Re: You forgot about videophones (useful for the deaf among us)! (was: Re: adsl)

2000-12-18 Thread Nadav Har'El

On Mon, Dec 18, 2000, Omer Zak wrote about "You forgot about videophones (useful for 
the deaf among us)! (was: Re: adsl)":
 
 VIDEOPHONES!  VIDEOPHONES!!  VIDEOPHONES!!!  VIDEOPHONES
 They need at least 384Kbps in each direction to provide high quality
 pictures.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't *DSL technology allows for a fixed
*total* bandwidth, and it is up to the implementation to decide how much
bandwidth it reserves for each direction? The 64kbps choice was probably made
because typical users don't send much upstream (forget about videophones for
a moment...) and reserving, say 500mbps for upstream will mean that most of that
bandwidth will be wasted. So why can't Bezek give some of the users DSL lines
with a different bandwidth division? Please correct me if I have made wrong
assumptions.

There may be a more sinister explanation for the asymetric nature of ADSL:
typical users will not sit by the computer 24/7 downloading stuff. However,
if their computer is connected all the time, it's easy to set up a server
that serves files 24/7, potentially using huge amounts of bandwidth. So by
limiting the upstream bandwidth, they limit the amount of bandwidth you can 
se up!

And another question? I know that videophones over ISDN exist for many years
now. Does that mean that 128kbps is maybe enough for a videophone? Or does
that mean the image will be too small or too fuzzy to read lips, or something?

-- 
Nadav Har'El|  Monday, Dec 18 2000, 21 Kislev 5761
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |-
Phone: +972-53-245868, ICQ 13349191 |Take my advice, I don't use it anyway.
http://nadav.harel.org.il   |

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: You forgot about videophones (useful for the deaf among us)! (was: Re: adsl)

2000-12-18 Thread Oded Arbel


- Original Message -
From: "Nadav Har'El" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't *DSL technology allows for a fixed
 *total* bandwidth, and it is up to the implementation to decide how much
 bandwidth it reserves for each direction? The 64kbps choice was probably
made
 because typical users don't send much upstream (forget about videophones
for
 a moment...) and reserving, say 500mbps for upstream will mean that most
of that
 bandwidth will be wasted. So why can't Bezek give some of the users DSL
lines
 with a different bandwidth division? Please correct me if I have made
wrong
 assumptions.
You are wrong (sorry). ADSL is completly asynchronous (that's what the A
stands for).

Oded

..
Geoffrey : "I have a feeling this is going to be the beginning of a
beautiful hatred."
 -- from "The Two Mrs. Carrolls"



=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: You forgot about videophones (useful for the deaf among us)! (was: Re: adsl)

2000-12-18 Thread Nadav Har'El

On Mon, Dec 18, 2000, Oded Arbel wrote about "Re: You forgot about videophones (useful 
for the deaf among us)! (was: Re: adsl)":
 
 - Original Message -
 You are wrong (sorry). ADSL is completly asynchronous (that's what the A
 stands for).

I'm sorry, but you got it wrong yourself... the "A" stands for Asymmetric,
not asynchronous (you probably confused it with the A in ATM. Well, at least
didn't confuse it with the A in Hawthorne's "The Scarlet Letter" :))

I don't know what you mean that ADSL is "asynchronous". So what? Can't it
still split up the frequency range in an asymmetric way between the two
directions, giving more frequencies to the downstream range? Anyway, I
believe that ADSL is synchronous, not asynchronous... Take a look for
example at http://www.adsl.com/adsl_tutorial.html 

-- 
Nadav Har'El|  Monday, Dec 18 2000, 21 Kislev 5761
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |-
Phone: +972-53-245868, ICQ 13349191 |Cigarette: tobacco wrapped in paper,
http://nadav.harel.org.il   |fire at one end, and a fool at the other.

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: You forgot about videophones (useful for the deaf among us)! (was: Re: adsl)

2000-12-18 Thread Geoffrey S. Mendelson

Nadav Har'El wrote:
 
 On Mon, Dec 18, 2000, Omer Zak wrote about "You forgot about videophones (useful for 
the deaf among us)! (was: Re: adsl)":
  
  VIDEOPHONES!  VIDEOPHONES!!  VIDEOPHONES!!!  VIDEOPHONES
  They need at least 384Kbps in each direction to provide high quality
  pictures.

 And another question? I know that videophones over ISDN exist for many years
 now. Does that mean that 128kbps is maybe enough for a videophone? Or does
 that mean the image will be too small or too fuzzy to read lips, or something?

We have an ISDN (128k) videophone at work. Usually we supplement the
video with a regular audio call on a speakerphone. If the camera is
focused on the persons lips and they s-p-e-a-k--s-l-o-w-l-y you might be
able to read their lips, but don't expect to watch a speaker at a podium
and do it.

The image being digital is always sharp and clear (depending upon the
focus of the camera). If the viewing are is too big, or the action too
fast (such as a fast pan around the room), it just becomes jerky.. ... 

Geoff.

-- 
Geoffrey S. Mendelson
Tel:  972-(0)3-6944-211  Fax: 972-(0)3-6944-225 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I knew that Crowley said that "Do what thou wilt is the whole of the law",
but I never thought it applied to the US Supreme Court.

=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]