linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the bluetooth tree
Hi all, Commit f48a273a4244 ("Bluetooth: virtio_bt: Use virtio_cread16 instead of virtio_cread") is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell pgpD2EFGhPL79.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the bluetooth tree
Hi all, Commit 98d2c3e17310 ("Bluetooth: L2CAP: Try harder to accept device not knowing options") is missing a Signed-off-by from its author. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell pgpMmSCCOkMuk.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the bluetooth tree
On Tue, 2021-01-26 at 19:54 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Commit > > 98d2c3e17310 ("Bluetooth: L2CAP: Try harder to accept device not > knowing options") > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author. Marcel, is it possible to amend this to add my Signed-off-by? Signed-off-by: Bastien Nocera Cheers
linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the bluetooth tree
Hi all, Commit bf1f79470a62 ("Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for Intel Bluetooth Device Typhoon Peak (8087:0032)") is missing a Signed-off-by from its author. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell pgp7QUlKCKDFZ.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the bluetooth tree
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Johan Hedbergwrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 10:25:52 +1100 Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >> > Commit >> > >> > 0a03f98b98c2 ("Bluetooth: Add a new 04ca:3015 QCA_ROME device") >> > >> > is missing a Signed-off-by from its . >> ^ >> committer > > It was me who originally committed and pushed this to the bluetooth-next > tree, and the commit does have a signed-off-by from me. However, it > looks like Marcel did some reshuffling/rebasing of the tree and now the > commit shows him in the committer field. In PDx86 subsystem we in the result of this check split our (Darren's and mine) review queues to a separate *non-published* (OK, they are visible, but not considered published) branches. Rebase, as stated that time by Linus, as formally creating new commits. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the bluetooth tree
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Johan Hedberg wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 10:25:52 +1100 Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >> > Commit >> > >> > 0a03f98b98c2 ("Bluetooth: Add a new 04ca:3015 QCA_ROME device") >> > >> > is missing a Signed-off-by from its . >> ^ >> committer > > It was me who originally committed and pushed this to the bluetooth-next > tree, and the commit does have a signed-off-by from me. However, it > looks like Marcel did some reshuffling/rebasing of the tree and now the > commit shows him in the committer field. In PDx86 subsystem we in the result of this check split our (Darren's and mine) review queues to a separate *non-published* (OK, they are visible, but not considered published) branches. Rebase, as stated that time by Linus, as formally creating new commits. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the bluetooth tree
Hi, On Sat, Dec 30, 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 10:25:52 +1100 Stephen Rothwell> wrote: > > Commit > > > > 0a03f98b98c2 ("Bluetooth: Add a new 04ca:3015 QCA_ROME device") > > > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its . > ^ > committer It was me who originally committed and pushed this to the bluetooth-next tree, and the commit does have a signed-off-by from me. However, it looks like Marcel did some reshuffling/rebasing of the tree and now the commit shows him in the committer field. Johan
Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the bluetooth tree
Hi, On Sat, Dec 30, 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 10:25:52 +1100 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > Commit > > > > 0a03f98b98c2 ("Bluetooth: Add a new 04ca:3015 QCA_ROME device") > > > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its . > ^ > committer It was me who originally committed and pushed this to the bluetooth-next tree, and the commit does have a signed-off-by from me. However, it looks like Marcel did some reshuffling/rebasing of the tree and now the commit shows him in the committer field. Johan
Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the bluetooth tree
Hi all, On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 10:25:52 +1100 Stephen Rothwellwrote: > > Hi all, > > Commit > > 0a03f98b98c2 ("Bluetooth: Add a new 04ca:3015 QCA_ROME device") > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its . ^ committer -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the bluetooth tree
Hi all, On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 10:25:52 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > Commit > > 0a03f98b98c2 ("Bluetooth: Add a new 04ca:3015 QCA_ROME device") > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its . ^ committer -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the bluetooth tree
Hi all, Commit 0a03f98b98c2 ("Bluetooth: Add a new 04ca:3015 QCA_ROME device") is missing a Signed-off-by from its . -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the bluetooth tree
Hi all, Commit 0a03f98b98c2 ("Bluetooth: Add a new 04ca:3015 QCA_ROME device") is missing a Signed-off-by from its . -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell