Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Real World Usage
Look, I don't have a dog in this fight (i.e. there's nothing I need Lilypond to do that it doesn't do, etc.) but I have to protest that Lilypond can do this, but nobody, including lilypond gurus, were able to do this. Since someone (i.e Kieren) just did it. I was going to object to Kieren's statement that it wasn't particularly difficult (since I think it was), but I have to suppose that he intended that it wasn't particularly difficult *for him*. As to why it never been done before, I don't know. I suppose the sets of people who really wanted it and the people who were capable did not intersect and the right person didn't get asked. Fortunately, we have this user-list. I think Kieren's point is that no other music engraving software has the extensibility that Lilypond has (even if the learning curve is steep.) I always know that if I did get to a point where I need Lilypond to do something that it doesn't appear to do, I can ask here and someone will likely be able to come up with a way to do it, even if they need to be motivated by, for example, telling them that lilypond is incapable. ;-) Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: why does this simple notation fail a barcheck?
Chip wrote: trpta = { \partial 8*1 e8-. | e4 d8 c4 d8 | e4 e8-. r r e | e4 d8 c4 d8 | e4 e8 r r fs | g4 fs8 g4 e8 | d2 d8 e | \times 2/3 {f4 fs b} | \times 2/3 {d c b} | g2.\fermata \bar || | r1*5 } There errors are this - Interpreting music... [8] F:/Lilypond Files/Score Template.ly:41:21: warning: barcheck failed at: 1/2 \times 2/3 {f4 fs b} | F:/Lilypond Files/Score Template.ly:42:19: warning: barcheck failed at: 1/4 \times 2/3 {d c b} | Preprocessing graphical objects... The piece is in 6/8 time. Thanks, Chip In 6/8 time, there should be six eighth notes or three quarter notes per bar, but with a quarter-note triplet (your \times 2/3 {} construct) you have the equivalent of two quarter notes (triplet = three notes in the space of two), so you're a quarter note short in that bar. It seems strange to me to even see a triplet in 6/8 time. Tim Reeves___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: svg export
Yes, although I don't use them except with Lilypond. I just double-checked and MS Word recognizes the Emmentaler fonts. Tim Reeves Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com 02/18/2009 10:51 PM To Tim Reeves tim.ree...@tokamerica.com cc lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject Re: svg export Hi Tim, On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Tim Reeves tim.ree...@tokamerica.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote: I plan on fixing this in the future. When you manage to install LilyPond's .otf fonts on your system, see if the attached SVG file renders correctly for you. It renders decently in Firefox 3. I forgot to compress it. This one should make it to the list. -Patrick Not for me. Lilypond 2.12.2-1 SVG output does not render correctly on Inkscape 0.46+ development version, Firefox 3 or Opera 9.6, and I have installed the Emmentaler fonts in my Windows (XP SP2) fonts folder. The closest to good output is with Inkscape but even there I get open-triangle noteheads instead of normal noteheads and in the browsers the SVG rendering is just terrible. Hmm. I'm not incredibly familiar with installing fonts on Windows, but are the Emmentaler fonts recognized by any other programs after you install them? -Patrick ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: svg export
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote: I plan on fixing this in the future. When you manage to install LilyPond's .otf fonts on your system, see if the attached SVG file renders correctly for you. It renders decently in Firefox 3. I forgot to compress it. This one should make it to the list. -Patrick Not for me. Lilypond 2.12.2-1 SVG output does not render correctly on Inkscape 0.46+ development version, Firefox 3 or Opera 9.6, and I have installed the Emmentaler fonts in my Windows (XP SP2) fonts folder. The closest to good output is with Inkscape but even there I get open-triangle noteheads instead of normal noteheads and in the browsers the SVG rendering is just terrible. Tim Reeves___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Stopwatch time in markup
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:03:29 +0100 From: James E. Bailey derhindem...@googlemail.com Subject: Re: Stopwatch time in markup To: Mark Polesky markpole...@yahoo.com Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org, Tom Hall r...@ludions.com Message-ID: 5c862e1f-ac50-4e7b-b7bb-30b3f4503...@googlemail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; delsp=yes; format=flowed See, that's just amazing. personally, I think \markup \concat {4\char ##x2032 33\char##x2033 } is a little shorter, but it's kind of awesome that that can be done with all that stuff that apparently means something. Am 24.01.2009 um 21:49 schrieb Mark Polesky: Don't forget you can store all the formatting as a music-function: timestamp = #(define-music-function (parser location minutes seconds) (number? number?) (let ((min (number-string minutes)) (sec (number-string seconds))) #{ \mark \markup \rounded-box \small \concat { $min â?² $sec â?³ } #})) { c'1 \timestamp #4 #33 c' } And solely out of paranoia, here's a version that doesn't rely on the special utf-8 characters -- in case my prime and double-prime characters above get corrupted on the way to your mailbox/browser: timestamp = #(define-music-function (parser location minutes seconds) (number? number?) (let ((min (number-string minutes)) (sec (number-string seconds))) #{ \mark \markup \rounded-box \small \concat { $min \char ##x2032 $sec \char ##x2033 } #})) { c'1 \timestamp #4 #33 c' } - Mark It's true, James that \markup \concat {4\char ##x2032 33\char##x2033 } is shorter if you just use it once, but if you use it a few times, or many times, then { c'1 \timestamp #4 #33 c' } is shorter, and easier. The long part, the definition, could even be hidden away in another file that you \include. Mind you, I could not have written that function, but I'm glad that there are those who can, and console myself with the thought that if I had the time, I could learn too. BTW, who is transcribing John Cage's work where the pianist just sits and plays nothing for exactly four minutes and thirty-three seconds? I'm sure the Lilypond output will be just gorgeous! ;-)___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 74, Issue 101
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:59:47 -0700 Andrew Hawryluk ahawry...@gmail.com wrote: Evince has a problem with the barlines (it's a bug). On Ubuntu, I work in Evince while I'm writing, but I print the final PDF from Adobe Acrobat. xpdf also does a good job and is lighter than Acroread. It's in the repos. -- Nicholas WASTELL France Ha. Microsoft Office and Open Office are lighter than Adobe Reader 9! (At least on WinXP) It boggles the mind. I installed Adobe Reader the other day, and when I saw how big it was, I promptly uninstalled it and found a free and more functional replacement. Tim Reeves___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: nvlle version -pov 3.7 beta 30
2009/1/6 Martial addr...@hidden: funny but true http://cathemline.org/povcheri/random/index.html A very nice piece of news for the (soon) resurrected LilyPond Report :-) I don't read French (Je parle francais non?), but from what I infer from that webpage - that is very funny. Making 3d-looking shapes based on musical content. Who would've thought? Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Fragment with broken/torn/shredded staff lines
I made a small change to the randomization code (attached). - Mark Mark, That is a very cool function. I don't have an immediate use for it, but I saved it for later, and I think it's a great illustration of the power of Lilypond. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: question about transposing an interval of a 4th
Umm... yeah. The fact that he thinks this answers the question gives me *less* confidence that he knows what he's talking about. If he wanted it a perfect fourth lower, then \transpose does the job. And normally when somebody says a fourth lower, they mean a perfect interval. If he wants it a variable fourth lower, then it's not doable without scheme. - Graham Yes, a variable fourth, if you want to call it that - you finally got it. This is like the not-so-helpful answer You can't get there from here. It just took about 20 messages to get to that conclusion. Merry Christmas!___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re:New LilyPondTool version available for testing
Message: 3 Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:41:05 +0100 From: Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) lilypondt...@organum.hu Subject: Re: New LilyPondTool version available for testing To: Tim Slattery slatter...@bls.gov Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Message-ID: 49490f81.8080...@organum.hu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Look at http://lilypondtool.organum.hu/demo.html Tim Slattery wrote: Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) lilypondt...@organum.hu wrote: Hi, for more advanced LilyPondTool users I released a new version. Installation instructions: - Install Project Viewer plugin from Plugin Manager (it's a new dependency) - Replace LilyPondTool.jar with the following file: http://www.organum.hu/fileadmin/lilypondtool/2.11-r1/LilyPondTool.jar and download http://www.organum.hu/fileadmin/lilypondtool/2.11-r1/julie-0.1.jar Can you give a clue what this is and what it does? I find no description, only the jars (which implies that it's a Java system). Bert, I *really* appreciate LilyPondTool. I have been using it for some time and it makes using Lilypond so much easier and enjoyable. I also really appreciate the new capabilities and icons. Thankyou! Some suggestions and questions: 1. How can I make the LilypondTool help work? It seems to be missing a help file. (Resource not found: LilyPondTool.jar!doc/users-guide.html)- I THINK YOU'RE WORKING ON THIS? 2. What does julie.jar do? (just curious) 3. Could you update your webpage (and the jEdit plugin repository) with links to the latest files? It would be much easier to upgrade that way. It was hard to get the needed files. I GUESS YOU'RE WAITING TO MAKE SURE IT IS STABLE. 4. Is there a way I can easily make LilyPondTool point to the 2.11.65 documentation (which I have on my hard drive) when I click on Show LilyPond help in the LilypondTool menu? 5. The new properties.xml that you instructed us to replace our old properties.xml file with seems to be a totally different sort of file. I'm not sure what to do with it. Could you instruct me in more detail? Is it really needed? (maybe I should have stayed away when I saw you wrote For more advanced LilyPondTool users - Sorry ;-) Thanks a lot! (I meant to send this message a few days ago, but I had some e-mail problem I guess...) Tim Reeves___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: why is Dutch the default language for note-entry?
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:54:21 +0100 From: Francisco Vila paconet@gmail.com Subject: Re: why is Dutch the default language for note-entry? Do English-speaking people read music saying g sharp f sharp all the time? Yes. An extra syllable is not a problem for us, I guess. -Tim Reeves___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Segmentation fault on file with bookparts
Message: 1 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:01:36 -0800 From: Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Segmentation fault on file with bookparts To: Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com Cc: lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org Message-ID: d1c3ee7b0812150701o69707465yecb03f6fb9e6a...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I had trouble, too, when I tried downloading it from my site. I think my admin doesn't allow serving of .tar files. Try this one: http://dl4.louisiana.edu/lorca.tar Run lilypond on the lorca.ly file and see what happens. I am able to compile this file successfully. Processing seemed normal, and there were only three types of warnings: warning: type check for `stencil' failed; value `#t' must be of type`unknown' warning: ignoring too many clashing note columns warning: too many colliding rests Patrick Also ran successfully here on Win XP SP2, Lilypond 2.11.65, with many warnings. (different from above warnings!) Tim Reeves___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: More vertical space between staves
Probably this was not the first time you compiled it, and a previous run's output (pdf file) was still open, preventing writing the new one. You were just looking at the old pdf. Happens to me frequently. Close the pdf and re-run Lilypond on it. Tim Reeves Interpreting music... [8] Preprocessing graphical objects... Finding the ideal number of pages... Fitting music on 1 page... Drawing systems... Layout output to `blues_2.ps'... Converting to `./blues_2.pdf'... error: failed files: blues_2.ly regards: Seppo ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re:LilyPond is excessively slow on Windows Vista
Hajo Dezelski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thinkpad x61sNewUbuntu (Linux)Dual 1,6 GHz2 GB4-5 s Thinkpad x61sNewXP Dual 1,6 GHz2 GB2 s Only one data point but interesting: Faster on WinXP than on Ubuntu. Was it the latest of each? i.e. Ubuntu 8.10 and XP SP3? Tim Reeves___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: LilyPond is excessively slow on Windows Vista
I also run Win Xp SP2 on my laptop (work provided) which is where I usually run Lilypond (typical .ly file compile times are about 5+/-2 seconds from my memory), but I have a Vista machine (newer, wife uses mainly) and an older machine running Ubuntu for now at home. I want to get her used to the idea of Linux and make the switch the next time Vista crashes hard ;-) Thanks for the information. Did you mean you switched from Lilypond back to some proprietary music software and that forced you to use Windows instead of Linux? I don't know what DAW is. Tim Reeves Hajo Dezelski [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/12/2008 12:43 PM To Tim Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject Re: LilyPond is excessively slow on Windows Vista It was Ubuntu 8.10 but XP SP2 and I took the time measure from Lilypond. Of course I ran the tests several times. On XP I only ran the necessary processes and the compile times were stable. Ubuntu was right out of the box and compile times differed. I switched back to XP for it was easier for me to use other musical software (DAW) Hajo 2008/11/12 Tim Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hajo Dezelski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thinkpad x61sNewUbuntu (Linux)Dual 1,6 GHz2 GB4-5 s Thinkpad x61sNewXP Dual 1,6 GHz2 GB2 s Only one data point but interesting: Faster on WinXP than on Ubuntu. Was it the latest of each? i.e. Ubuntu 8.10 and XP SP3? Tim Reeves -- --- ... indessen wandelt harmlos droben das Gestirn ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: What to do when \ and \ produce text
The \cresc macro is defined in ly/spanners-init.ly and is preceded by a comment: % STOP: junkme! so it's clearly not well-supported It's certainly intended to generate a text style crescendo cresc.. However, at the time the macro was implemented, any setting of crescendoText was automatically reverted after the next crescendo event (i.e. it worked like a \once \set ...) so now that the crescendoText property works just as all other properties, it would make more sense to let the macro be implemented as cresc = { #(ly:export (make-event-chord (list cr))) \once \set crescendoText = \markup { \italic cresc. } \once \set crescendoSpanner = #'text } if we want it to remain. In contrast to using the supported and documented macro \crescTextCresc, you don't get any dashed line when using \cresc. Note also that there is a macro \endcresc that reverts the settings done by \cresc (which wouldn't be needed if we used the above definition). Given that what \cresc currently does can also be achieved with \override DynamicTextSpanner #'dash-period = #-1.0 \crescTextCresc\ as clearly shown in Notation Reference 1.3.1, it there really a need to keep it? I can't say that I've seen many instances of the text cresc. without the dashed line, but perhaps others have. Please don't get rid of useful functions. What is it hurting to keep it? Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: mao
So when I write Mao, it has *nothing* to do with chairman mao. Ah -- finally I get an explanation of mao in the writings of Graham. Obviously the M in WTM has just as much meaning as the F in WTF, but I have never before been able to find out when or why mao began to be used in place of less acceptable expletives. Thanks for the explanation (and thanks for using mao instead of the other version!) In other circles, MAO = monoamine oxidase.___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Score with large empty section at the top
I think it is standard behaviour. I remember there was a command to let LilyPond display all the spaces it uses and its names. But I don´t remember the command and couldn´t find it by searching ... Take a look at Notation Reference 4.6.1: Displaying spacing. -Chris He actually did include annotate-spacing = ##t in his Paper block in his file, but he had it commented out. Putting it back in did give several clues for how to change the spacing to his liking.___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lilypond-user Digest - no messages for a few days
For several days I didn't get any message digests from lilypond-user, but instead of resubscribing, I just looked at the archives a few times. Now, all of sudden, today, I'm getting digests again. Anyone know what happened? Tim Reeves___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: changelog (was: Arbitrary changes?)
It took me a couple of minutes to scan through the source code (of convert-ly.py) as Han-Wen suggested and find the changes in 2.11.51, so as a convenience to others, here they are: \\octave changed to \\octaveCheck arpeggioUp changed to arpeggioArrowUp arpeggioDown changed to arpeggioArrowDown arpeggioNeutral changed to arpeggioNormal setTextCresc changed to crescTextCresc setTextDecresc changed to dimTextDecresc setTextDecr changed to dimTextDecr setTextDim changed to dimTextDim setHairpinCresc changed to crescHairpin setHairpinDecresc changed to dimHairpin sustainUp changed to sustainOff sustainDown changed to sustainOn sostenutoDown changed to sostenutoOn sostenutoUp changed to sostenutoOff Funny thing is, the only ones I use are the cresc and dim ones, and I don't see what was gained by those changes, but no big deal - I'd have to look them up the next time used them anyway most likely. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: indexing (was LSR search is broken)
I agree with Kieren and Werner. Programming and Mathematics aside, if I'm standing in line, the first person to be served will be the first person in line, not the zeroth person in line. I don't think zeroth person in line has ever been uttered. And I'm not just being anti-pedantic. Believe me, I can be quite pedantic. ;-) Tim Reeves___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: changelog (was: Arbitrary changes?)
True, but I usually avoid command line stuff. I'm on Windows XP. Also, I learned a little bit by looking at the code. Not enough to do anything with it, mind you. Tim Reeves Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/09/2008 12:49 PM To Tim Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED], Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject Re: changelog (was: Arbitrary changes?) Or you could have done what I suggested to Haipeng, and ran convert-ly -s --from=2.11.50 to see a list of all these changes. No looking at source code required. Cheers, - Graham On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:58:30 -0700 Tim Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It took me a couple of minutes to scan through the source code (of convert-ly.py) as Han-Wen suggested and find the changes in 2.11.51, so as a convenience to others, here they are: \\octave changed to \\octaveCheck arpeggioUp changed to arpeggioArrowUp arpeggioDown changed to arpeggioArrowDown arpeggioNeutral changed to arpeggioNormal setTextCresc changed to crescTextCresc setTextDecresc changed to dimTextDecresc setTextDecr changed to dimTextDecr setTextDim changed to dimTextDim setHairpinCresc changed to crescHairpin setHairpinDecresc changed to dimHairpin sustainUp changed to sustainOff sustainDown changed to sustainOn sostenutoDown changed to sostenutoOn sostenutoUp changed to sostenutoOff Funny thing is, the only ones I use are the cresc and dim ones, and I don't see what was gained by those changes, but no big deal - I'd have to look them up the next time used them anyway most likely. Tim Reeves ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user