Re: Frescobaldi on Fedora 31
Il giorno dom 15 mar 2020 alle 12:33, Andrew Bernard ha scritto: A new install of Fedora 31, Frescobaldi installs but the documentation reader is missed up. Moving the cursor over the page seeming drop down windows appear half filled with images of parts of the page and you cant read the docs. Everything is pristine, with the exception that I have added GNOME themes. Does anybody else have this problem? Andrew I'm not sure I understood your issue.. but it seems something related to general graphic issue? A screenshot would be better. I noticed some problems when running Frescobaldi under Wayland (see the recent issues I opened on github). I have to run it this way: QT_QPA_PLATFORM=xcb frescobaldi Anyway, the documentation browser works fine here on Fedora 31 and Frescobaldi installed from master. Except that it's supposed to read lilypond.org documentation and displays version 2.18.2 instead of 2.20.
Frescobaldi on Fedora 31
A new install of Fedora 31, Frescobaldi installs but the documentation reader is missed up. Moving the cursor over the page seeming drop down windows appear half filled with images of parts of the page and you cant read the docs. Everything is pristine, with the exception that I have added GNOME themes. Does anybody else have this problem? Andrew
Re: Lilypond and Frescobaldi on Fedora 28
On Thu, 24 May 2018, Federico Bruni wrote: Hi Martin This has been fixed now, right? (I haven't upgraded to 28 yet) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1568274 Yes, it's working again :-) Il giorno dom 6 mag 2018 alle 12:10, Martin Tarenskeen Official Fedora 28 version of lilypond 2.19.81 is currently broken. (I hope a fix will be found soon) MT ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Lilypond and Frescobaldi on Fedora 28
Hi Martin This has been fixed now, right? (I haven't upgraded to 28 yet) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1568274 Il giorno dom 6 mag 2018 alle 12:10, Martin Tarenskeen <"m.tarenskeen"@zonnet.nl> ha scritto: Hi, Official Fedora 28 version of lilypond 2.19.81 is currently broken. (I hope a fix will be found soon) As a workaround the install script for linux from http://lilypond.org/download/binaries/ can be used. This one works fine. If you install Frescobaldi from the official Fedora 28 repo it will pull in the (broken) lilypond version as a dependency. The default settings in Frescobaldi will point to the broken lilypond binary. Go to the preferences menu in Frescobaldi and you are ready to rock again. Maybe this can help other Fedora 28 / Lilypond / Frescobaldi users. -- MT ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Lilypond and Frescobaldi on Fedora 28
Hi, Official Fedora 28 version of lilypond 2.19.81 is currently broken. (I hope a fix will be found soon) As a workaround the install script for linux from http://lilypond.org/download/binaries/ can be used. This one works fine. If you install Frescobaldi from the official Fedora 28 repo it will pull in the (broken) lilypond version as a dependency. The default settings in Frescobaldi will point to the broken lilypond binary. Go to the preferences menu in Frescobaldi and you are ready to rock again. Maybe this can help other Fedora 28 / Lilypond / Frescobaldi users. -- MT ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lilypond, frescobaldi, and Fedora 22
I don't know about F22 and dfn, but pre-F22 rpm and yum had options to prevent following dependencies. Alternativey, you can make a dummy rpm package that provides the lilypond dependency and install that. Then you can add python-ly and frescobaldi. -- Johan ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lilypond, frescobaldi, and Fedora 22
Il giorno sab 16 mag 2015 alle 17:40, Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl ha scritto: In Fedora 22 the yum command has been replaced by dnf. Unfortately dnf remove remove lilypond automatically also removes the python-ly and frescobaldi packages. And if I do dnf install frescobaldi the Fedora lilypond package is automatically installed. Both I don't want. I want to use the lilypond installer from the Lilypond website, and I want to install frescobaldi and python-ly from the Fedora 22 repository. Why don't you leave lilypond package installed (even if it doesn't work) and set the lilypond downloaded from the website as default in Frescobaldi? (plus if you place it in a path with higher priority it will be the default also on the command line) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
lilypond, frescobaldi, and Fedora 22
Hi, Since the Fedora 22 (beta) package of LilyPond doesn't work I decided to remove (sudo dnf remove lilypond) lilypond from my system for now and downloaded and installed the Linux installer version from the LilyPond website instead. This one does work because it includes older and compatible Ghostscript components. In Fedora 22 the yum command has been replaced by dnf. Unfortately dnf remove remove lilypond automatically also removes the python-ly and frescobaldi packages. And if I do dnf install frescobaldi the Fedora lilypond package is automatically installed. Both I don't want. I want to use the lilypond installer from the Lilypond website, and I want to install frescobaldi and python-ly from the Fedora 22 repository. Any suggestions from Fedora 22 + Lilypond users here? -- MT ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lilypond, frescobaldi, and Fedora 22
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Federico Bruni wrote: Il giorno sab 16 mag 2015 alle 17:40, Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl ha scritto: In Fedora 22 the yum command has been replaced by dnf. Unfortately dnf remove remove lilypond automatically also removes the python-ly and frescobaldi packages. And if I do dnf install frescobaldi the Fedora lilypond package is automatically installed. Both I don't want. I want to use the lilypond installer from the Lilypond website, and I want to install frescobaldi and python-ly from the Fedora 22 repository. Why don't you leave lilypond package installed (even if it doesn't work) and set the lilypond downloaded from the website as default in Frescobaldi? (plus if you place it in a path with higher priority it will be the default also on the command line) Good suggestion. I think I will do that. Still hope the problems with Fedora 22, LilyPond, and Ghostscript will be fixed soon though. -- MT ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: kmid2 for frescobaldi in Fedora
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:15:32 -0700 (PDT) MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com wrote: Recently I switch from ubuntu to fedora. I installed frescobaldi and when I try to play the midi generated by lilypond, frescobaldi said it need Kmid2 2.4. I try to install Kmid2 2.4.0 I got yhe following the error report. transaction error: kmid2-2.4.0-1.fc16.i686 requires libkmidbackend.so.1 kmid2-2.4.0-1.fc16.i686 requires drumstick = 0.4 kmid2-2.4.0-1.fc16.i686 requires kdelibs4(x86-32) = 4.6.80 kmid2-2.4.0-1.fc16.i686 requires kmid2-libs = 2.4.0-1.fc16 Unless I'm compiling myself, I always use yum as package manager in fedora. It handles all dependencies very nicely: installing: $ sudo yum install kmid2 ... or just showing which dependencies the package has: $ sudo yum deplist kmid2 [ etc. ] package: kmid2.x86_64 2.3.0-2.fc14 [ etc. ] dependency: libkmidbackend.so.0()(64bit) provider: kmid2-libs.x86_64 2.3.0-2.fc14 dependency: drumstick = 0.3 provider: drumstick.x86_64 0.3.1-2.fc14 provider: drumstick.i686 0.3.1-2.fc14 dependency: kmid2-libs = 2.3.0-2.fc14 provider: kmid2-libs.x86_64 2.3.0-2.fc14 provider: kmid2-libs.i686 2.3.0-2.fc14 .. and so on. This list is very long. HTH David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
kmid2 for frescobaldi in Fedora
Recently I switch from ubuntu to fedora. I installed frescobaldi and when I try to play the midi generated by lilypond, frescobaldi said it need Kmid2 2.4. I try to install Kmid2 2.4.0 I got yhe following the error report. transaction error: kmid2-2.4.0-1.fc16.i686 requires libkmidbackend.so.1 kmid2-2.4.0-1.fc16.i686 requires drumstick = 0.4 kmid2-2.4.0-1.fc16.i686 requires kdelibs4(x86-32) = 4.6.80 kmid2-2.4.0-1.fc16.i686 requires kmid2-libs = 2.4.0-1.fc16 The kmid2-2.4.0-1.fc16.src.rpm is from RPM resource kmid2 Appreciate if anyone can help or direct me to find resolution. Blessing, Ming___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: kmid2 for frescobaldi in Fedora
Please note the download file in the email below is kmid2-2.4.0-1.fc16.i686.rpm from RPM resource kmid2 Blessing, ming From: MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com To: lilypond-user@gnu.org lilypond-user@gnu.org; lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 5:15:32 PM Subject: kmid2 for frescobaldi in Fedora Recently I switch from ubuntu to fedora. I installed frescobaldi and when I try to play the midi generated by lilypond, frescobaldi said it need Kmid2 2.4. I try to install Kmid2 2.4.0 I got yhe following the error report. transaction error: kmid2-2.4.0-1.fc16.i686 requires libkmidbackend.so.1 kmid2-2.4.0-1.fc16.i686 requires drumstick = 0.4 kmid2-2.4.0-1.fc16.i686 requires kdelibs4(x86-32) = 4.6.80 kmid2-2.4.0-1.fc16.i686 requires kmid2-libs = 2.4.0-1.fc16 The kmid2-2.4.0-1.fc16.src.rpm is from RPM resource kmid2 Appreciate if anyone can help or direct me to find resolution. Blessing, Ming___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Frescobaldi on Fedora
Op zaterdag 3 januari 2009, schreef Martin Tarenskeen: Building and installing went OK. I can see the Frescobaldi message windows and edit a lilypond file. But PDF preview fails: Could not load okularpart. What is okularpart ? It seems that I don't have it ? What am I missing ? Thats the PDF viewer of KDE. Install Okular and it should work. best regards, Wilbert Berendsen -- Frescobaldi, LilyPond editor for KDE: http://www.frescobaldi.org/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Frescobaldi on Fedora
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 07:35:20PM +0100, Wilbert Berendsen wrote: Op zaterdag 3 januari 2009, schreef Martin Tarenskeen: Building and installing went OK. I can see the Frescobaldi message windows and edit a lilypond file. But PDF preview fails: Could not load okularpart. What is okularpart ? It seems that I don't have it ? What am I missing ? Thats the PDF viewer of KDE. Install Okular and it should work. On Fedora okular is part of the kdegraphics rpm package. Yum install kedgraphics did the trick. -- Martin Tarenskeen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Frescobaldi on Fedora
For me (also on FC10), yum install kdegraphics (as root) did the trick. You probably also want to install kdebase so the built-in terminal works. Mike On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl wrote: Hi, I'm trying to build, install, and use Frescobaldi on my Fedora 10 system. Building and installing went OK. I can see the Frescobaldi message windows and edit a lilypond file. But PDF preview fails: Could not load okularpart. What is okularpart ? It seems that I don't have it ? What am I missing ? -- Martin Tarenskeen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- Michael Droettboom http://www.droettboom.com/ ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: Frescobaldi on Fedora
Thank you. That indeed did the trick. On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 05:53:49PM -0500, Michael Droettboom wrote: For me (also on FC10), yum install kdegraphics (as root) did the trick. You probably also want to install kdebase so the built-in terminal works. Mike On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Martin Tarenskeen m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl wrote: Hi, I'm trying to build, install, and use Frescobaldi on my Fedora 10 system. Building and installing went OK. I can see the Frescobaldi message windows and edit a lilypond file. But PDF preview fails: Could not load okularpart. What is okularpart ? It seems that I don't have it ? What am I missing ? ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
