RE: Fwd: Re: libata pmp support

2007-08-27 Thread Weksler Izik
Tejun,

I did it yesterday with the 2.6.22.5 vanilla from kernel.org. It works.
I don't have the dmesg output here - I'll send it to you in the evening.
Generally:
It defines ATA2 as Config disk but doesn't wait for device ID and doesn't 
perform several resets - no delay during the boot. Which actually has been the 
target of the fix.
Otherwise the kernel boots OK and performs well.

Do you want more info besides the dmesg? What other test do you want me to run 
with the new kernel?
As a matter of fact with this kernel looks like many things work faster. Is it 
because of the performance improvements or because it is without SUSE patches?

Isaac

-Original Message-
From: Tejun Heo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 3:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: libata pmp support

Izik Weksler wrote:
 
  On Saturday 25 August 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
 Izik Weksler wrote:
 --  Forwarded Message  --

 Subject: Re: libata pmp support
 Date: Thursday 23 August 2007
 From: Izik Weksler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  On Thursday 23 August 2007, you wrote:
 Izik Weksler wrote:
 Tejun,

 If you're sending the patch please send it to this address.
 Okay, please test the attached patch and please cc 
 linux-ide@vger.kernel.org when replying.  Thanks.
 Tejun,

 The patch failed. It sais:
 Against which version?  The patch will apply to 2.6.22.5  2.6.23-rcX 
 w/o the PMP patches.
 
 Yeah. I realized that it applies to a version that doesn't contain pmp 
 support. I tried to apply it to the 2.6.22.2-3 that goes with the SUSE 
 10.3 and of course it failed because it is pmp patched.
 So you suggest that I use the 2.6.22.5 vanilla from the 
 www.kernel.org? If not please send me a link to the applicable version.

Yeap, please apply against vanilla kernels.  Thanks.

--
tejun

 The information contained in this communication is proprietary to Israel 
Aerospace Industries Ltd. 
and/or third parties, may contain confidential or privileged information, and 
is intended only for 
the use of the intended addressee thereof. If you are not the intended 
addressee, please be aware 
that any use, disclosure, distribution and/or copying of this communication is 
strictly prohibited.
If you receive this communication in error, please notify the sender 
immediately and delete it from 
your computer. Thank you. 


This message is processed by the PrivaWall Email Security Server. 



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: Fwd: Re: libata pmp support

2007-08-27 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello,

Weksler Izik wrote:
 I did it yesterday with the 2.6.22.5 vanilla from kernel.org. It 
 works. I don't have the dmesg output here - I'll send it to you in 
 the evening. Generally: It defines ATA2 as Config disk but doesn't 
 wait for device ID and doesn't perform several resets - no delay 
 during the boot. Which actually has been the target of the fix. 
 Otherwise the kernel boots OK and performs well.

Good to hear that.

 Do you want more info besides the dmesg? What other test do you want 
 me to run with the new kernel?

dmesg should be enough for now.

 As a matter of fact with this kernel looks like many things work
 faster. Is it because of the performance improvements or because it
 is without SUSE patches?

Hm Can you be more specific about 'many things work faster'?  If
anything is slower on SUSE, I'd like to hear about that.  They're paying
my lazy ass after all.  :-)  Please file a bug report at
bugzilla.novell.com and cc [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: Fwd: Re: libata pmp support

2007-08-27 Thread Izik Weksler


 On Monday 27 August 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
 Izik Weksler wrote:
   On Saturday 25 August 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
 
  Izik Weksler wrote:
  --  Forwarded Message  --
 
  Subject: Re: libata pmp support
  Date: Thursday 23 August 2007
  From: Izik Weksler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   On Thursday 23 August 2007, you wrote:
 
  Izik Weksler wrote:
  Tejun,
 
  If you're sending the patch please send it to this address.
 
  Okay, please test the attached patch and please cc
  linux-ide@vger.kernel.org when replying.  Thanks.
 
  Tejun,
 
  The patch failed. It sais:
 
  Against which version?  The patch will apply to 2.6.22.5  2.6.23-rcX
  w/o the PMP patches.
 
  Yeah. I realized that it applies to a version that doesn't contain pmp
  support. I tried to apply it to the 2.6.22.2-3 that goes with the SUSE
  10.3 and of course it failed because it is pmp patched.
  So you suggest that I use the 2.6.22.5 vanilla from the www.kernel.org?
  If not please send me a link to the applicable version.

 Yeap, please apply against vanilla kernels.  Thanks.

OK. Here is the dmesg output (dmesg.txt).
Concerning things being faster, I'll investigate it a bit further and give you  
specific indications later.

Isaac
Linux version 2.6.22.5-default ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 
(prerelease) (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP Sun Aug 26 19:56:50 IDT 2007
Command line: root=/dev/sda2 vga=0x317 resume=/dev/sda5 splash=silent elevator=
BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
 BIOS-e820:  - 0009fc00 (usable)
 BIOS-e820: 0009fc00 - 000a (reserved)
 BIOS-e820: 000e4000 - 0010 (reserved)
 BIOS-e820: 0010 - 3ff8 (usable)
 BIOS-e820: 3ff8 - 3ff8e000 (ACPI data)
 BIOS-e820: 3ff8e000 - 3ffe (ACPI NVS)
 BIOS-e820: 3ffe - 4000 (reserved)
 BIOS-e820: ffb0 - 0001 (reserved)
Entering add_active_range(0, 0, 159) 0 entries of 3200 used
Entering add_active_range(0, 256, 262016) 1 entries of 3200 used
end_pfn_map = 1048576
DMI 2.4 present.
ACPI: RSDP 000FAF20, 0024 (r2 ACPIAM)
ACPI: XSDT 3FF80100, 004C (r1 A_M_I_ OEMXSDT   7000724 MSFT   97)
ACPI: FACP 3FF80290, 00F4 (r3 A_M_I_ OEMFACP   7000724 MSFT   97)
ACPI: DSDT 3FF80590, 9560 (r1  A0543 A05430000 INTL 20060113)
ACPI: FACS 3FF8E000, 0040
ACPI: APIC 3FF80390, 0080 (r1 A_M_I_ OEMAPIC   7000724 MSFT   97)
ACPI: OEMB 3FF8E040, 0066 (r1 A_M_I_ AMI_OEM   7000724 MSFT   97)
ACPI: HPET 3FF89AF0, 0038 (r1 A_M_I_ OEMHPET   7000724 MSFT   97)
ACPI: MCFG 3FF89B30, 003C (r1 A_M_I_ OEMMCFG   7000724 MSFT   97)
No NUMA configuration found
Faking a node at -3ff8
Entering add_active_range(0, 0, 159) 0 entries of 3200 used
Entering add_active_range(0, 256, 262016) 1 entries of 3200 used
Bootmem setup node 0 -3ff8
Zone PFN ranges:
  DMA 0 - 4096
  DMA324096 -  1048576
  Normal1048576 -  1048576
early_node_map[2] active PFN ranges
0:0 -  159
0:  256 -   262016
On node 0 totalpages: 261919
  DMA zone: 56 pages used for memmap
  DMA zone: 1295 pages reserved
  DMA zone: 2648 pages, LIFO batch:0
  DMA32 zone: 3526 pages used for memmap
  DMA32 zone: 254394 pages, LIFO batch:31
  Normal zone: 0 pages used for memmap
ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x808
ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee0
ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x00] enabled)
Processor #0 (Bootup-CPU)
ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x02] lapic_id[0x01] enabled)
Processor #1
ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x03] lapic_id[0x82] disabled)
ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x04] lapic_id[0x83] disabled)
ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x02] address[0xfec0] gsi_base[0])
IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 2, address 0xfec0, GSI 0-23
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl)
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 high level)
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl)
ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 high level)
ACPI: IRQ0 used by override.
ACPI: IRQ2 used by override.
ACPI: IRQ9 used by override.
Setting APIC routing to flat
ACPI: HPET id: 0x8086a201 base: 0xfed0
Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information
swsusp: Registered nosave memory region: 0009f000 - 000a
swsusp: Registered nosave memory region: 000a - 000e4000
swsusp: Registered nosave memory region: 000e4000 - 0010
Allocating PCI resources starting at 5000 (gap: 4000:bfb0)
SMP: Allowing 4 CPUs, 2 hotplug CPUs
PERCPU: Allocating 50568 bytes of per cpu data
Built 1 zonelists.  Total pages: 257042
Kernel command line: root=/dev/sda2 vga=0x317 resume=/dev/sda5 splash=silent 
elevator=
Initializing CPU#0
PID hash table entries: 4096 (order: 12, 32768 bytes)
time.c: Detected 2403.067 MHz processor.
Console: colour dummy device 80x25
Checking aperture...
Calgary: detecting Calgary via 

Re: Fwd: Re: libata pmp support

2007-08-26 Thread Tejun Heo
Izik Weksler wrote:
 --  Forwarded Message  --
 
 Subject: Re: libata pmp support
 Date: Thursday 23 August 2007
 From: Izik Weksler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
  On Thursday 23 August 2007, you wrote:
 Izik Weksler wrote:
 Tejun,

 If you're sending the patch please send it to this address.
 Okay, please test the attached patch and please cc
 linux-ide@vger.kernel.org when replying.  Thanks.
 
 Tejun,
 
 The patch failed. It sais:

Against which version?  The patch will apply to 2.6.22.5  2.6.23-rcX
w/o the PMP patches.

-- 
tejun

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: Fwd: Re: libata pmp support

2007-08-26 Thread Izik Weksler


 On Saturday 25 August 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
 Izik Weksler wrote:
  --  Forwarded Message  --
 
  Subject: Re: libata pmp support
  Date: Thursday 23 August 2007
  From: Izik Weksler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   On Thursday 23 August 2007, you wrote:
 
  Izik Weksler wrote:
  Tejun,
 
  If you're sending the patch please send it to this address.
 
  Okay, please test the attached patch and please cc
  linux-ide@vger.kernel.org when replying.  Thanks.
 
  Tejun,
 
  The patch failed. It sais:

 Against which version?  The patch will apply to 2.6.22.5  2.6.23-rcX
 w/o the PMP patches.

Yeah. I realized that it applies to a version that doesn't contain pmp 
support. I tried to apply it to the 2.6.22.2-3 that goes with the SUSE 10.3 
and of course it failed because it is pmp patched.
So you suggest that I use the 2.6.22.5 vanilla from the www.kernel.org? If not 
please send me a link to the applicable version.

Isaac
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: Fwd: Re: libata pmp support

2007-08-26 Thread Tejun Heo
Izik Weksler wrote:
 
  On Saturday 25 August 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
 Izik Weksler wrote:
 --  Forwarded Message  --

 Subject: Re: libata pmp support
 Date: Thursday 23 August 2007
 From: Izik Weksler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  On Thursday 23 August 2007, you wrote:
 Izik Weksler wrote:
 Tejun,

 If you're sending the patch please send it to this address.
 Okay, please test the attached patch and please cc
 linux-ide@vger.kernel.org when replying.  Thanks.
 Tejun,

 The patch failed. It sais:
 Against which version?  The patch will apply to 2.6.22.5  2.6.23-rcX
 w/o the PMP patches.
 
 Yeah. I realized that it applies to a version that doesn't contain pmp 
 support. I tried to apply it to the 2.6.22.2-3 that goes with the SUSE 10.3 
 and of course it failed because it is pmp patched.
 So you suggest that I use the 2.6.22.5 vanilla from the www.kernel.org? If 
 not 
 please send me a link to the applicable version.

Yeap, please apply against vanilla kernels.  Thanks.

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html