答复: [PATCH -next] ACPI: tables: Mark acpi_init_fpdt with static keyword

2021-01-29 Thread Zouwei (Samuel) 
Hi Rui, 

You can fix it in your patch together.

-邮件原件-
发件人: Zhang Rui [mailto:rui.zh...@intel.com] 
发送时间: 2021年1月29日 14:25
收件人: Zouwei (Samuel) ; r...@rjwysocki.net; l...@kernel.org
抄送: linux-a...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
主题: Re: [PATCH -next] ACPI: tables: Mark acpi_init_fpdt with static keyword

Hi, Wei,

Thanks for the patch.

Given that there are a couple of things need to be fixed in the orignal patch, 
I'd prefer to refresh the patch with all the fixes included

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-acpi/patch/20210129061548.13448-1-rui.zh...@intel.com/

what do you think?

thanks,
rui

On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 19:31 +0800, Zou Wei wrote:
> Fix the following sparse warning:
> 
> drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c:230:6: warning: symbol 'acpi_init_fpdt' was 
> not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zou Wei 
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c index 
> b810811..968f9cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c
> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static int fpdt_process_subtable(u64 address, u32
> subtable_type)
>   return 0;
>  }
>  
> -void acpi_init_fpdt(void)
> +static void acpi_init_fpdt(void)
>  {
>   acpi_status status;
>   struct acpi_table_header *header;

Re: [PATCH -next] ACPI: tables: Mark acpi_init_fpdt with static keyword

2021-01-28 Thread Zhang Rui 
Hi, Wei,

Thanks for the patch.

Given that there are a couple of things need to be fixed in the orignal
patch, I'd prefer to refresh the patch with all the fixes included

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-acpi/patch/20210129061548.13448-1-rui.zh...@intel.com/

what do you think?

thanks,
rui

On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 19:31 +0800, Zou Wei wrote:
> Fix the following sparse warning:
> 
> drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c:230:6: warning: symbol 'acpi_init_fpdt' was
> not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zou Wei 
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c
> index b810811..968f9cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c
> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static int fpdt_process_subtable(u64 address, u32
> subtable_type)
>   return 0;
>  }
>  
> -void acpi_init_fpdt(void)
> +static void acpi_init_fpdt(void)
>  {
>   acpi_status status;
>   struct acpi_table_header *header;

[PATCH -next] ACPI: tables: Mark acpi_init_fpdt with static keyword

2021-01-28 Thread Zou Wei 
Fix the following sparse warning:

drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c:230:6: warning: symbol 'acpi_init_fpdt' was not 
declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Zou Wei 
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c
index b810811..968f9cc 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static int fpdt_process_subtable(u64 address, u32 
subtable_type)
return 0;
 }
 
-void acpi_init_fpdt(void)
+static void acpi_init_fpdt(void)
 {
acpi_status status;
struct acpi_table_header *header;
-- 
2.6.2