Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP3+: dpll: optimize noncore dpll locking logic

2012-05-24 Thread Paul Walmsley
Hi Nishanth

On Fri, 18 May 2012, Nishanth Menon wrote:

 From: Vikram Pandita vikram.pand...@ti.com
 
 If the dpll is already locked, code can be optimized
 to return much earlier than doing redundent set of lock mode
 and wait on idlest.
 
 Cc: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com
 Cc: Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com
 Cc: Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com
 Cc: Mike Turquette mturque...@ti.com
 Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
 
 Signed-off-by: Vikram Pandita vikram.pand...@ti.com

Did you intend to add your Signed-off-by: to this patch?

Also, just FYI, no need to add the Cc: lines for the mailing lists in the 
bottom of the patch description.

- Paul


 ---
  arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c |   12 +++-
  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 
 diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c
 index fc56745..3cfd7c4 100644
 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c
 +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c
 @@ -135,11 +135,20 @@ static u16 _omap3_dpll_compute_freqsel(struct clk *clk, 
 u8 n)
   */
  static int _omap3_noncore_dpll_lock(struct clk *clk)
  {
 + const struct dpll_data *dd;
   u8 ai;
 - int r;
 + u8 state = 1;
 + int r = 0;
  
   pr_debug(clock: locking DPLL %s\n, clk-name);
  
 + dd = clk-dpll_data;
 + state = __ffs(dd-idlest_mask);
 +
 + /* Check if already locked */
 + if ((__raw_readl(dd-idlest_reg)  dd-idlest_mask) == state)
 + goto done;
 +
   ai = omap3_dpll_autoidle_read(clk);
  
   omap3_dpll_deny_idle(clk);
 @@ -151,6 +160,7 @@ static int _omap3_noncore_dpll_lock(struct clk *clk)
   if (ai)
   omap3_dpll_allow_idle(clk);
  
 +done:
   return r;
  }
  
 -- 
 1.7.9.5
 


- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP3+: dpll: optimize noncore dpll locking logic

2012-05-24 Thread Menon, Nishanth
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
 Hi Nishanth

 On Fri, 18 May 2012, Nishanth Menon wrote:

 From: Vikram Pandita vikram.pand...@ti.com

 If the dpll is already locked, code can be optimized
 to return much earlier than doing redundent set of lock mode
 and wait on idlest.

 Cc: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com
 Cc: Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com
 Cc: Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com
 Cc: Mike Turquette mturque...@ti.com
 Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org

 Signed-off-by: Vikram Pandita vikram.pand...@ti.com

 Did you intend to add your Signed-off-by: to this patch?

Other than forwarding the patch over(since it seems to have slipped
through the fingers of folks monitoring the product trees), I have had
no other contributions to the patch.

 Also, just FYI, no need to add the Cc: lines for the mailing lists in the
 bottom of the patch description.

Thanks. point taken. will take care of that in future patches.

Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP3+: dpll: optimize noncore dpll locking logic

2012-05-24 Thread Paul Walmsley
On Thu, 24 May 2012, Menon, Nishanth wrote:

 On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
  On Fri, 18 May 2012, Nishanth Menon wrote:
 
  From: Vikram Pandita vikram.pand...@ti.com
 
  If the dpll is already locked, code can be optimized
  to return much earlier than doing redundent set of lock mode
  and wait on idlest.
 
  Cc: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com
  Cc: Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com
  Cc: Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com
  Cc: Mike Turquette mturque...@ti.com
  Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
  Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
 
  Signed-off-by: Vikram Pandita vikram.pand...@ti.com
 
  Did you intend to add your Signed-off-by: to this patch?
 
 Other than forwarding the patch over(since it seems to have slipped
 through the fingers of folks monitoring the product trees), I have had
 no other contributions to the patch.

Okay.  As I understand it, the maintainers above me would like 
Signed-off-by:s from the entire submission patch, even if there are no 
contributions to the patch itself.  So please let me know if it's okay for 
me to add your S-o-b.


- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP3+: dpll: optimize noncore dpll locking logic

2012-05-24 Thread Menon, Nishanth
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:

 Okay.  As I understand it, the maintainers above me would like
 Signed-off-by:s from the entire submission patch, even if there are no
 contributions to the patch itself.  So please let me know if it's okay for
 me to add your S-o-b.
Thanks. ok with me :)

Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH] ARM: OMAP3+: dpll: optimize noncore dpll locking logic

2012-05-18 Thread Nishanth Menon
From: Vikram Pandita vikram.pand...@ti.com

If the dpll is already locked, code can be optimized
to return much earlier than doing redundent set of lock mode
and wait on idlest.

Cc: Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com
Cc: Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com
Cc: Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com
Cc: Mike Turquette mturque...@ti.com
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org

Signed-off-by: Vikram Pandita vikram.pand...@ti.com
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c |   12 +++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c
index fc56745..3cfd7c4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c
@@ -135,11 +135,20 @@ static u16 _omap3_dpll_compute_freqsel(struct clk *clk, 
u8 n)
  */
 static int _omap3_noncore_dpll_lock(struct clk *clk)
 {
+   const struct dpll_data *dd;
u8 ai;
-   int r;
+   u8 state = 1;
+   int r = 0;
 
pr_debug(clock: locking DPLL %s\n, clk-name);
 
+   dd = clk-dpll_data;
+   state = __ffs(dd-idlest_mask);
+
+   /* Check if already locked */
+   if ((__raw_readl(dd-idlest_reg)  dd-idlest_mask) == state)
+   goto done;
+
ai = omap3_dpll_autoidle_read(clk);
 
omap3_dpll_deny_idle(clk);
@@ -151,6 +160,7 @@ static int _omap3_noncore_dpll_lock(struct clk *clk)
if (ai)
omap3_dpll_allow_idle(clk);
 
+done:
return r;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html