Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] omap3: beaglexm: fix power on of DVI

2011-01-11 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com [110111 09:12]:
 From: Koen Kooi k...@beagleboard.org
 
 TFP410 DVI chip is used to provide display out.
 This chip is controlled by 2 lines:
 LDO which supplies the power is controlled over gpio + 2
 and the enable of the chip itself is done over gpio + 1
 NOTE: the LDO is necessary for LED, serial blocks as well.
 
 gpio + 1 was used to sense USB overcurrent in vanilla beagle.
 
 Without this fix, the display would not function as the LDO
 remains shut down.
 
 [...@ti.com: split up, added descriptive changelogs]
 Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com
 Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi k...@beagleboard.org
 ---
  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c |   20 +---
  1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c 
 b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c
 index 673deb9..458aee4 100644
 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c
 +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c
 @@ -293,9 +293,10 @@ static int beagle_twl_gpio_setup(struct device *dev,
   /* REVISIT: need ehci-omap hooks for external VBUS
* power switch and overcurrent detect
*/
 -
 - gpio_request(gpio + 1, EHCI_nOC);
 - gpio_direction_input(gpio + 1);
 + if (omap3_beagle_get_rev() != OMAP3BEAGLE_BOARD_XM) {
 + gpio_request(gpio + 1, EHCI_nOC);
 + gpio_direction_input(gpio + 1);
 + }

The return value for gpio_request must be checked.
  
   /*
* TWL4030_GPIO_MAX + 0 == ledA, EHCI nEN_USB_PWR (out, XM active
 @@ -316,6 +317,19 @@ static int beagle_twl_gpio_setup(struct device *dev,
   /* TWL4030_GPIO_MAX + 1 == ledB, PMU_STAT (out, active low LED) */
   gpio_leds[2].gpio = gpio + TWL4030_GPIO_MAX + 1;
  
 + /*
 +  * gpio + 1 on Xm controls the TFP410's enable line (active low)
 +  * gpio + 2 control varies depending on the board rev as follows:
 +  * P7/P8 revisions(prototype): Camera EN
 +  * A2+ revisions (production): LDO (supplies DVI, serial, led blocks)
 +  */
 + if (omap3_beagle_get_rev() == OMAP3BEAGLE_BOARD_XM) {
 + gpio_request(gpio + 1, nDVI_PWR_EN);
 + gpio_direction_output(gpio + 1, 0);
 + gpio_request(gpio + 2, DVI_LDO_EN);
 + gpio_direction_output(gpio + 2, 1);
 + }
 +
   return 0;
  }

Here too. I've applied the first two patches into devel-board branch,
but not this one.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] omap3: beaglexm: fix power on of DVI

2011-01-11 Thread Nishanth Menon

Tony Lindgren had written, on 01/11/2011 05:23 PM, the following:
[..]

-
-   gpio_request(gpio + 1, EHCI_nOC);
-   gpio_direction_input(gpio + 1);
+   if (omap3_beagle_get_rev() != OMAP3BEAGLE_BOARD_XM) {
+   gpio_request(gpio + 1, EHCI_nOC);
+   gpio_direction_input(gpio + 1);
+   }


The return value for gpio_request must be checked.

Ack.
we can go down two paths:
a) I can redo this patch as in v6.patch (attached)
OR
b) we take this patch and do another one cleaning the function up - 
gpio-check.patch


--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
From d08694a8dff8506f1963d9249a89dae9fe508e70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Koen Kooi k...@beagleboard.org
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 13:29:18 -0600
Subject: [PATCH v6 3/3] omap3: beaglexm: fix power on of DVI

TFP410 DVI chip is used to provide display out.
This chip is controlled by 2 lines:
LDO which supplies the power is controlled over gpio + 2
and the enable of the chip itself is done over gpio + 1
NOTE: the LDO is necessary for LED, serial blocks as well.

gpio + 1 was used to sense USB overcurrent in vanilla beagle.

Without this fix, the display would not function as the LDO
remains shut down.

[...@ti.com: split up, added descriptive changelogs]
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi k...@beagleboard.org
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c |   42 --
 1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c
index 673deb9..28dfe8e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c
@@ -273,6 +273,8 @@ static struct gpio_led gpio_leds[];
 static int beagle_twl_gpio_setup(struct device *dev,
 		unsigned gpio, unsigned ngpio)
 {
+	int r;
+
 	if (omap3_beagle_get_rev() == OMAP3BEAGLE_BOARD_XM) {
 		mmc[0].gpio_wp = -EINVAL;
 	} else if ((omap3_beagle_get_rev() == OMAP3BEAGLE_BOARD_C1_3) ||
@@ -293,9 +295,16 @@ static int beagle_twl_gpio_setup(struct device *dev,
 	/* REVISIT: need ehci-omap hooks for external VBUS
 	 * power switch and overcurrent detect
 	 */
-
-	gpio_request(gpio + 1, EHCI_nOC);
-	gpio_direction_input(gpio + 1);
+	if (omap3_beagle_get_rev() != OMAP3BEAGLE_BOARD_XM) {
+		r = gpio_request(gpio + 1, EHCI_nOC);
+		if (!r) {
+			r = gpio_direction_input(gpio + 1);
+			if (r)
+gpio_free(gpio + 1);
+		}
+		if (r)
+			pr_err(%s: unable to configure EHCI_nOC\n, __func__);
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * TWL4030_GPIO_MAX + 0 == ledA, EHCI nEN_USB_PWR (out, XM active
@@ -316,6 +325,33 @@ static int beagle_twl_gpio_setup(struct device *dev,
 	/* TWL4030_GPIO_MAX + 1 == ledB, PMU_STAT (out, active low LED) */
 	gpio_leds[2].gpio = gpio + TWL4030_GPIO_MAX + 1;
 
+	/*
+	 * gpio + 1 on Xm controls the TFP410's enable line (active low)
+	 * gpio + 2 control varies depending on the board rev as follows:
+	 * P7/P8 revisions(prototype): Camera EN
+	 * A2+ revisions (production): LDO (supplies DVI, serial, led blocks)
+	 */
+	if (omap3_beagle_get_rev() == OMAP3BEAGLE_BOARD_XM) {
+		r = gpio_request(gpio + 1, nDVI_PWR_EN);
+		if (!r) {
+			r = gpio_direction_output(gpio + 1, 0);
+			if (r)
+gpio_free(gpio + 1);
+		}
+		if (r)
+			pr_err(%s: unable to configure nDVI_PWR_EN\n,
+__func__);
+		r = gpio_request(gpio + 2, DVI_LDO_EN);
+		if (!r) {
+			r = gpio_direction_output(gpio + 2, 1);
+			if (r)
+gpio_free(gpio + 1);
+		}
+		if (r)
+			pr_err(%s: unable to configure DVI_LDO_EN\n,
+__func__);
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.6.3.3

From f16524ab1cfba7d2a9bd0a8ef5a577a1fb41bfff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:51:47 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] omap3: beagle: check gpio returns in gpio_setup

gpio request and set of directions need checks of return value
to ensure that operation succeeded or not.

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c |   49 ---
 1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c
index 458aee4..fc598d3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c
@@ -273,6 +273,8 @@ static struct gpio_led gpio_leds[];
 static int beagle_twl_gpio_setup(struct device *dev,
 		unsigned gpio, unsigned ngpio)
 {
+	int r;
+
 	if (omap3_beagle_get_rev() == OMAP3BEAGLE_BOARD_XM) {
 		mmc[0].gpio_wp = -EINVAL;
 	} else if ((omap3_beagle_get_rev() == OMAP3BEAGLE_BOARD_C1_3) ||
@@ -294,19 +296,29 @@ static int beagle_twl_gpio_setup(struct device *dev,
 	 * power switch and overcurrent detect
 	 */
 	if (omap3_beagle_get_rev() != OMAP3BEAGLE_BOARD_XM) {
-		gpio_request(gpio + 1, EHCI_nOC);
-		gpio_direction_input(gpio + 1);
+		r = gpio_request(gpio + 1, EHCI_nOC);
+		if (!r) {
+			r = gpio_direction_input(gpio + 1);
+			if (r)
+gpio_free(gpio + 1);
+		}
+		if (r)
+			pr_err(%s: 

Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] omap3: beaglexm: fix power on of DVI

2011-01-11 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com [110111 15:54]:
 Tony Lindgren had written, on 01/11/2011 05:23 PM, the following:
 [..]
 -
 -   gpio_request(gpio + 1, EHCI_nOC);
 -   gpio_direction_input(gpio + 1);
 +   if (omap3_beagle_get_rev() != OMAP3BEAGLE_BOARD_XM) {
 +   gpio_request(gpio + 1, EHCI_nOC);
 +   gpio_direction_input(gpio + 1);
 +   }
 
 The return value for gpio_request must be checked.
 Ack.
 we can go down two paths:
 a) I can redo this patch as in v6.patch (attached)

Yes let's do that, one comment below though..

 OR
 b) we take this patch and do another one cleaning the function up -
 gpio-check.patch

That can be done later.
 
 + if (omap3_beagle_get_rev() == OMAP3BEAGLE_BOARD_XM) {
 + r = gpio_request(gpio + 1, nDVI_PWR_EN);
 + if (!r) {
 + r = gpio_direction_output(gpio + 1, 0);
 + if (r)
 + gpio_free(gpio + 1);
 + }
 + if (r)
 + pr_err(%s: unable to configure nDVI_PWR_EN\n,
 + __func__);
 + r = gpio_request(gpio + 2, DVI_LDO_EN);
 + if (!r) {
 + r = gpio_direction_output(gpio + 2, 1);
 + if (r)
 + gpio_free(gpio + 1);
 + }
 + if (r)
 + pr_err(%s: unable to configure DVI_LDO_EN\n,
 + __func__);
 + }
 +

Should the second gpio_free be gpio + 2 instead of gpio + 1?

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] omap3: beaglexm: fix power on of DVI

2011-01-11 Thread Nishanth Menon

Tony Lindgren had written, on 01/11/2011 06:15 PM, the following:

* Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com [110111 15:54]:

Tony Lindgren had written, on 01/11/2011 05:23 PM, the following:
[..]

-
-   gpio_request(gpio + 1, EHCI_nOC);
-   gpio_direction_input(gpio + 1);
+   if (omap3_beagle_get_rev() != OMAP3BEAGLE_BOARD_XM) {
+   gpio_request(gpio + 1, EHCI_nOC);
+   gpio_direction_input(gpio + 1);
+   }

The return value for gpio_request must be checked.

Ack.
we can go down two paths:
a) I can redo this patch as in v6.patch (attached)


Yes let's do that, one comment below though..


OR
b) we take this patch and do another one cleaning the function up -
gpio-check.patch


That can be done later.

ok

 

+   if (omap3_beagle_get_rev() == OMAP3BEAGLE_BOARD_XM) {
+   r = gpio_request(gpio + 1, nDVI_PWR_EN);
+   if (!r) {
+   r = gpio_direction_output(gpio + 1, 0);
+   if (r)
+   gpio_free(gpio + 1);
+   }
+   if (r)
+   pr_err(%s: unable to configure nDVI_PWR_EN\n,
+   __func__);
+   r = gpio_request(gpio + 2, DVI_LDO_EN);
+   if (!r) {
+   r = gpio_direction_output(gpio + 2, 1);
+   if (r)
+   gpio_free(gpio + 1);
+   }
+   if (r)
+   pr_err(%s: unable to configure DVI_LDO_EN\n,
+   __func__);
+   }
+


Should the second gpio_free be gpio + 2 instead of gpio + 1?

oops.. yep. will fix and send out a v6 for this alone. thanks for the check.

--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html