Quoting t...@redhat.com (2020-11-27 16:28:28)
> From: Tom Rix
>
> The macro use will already have a semicolon.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> index e67cec8fa2aa..ef767f04c37c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void intel_device_info_print_static(const struct
> intel_device_info *info,
> drm_printf(p, "ppgtt-type: %d\n", info->ppgtt_type);
> drm_printf(p, "dma_mask_size: %u\n", info->dma_mask_size);
>
> -#define PRINT_FLAG(name) drm_printf(p, "%s: %s\n", #name, yesno(info->name));
> +#define PRINT_FLAG(name) drm_printf(p, "%s: %s\n", #name, yesno(info->name))
> DEV_INFO_FOR_EACH_FLAG(PRINT_FLAG);
I thought that this was a macro that avoided adding the ';' to each
invocation. Perhaps another time.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson
-Chris
