Re: Simple DASD question
Mm probably not.. It's golf day no more time for work today.. Maybe I'll just grab a mod 27 on Monday. On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Mark Postwrote: > >>> On 4/22/2016 at 11:20 AM, Tom Huegel wrote: > > Although when I try to reboot > > > > [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46... 6s / no > > limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2d > > uuid-d8b46... 6s / no limit) [ BUSY ] > > Again, this looks like the bug in SLES12 that is fixed by later > maintenance. Was that applied before adding the DASD volume to the file > system? > > > Mark Post > > -- > For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or > visit > http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 > -- > For more information on Linux on System z, visit > http://wiki.linuxvm.org/ > -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 -- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
Re: Formatting DASD
>>> On 4/22/2016 at 02:10 PM, Michael Weinerwrote: > I created /usr/test with 10 GB using dasd fmt and the lvmextend command. > > Now I want to add another 6 GB to /usr/test is there a problem with doing > this in YAST instead of the command line? There should not be a problem. That's why we have YaST in the first place. Mark Post -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 -- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
Re: Simple DASD question
>>> On 4/22/2016 at 11:20 AM, Tom Huegelwrote: > Although when I try to reboot > > [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46... 6s / no > limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2d > uuid-d8b46... 6s / no limit) [ BUSY ] Again, this looks like the bug in SLES12 that is fixed by later maintenance. Was that applied before adding the DASD volume to the file system? Mark Post -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 -- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
Re: Install not working for SLES11 SP4 thru TRUNKED VSWITCH
On Friday, 04/22/2016 at 04:50 GMT, Offer Baruchwrote: > If you make sure you have NATIVE NONE and keep track of your grants (just > like PORTBASED) there is no real security concern... > The guest is only allowed the vlans you grant it (just like PORTBASED) and > he cant send any untagged frames. > I would rather manage a USERBASED VSWITCH with trunks over managing ports > with PORTBASED any day... > It is much easier to make vlan mistakes with PORTBASED... USERBASED is much > more intuitive, easy to manage and easy to view... To that end, there is work under way to simplify the configuration of PORTBASED VSWITCHes. With the proposed configuration simplification, the only difference between the two is the explicit v. implicit port numbering scheme. I think that can be consolidated back into a single VSWITCH. > I agree you should close all the security holes before you do that... but > that seems a better solution then PORTBASED. > > There are pro's and con's for everything but I would recommend USERBASED > for security reasons and management reasons (assuming you know what you are > doing). At the end of the day, it's your choice. The problem was that USERBASED did not address the explicit need to put two access port vNICs on the same VSWITCH in different VLANs. The PORTBASED VSWITCH solved that problem, but introduced others. Let's talk again after we've made some progress on the VSWITCH Reconciliation Project (Do you like the name? I just made it up!) Alan Altmark Senior Managing z/VM and Linux Consultant Lab Services System z Delivery Practice IBM Systems & Technology Group ibm.com/systems/services/labservices office: 607.429.3323 mobile; 607.321.7556 alan_altm...@us.ibm.com IBM Endicott -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 -- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
Formatting DASD
Hi all Quick question. If your traditional method of adding and extending LVMs is done by command line and then you decide to add a volume and extend a specific logical volume using YAST is there any implications? Example I created /usr/test with 10 GB using dasd fmt and the lvmextend command. Now I want to add another 6 GB to /usr/test is there a problem with doing this in YAST instead of the command line? Have a good weekend! Sent from my iPhone -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 -- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
Re: Simple DASD question
Did you run command 'fdasd -a /dev/dasdb' to create the partition? /dev/dasdb1 doesn't exist unless you run the command. Harley Linker Jr. -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Tom Huegel Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 9:08 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Simple DASD question So far I have failed with my feeble attempts to add the second disk dasdb (0251) to the btrfs filesystem. This is what I have fresh after my re-re-re-re-install. It seems "btrfs device add /dev/dasdb1 /" would be a good thing to do but I get message about dasdb1 not existing... sles12:~ # lsdasd Bus-ID Status Name Device Type BlkSz Size Blocks == 0.0.0250 active dasda 94:0ECKD 4096 7042MB1802880 0.0.0251 active dasdb 94:4ECKD 4096 7042MB1802880 sles12:~ # btrfs filesystem show Label: none uuid: d8b46146-19c1-48d8-b024-80547e728787 Total devices 1 FS bytes used 2.74GiB devid1 size 5.71GiB used 3.53GiB path /dev/dasda3 Btrfs v3.16+20140829 sles12:~ # df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% / devtmpfs439M 8.0K 439M 1% /dev tmpfs 446M 0 446M 0% /dev/shm tmpfs 446M 7.0M 439M 2% /run tmpfs 446M 0 446M 0% /sys/fs/cgroup /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /var/tmp /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /var/spool /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /var/opt /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /var/log /dev/dasda1 194M 24M 161M 13% /boot/zipl /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /var/lib/pgsql /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /var/lib/named /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /var/lib/mailman /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /usr/local /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /tmp /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /var/crash /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /srv /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /opt /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /home /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /boot/grub2/s390x-emu sles12:~ # On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Mark Postwrote: > >>> On 4/21/2016 at 05:33 PM, Grzegorz Powiedziuk > >>> > wrote: > > then pvcreate, vgextend, lvextend and filesystem resize. > > No, we're trying to get him set up with LVM, just btrfs. > > > Mark Post > > -- > For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or > visit > http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 > -- > For more information on Linux on System z, visit > http://wiki.linuxvm.org/ > -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 -- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/ © 2016 Ensono, LP. All rights reserved. Ensono is a trademark of Ensono, LP. The information contained in this communication is confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please resend this communication to the sender and delete the original message or any copy of it from your computer system.
Re: Install not working for SLES11 SP4 thru TRUNKED VSWITCH
So, If you make sure you have NATIVE NONE and keep track of your grants (just like PORTBASED) there is no real security concern... The guest is only allowed the vlans you grant it (just like PORTBASED) and he cant send any untagged frames. I would rather manage a USERBASED VSWITCH with trunks over managing ports with PORTBASED any day... It is much easier to make vlan mistakes with PORTBASED... USERBASED is much more intuitive, easy to manage and easy to view... I agree you should close all the security holes before you do that... but that seems a better solution then PORTBASED. There are pro's and con's for everything but I would recommend USERBASED for security reasons and management reasons (assuming you know what you are doing). Offer Baruch On Apr 22, 2016 6:19 PM, "Alan Altmark"wrote: > On Friday, 04/22/2016 at 07:07 GMT, Offer Baruch > wrote: > > Can you please explain what is the problem with linux working in trunk > mode? > > What security problem are you talking about? > > An untrusted server should not be on a trunk port. Ever. A trunk can > also carry untagged frames, and those frames will be associated with the > *native* VLAN of the switch. I can't get people to code "VLAN AWARE > NATIVE NONE", so they are getting "NATIVE 1". That means untagged frames > from a VLAN-aware guest will be placed on VLAN 1, which is the default for > most switch vendors, and is used to carry switch management traffic. And > to talk to other hosts attached to the default VLAN. > > I'm not sure if a physical switch port can have the native VLAN ID for > that port excluded from the allowed VLANs, or if that will raise an error. > NATIVE NONE causes untagged frames to be dropped on trunking vNICs. z/VM > 6.1 and earlier don't have that capability, so be careful. > > Trunks are for switches, not hosts. From the network's point of view, ALL > hosts are evil. Let us say that in order to save money, you are attaching > multiple hosts to a trunked OSA port. There are NO OSA controls on what > LPARs can use what VLANs, so it must be assumed that the host can attach > itself to any VLAN authorized for the port. > > In a VSWITCH, we don't have that problem. However, VLAN IDs can and do > change. You don't want a VLAN-aware host to be accidentally left on the > wrong VLAN. Network People don't expect hosts to be using trunks without > a Really Good Reason. > > Alan Altmark > > Senior Managing z/VM and Linux Consultant > Lab Services System z Delivery Practice > IBM Systems & Technology Group > ibm.com/systems/services/labservices > office: 607.429.3323 > mobile; 607.321.7556 > alan_altm...@us.ibm.com > IBM Endicott > > -- > For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or > visit > http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 > -- > For more information on Linux on System z, visit > http://wiki.linuxvm.org/ > -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 -- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
Re: Simple DASD question
Although when I try to reboot [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46... 6s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2d uuid-d8b46... 6s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46... 7s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46... 7s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46... 8s / no li mit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46... 8s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by \x2duuid-d8b46... 9s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46... 9s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start jo b is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...10s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...10s / n o limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...11s / no limit) [** [0m] A start job is running for dev -disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...11s / no limit) [ * [0m] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...12s / no limit) [** [0m] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...12s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid -d8b46...13s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...13s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is run ning for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...14s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...14s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...15s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2d uuid-d8b46...15s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...16s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...16s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...17s / no li mit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...17s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by \x2duuid-d8b46...18s / no limit) [** [0m] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...18s / no limit) [ * [0m] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...19s / no limit) [ ** [0m] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b 46...19s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...20s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...20s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...21s / no limit) [ B USY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...21s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid -d8b46...22s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...22s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is run ning for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...23s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...23s / no limit) [ BUSY ] A start job is running for dev-disk-by\x2duuid-d8b46...24s / no limit) RUNNING SCZVMLX2 On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Tom Huegelwrote: > Thank-you... > Maybe someday I will learn how it all works... I just don't do that much > with LINUX.. > > > sles12:~ # fdasd -a /dev/dasdb > reading volume label ..: VOL1 > reading vtoc ..: ok > auto-creating one partition for the whole disk... > writing volume label... > writing VTOC... > rereading partition table... > sles12:~ # btrfs device add /dev/dasdb1 / > sles12:~ # btrfs filesystem show > Label: none uuid: d8b46146-19c1-48d8-b024-80547e728787 > Total devices 2 FS bytes used 2.74GiB > devid1 size 5.71GiB used 3.53GiB path /dev/dasda3 > devid2 size 6.88GiB used 0.00B path /dev/dasdb1 > Btrfs v3.16+20140829 > sles12:~ # df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% / > devtmpfs439M 8.0K 439M 1% /dev > tmpfs 446M 0 446M 0% /dev/shm > tmpfs 446M 7.0M 439M 2% /run > tmpfs 446M 0 446M 0% /sys/fs/cgroup > /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /var/tmp > /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /var/spool > /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /var/opt > /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /var/log > /dev/dasda1 194M 24M 161M 13% /boot/zipl > /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /var/lib/pgsql > /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /var/lib/named > /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /var/lib/mailman > /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /usr/local > /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /tmp > /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /var/crash > /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /srv > /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /opt > /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /home > /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /boot/grub2/s390x-emu > sles12:~ # > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Mark Post wrote: > >> >>> On 4/22/2016 at 10:07 AM,
Re: Install not working for SLES11 SP4 thru TRUNKED VSWITCH
On Friday, 04/22/2016 at 07:07 GMT, Offer Baruchwrote: > Can you please explain what is the problem with linux working in trunk mode? > What security problem are you talking about? An untrusted server should not be on a trunk port. Ever. A trunk can also carry untagged frames, and those frames will be associated with the *native* VLAN of the switch. I can't get people to code "VLAN AWARE NATIVE NONE", so they are getting "NATIVE 1". That means untagged frames from a VLAN-aware guest will be placed on VLAN 1, which is the default for most switch vendors, and is used to carry switch management traffic. And to talk to other hosts attached to the default VLAN. I'm not sure if a physical switch port can have the native VLAN ID for that port excluded from the allowed VLANs, or if that will raise an error. NATIVE NONE causes untagged frames to be dropped on trunking vNICs. z/VM 6.1 and earlier don't have that capability, so be careful. Trunks are for switches, not hosts. From the network's point of view, ALL hosts are evil. Let us say that in order to save money, you are attaching multiple hosts to a trunked OSA port. There are NO OSA controls on what LPARs can use what VLANs, so it must be assumed that the host can attach itself to any VLAN authorized for the port. In a VSWITCH, we don't have that problem. However, VLAN IDs can and do change. You don't want a VLAN-aware host to be accidentally left on the wrong VLAN. Network People don't expect hosts to be using trunks without a Really Good Reason. Alan Altmark Senior Managing z/VM and Linux Consultant Lab Services System z Delivery Practice IBM Systems & Technology Group ibm.com/systems/services/labservices office: 607.429.3323 mobile; 607.321.7556 alan_altm...@us.ibm.com IBM Endicott -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 -- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
Re: Simple DASD question
Thank-you... Maybe someday I will learn how it all works... I just don't do that much with LINUX.. sles12:~ # fdasd -a /dev/dasdb reading volume label ..: VOL1 reading vtoc ..: ok auto-creating one partition for the whole disk... writing volume label... writing VTOC... rereading partition table... sles12:~ # btrfs device add /dev/dasdb1 / sles12:~ # btrfs filesystem show Label: none uuid: d8b46146-19c1-48d8-b024-80547e728787 Total devices 2 FS bytes used 2.74GiB devid1 size 5.71GiB used 3.53GiB path /dev/dasda3 devid2 size 6.88GiB used 0.00B path /dev/dasdb1 Btrfs v3.16+20140829 sles12:~ # df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% / devtmpfs439M 8.0K 439M 1% /dev tmpfs 446M 0 446M 0% /dev/shm tmpfs 446M 7.0M 439M 2% /run tmpfs 446M 0 446M 0% /sys/fs/cgroup /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /var/tmp /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /var/spool /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /var/opt /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /var/log /dev/dasda1 194M 24M 161M 13% /boot/zipl /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /var/lib/pgsql /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /var/lib/named /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /var/lib/mailman /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /usr/local /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /tmp /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /var/crash /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /srv /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /opt /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /home /dev/dasda3 13G 3.0G 9.4G 24% /boot/grub2/s390x-emu sles12:~ # On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Mark Postwrote: > >>> On 4/22/2016 at 10:07 AM, Tom Huegel wrote: > > This is what I have fresh after my re-re-re-re-install. > > It seems "btrfs device add /dev/dasdb1 /" would be a good thing to do > but I > > get message about dasdb1 not existing... > > Have you used YaST or run fdasd to create it? > fdasd -a /dev/dasdb > > > Mark Post > > -- > For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or > visit > http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 > -- > For more information on Linux on System z, visit > http://wiki.linuxvm.org/ > -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 -- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
Ubuntu support for zoom
Hello lists, I added support for Ubuntu Linux to the new zoom 1-22 release. See: https://sourceforge.net/projects/system-zoom/files/ You will only find a .rpm, not a .deb package. But the Ubuntu "alien" command quickly and seemingly accurately converts RPMs to .deb format. For reading CMS files, it would seem that cmsfscat and cmsfslst are missing, so I modified the code to use cmsfs-fuse. I streamlined it so SLES and RHEL also use cmsfs-fuse. Less is more (sorry Rick :)). There is also a new, short chapter (5) "zoom on Ubuntu" in the PDF. This code is still very much experimental, but hopefully in keeping with the "Release early, release often" open-source philosophy. Enjoy if you are so inclined as to try it. Feedback is always welcome. -Mike MacIsaac -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 -- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
Re: Simple DASD question
>>> On 4/22/2016 at 10:07 AM, Tom Huegelwrote: > This is what I have fresh after my re-re-re-re-install. > It seems "btrfs device add /dev/dasdb1 /" would be a good thing to do but I > get message about dasdb1 not existing... Have you used YaST or run fdasd to create it? fdasd -a /dev/dasdb Mark Post -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 -- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
Re: Simple DASD question
So far I have failed with my feeble attempts to add the second disk dasdb (0251) to the btrfs filesystem. This is what I have fresh after my re-re-re-re-install. It seems "btrfs device add /dev/dasdb1 /" would be a good thing to do but I get message about dasdb1 not existing... sles12:~ # lsdasd Bus-ID Status Name Device Type BlkSz Size Blocks == 0.0.0250 active dasda 94:0ECKD 4096 7042MB1802880 0.0.0251 active dasdb 94:4ECKD 4096 7042MB1802880 sles12:~ # btrfs filesystem show Label: none uuid: d8b46146-19c1-48d8-b024-80547e728787 Total devices 1 FS bytes used 2.74GiB devid1 size 5.71GiB used 3.53GiB path /dev/dasda3 Btrfs v3.16+20140829 sles12:~ # df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% / devtmpfs439M 8.0K 439M 1% /dev tmpfs 446M 0 446M 0% /dev/shm tmpfs 446M 7.0M 439M 2% /run tmpfs 446M 0 446M 0% /sys/fs/cgroup /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /var/tmp /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /var/spool /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /var/opt /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /var/log /dev/dasda1 194M 24M 161M 13% /boot/zipl /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /var/lib/pgsql /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /var/lib/named /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /var/lib/mailman /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /usr/local /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /tmp /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /var/crash /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /srv /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /opt /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /home /dev/dasda3 5.8G 3.0G 2.5G 55% /boot/grub2/s390x-emu sles12:~ # On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Mark Postwrote: > >>> On 4/21/2016 at 05:33 PM, Grzegorz Powiedziuk > wrote: > > then pvcreate, vgextend, lvextend and filesystem resize. > > No, we're trying to get him set up with LVM, just btrfs. > > > Mark Post > > -- > For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or > visit > http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 > -- > For more information on Linux on System z, visit > http://wiki.linuxvm.org/ > -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 -- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
Available now: Linux on z Systems publications for Ubuntu 16.04
The Ubuntu 16.04 distribution is now available for Linux on z Systems and LinuxONE. IBM provides documentation that can be used as a complement to the documentation that is provided by the Ubuntu Documentation Project. See: IBM Knowledge Center: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/linuxonibm/liaaf/lnz_r_ubuntu.html developerWorks: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/linux390/documentation_ubuntu.html Dorothea Matthaeus Linux on z Systems, Information Development IBM Deutschland Research and Development GmbH -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 -- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
Available now: Linux on z Systems. Kernel 4.4 and libica 2.6 documentation
The following Linux on z Systems publications are now live on IBM Knowledge Center and developerWorks. - Device Drivers, Features, and Commands (Kernel 4.4) - Device Drivers, Features, and Commands for Linux as a KVM Guest (Kernel 4.4) - Using the Dump Tools (Kernel 4.4) - Kernel Messages (Kernel 4.4) - libica Programmer's Reference 2.6 See: developerWorks: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/linux390/documentation_dev.html IBM Knowledge Center: http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/linuxonibm/liaaf/lnz_r_main.html Dorothea Matthaeus Linux on z Systems, Information Development IBM Deutschland Research and Development GmbH -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 -- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
2016-04-21 Linux on z Systems - Kernel 4.4 related updates on developerWorks
Please refer to http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/linux390/whatsnew.html for several updates to the 'Development stream': * description of upstream kernel 4.4 features that were contributed by Linux on z Systems development * kernel 4.4 patch for kernel message catalog * s390-tools 1.33.0 and s390-tools 1.34.0 delivers new functionality and bug fixes * updated documentation -- Device Drivers, Features, and Commands for Linux as a KVM Guest (Kernel 4.4) - SC34-2754-01 -- Device Drivers, Features, and Commands (Kernel 4.4) SC33-8411-29 -- Using the Dump Tools (Kernel 4.4) SC33-8412-15 -- Kernel Messages (Kernel 4.4) - SC34-2599-11 -- libica Programmer's Reference -SC34-2602-07 * end of message Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards Gerhard Hiller Software Management and Linux Technologies IBM Systems Phone: +49-7031-16-4388 IBM Deutschland Schoenaicher Str. 220 E-Mail: ghil...@de.ibm.com 71032 Boeblingen Germany IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz, Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
Re: Install not working for SLES11 SP4 thru TRUNKED VSWITCH
Alan, Can you please explain what is the problem with linux working in trunk mode? What security problem are you talking about? Thanks Offer Baruch On Apr 22, 2016 8:00 AM, "Alan Altmark"wrote: > On Friday, 04/22/2016 at 02:41 GMT, Grzegorz Powiedziuk > wrote: > > > > 3. Less common, useful in some cases - OSA is plugged into "trunk" port > on > > real switch and in general same as (2). But, when you do grant, you can > say > > that this specific grant should act as "porttype trunk" (and you specify > > which vlans are trunked) so VSWITCH instead of removing the vlan tag, > > forwards the whole thing to linux guest. So linux guest should be > > configured to receive and send tagged frames. As Mark mentioned, during > > install process it might be troublesome. > > Please don't do this. Instead, use a PORTBASED VSWITCH so that you can > two vNICs, each assigned to a different VLAN on the same VSWITCH. > > Except for a VSWITCH sniffer, there's no longer any need for Linux to be > VLAN-aware when running as a guest. > > Alan Altmark > > Senior Managing z/VM and Linux Consultant > Lab Services System z Delivery Practice > IBM Systems & Technology Group > ibm.com/systems/services/labservices > office: 607.429.3323 > mobile; 607.321.7556 > alan_altm...@us.ibm.com > IBM Endicott > > -- > For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or > visit > http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 > -- > For more information on Linux on System z, visit > http://wiki.linuxvm.org/ > -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 -- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/