Re: GDP: NR 3
Graham Percival wrote Friday, July 18, 2008 1:28 AM On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:10:11 +0100 Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Graham Percival wrote Thursday, July 17, 2008 9:37 AM I think 3.5.7 is unnecessary. Just add , in any MIDI player which supports pitch bending to the item in 3.5.2. I included this because the only mention of microtones in NR 1/NR 2 (AFAICS) is rather buried in Note names in other languages, with no heading to @ref to. They're covered in Accidentals. If the current material in there isn't sufficient, we could add more...? Anyway, @ref to Accidentals. OK, found it. I'll @ref to there and mention quarter tones, which is the index entry I missed. (As an aside, it's a pity we can't ref to index entries.) I'm not certain if we need a separate subsubsection for instrument names. Why not merge that with 3.5.3? Agreed it is too short to remain on its own, but it doesn't really belong in a section about \midi. Maybe merging it into 3.5.1 would be better? No objection here. Done Cheers, - Graham Trevor ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
GDP: NR 3
NR 3 Input Syntax in GDP has been largely reorganised and several subsections redrafted. Could you please review this for gross errors and omissions before we get down to detailed formatting and wording. The sections which have been substantially modified are: NR 3.1 Input Structure NR 3.3 Working with input files NR 3.5 MIDI output NR 3.2 and NR 3.4 are virtually unchanged, but comments on these too are still welcome. The section name Input syntax now seems a poor match to the contents. Perhaps Other notation might be better? Views on this welcome. As always, see the GDP docs at the GDP website: http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/ Trevor ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: GDP: NR 3
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:17:31 +0100 Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NR 3.5 MIDI output I think 3.5.7 is unnecessary. Just add , in any MIDI player which supports pitch bending to the item in 3.5.2. I'm not certain if we need a separate subsubsection for instrument names. Why not merge that with 3.5.3? I'm not certain about the order of .2 and .3. IMO, there's three parts of MIDI: - basic setup (including tempo and instrument name) - what's included in MIDI - special cases (\unfoldRepeats, dynamics) I don't mind having multiple subsections for each item in the above list, but IMO they should still be found next to each other. Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: GDP: NR 3
Thanks for the quick response! Graham Percival wrote Thursday, July 17, 2008 9:37 AM On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:17:31 +0100 Trevor Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NR 3.5 MIDI output I think 3.5.7 is unnecessary. Just add , in any MIDI player which supports pitch bending to the item in 3.5.2. I included this because the only mention of microtones in NR 1/NR 2 (AFAICS) is rather buried in Note names in other languages, with no heading to @ref to. Maybe now that we have a section on World music it could be replaced by a @ref to something there, but there's nothing suitable yet. Happy to do as you suggest as soon as there is a suitable section on microtones elsewhere which I could @ref to. I'm not certain if we need a separate subsubsection for instrument names. Why not merge that with 3.5.3? Agreed it is too short to remain on its own, but it doesn't really belong in a section about \midi. Maybe merging it into 3.5.1 would be better? I'm not certain about the order of .2 and .3. IMO, there's three parts of MIDI: - basic setup (including tempo and instrument name) - what's included in MIDI - special cases (\unfoldRepeats, dynamics) OK, I'll swap them over. I agree it would be better. - Graham Trevor ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
