Hey Graham.
Thanks a lot for the reaction on this one and the 'hairpinToBarline'. If it
helps in debugging: After a bit more investigation on the 'slurs', it seems
that it is not (only?) the length of the notes but the barline in between the
notes. The slur-algorithm seems to try to avoid any collision of a slur with
a barline. A test with ties shows, that this does not happen with tied notes.
regards
Thomas
Thanks, this bug has been entered as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=156
Note that it has nothing to do with double slurs, are your final line
demonstrates. I've simplified the example for the bug tracker.
Cheers,
- Graham
Thomas Frank wrote:
The follwing snippet shows a very strange behaviour of slurs on whole
notes which are not placed on the 'default'-side of the note. While the
quarter notes in the first line are just perfect, the same fails with the
whole notes in the second and third line.
Is there a way to work around this?
Is it a known bug?
cheers
Thomas
%% BEGIN CODE SNIPPET
\version 2.10.0
\relative c'' {
\set doubleSlurs = ##t
c e4( f a)( b d)( e g) |
\break
c, e1( | f a)( | b d)( | e g) |
\set doubleSlurs = ##f
\break
c, e1_( | f a)_( | b d)_( | e g) |
}
%% END CODE SNIPPET
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
