Re: [PATCH] [stable v5.4.x] pwm: jz4740: Fix build failure

2020-07-14 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 09:47:02PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:48:36PM +0200, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> > 
> > > Am 10.07.2020 um 12:27 schrieb Uwe Kleine-König 
> > > :
> > > 
> > > When commit 9017dc4fbd59 ("pwm: jz4740: Enhance precision in calculation
> > > of duty cycle") from v5.8-rc1 was backported to v5.4.x its dependency on
> > > commit ce1f9cece057 ("pwm: jz4740: Use clocks from TCU driver") was not
> > > noticed which made the pwm-jz4740 driver fail to build.
> > 
> > Please can you add my "reported by?"
> 
> Greg, can you please add this while applying? (Assuming you're ok with
> this change and ideally Paul can confirm the change is fine.)
> 
> Reported-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller 

Now added, thanks.


Re: [PATCH] [stable v5.4.x] pwm: jz4740: Fix build failure

2020-07-10 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:48:36PM +0200, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> 
> > Am 10.07.2020 um 12:27 schrieb Uwe Kleine-König 
> > :
> > 
> > When commit 9017dc4fbd59 ("pwm: jz4740: Enhance precision in calculation
> > of duty cycle") from v5.8-rc1 was backported to v5.4.x its dependency on
> > commit ce1f9cece057 ("pwm: jz4740: Use clocks from TCU driver") was not
> > noticed which made the pwm-jz4740 driver fail to build.
> 
> Please can you add my "reported by?"

Greg, can you please add this while applying? (Assuming you're ok with
this change and ideally Paul can confirm the change is fine.)

Reported-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller 

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.   | Uwe Kleine-König|
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [PATCH] [stable v5.4.x] pwm: jz4740: Fix build failure

2020-07-10 Thread H. Nikolaus Schaller


> Am 10.07.2020 um 12:27 schrieb Uwe Kleine-König 
> :
> 
> When commit 9017dc4fbd59 ("pwm: jz4740: Enhance precision in calculation
> of duty cycle") from v5.8-rc1 was backported to v5.4.x its dependency on
> commit ce1f9cece057 ("pwm: jz4740: Use clocks from TCU driver") was not
> noticed which made the pwm-jz4740 driver fail to build.

Please can you add my "reported by?"

> As ce1f9cece057 depends on still more rework, just backport a small part
> of this commit to make the driver build again. (There is no dependency
> on the functionality introduced in ce1f9cece057, just the rate variable
> is needed.)

BR and thanks,
Nikolaus

> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König 
> ---
> Hello,
> 
> @Paul: Can you please check this is correct? I only build-tested this
> change.
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 
> drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c
> index d0f5c69930d0..77c28313e95f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c
> @@ -92,11 +92,12 @@ static int jz4740_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct 
> pwm_device *pwm,
> {
>   struct jz4740_pwm_chip *jz4740 = to_jz4740(pwm->chip);
>   unsigned long long tmp;
> - unsigned long period, duty;
> + unsigned long rate, period, duty;
>   unsigned int prescaler = 0;
>   uint16_t ctrl;
> 
> - tmp = (unsigned long long)clk_get_rate(jz4740->clk) * state->period;
> + rate = clk_get_rate(jz4740->clk);
> + tmp = rate * state->period;
>   do_div(tmp, 10);
>   period = tmp;
> 
> -- 
> 2.27.0
> 



[PATCH] [stable v5.4.x] pwm: jz4740: Fix build failure

2020-07-10 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
When commit 9017dc4fbd59 ("pwm: jz4740: Enhance precision in calculation
of duty cycle") from v5.8-rc1 was backported to v5.4.x its dependency on
commit ce1f9cece057 ("pwm: jz4740: Use clocks from TCU driver") was not
noticed which made the pwm-jz4740 driver fail to build.

As ce1f9cece057 depends on still more rework, just backport a small part
of this commit to make the driver build again. (There is no dependency
on the functionality introduced in ce1f9cece057, just the rate variable
is needed.)

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König 
---
Hello,

@Paul: Can you please check this is correct? I only build-tested this
change.

Best regards
Uwe

 drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c
index d0f5c69930d0..77c28313e95f 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c
@@ -92,11 +92,12 @@ static int jz4740_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct 
pwm_device *pwm,
 {
struct jz4740_pwm_chip *jz4740 = to_jz4740(pwm->chip);
unsigned long long tmp;
-   unsigned long period, duty;
+   unsigned long rate, period, duty;
unsigned int prescaler = 0;
uint16_t ctrl;
 
-   tmp = (unsigned long long)clk_get_rate(jz4740->clk) * state->period;
+   rate = clk_get_rate(jz4740->clk);
+   tmp = rate * state->period;
do_div(tmp, 10);
period = tmp;
 
-- 
2.27.0