Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
Memory allocation for vhost-net now supports fallback on vmalloc (same
as for vhost-scsi) this makes it possible to create the device on
systems where memory is very fragmented, with slightly lower
performance.
Thanks Michael, I'm glad to see that this change made its way into
mainline after all! Would you be willing to take the following on top?
From: Romain Francoise rom...@orebokech.com
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:26:40 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] vhost-net: don't open-code kvfree
Commit 23cc5a991c (vhost-net: extend device allocation to vmalloc)
added another open-coded version of kvfree (which is available since
v3.15-rc5), nuke it.
Signed-off-by: Romain Francoise rom...@orebokech.com
---
drivers/vhost/net.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index 971a760..8dae2f7 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -700,14 +700,6 @@ static void handle_rx_net(struct vhost_work *work)
handle_rx(net);
}
-static void vhost_net_free(void *addr)
-{
- if (is_vmalloc_addr(addr))
- vfree(addr);
- else
- kfree(addr);
-}
-
static int vhost_net_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
{
struct vhost_net *n;
@@ -723,7 +715,7 @@ static int vhost_net_open(struct inode *inode, struct file
*f)
}
vqs = kmalloc(VHOST_NET_VQ_MAX * sizeof(*vqs), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!vqs) {
- vhost_net_free(n);
+ kvfree(n);
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -840,7 +832,7 @@ static int vhost_net_release(struct inode *inode, struct
file *f)
* since jobs can re-queue themselves. */
vhost_net_flush(n);
kfree(n-dev.vqs);
- vhost_net_free(n);
+ kvfree(n);
return 0;
}
--
2.0.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html