Re: cannot find property type-check for `no-spacing-rods'

2009-03-29 Thread Kieren MacMillan

Hi Anthony,

How metronome are your metronome functions? I'm just using it for  
text like moderately fast.


\tempo \markup moderately fast

=)
Kieren.


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


cannot find property type-check for `no-spacing-rods'

2009-03-28 Thread Anthony W. Youngman

Not sure if this belongs here or on -devel ...

But I've just looked in the log file and found this in there. V 2.12.2 
on Windows (same on V 2.11.59 - I've just upgraded to make sure it isn't 
a known/fixed thingy).


Bearing in mind I don't know what no-spacing-rods is, it's an error 
internal to lily (which may or may not be something I've done :-)


Relevant log contents follow:

Interpreting music...
warning: cannot find property type-check for `no-spacing-rods' 
(backend-type?).  perhaps a typing error?

warning: doing assignment anyway
[8]
warning: cannot find property type-check for `no-spacing-rods' 
(backend-type?).  perhaps a typing error?

warning: doing assignment anyway
warning: cannot find property type-check for `no-spacing-rods' 
(backend-type?).  perhaps a typing error?

warning: doing assignment anyway
[16]
warning: cannot find property type-check for `no-spacing-rods' 
(backend-type?).  perhaps a typing error?

warning: doing assignment anyway
[24][32][40][48][56][64][72][80][88][96][104][112][120][128][136][144][15
2][152]


Cheers,
Wol
--
Anthony W. Youngman - anth...@thewolery.demon.co.uk



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: cannot find property type-check for `no-spacing-rods'

2009-03-28 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/3/28 Anthony W. Youngman lilyp...@thewolery.demon.co.uk:
 Not sure if this belongs here or on -devel ...

 But I've just looked in the log file and found this in there. V 2.12.2 on
 Windows (same on V 2.11.59 - I've just upgraded to make sure it isn't a
 known/fixed thingy).

 Bearing in mind I don't know what no-spacing-rods is, it's an error
 internal to lily (which may or may not be something I've done :-)

It's an obsolete property which was removed a while ago;  there should
be a convert-ly rule for it.

Try replacing it (assuming it's set to #t) with the following:

#'extra-spacing-width = #'(+inf.0 . -inf.0)

Regards,
Neil


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: cannot find property type-check for `no-spacing-rods'

2009-03-28 Thread Anthony W. Youngman
In message 9nk9hhd$hkzjf...@thewolery.demon.co.uk, Anthony W. Youngman
lilyp...@thewolery.demon.co.uk writes
Not sure if this belongs here or on -devel ...

Oops - just found my code that's doing it - but I copied it from
somewhere and don't understand what it's doing or why ...

tempoMark = #(define-music-function (parser location markp) (string?)
#{
\once \override Score . RehearsalMark #'self-alignment-X = #left
\once \override Score . RehearsalMark #'no-spacing-rods = ##t
\mark \markup { \small \bold $markp }
#})

And the error makes it look like it might be a bug in lily anyway, but I
don't want to say that because I've been wrong too often - is the code
looking for something called type-check that should be there and
isn't?

But I've just looked in the log file and found this in there. V 2.12.2 on
Windows (same on V 2.11.59 - I've just upgraded to make sure it isn't a
known/fixed thingy).

Bearing in mind I don't know what no-spacing-rods is, it's an error
internal to lily (which may or may not be something I've done :-)

Relevant log contents follow:

Interpreting music...
warning: cannot find property type-check for `no-spacing-rods' (backend-
type?).  perhaps a typing error?
warning: doing assignment anyway
[8]
warning: cannot find property type-check for `no-spacing-rods' (backend-
type?).  perhaps a typing error?
warning: doing assignment anyway
warning: cannot find property type-check for `no-spacing-rods' (backend-
type?).  perhaps a typing error?
warning: doing assignment anyway
[16]
warning: cannot find property type-check for `no-spacing-rods' (backend-
type?).  perhaps a typing error?
warning: doing assignment anyway
[24][32][40][48][56][64][72][80][88][96][104][112][120][128][136][144][15
2][152]


Cheers,
Wol

-- 
Anthony W. Youngman - anth...@thewolery.demon.co.uk



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: cannot find property type-check for `no-spacing-rods'

2009-03-28 Thread Kieren MacMillan

Hi Anthony,


Oops - just found my code that's doing it - but I copied it from
somewhere and don't understand what it's doing or why ...

tempoMark = #(define-music-function (parser location markp) (string?)
#{
\once \override Score . RehearsalMark #'self-alignment-X =  
#left

\once \override Score . RehearsalMark #'no-spacing-rods = ##t
\mark \markup { \small \bold $markp }
#})


That looks like my old (pre-recent-MetronomeMark improvements)  
function/macro for making tempo indications...


And the error makes it look like it might be a bug in lily anyway,  
but I

don't want to say that because I've been wrong too often - is the code
looking for something called type-check that should be there and  
isn't?


No... it's just indicating that this old code needs updating.
Actually, it should be replaced entirely by a MetronomeMark-based  
function -- I've got a couple that I will be submitting to LSR soon.


Hope this helps,
Kieren.


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: cannot find property type-check for `no-spacing-rods'

2009-03-28 Thread Anthony W. Youngman
In message blu0-smtp263ca4a0baec066965c6ca94...@phx.gbl, Kieren 
MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes
That looks like my old (pre-recent-MetronomeMark improvements) 
function/macro for making tempo indications...


And the error makes it look like it might be a bug in lily anyway, 
but I

don't want to say that because I've been wrong too often - is the code
looking for something called type-check that should be there and 
isn't?


No... it's just indicating that this old code needs updating.
Actually, it should be replaced entirely by a MetronomeMark-based 
function -- I've got a couple that I will be submitting to LSR soon.


Actually, it's fairly new code :-)

How metronome are your metronome functions? I'm just using it for text 
like moderately fast.


Cheers,
Wol
--
Anthony W. Youngman - anth...@thewolery.demon.co.uk



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user