Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] blk-mq: Introduce blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue()

[Christoph Hellwig]

> + if (msecs == 0)
> + kblockd_schedule_work_on(blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(hctx),
> +  >run_work);
> + else
> + kblockd_schedule_delayed_work_on(blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(hctx),
> +  >delayed_run_work,
> +  msecs_to_jiffies(msecs));
> +}

I'd rather make run_work a delayed_work (again) and use
kblockd_schedule_delayed_work_on with a timeout of zero for the immediate
run case instead of having two competing work structs.

[PATCH v4 4/6] blk-mq: Introduce blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue()

[Bart Van Assche]

Introduce a function that runs a hardware queue unconditionally
after a delay. Note: there is already a function that stops and
restarts a hardware queue after a delay, namely blk_mq_delay_queue().

This function will be used in the next patch in this series.

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche 
Cc: Christoph Hellwig 
Cc: Hannes Reinecke 
Cc: Long Li 
Cc: K. Y. Srinivasan 
---
 block/blk-mq.c | 32 ++--
 include/linux/blk-mq.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index aff85d41cea3..836e3a17da54 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1146,7 +1146,8 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx 
*hctx)
return hctx->next_cpu;
 }
 
-void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async)
+static void __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async,
+   unsigned long msecs)
 {
if (unlikely(blk_mq_hctx_stopped(hctx) ||
 !blk_mq_hw_queue_mapped(hctx)))
@@ -1163,7 +1164,24 @@ void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, 
bool async)
put_cpu();
}
 
-   kblockd_schedule_work_on(blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(hctx), >run_work);
+   if (msecs == 0)
+   kblockd_schedule_work_on(blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(hctx),
+>run_work);
+   else
+   kblockd_schedule_delayed_work_on(blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(hctx),
+>delayed_run_work,
+msecs_to_jiffies(msecs));
+}
+
+void blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, unsigned long msecs)
+{
+   __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(hctx, true, msecs);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue);
+
+void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async)
+{
+   __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(hctx, async, 0);
 }
 
 void blk_mq_run_hw_queues(struct request_queue *q, bool async)
@@ -1266,6 +1284,15 @@ static void blk_mq_run_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
__blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx);
 }
 
+static void blk_mq_delayed_run_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+   struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
+
+   hctx = container_of(work, struct blk_mq_hw_ctx, delayed_run_work.work);
+
+   __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx);
+}
+
 static void blk_mq_delay_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 {
struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
@@ -1866,6 +1893,7 @@ static int blk_mq_init_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
node = hctx->numa_node = set->numa_node;
 
INIT_WORK(>run_work, blk_mq_run_work_fn);
+   INIT_DELAYED_WORK(>delayed_run_work, blk_mq_delayed_run_work_fn);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(>delay_work, blk_mq_delay_work_fn);
spin_lock_init(>lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(>dispatch);
diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
index bdea90d75274..b90c3d5766cd 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx {
 
atomic_tnr_active;
 
+   struct delayed_work delayed_run_work;
struct delayed_work delay_work;
 
struct hlist_node   cpuhp_dead;
@@ -236,6 +237,7 @@ void blk_mq_stop_hw_queues(struct request_queue *q);
 void blk_mq_start_hw_queues(struct request_queue *q);
 void blk_mq_start_stopped_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async);
 void blk_mq_start_stopped_hw_queues(struct request_queue *q, bool async);
+void blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, unsigned long 
msecs);
 void blk_mq_run_hw_queues(struct request_queue *q, bool async);
 void blk_mq_delay_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, unsigned long msecs);
 void blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(struct blk_mq_tag_set *tagset,
-- 
2.12.0