Re: [PATCH 1/3] crypto: ccree: drop signature register check

[Gilad Ben-Yossef]

Herbert,

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 3:29 PM, Gilad Ben-Yossef  wrote:
> We were using the content of the signature register as a sanity
> check for the hardware functioning but it turns out not all
> implementers use the same values so the check is giving false
> negative on certain SoCs and so we drop it.
>

Please drop this patch. I have found a better fix and will send a v2 soon.

Thanks,
Gilad


-- 
Gilad Ben-Yossef
Chief Coffee Drinker

"If you take a class in large-scale robotics, can you end up in a
situation where the homework eats your dog?"
 -- Jean-Baptiste Queru

[PATCH 1/3] crypto: ccree: drop signature register check

[Gilad Ben-Yossef]

We were using the content of the signature register as a sanity
check for the hardware functioning but it turns out not all
implementers use the same values so the check is giving false
negative on certain SoCs and so we drop it.

Signed-off-by: Gilad Ben-Yossef 
---
 drivers/crypto/ccree/cc_driver.c | 18 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ccree/cc_driver.c b/drivers/crypto/ccree/cc_driver.c
index 89ce013..f8ff358 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/ccree/cc_driver.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/ccree/cc_driver.c
@@ -38,21 +38,20 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(cc_dump_bytes, "Dump buffers to kernel log 
as debugging aid");
 struct cc_hw_data {
char *name;
enum cc_hw_rev rev;
-   u32 sig;
 };
 
 /* Hardware revisions defs. */
 
 static const struct cc_hw_data cc712_hw = {
-   .name = "712", .rev = CC_HW_REV_712, .sig =  0xDCC71200U
+   .name = "712", .rev = CC_HW_REV_712
 };
 
 static const struct cc_hw_data cc710_hw = {
-   .name = "710", .rev = CC_HW_REV_710, .sig =  0xDCC63200U
+   .name = "710", .rev = CC_HW_REV_710
 };
 
 static const struct cc_hw_data cc630p_hw = {
-   .name = "630P", .rev = CC_HW_REV_630, .sig = 0xDCC63000U
+   .name = "630P", .rev = CC_HW_REV_630
 };
 
 static const struct of_device_id arm_ccree_dev_of_match[] = {
@@ -186,7 +185,6 @@ static int init_cc_resources(struct platform_device 
*plat_dev)
struct cc_drvdata *new_drvdata;
struct device *dev = _dev->dev;
struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
-   u32 signature_val;
u64 dma_mask;
const struct cc_hw_data *hw_rev;
const struct of_device_id *dev_id;
@@ -275,16 +273,6 @@ static int init_cc_resources(struct platform_device 
*plat_dev)
return rc;
}
 
-   /* Verify correct mapping */
-   signature_val = cc_ioread(new_drvdata, CC_REG(HOST_SIGNATURE));
-   if (signature_val != hw_rev->sig) {
-   dev_err(dev, "Invalid CC signature: SIGNATURE=0x%08X != 
expected=0x%08X\n",
-   signature_val, hw_rev->sig);
-   rc = -EINVAL;
-   goto post_clk_err;
-   }
-   dev_dbg(dev, "CC SIGNATURE=0x%08X\n", signature_val);
-
/* Display HW versions */
dev_info(dev, "ARM CryptoCell %s Driver: HW version 0x%08X, Driver 
version %s\n",
 hw_rev->name, cc_ioread(new_drvdata, CC_REG(HOST_VERSION)),
-- 
2.7.4