[LAD] changes in gcc

2012-04-29 Thread Emanuel Rumpf
Now ... isn't this a bit frustrating, if scripts stop to work after
only 5 years ??

I tried to compile ladspa-sdk, which failed.
As I found out, it is due to (nowadays) invalid argument order:

failed:
$(CC) $(CFLAGS)  $(LIBRARIES)   -o ../bin/listplugins   listplugins.o

works:
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o ../bin/listplugins   listplugins.o $(LIBRARIES)

gcc 4.6.3
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev


Re: [LAD] changes in gcc

2012-04-29 Thread Paul Davis
technically the first order (the one that fails) was always wrong.

its unfortunate that at least a generation or two of developers got
used to the fact that it was permitted.

On 4/29/12, Emanuel Rumpf xb...@web.de wrote:
 Now ... isn't this a bit frustrating, if scripts stop to work after
 only 5 years ??

 I tried to compile ladspa-sdk, which failed.
 As I found out, it is due to (nowadays) invalid argument order:

 failed:
 $(CC) $(CFLAGS)  $(LIBRARIES)   -o ../bin/listplugins   listplugins.o

 works:
 $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o ../bin/listplugins   listplugins.o $(LIBRARIES)

 gcc 4.6.3
 ___
 Linux-audio-dev mailing list
 Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
 http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev