Compilation Problem (overlaping sections)

2005-03-07 Thread Jeff Stevens
I am trying to compile LinuxBios for a custom
quad-opteron system.  I copied from the amd quartet to
create my build environment.  The Quartet seems to
compile correct, but mine errors out.  Here is a
screen dump:

objcopy -O binary linuxbios_ram linuxbios_ram.bin
./nrv2b e linuxbios_ram.bin linuxbios_ram.nrv2b
input/output = 84556/28434 = 2.974
cp linuxbios_ram.nrv2b linuxbios_ram.rom
gcc -m32 -nostdlib -nostartfiles -static -o linuxbios
-T ldscript.ld crt0.o
/usr/bin/ld: section .reset [fffdfff0 - fffd]
overlaps section .rom [fffd6f16 - fffe119f]
/usr/bin/ld: section .id [fffdffd7 - fffdffef]
overlaps section .rom [fffd6f16 - fffe119f]
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [linuxbios] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/usr/src/freebios_030205/freebios2/targets/cwcec/vortex/vortex/normal'
make: *** [normal/linuxbios.rom] Error 1


Please help!

Thanks in advance,
   Jeff Stevens




__ 
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! 
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web 
http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/
___
Linuxbios mailing list
Linuxbios@clustermatic.org
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


Re: Compilation Problem (overlaping sections)

2005-03-07 Thread Jeff Stevens
I'm sorry, I was wrong.  The AMD Quartet doesn't seem
to compile either.  I get the same error!


--- Jeff Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am trying to compile LinuxBios for a custom
 quad-opteron system.  I copied from the amd quartet
 to
 create my build environment.  The Quartet seems to
 compile correct, but mine errors out.  Here is a
 screen dump:
 
 objcopy -O binary linuxbios_ram linuxbios_ram.bin
 ./nrv2b e linuxbios_ram.bin linuxbios_ram.nrv2b
 input/output = 84556/28434 = 2.974
 cp linuxbios_ram.nrv2b linuxbios_ram.rom
 gcc -m32 -nostdlib -nostartfiles -static -o
 linuxbios
 -T ldscript.ld crt0.o
 /usr/bin/ld: section .reset [fffdfff0 - fffd]
 overlaps section .rom [fffd6f16 - fffe119f]
 /usr/bin/ld: section .id [fffdffd7 - fffdffef]
 overlaps section .rom [fffd6f16 - fffe119f]
 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
 make[1]: *** [linuxbios] Error 1
 make[1]: Leaving directory

`/usr/src/freebios_030205/freebios2/targets/cwcec/vortex/vortex/normal'
 make: *** [normal/linuxbios.rom] Error 1
 
 
 Please help!
 
 Thanks in advance,
Jeff Stevens
 
 
   
   
 __ 
 Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! 
 Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web 
 http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/
 ___
 Linuxbios mailing list
 Linuxbios@clustermatic.org

http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
 




__ 
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! 
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web 
http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/
___
Linuxbios mailing list
Linuxbios@clustermatic.org
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


Re: Compilation Problem (overlaping sections)

2005-03-07 Thread yhlu
How about Tyan s4882 in your compile environment? It should be OK.

Please try to set LOG_LEVEL in your MB Config to 7.

YH


On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 09:06:42 -0700 (MST), Ronald G. Minnich
rminnich@lanl.gov wrote:
 
 
 On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Jeff Stevens wrote:
 
  I'm sorry, I was wrong.  The AMD Quartet doesn't seem
  to compile either.  I get the same error!
 
 sigh, things are growing bigger.
 
 anybody want to fix this one?
 
 ron
 ___
 Linuxbios mailing list
 Linuxbios@clustermatic.org
 http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

___
Linuxbios mailing list
Linuxbios@clustermatic.org
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


Re: ASUS and linuxbios

2005-03-07 Thread yhlu
depends if you can get enough Info about MB and chipset.

Anyway SB is easier than NB

YH


On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 16:42:43 +1100 (EST), Geoffrey McRae
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I would like the:
  Asus K8N-E Delux Please
 I have a lan cafe with 40 of these machines in it, would be nice to be
 running linuxbios in them so I can run a cluster after hours ;D (That is
 if they could still boot windows 2000)
 
  I was talking to ASUS at one point but the conversation faltered. I can
  try again. Pick a mobo you really want to see it done for.
 
  ron
 
  ___
  Linuxbios mailing list
  Linuxbios@clustermatic.org
  http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
 
 
 ___
 Linuxbios mailing list
 Linuxbios@clustermatic.org
 http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

___
Linuxbios mailing list
Linuxbios@clustermatic.org
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


Does anybody needs LinuxBIOS for VMware virtual machines?

2005-03-07 Thread Dmitriy Budko
Does anybody needs LinuxBIOS for VMware virtual machines?
If you want it please describe why do you want it.

Thanks,

Dmitriy Budko,  
the maintainer of VMware's BIOS and chipset

___
Linuxbios mailing list
Linuxbios@clustermatic.org
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


Re: Does anybody needs LinuxBIOS for VMware virtual machines?

2005-03-07 Thread Ronald G. Minnich


On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Dmitriy Budko wrote:

 Does anybody needs LinuxBIOS for VMware virtual machines?
 If you want it please describe why do you want it.

it would sure make it easier to do full-up sims of linuxbios-equipped 
systems.

ron
___
Linuxbios mailing list
Linuxbios@clustermatic.org
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


Re: Does anybody needs LinuxBIOS for VMware virtual machines?

2005-03-07 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Dmitriy Budko [EMAIL PROTECTED] [050307 22:28]:
 Does anybody needs LinuxBIOS for VMware virtual machines?
 If you want it please describe why do you want it.

This sounds very interesting. Having a possibility to test 
LinuxBIOS+payload in vmware would allow easy and comfortable 
payload development in projects such as OpenBIOS, filo or etherboot.

   Stefan

___
Linuxbios mailing list
Linuxbios@clustermatic.org
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


Re: linuxbios on k7sem with 2.6.x kernel?

2005-03-07 Thread Thomas Wehrspann
On Friday 04 March 2005 14:57, Markus Wolters wrote:
 Hallo,
 
  
 
 I have an old k7sem board and I want to try Linuxbios (v1 or v2) on it. Now
 before I kill my board, I have a 
 
I have the same board. Works well with LinuxBIOS v1. 
AFAIK there is currently no v2 support for SiS boards like the K7SEM.

 few questions, maybe somebody could answer them to me and give me a helping
 hand?
 
  
 
 Is it possible to use a 2.6 kernel?
 
Yes, works here.
The kernel patches with v1 are only for 2.4 kernels. They are not neccessary, 
but perhaps useful, so i ported them to 2.6 a while ago. See here
http://www.clustermatic.org/pipermail/linuxbios/2004-July/008446.html

 Is it possible to use the original bios chip?
 
Try to get a DiskOnChip Millenium (NOT a DoC 2000). Although they are not 
produced anymore ;-(
Does anyone know if the DoC Millenium Plus (has a  boot capability) is also 
sufficient?

 And how do I configure and build it with these options, if it is possible?
 
There is a K7SEM HOWTO in the sources.

The last time i checked the CVS, it was broken for K7SEM. Try this patch for a 
workaround
http://www.clustermatic.org/pipermail/linuxbios/2003-August/004354.html


Thomas
___
Linuxbios mailing list
Linuxbios@clustermatic.org
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


RE: Does anybody needs LinuxBIOS for VMware virtual machines?

2005-03-07 Thread Dmitriy Budko
 From: Ronald G. Minnich
 On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Dmitriy Budko wrote:
 
  Does anybody needs LinuxBIOS for VMware virtual machines?
  If you want it please describe why do you want it.
 
 it would sure make it easier to do full-up sims of linuxbios-equipped 
 systems.

So, you don't need it for production systems, only for development, 
do you?

How difficult is it to port Intel 440BX chipset support from
V1 to V2?

It seems to me that supporting a new SIO chips (the emulated 
NS PC97338/PC87338) should be easy.


Dmitriy Budko, VMware
___
Linuxbios mailing list
Linuxbios@clustermatic.org
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


error snapshots download.

2005-03-07 Thread Nathanael D. Noblet
So I downloaded the cvs snapshot referenced from the new wiki. It seems
to be a copy of the repository, and not a checkout.(files are .v ) with
all sorts of version information.

Just a FYI.

-- 
Nathanael D. Noblet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gnat Solutions

___
Linuxbios mailing list
Linuxbios@clustermatic.org
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


Re: Anyone tried LinuxBIOS with freeBSD?

2005-03-07 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:37:31 -0600, Bari Ari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  http://wiki.linuxbios.org/ADLO
  
 
 That info is all from my V1 stuff  and ADLO is not in V2 yet.  However
 its just a elf payload just like anything else so it will load fine. 
 It won't run until you get the shadowing right.
 
 I don't remember what the final result of our V2 shadowing discussion
 was.  I seem to remember that we thought we could do an elf location
 trick that might make the mainboard specific shadowing in ADLO
 unnecessary.

Right.  We should simply need to enable the shadow memory in V2.
ADLO can take it from there.  We can reexamine if we ever find
memory that has a problem being read-write.

It is weird that ADLO loads in one place and runs in another but
that is largely a non-issue.  We need the a loader that runs
in protected mode.  So whatever I was thinking with ELF tricks
is something we can ignore.

Eric



___
Linuxbios mailing list
Linuxbios@clustermatic.org
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


Re: Does anybody needs LinuxBIOS for VMware virtual machines?

2005-03-07 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Dmitriy Budko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  From: Ronald G. Minnich
  On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Dmitriy Budko wrote:
  
   Does anybody needs LinuxBIOS for VMware virtual machines?
   If you want it please describe why do you want it.
  
  it would sure make it easier to do full-up sims of linuxbios-equipped 
  systems.
 
 So, you don't need it for production systems, only for development, 
 do you?
 
 How difficult is it to port Intel 440BX chipset support from
 V1 to V2?

Not terribly hard.  It is more of a time/desire thing.  Does vmware
accurately simulate what is required to bring memory up or do we
get to short cut that.  If the latter the porting could be done
very quickly.  Memory initialization is generally the hard part,
of a LinuxBIOS port and would likely be trivial under vmware :)

 It seems to me that supporting a new SIO chips (the emulated 
 NS PC97338/PC87338) should be easy.

Right it should not be a problem there.

The case that was discussed recently with vmware was to do things
the other way around.  The observation was made that for server
clusters dedicated to running vmware, running LinuxBIOS underneath
could help boot time and cluster management.

Eric
___
Linuxbios mailing list
Linuxbios@clustermatic.org
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


Re: Does anybody needs LinuxBIOS for VMware virtual machines?

2005-03-07 Thread Richard Smith
  How difficult is it to port Intel 440BX chipset support from
  V1 to V2?
 
 Not terribly hard.  It is more of a time/desire thing.  Does vmware
 accurately simulate what is required to bring memory up or do we

Yep. not to bad.  I've got the beginnings of the port already done.  I
got hung up on getting my dump_spd routine to return somthing else
besides zero.  Its really wierd.  I can actually see the data on the
SMbus happening but I don't ever seem to get a result back.

Like Eric says if you don't have to to the RAM init then it will
probally move really quickly.

I haven't had chance to work on it for a while.  If your are
interested I can whip up a patch vs current cvs and send it to you. 
It's not in the V2 tree.


-- 
Richard A. Smith
___
Linuxbios mailing list
Linuxbios@clustermatic.org
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios


Re: First cluster project

2005-03-07 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Justin C. Darby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 * Lustre (If I can get a good dialogue with the ClusterFS folks started..
 still waiting to hear from them. I need to mirror two hard disks over
 1000mbit tcp/ip for redundancy.)

For the small scale you are looking at,  I recommend you look at
nbd and the linux md layer, or possibly drbd.  I don't believe Lustre
does redundancy in software yet.  If you need an active/active
configuration things are harder.  nfs from the primary to the secondary
would be my first guess there.

Eric
___
Linuxbios mailing list
Linuxbios@clustermatic.org
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios