[RFC] Generic PHY interface extention for dynamic configuration
Hi Kishon, Now, Generic PHY framework just provide four interfaces(AKA: init/exit/power_on/power_off). Also, these fours itfs take struct phy as unique argument.Is it means that the generic PHY framework can't support to modify PHY configuration at run-time for diff cases? Actually I'm writing some code for supporting emmc controller's phy. And sometimes it indeed need to modify the phy's configuration. But I have no idea about how to deal with it in current framework. So I send this RFC to you and mailing. Thanks. -- Best Regards Shawn Lin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[RFC] Generic PHY interface extention for dynamic configuration
Hi Kishon, Now, Generic PHY framework just provide four interfaces(AKA: init/exit/power_on/power_off). Also, these fours itfs take struct phy as unique argument.Is it means that the generic PHY framework can't support to modify PHY configuration at run-time for diff cases? Actually I'm writing some code for supporting emmc controller's phy. And sometimes it indeed need to modify the phy's configuration. But I have no idea about how to deal with it in current framework. So I send this RFC to you and mailing. Thanks. -- Best Regards Shawn Lin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
