Anatomy of the B. Lute

2004-09-07 Thread Michael Stitt
Dear all,
 
I have recently updated the Baroque Lute mailing group page to include a section 
entitled: Anatomy of the Baroque Lute.  It can be viewed at:
 
http://bachplucked.com/baroque-lute/
 
Membership of the BL group can be done at:
 
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/baroque-lute/
 
 
Best regards,
 
Michael Stitt
http://bachplucked.com/lutenist/
 
 
 
 
 




-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
--


Re: lute photography

2004-02-09 Thread Michael Stitt
Martin,
 
I do not know why you need a tripod for taking photos of lutes.  I have been using 
both SLRs and digital - the later before the technology took off.  It is posssible to 
take both micro and macro photos of a very high resolution handheld.  The problem you 
might face is the flexibility of micro and macro views, but this is not impossible 
either, just more expensive.
 
The good news is that digital cameras have plummeted in price and even a moderate 
Kodak camera comes with great software and quality features.
 
Regards,
 
Michael.

Martin Shepherd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,

This is off-topic, I know, but I wondered if there's anybody out there in the 
Collective Wisdom who could offer me advice (off-list, please).

I would like to buy a digital camera to take pictures of lutes. Going digital would 
greatly simplify getting photos to my web site, other people on the net, etc. I need a 
remote control so I can operate the shutter without touching the camera (and it needs 
a standard tripod fitting). I need a reasonable macro facility for taking roses and 
possibly small details as well. I also need to be able to take photos indoors, so 
accurate control of long exposures and good lighting will be needed (any suggestions 
for lighting?). I suspect that I will need to spend money on a decent tripod, lighting 
etc. rather than on the camera itself, especially as most images will have to be 
degraded for net use anyway. Bear in mind I'm not a photography nut and my 
understanding of the jargon is limited. I currently use an SLR camera, so I'm used to 
that way of working.

Sorry to bore you with this but I'm attracted by the idea of taking a short cut by 
asking someone who knows!

Best wishes,

Martin








-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online
--


Re: sending test messages

2004-02-08 Thread Michael Stitt
Wayne  all,
 
For some of us with the Brouwser based E-mail such as hotmail or Yahoo, a SPAM filter 
is usually effective in warding off unwanted material, without culling luteNet 
E-mails.  However, recently this has appeared in our bulk.  It is fast approaching a 
stage where even REAL E-mail is being treated as SPAM.  Of course using a free service 
entails a price in quality, however, being able to fly anywhere and read from a 
internet cafe has its advantages.
 
Thanks to Wayne for continually addressing this problem.
 
Regards,
 
Michael Stitt.


Wayne Cripps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

No - I am not sending a test message. But I would like to
point out that certain viruses use the word test in their headers
and so some test messages will be considered unwanted, like
the recent test message from Christopher Schaub.

Wayne






-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online
--


Just a test

2004-02-03 Thread Michael Stitt
Test

Wayne Cripps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone -

I have just installed a new filter into the lute list
mechanism. When someone posts a message to the list, the
robot looks to see if the mail address that the message is
From: is the same, or close to, an address on the list.
This way random people are prevented from posting messages which
are totally inappropriate, which is good. However, it will
also block some valid posters

If you signed up to the lute list with a handle of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] two years ago, and last year you changed your 
handle to [EMAIL PROTECTED] the robot will not recognise
you. You will have to arrange with me to make both addresses
the same. And if you get your lute messages sent to your home
address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] but you like to post from your
work address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] the robot will not recognise
you either. You will have to post from your home account.

The robot does have a small amount of intelligence. If you
are on the list as [EMAIL PROTECTED] but you post 
from [EMAIL PROTECTED] the robot will recognise.
but if you post from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the robot won't recognise you. You are allowed to
post from a different computer, the first name after the @ sign,
but the rest must be the same.

I imagine some people will have trouble because of this, and
I plan to fine tune the program as I go along. I will check the
messages that get caught and notify the sender.

Once again, I apologise for the hassle this will cause, but
I have to take stronger stepas against unwanted messages.

Wayne







-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
--


Re: Air travel.

2004-02-03 Thread Michael Stitt
Ed and all,
 
I once flew to Beijing with a very sturdy custom made metal case the size of a coffin 
only to discover that a crack emerged having not lowered the strings sufficiently.
 
About to embark on the UK with the same case, this time strings retuned totally down 
in a soft cello case that I use for short distances carried like a backpack.
 
BTW, I fixed the crack to the swan-neck by buying a tube of superglue at Peking 
University, and squeezed it in the crack.  To date no problems!
 


Edward Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone please elaborate on what the musician's union agreement 
states regarding this topic? I am curious.

I have flown a great deal with lutes. I sometimes use a large metal flight 
case,  have never had a problem with it. I also plead with the people 
about carry on lutes,  have been successful.

ed



At 04:39 PM 2/3/04 -0500, Deb Fox wrote:
The guitar travelled in the overhead, and just in case, I also carried a
copy of the musicians union agreement



Edward Martin
2817 East 2nd Street
Duluth, Minnesota 55812
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
voice: (218) 728-1202







-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
--


Re: Air travel.

2004-02-03 Thread Michael Stitt
The problem with all of this is what an earlier writer had highlighted, that the 
crisis occurs at the one time when you DON'T want it to happen.  I recall explaining 
my lutecase to a number of Airlines representative, only to wonder if it was worth the 
risk or not.
 
In the end it was stowed below.  However, last year I managed to travel with a Turkish 
Sarz (long neck lute!)I purchased in Istanbul, and the stewardess, was very kind to 
let me stow it on board.
 
Regards,
 
Michael Stitt
http://bachplucked.com/lutenist/

Deb Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The agreement was made in December 2002 between the AFM (American Federation
of Musicians) and the TSA (Transportation Security Administration, which is
a branch of the US Dept. of Transportation). It basically states that
musical instruments are allowed as carry-on baggage in addition to one bag
and one personal item per person. Also, the TSA was supposed to communicate
this with security screeners at airports to avoid any hassles along the way.
I haven't tried to carry on my theorbo, and the agreement doesn't mention
anything about size. Somehow,though, I imagine the theorbo would create a
carry-on problem. But I have had no problems with smaller instruments. And
once you get past the security and gate people, the flight attendants are
always gracious and helpful with instruments, in my experience.
For more info, you can visit the AFM website, at
http://www.afm.org/public/home/index.php but I am not sure how much info
there is accessible if you're not a member of the union.
best,
Deborah Fox
- Original Message -
From: Edward Martin 
To: Deb Fox ; Candace Magner
; 
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: Air travel.


 Could someone please elaborate on what the musician's union agreement
 states regarding this topic? I am curious.

 I have flown a great deal with lutes. I sometimes use a large metal
flight
 case,  have never had a problem with it. I also plead with the people
 about carry on lutes,  have been successful.

 ed



 At 04:39 PM 2/3/04 -0500, Deb Fox wrote:
 The guitar travelled in the overhead, and just in case, I also carried a
 copy of the musicians union agreement



 Edward Martin
 2817 East 2nd Street
 Duluth, Minnesota 55812
 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 voice: (218) 728-1202








-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
--


Re: technical problems on lute-theorbo (+theorbo) Att: Chris

2004-01-18 Thread Michael Stitt
Chris,
 
My apologies, I did not see your reply until Tony raised it just now.
 
I wish I could give you more details about the harp device, but I still don't have it 
clear in my head.  I plan to address it very soon.  The problem with Ed's Koto idea - 
as far as I can see it, is how do you time it well playing swiftly the passagio of BWV 
996?  The harp hook sounds more practical.
 
Regards,
 
Michael

Tony Chalkley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris,

I haven't noticed a direct reply coming in to your question about the harp
mechanism - if one did, could you pass it on, please? The idea is
intriguing, as the harp mechanism I've seen on harps is a hook fitted into
the harmonic curve of the instrument, which you can turn to touch the string
at the right distance for a semitone up. More sophisticated versions exist,
but one way or another they are fitted to the top block of wood at the wrest
pin end. The koto-ji propostions are at the bridge end and it is easy to
see that they are workable. Try as I might, I cannot see anywhere on my
theorbo that I could attach a harp mechanism, short of building a sort of
gantry out from the neck which would be out of reach, or having holes in the
sounboard!

Tony
- Original Message - 
From: 
To: 
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 1:24 AM
Subject: Re: technical problems on lute-theorbo (+theorbo)


 Michael,

 Just curious about the harp-like device that Tim
 Crawford mentioned to you for raising a diapason up a
 1/2 step. Would you mind describing it? I've seen
 these sorts of things on various harps and wondered
 how it might apply to my situation. Is it something
 that one could rig up on their own? I have a
 14-course theorbo (only six on the fingerboard) and
 I'm getting a little annoyed at having to take the
 instrument off, stand up and re-tune if I need an F#
 or G# consistently in a piece. This can be especially
 distracting to other players in tight quarters.
 I wonder if the harp-device would attach down at
 the bridge, which would be reasonable as long as it
 wasn't too big and wouldn't get in the way when it
 wasn't being used. In that case, you could even
 engage it while in the course of a piece, given enough
 time. Even if the sound would be somewhat
 compromised, it would be worth it to avoid some of the
 hastle.
 I don't know if this would even have been
 considered in the historical days. At any rate, I
 think that the oldens were more practical than we
 give them credit sometimes.


 Chris Wilke
 --- Michael Stitt wrote:
  Hi Donatella,
 
  I checked out at a glance so far your tab version of
  BWV 996 and looks nice!
 
  There has been a real flowering of lute tablature of
  Bach's music. Clive Titmuss has been active and
  completed - quite recently, a playable version of
  BWV 1012 - the sixth cello suite. For beginners
  out there - be warned - this is not easy stuff!
 
  As for 996, it used to be my favourite and not too
  difficult on the classical guitar. For some strange
  reason I fnd it very hard on the Baroque lute. I
  worked out that it is not so much the technical
  PLAYING difficulty, but rather the problem of
  realisation on my fourteen course theorbo-lute.
  Since I note - your instrument, Donatella, is also a
  swan neck, you too problem run into the difficulty
  of not having D sharp bass, resulting in an
  unavoidable interruption of the passagio - opening
  prelude. Tim Crawford once gave an interesting
  solution to this, which is to attach a device -
  similar to one used by harpists, which stops the
  string. I haven't quite done this as yet!
 
  My temporary solution is to play the D# an octave
  higher, and although not perfect, is acceptable.
  You encounter this problem also in the Courante.
 
  As for the sxth cello suite, this is beautiful stuff
  on the lute and in the key of D Major makes it a
  warm and beautiful work to play. It has been said
  before that Bach wrote some of his finest and
  brighter sounding music in this key. The Magnificat
  is one such example. The prelude has the same
  intensity and virtuosic feel as that of BWV 1006a
  IMHO.
 
  Cheers.
 
  Michael Stitt
  http://bachplucked.com/lutenist/
 
 


 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes
 http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus







-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes
--


Re: technical problems on lute-theorbo (+theorbo)

2004-01-17 Thread Michael Stitt
Ed,
 
Could you take a digital photo and show us?  I think I've got the idea, but seeing it 
would explain everything.
 
Michael.


Ed Durbrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if you could make a little portable bridge like those used 
on kotos. Since it would be between the strings and belly it wouldn't 
even get in the way. It wouldn't need to attach to anything. You 
would put felt or something similar on the bottom so as not to 
scratch the surface of the theorbo. You would only need enough 
pressure to make a node. I just tried this with the handle of a 
magnifying glass. It works! This is too easy.

Michael,

 Just curious about the harp-like device that Tim
Crawford mentioned to you for raising a diapason up a
1/2 step. Would you mind describing it? I've seen
these sorts of things on various harps and wondered
how it might apply to my situation. Is it something
that one could rig up on their own? I have a
14-course theorbo (only six on the fingerboard) and
I'm getting a little annoyed at having to take the
instrument off, stand up and re-tune if I need an F#
or G# consistently in a piece. This can be especially
distracting to other players in tight quarters.
 I wonder if the harp-device would attach down at
the bridge, which would be reasonable as long as it
wasn't too big and wouldn't get in the way when it
wasn't being used. In that case, you could even
engage it while in the course of a piece, given enough
time. Even if the sound would be somewhat
compromised, it would be worth it to avoid some of the
hastle.
 I don't know if this would even have been
considered in the historical days. At any rate, I
think that the oldens were more practical than we
give them credit sometimes.


Chris Wilke
--- Michael Stitt wrote:
 Hi Donatella,
 
 I checked out at a glance so far your tab version of
 BWV 996 and looks nice! 
 
 There has been a real flowering of lute tablature of
 Bach's music. Clive Titmuss has been active and
 completed - quite recently, a playable version of
 BWV 1012 - the sixth cello suite. For beginners
 out there - be warned - this is not easy stuff! 
 
 As for 996, it used to be my favourite and not too
 difficult on the classical guitar. For some strange
 reason I fnd it very hard on the Baroque lute. I
 worked out that it is not so much the technical
 PLAYING difficulty, but rather the problem of
 realisation on my fourteen course theorbo-lute.
 Since I note - your instrument, Donatella, is also a
 swan neck, you too problem run into the difficulty
 of not having D sharp bass, resulting in an
 unavoidable interruption of the passagio - opening
 prelude. Tim Crawford once gave an interesting
 solution to this, which is to attach a device -
 similar to one used by harpists, which stops the
 string. I haven't quite done this as yet! 
 
 My temporary solution is to play the D# an octave
 higher, and although not perfect, is acceptable.
 You encounter this problem also in the Courante.
 
 As for the sxth cello suite, this is beautiful stuff
 on the lute and in the key of D Major makes it a
 warm and beautiful work to play. It has been said
 before that Bach wrote some of his finest and
 brighter sounding music in this key. The Magnificat
 is one such example. The prelude has the same
 intensity and virtuosic feel as that of BWV 1006a
  IMHO.
 
  Cheers.
 
  Michael Stitt
  http://bachplucked.com/lutenist/
 
 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus


-- 
Ed Durbrow
Saitama, Japan
http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/





-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes
--


Re: Clasical Music Recording - Ed Martin

2004-01-15 Thread Michael Stitt
Ed,
 
Yesterday I received two CD recordings of the other Ed - Ed Martin!  His recordings 
are at Magatune, and in a day or two I will write about his superb Luis De Milano and 
Weiss/Losy/Baron duo recordings!
 
BTW, a link to his Magnatune recordings can be found at http://weissplucked.com/, but 
more to come.
 
Regards,
 
Michael Stitt


Ed Durbrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the days of vinyl one needed a manufacturing plant, in these days 
of digital
CDs one needs only to rent a studio. I would see a resurgence of the
classical coming as the majors drop it and the musicians move to the
internet sales and the desk top production.

This is indeed the new paradigm. I think concepts like Magnatune are 
the wave of the future. As CD sales drop, only the big sellers will 
be in the stable of the big labels. Someone told me that Vol. 6 of 
Barto's Weiss series was recorded in a living room. I don't know if 
that is true or not, but within the lute world, I imagine he is a big 
seller. With today's technology, the potential for quality recording 
can be had for only a few thousand dollars. I've had a home studio 
for 20 years and I am so glad to have gotten rid of all that big 
'pro' gear. I've never been happier, technology-wise. Probably the 
most expensive link in the home/mobile recording chain is the 
mic/preamp. Of course, the acoustic environment is what you get in a 
proper studio, but for single instruments, lute, harp etc. you should 
be able to get a good sound almost anywhere, - if you know what you 
are doing.

cheers,
-- 
Ed Durbrow
Saitama, Japan
http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/





-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes
--


Re: Modern music for Renaissance Baroque lute

2004-01-08 Thread Michael Stitt
Dear Betsy,
 
Wow!  What a comprehensive reply this was!  Many thanks for this.  I especially like 
the detailed CD list you have enclosed.  I will contact Oliver about his Encyclopedia 
of New Lute Music.
 
Once again many thanks for your detailed reply.
 
Regards,
 
Michael Stitt

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Michael and lutenetters --

Here is the e-mail address of Oliver Holzenburg, who has just come out with 
an updated edition of his extensive Encyclopedia of New Lute Music:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

I just guest-edited a double issue of the Lute Society Quarterly which is 
devoted to the theme of lute songs -- early and contemporary. Published in this 
issue are six compelling new lute songs (in a surprising range of styles, from 
traditional to contemporary) by Geoffrey Alvarez, Bryan Johanson, Gail 
Gillispie, Andrew Ager, Meinhard Gerlach and Frank Wallace, (who is also interviewed 
in the issue with his wife and duo partner, Nancy Knowles) as well as 
commentary by Toyohiko Satoh, Peter Croton and Jacob Heringman. For those who are 
interested in early lute songs there are 2 lute song intabulations of chansons, 
articles (including one by Gail Gillispie which explores Elizabethan language 
in lute songs), research (greatest song hits of the 16th century) and 
Renaissance lute song CD reviews.

Also in the issue are addresses of websites with new lute song publications 
and other information on the subject, (including Brian Wright's new lute songs, 
published by the British lute Society and Roman Turovsky's intabulations for 
Baroque lute of classical and Romantic Lieder) 

Here is a list of CDs of newly composed and arranged songs for lute and voice 
which appears in the issue:

Sad Steps: New Settings of Renaissance Poems 
Virelai -- Catherine King, voice; Jacob Heringman, lute; William Lyons, 
Renaissance flute; Susanna Pell, viol 
Riverrun Records: RVRCD62; 2002
Order from www.rvrcd.co.uk 
Includes Orpheus with his lute by Bryan Johanson, Sonnet 105 by Andrew 
Ager, My lute awake by Gail Gillispie, printed in the issue, and Fur Hermen 
by Jacob Heringman. (For more info, see CD review of Sad Steps in the issue)

Sweeter Than Roses
Derek Lee Ragin, countertenor; Peter Croton, lute; Gerd Lunenburger, recorder 
Balance (Munich) BAL-9425-1; 1998
Order from www.amazon.de
17th century lute songs and solos, as well as six songs by Peter Croton. 

Works of Toyohiko Satoh
Ensemble Alba Musica Kyoto
Chiyomi Yamada, soprano; Toyohiko Satoh, lutes; Taka Kitazaka and Toshiya 
Suzuki, recorders; Kaori Uemura, tenor viol; Michael Niessen, lute 
Channel Classics CCS 4692; 1992 
Order from: www.channelclassics.com
Lute songs, solos, duets and chamber music by Toyohiko Satoh

Woman of the Water: Songs of Frank Wallace
By Duo LiveOak -- Nancy Knowles, soprano and Frank Wallace, lute
Gyre Music 10082; 2003 
Order from: www.gyremusic.com
Includes The Restored, printed in this issue, first published by Gyre Music 
and available to purchase at www.gyremusic.com See interview for more info.

Silence
Diane Severson, soprano and Meinhard Gerlach, lute
GEMA LJ1812885891; 2002
Order through Thomas Schall at www.tslaute.de/katalog-ts.jsp
Lute songs and solos by Meinhard Gerlach
(includes Leise Lieder, printed in this issue)

Lute Unleashed
Carver Blanchard, voice and lute, string bass, harmonica and recorder
Albany Records Troy 083; 1992
Order at: www.albanyrecords.com
Arrangements of spirituals, worksongs, popular classics and music by Stephen 
Foster and his contemporaries. 
(Carver Blanchard also has an article on arranging, transposing and 
memorizing for the lute in this issue)

Best,
Betsy Small



-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes
--


New Cello Lute: Into the New Century

2004-01-06 Thread Michael Stitt

New Cello Lute - 14 Course Theorbo
 
http://bachplucked.com/stittm.htm




-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes
--


Re: MORE THAN 14 course German theorbo?

2004-01-06 Thread Michael Stitt
Good on you Donatella,  I concur with all the way on this!  
 
Reading Forkel and subsequent keyboard players note that Bach's music 

is very difficult to play.  It is generally regarded that his music was written in his 
mind and not with his fingers.  The man continually strived to write pure music 
without the limitation of finger tampering.  The whole history of his music leading up 
to the Art of the Fugue (where no instruments are specified for this monumental work) 
always strives more and more complex, but necessarily idiomatic music.
Bach was in possession of a lute worth a considerable sum in the inventory of his 
Estate following death.  I just can’t imagine a man with the mind of Bach conceiving 
masterpieces for so many instruments, not understanding the lute and missing a low Gg!

Regards,

Michael Stitt

 


Thomas Schall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Donatella,

I'm not sure - there were many different types of lute around at Bach's
day. Just as an example the low G usually would fit the tessitura of an
archlute - giving the italian connections of the courts it would be
understandable how this mistake could happen. Or - another possibility:
It was even intended to be played on an archlute (which would make the
complete work much easier).

If you tune the 13th course down to g you will need to change the A
which seldom but occassionally appears in the suite. So this would point
into a similar direction: Bach wouldn't have known the tessitura of the
baroque lute. 
Actually I don't think the work, even if dedicated to someone who is
known to have played the lute, is arranged for a lute in baroque tuning.

Writing such awkward difficult (if possible to play at all) compositions
would have been considered bad at Bach's time.

Best wishes
Thomas

Am Die, 2004-01-06 um 14.09 schrieb Donatella Galletti:

 I don't think someone like Bach made tiny mistakes of this sort. I played
 BWV 995 years ago, at my final Diploma, setting the 13th course as a G and
 it worked, and I read from staff. Weyrauch is easier, but makes some changes
 I don't think Bach would have much appreciated.
 
 Donatella
 
 http://web.tiscali.it/awebd
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Thomas Schall 
 To: Howard Posner 
 Cc: Michael Stitt ; Miles Dempster
 ; Lute Net 
 Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 10:51 AM
 Subject: Re: MORE THAN 14 course German theorbo?
 
 
  The piece in question (BWV 995) is the only one (apart from the short
  prelude BWV 999) clearly dedicated to the Lute.
  The rest could have been to the Lautenwerk (which would have a low g)
  but this one most likely really was rearranged for the lute.
 
  The compromise - as I already said - would be that Big B. made that tiny
  little mistake regarding the range of the lute.
 
  Best wishes
  Thomas
 
  Am Die, 2004-01-06 um 02.09 schrieb Howard Posner:
 
   Michael Stitt at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
Thanks for this Thomas. Assuming Bach either misunderstood the lowest
 tuning
of the Baroque lute (which I very much doubt) not being an Gg but
 rather a Aa,
or was in contact with such a 14 course instrument.
  
   I think it makes more sense to assume that he had a low G on his
 lautenwerk.
 
  --
  Thomas Schall
  Niederhofheimer Weg 3
  D-65843 Sulzbach
  06196/74519
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  www.lautenist.de / www.tslaute.de/weiss
 
  --
 
 
 __
 Tiscali ADSL SENZA CANONE:
 Attivazione GRATIS, contributo adesione GRATIS, modem GRATIS,
 50 ore di navigazione GRATIS. ABBONARTI TI COSTA SOLO UN CLICK!
 http://point.tiscali.it/adsl/index.shtml
 
 
 

-- 
Thomas Schall
Niederhofheimer Weg 3 
D-65843 Sulzbach
06196/74519
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.lautenist.de / www.tslaute.de/weiss

--



-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes
--


Re: MORE THAN 14 course German theorbo?

2004-01-06 Thread Michael Stitt

Dear Arto and Thomas,

 

I think those who leave the Bach lute suites, however debateable they be that they 
were conceived on a lute, off their repertoire agenda, miss out on great music.  It is 
hard work on the lute but IMHO well worth the effort.  I play them all (although I 
still have some difficulty with the fuga BWV 997) . The only one which I feel is 
particularly better suited for a guitar is BWV 996 – perhaps because of the e minor 
key which is well suited to that instrument.  Over the years I have gained a greater 
appreciation for other composers, particularly Hagen and Weiss – still primarily the 
German composer.  Recently I have started writing my own music, but that’s progressing 
slowly so far.

 

As for Weiss, those late Dresden Suites are wonderful and that’s what I have been 
playing on a daily basis.  The problem I have is my old fashionness!  I love 
contrapuntal music – so while I enjoy Weiss’s idiomatic insight with the lute, I wish 
we had more fugas like BWV 996, 997, 998 and 1000.  That’s why I’m turning to my own 
compositions however, amateurish they may be.

 

Michael Stitt


Thomas Schall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi Michael,

if it was a lute or a mandora which Bach owned - nobody knows. His household had quite 
many instruments and he not necessarily played all of them. He was in firendly contact 
with JC Hoffmann, yes, bu Johann Christian also has built many other instruments apart 
from lutes.

The difficulty could mean many things: technical difficulty or musical difficulty. 
Usually the works by Bach were regarded as musically difficult - difficult to 
understand, difficult to listen to them etc. old-fashioned. 

Bach was more famous for being an exceptional keyboard player during his lifetime than 
for his compositions!

Best wishes
Thomas

Am Die, 2004-01-06 um 22.59 schrieb Michael Stitt: Good on you Donatella,  I concur 
with all the way on this!  
 
Reading Forkel and subsequent keyboard players note that Bach's music 

is very difficult to play.  It is generally regarded that his music was written in his 
mind and not with his fingers.  The man continually strived to write pure music 
without the limitation of finger tampering.  The whole history of his music leading up 
to the Art of the Fugue (where no instruments are specified for this monumental work) 
always strives more and more complex, but necessarily idiomatic music.

Bach was in possession of a lute worth a considerable sum in the inventory of his 
Estate following death.  I just can?t imagine a man with the mind of Bach conceiving 
masterpieces for so many instruments, not understanding the lute and missing a low Gg!

Regards,

Michael Stitt

 



Thomas Schall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Donatella,

I'm not sure - there were many different types of lute around at Bach's
day. Just as an example the low G usually would fit the tessitura of an
archlute - giving the italian connections of the courts it would be
understandable how this mistake could happen. Or - another possibility:
It was even intended to be played on an archlute (which would make the
complete work much easier).

If you tune the 13th course down to g you will need to change the A
which seldom but occassionally appears in the suite. So this would point
into a similar direction: Bach wouldn't have known the tessitura of the
baroque lute. 
Actually I don't think the work, even if dedicated to someone who is
known to have played the lute, is arranged for a lute in baroque tuning.

Writing such awkward difficult (if possible to play at all) compositions
would have been considered bad at Bach's time.

Best wishes
Thomas

Am Die, 2004-01-06 um 14.09 schrieb Donatella Galletti:

 I don't think someone like Bach made tiny mistakes of this sort. I played
 BWV 995 years ago, at my final Diploma, setting the 13th course as a G and
 it worked, and I read from staff. Weyrauch is easier, but makes some changes
 I don't think Bach would have much appreciated.
 
 Donatella
 
 http://web.tiscali.it/awebd
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Thomas Schall 
 To: Howard Posner 
 Cc: Michael Stitt ; Miles Dempster
 ; Lute Net 
 Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 10:51 AM
 Subject: Re: MORE THAN 14 course German theorbo?
 
 
  The piece in question (BWV 995) is the only one (apart from the short
  prelude BWV 999) clearly dedicated to the Lute.
  The rest could have been to the Lautenwerk (which would have a low g)
  but this one most likely really was rearranged for the lute.
 
  The compromise - as I already said - would be that Big B. made that tiny
  little mistake regarding the range of the lute.
 
  Best wishes
  Thomas
 
  Am Die, 2004-01-06 um 02.09 schrieb Howard Posner:
 
   Michael Stitt at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
Thanks for this Thomas. Assuming Bach either misunderstood the lowest
 tuning
of the Baroque lute (which I very much doubt) not being an Gg but
 rather a Aa,
or was in contact with such a 14 course instrument

Re: MORE THAN 14 course German theorbo?

2004-01-06 Thread Michael Stitt
That Bach was known as an exceptional keyboardist rivalling Handel and Scarlatti was 
indeed well known, however, Forkel and those who defended Bach in the mid eighteenth 
century acknowledged his abilities as a composer.  I know of no other composer who 
transcribes so well to other instruments.  It is truly pure music.  Even Weiss does 
not hold well on other instruments I suspect compared with Bach.
 
Regards,
 
M.

Thomas Schall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Michael,

if it was a lute or a mandora which Bach owned - nobody knows. His
household had quite many instruments and he not necessarily played all
of them. He was in firendly contact with JC Hoffmann, yes, bu Johann
Christian also has built many other instruments apart from lutes.

The difficulty could mean many things: technical difficulty or musical
difficulty. Usually the works by Bach were regarded as musically
difficult - difficult to understand, difficult to listen to them etc.
old-fashioned. 

Bach was more famous for being an exceptional keyboard player during his
lifetime than for his compositions!

Best wishes
Thomas 

Am Die, 2004-01-06 um 22.59 schrieb Michael Stitt:

 Good on you Donatella, I concur with all the way on this! 
 
 Reading Forkel and subsequent keyboard players note that Bach's music 
 
 is very difficult to play. It is generally regarded that his music
 was written in his mind and not with his fingers. The man continually
 strived to write pure music without the limitation of finger
 tampering. The whole history of his music leading up to the Art of
 the Fugue (where no instruments are specified for this monumental
 work) always strives more and more complex, but necessarily idiomatic
 music.
 
 Bach was in possession of a lute worth a considerable sum in the
 inventory of his Estate following death. I just can?t imagine a man
 with the mind of Bach conceiving masterpieces for so many instruments,
 not understanding the lute and missing a low Gg!
 
 Regards,
 
 Michael Stitt
 
 
 
 
 
 Thomas Schall wrote:
 
 Dear Donatella,
 
 I'm not sure - there were many different types of lute around
 at Bach's
 day. Just as an example the low G usually would fit the
 tessitura of an
 archlute - giving the italian connections of the courts it
 would be
 understandable how this mistake could happen. Or - another
 possibility:
 It was even intended to be played on an archlute (which would
 make the
 complete work much easier).
 
 If you tune the 13th course down to g you will need to change
 the A
 which seldom but occassionally appears in the suite. So this
 would point
 into a similar direction: Bach wouldn't have known the
 tessitura of the
 baroque lute. 
 Actually I don't think the work, even if dedicated to someone
 who is
 known to have played the lute, is arranged for a lute in
 baroque tuning.
 
 Writing such awkward difficult (if possible to play at all)
 compositions
 would have been considered bad at Bach's time.
 
 Best wishes
 Thomas
 
 Am Die, 2004-01-06 um 14.09 schrieb Donatella Galletti:
 
  I don't think someone like Bach made tiny mistakes of this
 sort. I played
  BWV 995 years ago, at my final Diploma, setting the 13th
 course as a G and
  it worked, and I read from staff. Weyrauch is easier, but
 makes some changes
  I don't think Bach would have much appreciated.
  
  Donatella
  
  http://web.tiscali.it/awebd
  
  - Original Message -
  From: Thomas Schall 
  To: Howard Posner 
  Cc: Michael Stitt ; Miles Dempster
  ; Lute Net 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 10:51 AM
  Subject: Re: MORE THAN 14 course German theorbo?
  
  
   The piece in question (BWV 995) is the only one (apart
 from the short
   prelude BWV 999) clearly dedicated to the Lute.
   The rest could have been to the Lautenwerk (which would
 have a low g)
   but this one most likely really was rearranged for the
 lute.
  
   The compromise - as I already said - would be that Big B.
 made that tiny
   little mistake regarding the range of the lute.
  
   Best wishes
   Thomas
  
   Am Die, 2004-01-06 um 02.09 schrieb Howard Posner:
  
Michael Stitt at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 Thanks for this Thomas. Assuming Bach either
 misunderstood the lowest
  tuning
 of the Baroque lute (which I very much doubt) not
 being an Gg but
  rather a Aa,
 or was in contact with such a 14 course instrument.
   
I think it makes more sense to assume that he had a low
 G on his
  lautenwerk.
  
   --
   Thomas Schall
   Niederhofheimer Weg 3
   D-65843 Sulzbach
   06196/74519
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   www.lautenist.de / www.tslaute.de/weiss
  
   --
  
  
 
 __
  Tiscali ADSL SENZA CANONE:
  Attivazione GRATIS, contributo adesione GRATIS, modem
 GRATIS,
  50 ore di navigazione GRATIS. ABBONARTI TI COSTA SOLO UN
 CLICK!
  http://point.tiscali.it/adsl/index.shtml
  
  
  
 
 -- 
 Thomas Schall
 Niederhofheimer Weg 3 
 D-65843 Sulzbach
 06196/74519
 [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: MORE THAN 14 course German theorbo?

2004-01-06 Thread Michael Stitt

Thomas,
 
You are quite right.  I'm currently enjoying the lute journey of discovery as far as 
learning  composers for this wonderful instrument.
 
Michael.

Thomas Schall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Michael,

Bach wrote very fine music, no doubt and it deserves to be played. I am just a bit 
surfeits (?) by Bach on the lute or guitar. 
It's the very secure way to play Bach because everybody will tell you how marvelous 
the music would be. I personally think it's much more fun to intrduce audiences in the 
rich and wonderfull world of the lute - there is so much to detect and Bach's lute 
work is just a nice detail regarding the vast amount of marvelous music which was 
written for the lute. 

I better do not start a discussion about contrapuntal music on the baroque lute ...

All the best (and I hope discussions like these don't affect your enthusiasm for Bach!)
Thomas

Am Die, 2004-01-06 um 23.57 schrieb Michael Stitt: Dear Arto and Thomas,

 

I think those who leave the Bach lute suites, however debateable they be that they 
were conceived on a lute, off their repertoire agenda, miss out on great music.  It is 
hard work on the lute but IMHO well worth the effort.  I play them all (although I 
still have some difficulty with the fuga BWV 997) . The only one which I feel is 
particularly better suited for a guitar is BWV 996 ? perhaps because of the e minor 
key which is well suited to that instrument.  Over the years I have gained a greater 
appreciation for other composers, particularly Hagen and Weiss ? still primarily the 
German composer.  Recently I have started writing my own music, but that?s progressing 
slowly so far.

 

As for Weiss, those late Dresden Suites are wonderful and that?s what I have been 
playing on a daily basis.  The problem I have is my old fashionness!  I love 
contrapuntal music ? so while I enjoy Weiss?s idiomatic insight with the lute, I wish 
we had more fugas like BWV 996, 997, 998 and 1000.  That?s why I?m turning to my own 
compositions however, amateurish they may be.

 

Michael Stitt



Thomas Schall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Michael,

if it was a lute or a mandora which Bach owned - nobody knows. His household had quite 
many instruments and he not necessarily played all of them. He was in firendly contact 
with JC Hoffmann, yes, bu Johann Christian also has built many other instruments apart 
from lutes.

The difficulty could mean many things: technical difficulty or musical difficulty. 
Usually the works by Bach were regarded as musically difficult - difficult to 
understand, difficult to listen to them etc. old-fashioned. 

Bach was more famous for being an exceptional keyboard player during his lifetime than 
for his compositions!

Best wishes
Thomas

Am Die, 2004-01-06 um 22.59 schrieb Michael Stitt: Good on you Donatella,  I concur 
with all the way on this!  
 
Reading Forkel and subsequent keyboard players note that Bach's music 

is very difficult to play.  It is generally regarded that his music was written in his 
mind and not with his fingers.  The man continually strived to write pure music 
without the limitation of finger tampering.  The whole history of his music leading up 
to the Art of the Fugue (where no instruments are specified for this monumental work) 
always strives more and more complex, but necessarily idiomatic music.

Bach was in possession of a lute worth a considerable sum in the inventory of his 
Estate following death.  I just can?t imagine a man with the mind of Bach conceiving 
masterpieces for so many instruments, not understanding the lute and missing a low Gg!

Regards,

Michael Stitt

 



Thomas Schall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Donatella,

I'm not sure - there were many different types of lute around at Bach's
day. Just as an example the low G usually would fit the tessitura of an
archlute - giving the italian connections of the courts it would be
understandable how this mistake could happen. Or - another possibility:
It was even intended to be played on an archlute (which would make the
complete work much easier).

If you tune the 13th course down to g you will need to change the A
which seldom but occassionally appears in the suite. So this would point
into a similar direction: Bach wouldn't have known the tessitura of the
baroque lute. 
Actually I don't think the work, even if dedicated to someone who is
known to have played the lute, is arranged for a lute in baroque tuning.

Writing such awkward difficult (if possible to play at all) compositions
would have been considered bad at Bach's time.

Best wishes
Thomas

Am Die, 2004-01-06 um 14.09 schrieb Donatella Galletti:

 I don't think someone like Bach made tiny mistakes of this sort. I played
 BWV 995 years ago, at my final Diploma, setting the 13th course as a G and
 it worked, and I read from staff. Weyrauch is easier, but makes some changes
 I don't think Bach would have much appreciated.
 
 Donatella
 
 http://web.tiscali.it/awebd
 
 - Original

Re: MORE THAN 14 course German theorbo?

2004-01-06 Thread Michael Stitt
Which Clavier-Ubung?  I assume No.3 - Goldberg variations?  In which case, technically 
difficult indeed.  I understand the Tocattas for keyboard are thought to have been 
written on clavichord (Here I refer not to the organ works) are the closest we have to 
Bach the improvisor - how the man extemporised and once again I understand are a 
tremendous challenge for a keyboard player to work through.
 
regards,
 
Michael.

Howard Posner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Schall at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The difficulty could mean many things: technical difficulty or musical
 difficulty. Usually the works by Bach were regarded as musically
 difficult - difficult to understand, difficult to listen to them etc.
 old-fashioned. 

Were regarded by whom, other than Johann Adolph Scheibe in a couple of
paragraphs in a 1737 article that were roundly denounced by Birnbaum and
Mizler? BTW, Scheibe wrote that Bach demands that singers and
instrumentalists should be able to do with their throats and instruments
whatever he can play on the clavier, but this is impossible.

 Bach was more famous for being an exceptional keyboard player during his
 lifetime than for his compositions!

His keyboard playing would have consisted mostly of his compositions,
improvisations and continuo playing, so I think it misses the point to draw
a sharp distinction between Bach the player and Bach the composer. In any
event, Scheibe's 1739 praise of the Italian Concerto (yes, the same
Scheibe), Mizler's 1740 praise of the Clavier-Ubung, Mattheson's 1737
remarks on the A minor sonata for unaccompanies violin, Quantz's 1752
remarks about organ music, Marpurg's 1754 dedication that speaks about
Bach's combination of melody and harmony, and others all speak of his skill
as a composer. Just cruising through the excerpts in the Bach Reader, I see
rather more about Bach's music itself than his execution.

Howard





-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes
--


Re: MORE THAN 14 course German theorbo?

2004-01-05 Thread Michael Stitt
Thomas,
 
Very interesting indeed!  Well I might try a retune and explore.  Many thanks,
 
Michael Stitt


Thomas Schall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My liuto attiorbato (14-ch. model after Sellas) has a low F and it's frequently used 
by Mellii, Zamboni and others. I have not seen up to now a piece in the italian 
baroque which uses a 15th ch. - many players even tune their 14th course at f-sharp 
(for easier continuo).

BTW: BWV 995 works fine on a 13-ch instrument when tuning the 13th course at G and 
transposing just the very few passages an A is needed. 

Best wishes
Thomas

Am Mon, 2004-01-05 um 22.52 schrieb Michael Stitt: Thanks for this Thomas.  Assuming 
Bach either misunderstood the lowest tuning of the Baroque lute (which I very much 
doubt) not being an Gg but rather a Aa, or was in contact with such a 14 course 
instrument.  Just how low can the instrument be tuned down to take advantage of low 
bass strings for musical affect on the instrument?  My thumb with little finger JUST 
manages the stretch to reach those low Gs, but I find that - say in the final bars of 
BWV 995 my hand assumes a guitarist-like position.  I had once thought of adding a 
fifteenth course a very low Ff, but in the end musically what would this achieve?  
 
Any suggestions on the value of a very low Ff?
 
Regards,
 
Michael Stitt
Thomas Schall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Miles,

Zamboni wrote for an Archlute which is tuned in the vielle tone
(renaissance tuning) while Michael tunes his instrument in the new
(d-minor) tuning. 

Archlutes are usually 14-ch., I also know about 15-ch. examples (for
example in Paris - take a look at the website of David van Edwards and
search for liito attiorbato and you'll find fotos of replica).

There are a lot of other differences to the baroque (d-minor) lute
(barring, usual number of ribs etc.) and I think one need to name them
as different instruments. 

best wishes
Thomas

Am Mon, 2004-01-05 um 19.45 schrieb Miles Dempster:

 Dear Michael,
 
 
 Zamboni' s sonatas very occasionally use a 14th course.
 
 Regards
 
 
 Miles Dempster
 
 
 On Sunday, January 4, 2004, at 09:29 PM, Michael Stitt wrote:
 
  Dear all,
 
  Am I right to assume that Bach's music is the only music to require 
  that low Gg - fourteeth course?
 
  The ambiguity and terminology of description for this lute has always 
  been a bit of problem for me. When asked what instrument I play and 
  Courses versus `number of strings', it becomes a mouthful. I am 
  asked: `What instrument do you play?' I play a 14 course German 
  theorbo, is usually my reply. But then explaining that each course 
  has two `doubled-up' strings but the first two are single, making a 
  sum total of twenty-six NOT twenty-eight strings... Then there is 
  `fourteen course??!' - I thought the Baroque lute has thirteen 
  courses? My response is: `Yes, a Gg tp play Bach's BWV 995, 1997,  
  1000' Almost finally, but is it really a theorbo or a Baroque lute? 
  `Yes it is a theorbo because it has the extra bass pegbox'. Why the 
  German bit? `It is based on a lute constructed by JCHoffmann who was 
  German...'. End of breath...
 
 
  I bet a guitarist does not get this, six strings will do! hehe.
 
  Regards,
 
  Michael Stitt
 
 
 
 
 
 
  -
  Do you Yahoo!?
  Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
  --
 

-- 
Thomas Schall
Niederhofheimer Weg 3 
D-65843 Sulzbach
06196/74519
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.lautenist.de / www.tslaute.de/weiss

-- 


-
Do you Yahoo!?
Find out what made the Top Yahoo! Searches of 2003 
-- Thomas SchallNiederhofheimer Weg 3   D-65843 Sulzbach06196/[EMAIL PROTECTED] / 
www.tslaute.de/weiss




-
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
--


Re: MORE THAN 14 course German theorbo?

2004-01-05 Thread Michael Stitt
Thanks for this Thomas.  Assuming Bach either misunderstood the lowest tuning of the 
Baroque lute (which I very much doubt) not being an Gg but rather a Aa, or was in 
contact with such a 14 course instrument.  Just how low can the instrument be tuned 
down to take advantage of low bass strings for musical affect on the instrument?  My 
thumb with little finger JUST manages the stretch to reach those low Gs, but I find 
that - say in the final bars of BWV 995 my hand assumes a guitarist-like position.  I 
had once thought of adding a fifteenth course a very low Ff, but in the end musically 
what would this achieve?  
 
Any suggestions on the value of a very low Ff?
 
Regards,
 
Michael Stitt

Thomas Schall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Miles,

Zamboni wrote for an Archlute which is tuned in the vielle tone
(renaissance tuning) while Michael tunes his instrument in the new
(d-minor) tuning. 

Archlutes are usually 14-ch., I also know about 15-ch. examples (for
example in Paris - take a look at the website of David van Edwards and
search for liito attiorbato and you'll find fotos of replica).

There are a lot of other differences to the baroque (d-minor) lute
(barring, usual number of ribs etc.) and I think one need to name them
as different instruments. 

best wishes
Thomas

Am Mon, 2004-01-05 um 19.45 schrieb Miles Dempster:

 Dear Michael,
 
 
 Zamboni' s sonatas very occasionally use a 14th course.
 
 Regards
 
 
 Miles Dempster
 
 
 On Sunday, January 4, 2004, at 09:29 PM, Michael Stitt wrote:
 
  Dear all,
 
  Am I right to assume that Bach's music is the only music to require 
  that low Gg - fourteeth course?
 
  The ambiguity and terminology of description for this lute has always 
  been a bit of problem for me. When asked what instrument I play and 
  Courses versus `number of strings', it becomes a mouthful. I am 
  asked: `What instrument do you play?' I play a 14 course German 
  theorbo, is usually my reply. But then explaining that each course 
  has two `doubled-up' strings but the first two are single, making a 
  sum total of twenty-six NOT twenty-eight strings... Then there is 
  `fourteen course??!' - I thought the Baroque lute has thirteen 
  courses? My response is: `Yes, a Gg tp play Bach's BWV 995, 1997,  
  1000' Almost finally, but is it really a theorbo or a Baroque lute? 
  `Yes it is a theorbo because it has the extra bass pegbox'. Why the 
  German bit? `It is based on a lute constructed by JCHoffmann who was 
  German...'. End of breath...
 
 
  I bet a guitarist does not get this, six strings will do! hehe.
 
  Regards,
 
  Michael Stitt
 
 
 
 
 
 
  -
  Do you Yahoo!?
  Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
  --
 

-- 
Thomas Schall
Niederhofheimer Weg 3 
D-65843 Sulzbach
06196/74519
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.lautenist.de / www.tslaute.de/weiss

--



-
Do you Yahoo!?
Find out what made the Top Yahoo! Searches of 2003
--


Re: MORE THAN 14 course German theorbo? BACH

2004-01-05 Thread Michael Stitt
Howard,
 
This is fair assumption to make, but I don't think a man who devoted a greater part of 
his life to music, a meticulous thinker, friends of at least two lutenists, and one 
frequented by one of the greatest of them all (Weiss),  without mistaking the lowest 
bass string on the lute.  It just seems too hard to believe.
 
He may have written it on the lautenwerke, but he intended it to be played on a lute, 
( See autograph copy).  I think it all points to Weyrauch (sp?) or Falkenhagen - or - 
and no one knows for sure on this - Schouster - a possible amateur lutenist? having 
ownership of a 14 course with that low Gg.
 
Best regards,
 
Michael.


Howard Posner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Stitt at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thanks for this Thomas. Assuming Bach either misunderstood the lowest tuning
 of the Baroque lute (which I very much doubt) not being an Gg but rather a Aa,
 or was in contact with such a 14 course instrument.

I think it makes more sense to assume that he had a low G on his lautenwerk.




-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes
--


Re: 14 course German theorbo? Three peg boxes?

2004-01-05 Thread Michael Stitt
Roman,  
 
Interesting.  Is there any advantage in tuning this instrument over a swan neck?
 
M.

Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I note Bob Barto plays something like a three-pegbox swan neck theorbo lute.
 Is this a modern adaption or based on a historical - period instrument?
http://polyhymnion.org/swv/vita.html
RT




-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes
--


14 course German theorbo?

2004-01-04 Thread Michael Stitt
Dear all,
 
Am I right to assume that Bach's music is the only music to require that low Gg - 
fourteeth course?
 
The ambiguity and terminology of description for this lute has always been a bit of 
problem for me. When asked what instrument I play and Courses versus `number of 
strings', it becomes a mouthful.  I am asked:  `What instrument do you play?'  I play 
a 14 course German theorbo, is usually my reply.  But then explaining that each course 
has two `doubled-up' strings but the first two are single, making a sum total of 
twenty-six NOT twenty-eight strings...  Then there is `fourteen course??!' - I thought 
the Baroque lute has thirteen courses? My response is: `Yes, a Gg tp play Bach's BWV 
995, 1997,  1000'  Almost finally, but is it really a theorbo or a Baroque lute?  
`Yes it is a theorbo because it has the extra bass pegbox'.  Why the German bit? `It 
is based on a lute constructed by JCHoffmann who was German...'.  End of breath...

 
I bet a guitarist does not get this, six strings will do!  hehe.
 
Regards,
 
Michael Stitt
 
 




-
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
--


Modern music for Renaissance Baroque lute

2004-01-04 Thread Michael Stitt
Dear Luteneers,
 
Does anyone know a web site which has a comprehensive list of music written by 
contemporary composers for the Renaissance  Baroque lutes? 
 
Regards,
 
Michael Stitt
 




-
Do you Yahoo!?
Find out what made the Top Yahoo! Searches of 2003
--


Re: Modern music for Renaissance Baroque lute

2004-01-04 Thread Michael Stitt
Thanks for this Roman,  BTW, I tried to post this directly to you, however, I suspect 
your ISP considers my yahoo mail as Spam as it returned it with a deamon error 
message. The question is where I post it cc lutenet, you will still recieve it.
 
Here goes.
 
M.

Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dear Luteneers,
 Does anyone know a web site which has a comprehensive list of music written by
 contemporary composers for the Renaissance  Baroque lutes?
 Regards,
 Michael Stitt
There is none, but David Parsons and Lynda Sayce are compiling one. It would
be a hard copy publication though.
RT




-
Do you Yahoo!?
Find out what made the Top Yahoo! Searches of 2003
--


Re: 14 course German theorbo?

2004-01-04 Thread Michael Stitt
Thanks for this Sterling.  I do recall on a couple of occasions calling my instrument 
`a Baroque lute' only to be corrected that it is a theorbo.  Will the real instrument 
please stand up?! hehe.  
 
When you say you play Weiss C Major Suites with a 14th course, do you mean playing the 
dominant - G - an octave lower? Gg?  I must give this a go.
 
Best regards,
 
Michael Stitt


sterling price [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi- I play a 14c baroque-lute. I use the 14th course
all time in Weiss where it makes sense-for instance in
c major keys. The thing about playing a 14 course
baroque lute is the music is designed for 13 courses
so having a 14th can be confusing for the thumb when
playing a 13c then a 14c like I do. I moved the 14th
over so there is a bigger space between 13 and 14.
Also-just call it what it is-a baroque lute. The
difference in sound is barely noticable.
Sterling Price

--- Michael Stitt wrote:
 Dear all,
 
 Am I right to assume that Bach's music is the only
 music to require that low Gg - fourteeth course?
 
 The ambiguity and terminology of description for
 this lute has always been a bit of problem for me.
 When asked what instrument I play and Courses versus
 `number of strings', it becomes a mouthful. I am
 asked: `What instrument do you play?' I play a 14
 course German theorbo, is usually my reply. But
 then explaining that each course has two
 `doubled-up' strings but the first two are single,
 making a sum total of twenty-six NOT twenty-eight
 strings... Then there is `fourteen course??!' - I
 thought the Baroque lute has thirteen courses? My
 response is: `Yes, a Gg tp play Bach's BWV 995,
 1997,  1000' Almost finally, but is it really a
 theorbo or a Baroque lute? `Yes it is a theorbo
 because it has the extra bass pegbox'. Why the
 German bit? `It is based on a lute constructed by
 JCHoffmann who was German...'. End of breath...
 
 
 I bet a guitarist does not get this, six strings
 will do! hehe.
 
 Regards,
 
 Michael Stitt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
 --


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Find out what made the Top Yahoo! Searches of 2003
http://search.yahoo.com/top2003



-
Do you Yahoo!?
Find out what made the Top Yahoo! Searches of 2003
--


Re: Happy New Year from Down Under

2003-12-31 Thread Michael Stitt
Dear Luteneers,
 
Happy New Year from Down Under!  Looking forward today to Kangaroo pie with Wallaby 
spounge cake for lunch today under the coolabar tree!
 
Regards to all,
 
Michael Stitt
Australian Lutenist
http://bachplucked.com/lutenist/
 
 




-
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
--


Re: Vivaldi Lute Concerto

2003-12-21 Thread Michael Stitt
J.S.Bach?  :-)
 
Michael Stitt
http://weissplucked.com/


Sal Salvaggio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On this Vivaldi Concerto -

I've played it on the Baroque (dm) lute and it sits
very well - I wonder if a certain German Lutenist was
in town and played it back in Antonio's
day.

SS

__
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/





-
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing
--


Re: S.L, Weiss: Segovia's letters to Ponce

2003-12-18 Thread Michael Stitt
You should look at the primary source:  Segovia's letters to Ponce.  Sometime in the 
1920s, Segovia was in a great rush to perform the work and asked Ponce to attribute 
the work to.  He suggested Weiss as most of the music public already new most of 
Bach's guitar transcriptions.
 
I believe it is a fine work.  Lesser known is the Suite he wrote in D Major of which 
the Prelude is very beautiful indeed.  I have played both on Baroque lute and it 
sounds fine indeed!  Ponce is IMHO a highly under-rated guitar composer.  Why?  Most 
of his music was written by a piano based composer who wrote difficult music.  Many 
composer prefer the easy stuff like Sor and Guiliani and much of Villa Lobos.  
 
His La Folia Variations are probably his finest work.
 
Regards,
 
Michael Stitt
http://bachplucked.com/
 
 
 




-
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing
--


Re: The ecological sustainable lute luthier

2003-12-18 Thread Michael Stitt
Gimme a break - NOT!  Okay I'm prepared to accept the gist of your argument to a 
point.  The music instrument making and - dare I say it - furniture industry are not 
cut off from mother earth when it comes to economics and the demand for wood!   Just 
as I as a consumer have consumer soveignity on the purchase of consumer goods.
 
I acknowledge that luthiers are a small part of the process that has impact on native 
and exotic  trees, but I've seen some hefty prices for quality woods used for a 
multitude of manufacturing purposes.  Just how many produces of wood based products 
ask: `Just  how and where did this fine piece of wood come from and by what means?'   
Very few I suspect.   BTW, all trees are dead when they are cut down.  :-)
 
Respectfully,
 
Michael Stitt
http://bachplucked.com/


Jon Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gimme a break,

There is no way that the needs of luthiers for exotic woods can endanger the
trees. Luciano says that his woods come from dead trees, but it isn't
necessary that he say that. The massive endangerment of the rain forests in
S.A. is not only from the loggers but also the cut and burn of the native
agriculturists. Any wood sold as rosewood, or whatever, comes from someone
who knew the value of the rosewood. The problem is those who don't know that
the wood has value and just cut it to get it out of the way (either of their
crop fields, or of their lumbering). The forests of England and Spain were
stripped of fine oak in the time of the great fleets, but the yew wasn't
stripped for the archers. The bow had to be made from just the right branch
of a mature tree - whereas the masts of the Armada and the English fleet
required the entire trunk of the straightest and best oak.

Take any wood you will, the entire production of hand crafted musical
instruments in the world won't impact the ecology. But if the elite decide
they need rosewood dashboards on their cars, and the polloi follow them,
that would be a problem.

There is an old joke, The Lawyer's Prayer: Dear God, if there is a God, and
for the purposes of this prayer we shall assume there is a God. Well then
I'll say that that god invented rosewood, cherry and all the other exotic
wood specifically for the use of luthiers - to be harvested carefully and
nurtured for the making of music for mankind. But not for clear cutting or
burning.

Best, Jon





-
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
--


John Cage on Lute

2003-12-18 Thread Michael Stitt

Does any one know whether John Cage wrote for the lute in his life time?  

I heard something about a contemporary composer who wrote a Passaicialle where after 
each return of the bass motif, a course was cut with sizzors until all strings were no 
more.  Then silence.




-
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing
--


Re: Copyright and library restrictions in Germany

2003-12-17 Thread Michael Stitt
Dear Stefan  Stewart,
 
Surely this cannot be true.  I would assume this one just remains in legal limbo-land 
- untested and without precedent.  
 
Regards,
 
 
Michael Stitt


Stewart McCoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Stefan,

Thank you for all this information. I think it would be very
difficult to prove that you were the first person to perform music
from a lute manuscript. The chances are that the original owner of
the manuscript played music from it to a few friends, and so
(according to your interpretation of German law) he would own the
copyright for the next 25 years, after which it would be in the
public domain. That would mean, for example, that Richard Mynshall
could claim a royalty from us, if we were to perform music from his
manuscript before 1622. After that it's all up for grabs.

Best wishes,

Stewart.


- Original Message -
From: Stefan Ecke 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 8:55 PM
Subject: Copyright and library restrictions in Germany



 An Editio Princeps is the first edition of a piece of music that
was
 never published before. Thus this part of the copyright law only
 applies to lute manuscripts and not to historical prints of lute
music.
 The person who first publishes or performs (!!) a so far
unpublished
 piece of music, owns the rights overs the music for the next 25
years!
 Thus the lutenist who is first to publish or perform in public a
previously
 unpublished piece of music, can ask for royalties form all other
 lutenists that play the piece.
 Personally, I think this regulation is unbelievable.







-
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing
--


The ecological sustainable lute luthier

2003-12-17 Thread Michael Stitt
Dear all,
 
Just after reading the lute doctor I just wondered what the state of play is for 
luthiers these days.  Have we come to a point where woods used for the construction of 
lutes and historical based instruments are using ecologically sustainable timbers?  By 
this I mean timbers which have been grown and distributed based on best practise, 
sustainable principles.  I believe that my 1971 lute constructed from Brazilian rose 
wood - the wood being an endangered timber, and becoming a rarity for instrument 
construction.  Is this true?  Any passionate thoughts about this subject?  I 
acknowledge it must be quite a dilemma for those luthiers who genuine ethical regard 
for the environment.
 
Regards,
 
Michael Stitt
 




-
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing
--


Re: The ecological sustainable lute luthier

2003-12-17 Thread Michael Stitt
Thanks for your detailed reply Michael.
 
I guess some companies - and I'm sure there are many, which condone woodchipping and 
other uses on a non sustainable basis,  which are the real vandals, and not the humble 
luthier.  Its unfortunate that the market (and therefore $$$) which appears to be the 
only real regulation for the purchase of rainforest timbers.  Perhaps I am wrong but I 
understand the Amazon still undergoes enormous removal of prime timbers which continue 
to be illegally logged.  
 
I do recall a thread on this list discussing alternative materials including plastics 
( frightening thought isn't it!) to curb the ever diminishing supply of rare woods.
 
Regards,
 
Michael.
 
 


Michael Thames [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Michael,
In this day and age, I think cutting down any tree whether endangered, or
not, is a crime. However, some crimes are more serious than others. This
from a self confessed criminal.
The only thing stopping me from buying up all the Brazilian rosewood I
can is the price, and whats worse than cutting down Brazilian rosewood, is
cutting down Yew wood, the longest living tree on the planet, with the
exception of maybe a couple others.
I don't know how it is in Canada and further north of New Mexico, but
every pine tree here has been killed by the pine beetle, and scientist here
predict it will only get worse and spread further north, as the planet
warms.
I've witnessed this myself and have seen this spread to the higher
elevations were it will affect spruce as well. I can live without Brazilian
rosewood, but simply can do without spruce. I hope this is not happening in
Europe.
Michael Thames
Luthier
www.ThamesClassicalGuitars.com
Site design by Natalina Calia-Thames
- Original Message - 
From: Michael Stitt 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 8:52 PM
Subject: The ecological sustainable lute  luthier


 Dear all,

 Just after reading the lute doctor I just wondered what the state of play
is for luthiers these days. Have we come to a point where woods used for
the construction of lutes and historical based instruments are using
ecologically sustainable timbers? By this I mean timbers which have been
grown and distributed based on best practise, sustainable principles. I
believe that my 1971 lute constructed from Brazilian rose wood - the wood
being an endangered timber, and becoming a rarity for instrument
construction. Is this true? Any passionate thoughts about this subject? I
acknowledge it must be quite a dilemma for those luthiers who genuine
ethical regard for the environment.

 Regards,

 Michael Stitt





 -
 Do you Yahoo!?
 New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing
 --





-
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing
--


Re: The ecological sustainable lute luthier

2003-12-17 Thread Michael Stitt
Dear Luciano  others
 
My comment by no means intended to suggest that all wood from Brazil was illegally 
obtained by luthiers.  If my last E-mail read like this then I certainly need to make 
this clear.  Like I expressed broadly before, I'm sure most luthier's are honest, hard 
working craftsman trying to make something beautiful within appropriate ethical 
practices.  
 
But I do wonder how one can guage exactly where timbers have come from? and indeed 
whether - unabiguiously, this wood has been harvest based on ecological sustainable 
practises - therefore legal?
 
Michael Stitt

Luciano Faria [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Michael,

I'm a brazilian lute maker and I have hundreds of sets of Brazilian =
rosewood, King wood, tulip wood and many other tropical hardwoods. ALL =
my wood has been sawned from dead trees and this is a legal and =
certified source of wood. I know a lot of instrument makers here and =
almost all rosewood in their stocks came from dead trees or recicled =
furniture. There are hundreds of dead logs being certified each year and =
this is more than sufficient for instrument making around the world.=20

Best,
Luciano Faria





--



-
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing
--


Karl-Ernst Schröder - Weiss contribution.

2003-12-15 Thread Michael Stitt

Dear luteneers,

 

I understand from an E-mail not so long ago that Karl-Ernst Schröder passed away 
recently.  My only contact, (if that the word for it) of Karl Ernst was the wonderful 
recording he made with Bob of the missing duet part from the Dresden MS.  So it comes 
as a surprise that he passed away.  Did Karl Ernst do other Weiss recordings?  If so 
can anyone provide CD details. I did a review of this CD sometime ago but currently in 
the process of updating.

I have made a small acknowledgement of his work at the weissplucked web site, but if 
others can fill in more about this work. http://bachplucked.com/weiss/new.htm

Regards,

Michael Stitt

http://weissplucked.com/

http://bachplucked.com/

 




-
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing
--


Re: numbers

2003-12-15 Thread Michael Stitt
I might be wrong but I think this cropped picture is in the Loursse (sp!) enclycopedia 
of Music.  You should check the reference if you have this largely ubiquitous 
publication.

 
Michael Stitt
http://bachplucked.com/lutenist/

Emily Corrigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to everyone who pointed out the fourth lute
player, and for the warm welcome. I am not a lute
player, just working on a piece about the infamous
John Johnson. As for the fourth lute player, he
appears to be playing to a different crowd, and not in
consort with the other three, so I maintain that these
three still may be the three lutenists of Queen
Elizabeth. Regardless of the number though, I'm still
looking for the artist's name. Any other possible
answers?

Thanks for your help.

Emily Corrigan
Graduate Student
Musicology
University of Minnesota

__
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/





-
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing
--


Re: Tabs, Staff and Bach superior to Weiss

2003-12-11 Thread Michael Stitt
Howard,
 
I would not content that any composer who writes in staff notation will be any greater 
then a composer who writes in lute tablature.  This criterion alone is nonsense.  What 
I would suggest is that a composer with skill and ability would be limited in scope in 
expressing and exploring ideas using lute notation as a medium, rather then using 
staff notation.. 
 
This topic is exceptionally complex and difficult to put a strong argument together in 
a few paragraphs. I'll defer a full explanation while I can put my thoughts on this 
matter together in the near future.
 
As for your point about pointing `to a piece by Weiss and explain how it would
have been better if he'd written it in staff notation'. all I can say is that this is 
quite a challenge, but once again defer this until another time soon too.
 
Many thanks for your reply.  Will get back soon.
 
Michael Stitt
http://bachplucked.com/
http://weissplucked.com/
 
 
Howard Posner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Stitt at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I still content that writing in lute tablature did not server him to the
 fullest as a composer. I know this is hot point to make

Hot? I think the word you're looking for is silly, or perhaps
self-evidently fallacious. The notion that Bach's music is better than
Weiss' because Bach wrote in staff notation and Weiss wrote in tablature
might carry some weight if every one of the thousands of other composers who
wrote in staff notation were indisputably superior to Weiss.

But what the hey: Can you point to a piece by Weiss and explain how it would
have been better if he'd written it in staff notation?

HP





-
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing
--


Updates: Silvius Leopold Weiss

2003-12-07 Thread Mr Michael Stitt
Dear Luteneers,

Many thanks for your positive comments.  I have made some amendments and
will continue to update the site here.  http://weissplucked.com/

Regards,

Michael Stitt




Fretgut question

2003-12-03 Thread Michael Stitt

Dear Luteneers,

I'm at astage where my fretgut on my 14 course swan neck are so frayed that buzzing is 
serious.  I survived two years on my old supply but forgot what size I need.  I have 
two requests.  The first is short term.  What diameter fretgut should I order?  I 
recall 0.9, 0.8, 0.7 down the neck?  Is this right?

Second request is can someone suggest what gauge strings should I order for a fourteen 
course.  Starting with 1st to 14th.  A cut and paste of someone's order form would be 
appreciated.  I have the standard J.C. Hoffmann 14 course German swan neck 
theorbo-lute.

Many thanks in advance.

Michael.




-
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
--


Re: Facsimeles etc.

2003-12-02 Thread Michael Stitt
Interesting reading...umm..
 
Just to elaborate on Matanya's URL for free downloadable music, I have a download page 
at Bach Plucked! which includes other Bach and related music for free.  See 
http://bachplucked.com/download.htm
 
I have pondered on this subject and agree it raises many questions.  I know that Frank 
Koonce has put a lot of time and effort on his Bach transcription of the lute suite 
music for classical guitar, including his second edition which I reviewed not so long 
ago.  It includes new fingering for guitarists based on his many years as a university 
teacher of the classical guitar - time and experience as a teacher.  Those interested 
in getting that professional knowledge will not find it in the free downloadable 
music, but in saying that I mean no disrespect for the efforts of these people too - 
just that his complete edition is so far reaching and holistic.
 
Those many years of teaching and looking for easier and more effective ways to plays 
this technically difficult - but musically rewarding music - certainly is worthy of 
some return on a monetary basis.  All Bach on guitar lovers have the opportunity to 
positively benefit from his work.
 
I hope those who view his labour of love - will show respect.
 
Regards,
 
Michael Stitt


Matanya Ophee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 09:20 PM 12/2/2003 -0600, Michael Thames wrote:

  St. Michael the Liberator! I notice you don't give your guitars away.
  Don't you think the world should be given free access to such fine
  instruments? ;-)
 
  DR
This is not an analogy, he MAKES them from scratch.
RT
 Roman, thanks. I just didn't know what to say to someone like that.

It's easy to grab at the straws RT supplies you with when your hypocrisy is 
staring you in the face. But Roman is wrong. The analogy is perfect. The 
issue is not the music, but the object you hold in your hand when you put 
it on the copy machine. That is a book, and it was made from scratch by one 
person who invested a great deal of time and money in creating it. And if 
it was not created by Albert, you would have had to find another such 
object made by someone else, like Frank Koonce, that contains the same 
image you want.

BTW, regarding your intentions to make a guitar transcriptions: besides the 
many editions of this music on the market, by such editors/transcribers as 
Frederick Zigante, Josef Eotvoes, Jerry Willard, Tillmann Hopstock, to 
mention the better known ones, there is quite a bit of free, downloadable 
editions of this music available on the net. This is one remarkable example:

http://icking-music-archive.org/scores/bach/bwv995/bwv995cg.pdf

Clearly, there is nothing you can possibly contribute here that has not 
been done zillions of times before, in print and on the web. You are 
wasting your time. Try and come up with more creative ideas. I am sure 
brother Roman will be happy to supply with them.


Matanya Ophee
Editions Orphe'e, Inc.,
1240 Clubview Blvd. N.
Columbus, OH 43235-1226
Phone: 614-846-9517
Fax: 614-846-9794
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.orphee.com 







-
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
--


Re: Gutsy Satoh CD

2003-11-27 Thread Michael Stitt
Hi Leonard,
 
I too have this CD.  I was given it asa present from my wife and only played it once 
or twice.  Then following Ed's recommendation - especially the full gut stringing 
compoent I have been playing the recording very frequently indeed.  My favourite is 
his recendition of the Prelude to the 2nd Suite which isvery nicely transcibed indeed.
 
Best regards,
 
Michael.


Edward Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leonard, it is:

Three Solo Suites - JS Bach
(it contains cello suites 1, 2, and 4)
Channel Classics CCS 18798

You will like it.

ed



At 04:58 PM 11/25/03 -0500, Leonard Williams wrote:
 Recently someone mentioned a CD on which Toyohiko Satoh uses a
completely gut-strung lute for Bach suites. Which of his CD's is this? I'd
like to get a copy.
 Thanks!
Regards,
Leonard Williams
 []
 (_)
 ~




“The ultimate end and aim of music should only be the glorification of God and the 
recreation of the mind.  Where these are not kept in view, there can be no real music 
- only infernal jingling and  bellowing…”  [Johann Sebastian Bach]

-
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
--


Re: Instrument Archaeology [was: fretted ud ?]

2003-11-25 Thread Michael Stitt
Dear gran,
 
I will acknowledge that I may have got the immigration date wrong, but my point was 
more your reference to ` last
surviving descendants of the Neanderthaalers'  which I very much doubt you got from 
the Encyclopædia Britannica.  Why?  Because it seems modern man does not derive from 
the Neanderthaals, (according to scientists) but rather considered to be from all on 
its own. ( a recent BBC documentary too)
 
I sent this E-mail to you privately with goodwill intended, and not as a personal 
criticsm.
 
Best regards,
 
Michael.


G.R. Crona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Michael,

I can see that you are mis-informed about these matters. I suggest you check
info before making a statement that is incorrect!

Here is what Encyclopædia Britannica says about the matter:

Genetically Aborigines show considerable diversity but are quite distinct
from groups outside Australia. They came originally from somewhere in Asia
and have been in Australia for at least 40,000 years. (In 1990 a date of
60,000 years was suggested for a rock shelter in the Northern Territory, but
the finding, based on the use of a recently developed technique called
thermoluminescence, is still being evaluated.) The first settlement would
have occurred during an era of lowered sea levels, when there was an almost
continuous land bridge between Asia and Australia, but watercraft must have
been used at some points. By 30,000 years ago most of the continent was
occupied, including the southwest and southeast corners (Tasmania became an
island when sea levels rose sometime between 13,500 and 8,000 years ago and
isolated the Aborigines who lived there from the mainland) as well as the
Highlands of the island of New Guinea. Archaeological evidence suggests that
much of the interior of Australia was abandoned by Aborigines during a
period of harsh climatic conditions between 25,000 and 15,000 years ago and
reoccupied after conditions improved.

But this is all very OT, and although fascinating, has little to do with
lutes, however does not seem to spoil my theory.

With Regards
Göran

- Original Message -
From: Michael Stitt
To: G.R. Crona
Sent: 24. november 2003 23:00
Subject: Re: Instrument Archaeology [was: fretted ud ?]


Göran

It is generally accepted by anthropologists that the Australian Aborigines
settled in Australia on about 2,500 years ago and came for SE Asia. The
comment that they are `last surviving descendants of the Neanderthaalers'
would not be appreciatted in this part of the world, though I recognise you
did make mean to offend.

Regards,

Michael Stitt
[Melbourne, Australia]


G.R. Crona wrote:
Dear Jon,

you're wondering into deep OT-land here, bringing up the Didgeridoo. (If the
Aborigenes of Australia are indeed (like I like to theorize) the last
surviving descendants of the Neanderthaalers, their instruments might be the
oldest ones we have.

The musical bow, is the simplest of string instruments, using f.ex. the
mouth as resonator. I agree w/ you about it probably being the idea that
started all this string hoopla.

What about a duet for lute and Didgeridoo anyone?

Best Regards

Göran

- Original Message -
From: Jon Murphy
To: Lute List
Sent: 24. november 2003 09:56
Subject: Re: fretted ud ?


| Shakespeare said it. What's in a name? That which we call a rose/ By any
| other name would smell as sweet;
|
| On the whole every instrument we know has been invented in every culture
(I
| think the Australian aborigine Digereedoo may be an exception). The wind
| instruments start with the willow whistle (found in caves from 50,000
years
| ago), or perhaps with the end blown flute. Whatever, early man
discovered
| that by splitting the wind of his breath he could make a sound in a
hollow
| tube - and then discovered that he could vary the sound by making holes in
| the tube to change the effective length. And he discovered it
independently
| at different times and different places, as he did most other basic
| instrumental principles. That split stream of air gives us the organ, the
| penny whistle, the side blown flute, and etc. At some later point (before
| Roman times if we are to believe the Hollywood extravaganzas with Roman
| trumpets) he also discovered the way to make an air column in a tube make
| sound using a mouthpiece and the compression of the lips to vary it.
|
| We need not spend much time on drums, even chimps beat on a hollow log.
But
| the skin covered ring of wood is almost universal to all cultures.
|
| Strings, now we come to the heart of the matter - or at least our hearts.
It
| is probably a good guess to say that the hunter's bow was developed before
| the stringed instrument, after all food is yet more important than
| aesthetics (although man doesn't live by bread alone). And again we come
to
| a weapon developed independently in most parts of the world. The archer
may
| have found a pleasure in the twang, and played with it by bending the
bow
| to change the tension while

Re: fretted ud ?

2003-11-24 Thread Michael Stitt
Dear Davide,
 
Okay I take your point and appreciate your detailed reply.  I'm impressed by the depth 
of your knowledge too.
 
Sincere best regards,
 
Michael Stitt


drebuffa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Michael,
I also have the CD by Ergin Kizilay: ud Taksimleri. Did you listen to it?
of course it is an unfretted 'ud because there is no way to play turkish or
arab music with frets. I was also surprised when I saw the photo of a
fretted 'ud on the back cover, but look at the picture of the inside
booklet: that's a traditional Othoman ud. I know Ergin Kizilay and many
other 'ud players but none of them will ever play a fretted ud. Besides as
you heve seen, the graphic quality of many CD's published by MEGA MUZIK in
Unkapani is terrible.
So if you have been in Istanbul you must have seen the new invented
electronic 'ud without belly and ribs, electric saz and baglama with
humbucker pick-ups and if look carefully in some shops you can find ( even
if it's very rare,since I've seen 2 in many years of travelling and visiting
all the lute makers and shop in every part of Istanbul)an 'ud with painted
frets on the fingerboard .( also in Lebanon I have seen some)
But all this means nothing. You can always find a stupid instrument maker in
any country you go) It is sad but Turkey , as already happened to most of
the arabian countries , will gradually loose it' s important historical
tradition in lute making and one day ( not too far) they will all play
electric guitars , keyboards, and maybe fretted idan.
regards,
Davide
- Original Message -
From: Michael Stitt 
To: drebuffa ; 
Cc: lute list 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 3:24 AM
Subject: Re: fretted ud ?


 I'm looking at the back of a CD cover with the word Ud on the front and a
picture of a Ud with clearly marked frets on it. I was in Turkey in
JUne and saw many uds so I know what one looks like..

 I expect the word `absolute' or never may need further investigation.

 Regards,

 Michael.



 drebuffa wrote:
 The turkish 'ud has never been fretted. same is for any idan from Morocco
to
 Iraq.
 The only fretted lute they havein Turkey is the Lauta which is different
 and has a longer neck and different tuning.
 Only long neck lutes, like the tanbur, or the baglama , saz, and cura in
 Turkey as well as the Buzuq (in Siria and Lebanon) the Iranian tar, setar
 and many similar long necked lutes from Greece to Turkmenistan, have
always
 been fretted.
 davide rebuffa

 - Original Message -
 From: Thomas Schall
 To: Michael Stitt
 Cc: lute list
 Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 7:23 PM
 Subject: Re: fretted ud: still exists - here


  Hi Michael,
 
  it seems as if the turkey has reimported the european lute (with frets)
  which was to a certain degree spread over the osmanian empire (and in
  india). I think they coexist together with the arabian form of the ud
  without frets and are slightly different built.
  Daniel would surely be able to tell more about it (I'm just starting to
  deal with this topic).
  As far as I know uds with frets are not common in northern africa.
 
  Best wishes
  Thomas
 
  Am Son, 2003-11-23 um 18.32 schrieb Michael Stitt:
 
   On Saturday my wife and I wandered into a Turkish music shop here in
oz
 to buy an ud CD. I asked the Turkish born shop keeper for the best solo ud
 player of Turkey and he gave me a recording of Ergin Kizilay playing solo
ud
 music. I don't know whether he is `the best' ud player of Turkey - but the
 performance and recording quality is fantastic -with the musical
 composition characterised by a Spanish tinge but in reality totally
Arabic.
  
  
  
   But that was not the interesting part. On the back of the CD it shows
 the instrument and yes it has frets! I told my Lebanonese wife that this
is
 unusual and her reply was `what do you mean unusual.all uds HAVE frets' I
 informed this was not the case and it seems that this generialisation does
 appear to be wrong.
  
  
  
   On my newly created ud page I have included a photograph of a ud
player
 playing a unfretted instrument. It's a bit dark and probably not clear
 enough from the original to see a non-fretted instrument. The point IS not
 all uds are fretted. Here is the picture:
  
  
  
   http://bachplucked.com/ud/
  
  
  
  
  
   Regards,
  
  
  
   Michael.
  
  
  
  
  
   -
   Do you Yahoo!?
   Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
   --
 
  --
  Thomas Schall
  Niederhofheimer Weg 3
  D-65843 Sulzbach
  06196/74519
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  www.lautenist.de / www.tslaute.de/weiss
 
  --






 -
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
 --





-
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
--


Re: fretted ud: still exists - correction

2003-11-23 Thread Michael Stitt

Correction from previous tranmitted meassage.  I mean to say ` The point IS not all 
uds are UNfretted'.  Here is the picture:  http://bachplucked.com/ud/

 

 

Regards,

 

Michael.
 





-
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
--


Re: fretted ud: still exists - here

2003-11-23 Thread Michael Stitt

On Saturday my wife and I wandered into a Turkish music shop here in oz to buy an ud 
CD.  I asked the Turkish born shop keeper for the best solo ud player of Turkey and he 
gave me a recording of Ergin Kizilay playing solo ud music.  I don’t know whether he 
is `the best’ ud player of Turkey - but the performance and recording  quality is 
fantastic –with the musical composition characterised by a Spanish tinge but in 
reality totally Arabic.

 

But that was not the interesting part.  On the back of the CD it shows the instrument 
and yes it has frets!  I told my Lebanonese wife that this is unusual and her reply 
was `what do you mean unusual…all uds HAVE frets’  I informed this was not the case 
and it seems that this generialisation does appear to be wrong.  

 

On my newly created ud page I have included a photograph of a ud player playing a 
unfretted instrument.  It’s a bit dark and probably not clear enough from the original 
to see a non-fretted instrument.   The point IS not all uds are fretted.  Here is the 
picture:

 

http://bachplucked.com/ud/

 

 

Regards,

 

Michael.
 




-
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
--


Re: fretted ud ?

2003-11-23 Thread Michael Stitt
I'm looking at the back of a CD cover with the word Ud on the front and a picture of a 
Ud with clearly marked frets on it.   I was in Turkey in JUne and saw many uds so 
I know what one looks like..
 
I expect the word `absolute' or never may need further investigation.
 
Regards,
 
Michael.
 


drebuffa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The turkish 'ud has never been fretted. same is for any idan from Morocco to
Iraq.
The only fretted lute they havein Turkey is the Lauta which is different
and has a longer neck and different tuning.
Only long neck lutes, like the tanbur, or the baglama , saz, and cura in
Turkey as well as the Buzuq (in Siria and Lebanon) the Iranian tar, setar
and many similar long necked lutes from Greece to Turkmenistan, have always
been fretted.
davide rebuffa

- Original Message -
From: Thomas Schall 
To: Michael Stitt 
Cc: lute list 
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: fretted ud: still exists - here


 Hi Michael,

 it seems as if the turkey has reimported the european lute (with frets)
 which was to a certain degree spread over the osmanian empire (and in
 india). I think they coexist together with the arabian form of the ud
 without frets and are slightly different built.
 Daniel would surely be able to tell more about it (I'm just starting to
 deal with this topic).
 As far as I know uds with frets are not common in northern africa.

 Best wishes
 Thomas

 Am Son, 2003-11-23 um 18.32 schrieb Michael Stitt:

  On Saturday my wife and I wandered into a Turkish music shop here in oz
to buy an ud CD. I asked the Turkish born shop keeper for the best solo ud
player of Turkey and he gave me a recording of Ergin Kizilay playing solo ud
music. I don't know whether he is `the best' ud player of Turkey - but the
performance and recording quality is fantastic -with the musical
composition characterised by a Spanish tinge but in reality totally Arabic.
 
 
 
  But that was not the interesting part. On the back of the CD it shows
the instrument and yes it has frets! I told my Lebanonese wife that this is
unusual and her reply was `what do you mean unusual.all uds HAVE frets' I
informed this was not the case and it seems that this generialisation does
appear to be wrong.
 
 
 
  On my newly created ud page I have included a photograph of a ud player
playing a unfretted instrument. It's a bit dark and probably not clear
enough from the original to see a non-fretted instrument. The point IS not
all uds are fretted. Here is the picture:
 
 
 
  http://bachplucked.com/ud/
 
 
 
 
 
  Regards,
 
 
 
  Michael.
 
 
 
 
 
  -
  Do you Yahoo!?
  Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
  --

 --
 Thomas Schall
 Niederhofheimer Weg 3
 D-65843 Sulzbach
 06196/74519
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.lautenist.de / www.tslaute.de/weiss

 --






-
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
--


Re: fretted ud - full Arabic analysis - on web

2003-11-21 Thread Michael Stitt
Visit:  http://bachplucked.com/ud/
 
Regards,
 
Michael Stitt
 


Mathias Rösel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jon Murphy schrieb:
 But I think that may be the limit, so far as I know there are no musical 
 transcriptions available in Cuneiform.

well, there are :)

 BTW, has the Arabic retained its form and vocabulary since the times of those 
 pictures?

yes, is has retained them. That's one of those many positively surprising
features of Arabic

 Could there be changes in meaning of words as has happened in English (I can read 
 Chaucer,
 but with difficulty).

any normally trained and educated native speaker of Arabic will _without_
difficulty understand the qur'an which is by now 13 centuries of age (Chaucer is
7, I think). Since in Islam, Scripture is to be read aloud (or sung, rather) at
service, immediate understanding greatly adds to the power of Islam (stuff for
thinking).

Some words have taken additional connotations like e.g. irhaab (political
terrorism), but basic meanings of the verbal roots have not changed (r-h-b,
fear, horror).

-- 
Best wishes,

Mathias

Mathias Roesel, Grosze Annenstrasze 5, 28199 Bremen, Deutschland/ Germany, T/F
+49 - 421 - 165 49 97, Fax +49 1805 060 334 480 67, E-Mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
--


Re: gut versus nylgut - 14 course - chewing gum sound?

2003-11-19 Thread Michael Stitt
Dear Thomas,
 
Ed made a recommendation to listen to Toyohiko Satoh's recording of the cello suites 
1,2,4 on BL with particular emphasis on the sound of the lower bass strings.  I do 
have this recording and must confess I listened with more focus on the quality of 
sound, and - yes - was impressed.  
 
I have not changed my strings for two years!  and they definitely need a change.  I 
just fear that the fourteenth course will rattle?
 
I believe you have produced a fined recording of Baroque lute music containing 
contemporary music.  
 
Well done!
 
Best wishes,
 
Michael.

Thomas Schall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ed and the rest of the list,

I tried gut and confess it's the better choice regarding sound etc. 
I needed to get used to the feeling of gut on the fingers - I felt like
glued on the strings the first time I tried to play them. 
The KO for gut and the reason to change back to nylgut was that the
first chantarelle broke after three days of usage (the second lasted 4
days). 

Maybe it was bad luck - but gut is rather expensive and I didn't feel
the sound would have so much so I decided to change back to nylgut.
Anyway - I would give it another try if someone could recommend a better
quality (I was recommended Kürschner's Luxline but asking for the price
- 450 bucks for a set of strings - is was out of the question).

Thomas

Am Mit, 2003-11-19 um 01.34 schrieb Michael Stitt:

 Ed,
 
 I was referring primarily to that low Gg which resonants very low indeed. It just 
 reminds me of stretched gum - as a kid - as it resonates.
 
 I will try it and will follow your recommendation.
 
 Many thanks.
 
 Michael.
 
 Edward Martin wrote:
 
 
 At 09:23 AM 11/18/03 -0800, Michael Stitt wrote:
 I can't imagine what gut strings would sound like on the fourteenth course 
 - a low Gg. A bit like chuing gum!!
 
 Michael, you would be very surprised if you were to try it. I use gut to 
 the 13th course, in low A, and it works very, very well. It is a much 
 improved sound over overspun wounds, in my opinion. Chewing gum? What do 
 you mean?
 
 Listen to Toyohiko Satoh's recent JS Bach recording on Channel 
 Classics. He recorded the CD on an entirely gut strung baroque lute, and 
 it does not sound like gum, in my opinion. The sound is crisp, clean, 
 and beautiful.
 
 But seriously, those wound metal strings have so much power and would be 
 very much missed if replaced with unstable gut.
 
 Hm. you seem to imply that wound metal strings are more 
 powerful than gut. Do you mean louder? They are not louder. My gut 
 basses are just as loud, if not louder than overspun strings. The metal 
 wound strings have a slower response, and a long sustain, which is not 
 desirable, in my opinion. The gut is as loud, is faster in sound, but it 
 has a rapid decay, which I consider an asset. And, they are certainly 
 beautiful sounding.
 
 I agree with your statement that the wound metal strings would be missed if 
 replaced with unstable gut. But, why not replace them with stable gut? If 
 you think that all gut is unstable, that is not true. The quality of 
 available gut has greatly improved; I have performed for the past 7 to 8 
 years in gut, and have not had tuning trouble.
 
 Edward Martin
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
 --

-- 
Thomas Schall
Niederhofheimer Weg 3 
D-65843 Sulzbach
06196/74519
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.lautenist.de / www.tslaute.de/weiss

--



-
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
--


Re: fretted ud

2003-11-19 Thread Michael Stitt
My wife is willing to translate the Classical Arabic, assuming it isn't Persian, but 
we keep getting `cannot find the server'  Lets hope this is a temporary problem..
 
Michael Stitt

David Van Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Roman,

Do you mean this picture which I've just copied from your page?:
http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/Ud.htm

As you see I also have a much bigger version which is among the 
earliest images I collected. Alas in those days I didn't take much 
care over keeping notes on the source. But if that's the image you 
mean, I might be able to search for where I found it. Probably in the 
local university library. Or maybe an early issue of Early Music.

I too would be interested in a translation of the arabic script 
along the strings and as a title to the illustration. As you say it 
is an interesting confirmation of Farmer's thesis that the early 'Ud 
was fretted.

Best wishes,

David


At 9:15 PM -0500 18/11/03, Roman Turovsky wrote:
Today my eye has caught a CD by an Azerbajdzhani composer Frangi Ali-Zade
called Crossings. She does not appear to be related to our own arabe-manquÈ
Daniel Franke-Ferengizade.
The cover is illustrated with what appears to be a collage with a clipping
of an antique illumination of a FRETTED ud with two rosettes in the form of
the Star of David, situated crosswise the axis of the body, above and below
the strings. There is writing UNDER the strings, apparently in Arabic
script.
I have found a SMALL jpg picture and inserted it into the text in the page
2, paragraph 4 at
http://www.polyhymnion.org/torban
Can anyone identify the source of this illumination???
RT
__
Roman M. Turovsky
http://turovsky.org
http://polyhymnion.org


-- 
The Smokehouse,
6 Whitwell Road,
Norwich, NR1 4HB 
England.

Telephone: + 44 (0)1603 629899
Website: http://www.vanedwards.co.uk






-
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
--


Re: Historical cost of lutes - Mattheson Baron.

2003-11-14 Thread Michael Stitt
My quoted source was not quite right, it is Mattheson who asserted:
 
In addition, there is trouble with bad or spliced strings, especially the 
charantarelle, and trouble with frets and tuning pegs, so that I have had it heard 
that it costs as much in Paris to keep a lute as a horse.
 
Baron rebutted this remark saying for a year with two Thalers' worth of feed, [they] 
would very shortly look like one of the seven scrawny, emaciated cows that the pharaoh 
saw in his dream. [ Baron Study,p.27 via Per Kjetil Farstad thesis German Galant Lute 
Music, 2000.]
 
Michael Stitt
http://bachplucked.com/lutenist/

Stewart McCoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm afraid I don't know about Baron, and don't have a copy of his
book to check at home.

Best wishes,

Stewart McCoy.


- Original Message -
From: Michael Stitt 
To: Marcus Merrin 
Cc: 
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 4:19 AM
Subject: Re: Historical cost of lutes.


 Marcus,

 I think this quote actually derives from Baron's treatise on the
lute and lute playing, and referred to the cost of a then Baroque
lute.

 Regards,

 Michael Stitt
 http://bachplucked.com/

 Marcus Merrin wrote:
 I think Thomas Mace wrote that just for the _upkeep_ of a lute a
man
 must expect to pay as much as for a horse. He goes on to tell you
how
 to remove the belly yourself and thus completely ruin the thing.
(Lute,
 not horse I suppose). A blacksmith might earn maybe 20 pence on a
busy
 day, and stabling for a horse at an inn was about 1-2 pence. I
conclude
 that a blacksmith couldn't keep a lute unless he made his own
strings.
 All figures are as accurate as most Govornment fiscal projections
:-)

 Marcus

 Herbert Ward wrote:

 How much did a lute cost 1500-1650, in terms of months of salary?
I'm
 thinking of skilled or low-end professional labor (say,
professor,
 lawyer, or agricultural manager).
 
 Today, a good lute runs, say, from 0.5 - 1.0 months' salary
(depending, of
 course, on both salary level and lute cost).






-
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
--


Re: Historical cost of lutes - Matheson Baron.

2003-11-14 Thread Michael Stitt
My quoted source was not quite right, it is Mattheson who asserted:
 
In addition, there is trouble with bad or spliced strings, especially the 
charantarelle, and trouble with frets and tuning pegs, so that I have had it heard 
that it costs as much in Paris to keep a lute as a horse.
 
Baron rebutted this remark saying for a year with two Thalers' worth of feed, [they] 
would very shortly look like one of the seven scrawny, emaciated cows that the pharaoh 
saw in his dream. [ Baron Study,p.27 via Per Kjetil Farstad thesis German Galant Lute 
Music, 2000.]
 
Michael Stitt
http://bachplucked.com/lutenist/

Stewart McCoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm afraid I don't know about Baron, and don't have a copy of his
book to check at home.

Best wishes,

Stewart McCoy.


- Original Message -
From: Michael Stitt 
To: Marcus Merrin 
Cc: 
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 4:19 AM
Subject: Re: Historical cost of lutes.


 Marcus,

 I think this quote actually derives from Baron's treatise on the
lute and lute playing, and referred to the cost of a then Baroque
lute.

 Regards,

 Michael Stitt
 http://bachplucked.com/

 Marcus Merrin wrote:
 I think Thomas Mace wrote that just for the _upkeep_ of a lute a
man
 must expect to pay as much as for a horse. He goes on to tell you
how
 to remove the belly yourself and thus completely ruin the thing.
(Lute,
 not horse I suppose). A blacksmith might earn maybe 20 pence on a
busy
 day, and stabling for a horse at an inn was about 1-2 pence. I
conclude
 that a blacksmith couldn't keep a lute unless he made his own
strings.
 All figures are as accurate as most Govornment fiscal projections
:-)

 Marcus

 Herbert Ward wrote:

 How much did a lute cost 1500-1650, in terms of months of salary?
I'm
 thinking of skilled or low-end professional labor (say,
professor,
 lawyer, or agricultural manager).
 
 Today, a good lute runs, say, from 0.5 - 1.0 months' salary
(depending, of
 course, on both salary level and lute cost).






-
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
--


Re: Fine Nacks for Ladies...Rob Spencer

2003-11-11 Thread Michael Stitt
Dear all,
 
I haven't been following this thread in detail, however, I'm reminded of my first 
introduction to Dowland and the lute - a recording with this song on it - track one if 
I recall.  It was LP with Robert Spencer though I cannot remember the tenor's name.  
Love to know whether it has been re-issued on CD.   It was a beautiful recording...
 
Best regards to all.
 
Michael.



bill sterling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This old man, he played one,
he played knick-knack on my thumb
With a knick-knack patty whack,
give a dog a bone
This old man came rolling home

- Original Message - 
From: Caroline Usher 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 7:06 AM
Subject: Re: Fine Nacks for Ladies


 At 08:51 AM 11/11/2003 -0500, you wrote:
 So then the nacks could be a metaphor for the kind of breathlessness
 experienced in a passionate encounter.

 No need to reach so far:

 3. concr. An ingenious contrivance; a toy, trinket, trifle,
KNIC
K-KNACK. ? Obs.

 1540 HEYWOOD Four P.P. in Hazl. Dodsley I. 349 Needles, thread, thimble,
shears, and all such knacks. 1596 SHAKES. Tam. Shr. IV. iii. 67 Why 'tis a
cockle or a walnut-shell, A knacke, a toy, a tricke, a babies cap: Away with
it. a1677 BARROW Serm. (1683) II. vii. 104 Springs, and wheels, and such
mechanick knacks. 1715 tr. C'tess D'Aunoy's Wks. 557 A Thousand pretty
Knacks..which she made with Fish-Bones and Shells, with Reeds and Rushes.
1825 LAMB Elia Ser. II. Superannuated Man, All the glittering and endless
succession of knacks and gew~gaws. 1863 COWDEN CLARKE Shaks. Char. xiv. 360
The pedlar's knacks and gaudy trash [Wint. T. IV. iv.] absorb Mopsa's whole
gloating vision.

 Check the third verse of the song, which lists some of the pedlar's kncks:
pins, points, laces and gloves.

 *
 Caroline Usher
 DCMB Administrative Coordinator
 613-8155
 Box 91000
 --






-
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
--


Ziryab - the Weissian figure of Cordoba

2003-11-08 Thread Michael Stitt

Hello all

 

I am interested in finding out more about the legendary Ziryab the musician, whose 
real name was Abdul-Hasan Ali ibn Nafi.  I understand that Ziryab was the man who 
first introduced the lute to Spain [Cordova].  As well as this he was an influential 
composer and was also famous for his fashion design and gastronomical skills too! A 
favourite of the Abbasid Caliph Harun ar-Rashid he is accredited with al kindi, for 
the addition of the fifth bass string to the lute, and substituting the wooden 
plectrum with a the eagle’s pen.

 

I can give a little more biographical detail of the man.  Known as Ziryab, he was born 
in Iraqi in 789 AD and nicknamed Ziryab because of his melodious voice and his dark 
complexion and features which people compared with a singing bird called a merit  with 
its black plumage.  He was a gifted pupil of Ishaq al-Mawsili, a renown musician in 
Baghdad and settled in Cordoba in 822 which was under the Caliph of Abrdur Rahman II.  
He became a type of Weissian figure of the city being the court entertainer with a 
monthly salary of 200 golden dinars a sum, [which probably has some comparison with 
the equalvalent status of Weiss in salary Dresden - I suspect].  

 

He established the first conservatory in the world, which included teaching harmony 
and composition which continued well beyond his lifetime.  As a lute player he played 
with a special type of gut string.  It is said: Ziryab fascinated the proud court of 
Abderraman II, in C6rdoba, by playing the strings of lion cub gut which were used in 
his lute…”

 

My questions are:  do we have any idea of the type and harmonic structure of 
compositions written by this man?   I suspect that there is none and all we can go by 
is his reputation which seems to have influenced middle-eastern musicians, 
particularly oud players.

 

Do we have any evidence of the type of musical composition - harmonic structure he 
conceived on the lute, beyond the physical innovation to the instrument – the fifth 
string?  

 

Many thanks in advance,

 

Michael Stitt

 

http://bachplucked.com/

 

 

 

 





-
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
--


Re: Ziryab - the Weissian figure of Cordoba

2003-11-08 Thread Michael Stitt
Gary,
 
All this is great stuff and I really appreciate the bibliography at the end.  Many 
thanks.
 
Your questions about the Ud as a living instrument is exactly my interest at the 
moment.  While in Turkey I bought a Sarz (sp?) and now kick myself that I did not buy 
a method which was on sale including one for ud.
 
The question I want to have answered one day is:  can we fuse Arabic and Western 
musical traditions to create something new on the lute, without it being being gimacky 
and artificial, so as to bring to life again a living 21st century music beyond 
tradtional art music?
 
I'm hoping one day it might be possible on my 14 course [Baroque without removing the 
frets.
 
Good luck with your musicology work. It sounds very interesting indeed.
 
Regards,
 
Michael Stitt
http://bachplucked.com/lutenist/
 


archlute [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Michael,

At the risk of offending those who invest themselves in this very rich musical 
repertoire, apologies in advance. I'm writing a paper on this very topic for one of my 
ethnomusicology seminars at the moment. 

I am interested in finding out more about the legendary Ziryab the 
musician, whose real name was Abdul-Hasan Ali ibn Nafi. I understand that 
Ziryab was the man who first introduced the lute to Spain [Cordova]. As 
well as this he was an influential composer and was also famous for his 
fashion design and gastronomical skills too! 

My questions are: do we have any idea of the type and harmonic structure 
of compositions written by this man? I suspect that there is none and 
all we can go by is his reputation which seems to have influenced 
middle-eastern musicians, particularly oud players.

Do we have any evidence of the type of musical composition - harmonic 
structure he conceived on the lute, beyond the physical innovation to the 
instrument ñ the fifth string? 

From what I understand in the English language sources, harmony (as the western world 
defines the term) seems not to have existed other than in a theoretical model. There 
are many sources at the time that rely on Greek views of the monochord, however. From 
what I've been able to gather, the oud seems to be a heterophonic accompaniment 
instrument for the voice. I'm sure that solo music was played on the instrument, yet 
the preoccupation with taqasim (the scales used by the players) theoretical 
permutations seems to imply that vertical sonorities were not used. [It's an 
interesting conundrum - they have plectrums but it seems as if they never strummed?]

I would suggest that all lutenists investigate this instrument and it's repertoire. 
The oud is clearly a *living* tradition with a myriad of regional permutations that 
exist even today. In addition to interesting historical questions such as: when did 
the modern oud remove the frets that it had in the middle ages?, which system of 
division of the monochord was used in which locale?, etc., the instrument brings us 
closer to the lute because we can see a living tradition in action which, IMHO, 
provides a context for our own performance practice and sociological investigations.

Further, I am just amazed at the level of musical thought occurring in Arab countries 
during the West's Medieval Era. There are many musical treatises (some translated in 
part to english) that have changed my view of the western musical tradition. It seems 
the west was more influenced by this strand of musical theory that Grout (and I dare 
say Grove) could ever begin to mention. It's been a very enlightening investigation to 
say the least.

I'm definetly not an expert on this by any means, just wanted to share what I have 
found in a very short time. Hope this helps.

Gary Beckman

PS Here are a few english sources that may help:

PPS The first book has a few facsimiles of oud tablature from the 13th century. It's 
beautiful to look at and provides a foil to a few ideas about the lute that we may all 
share.



El-Mallah, Issam. Arab Music and Musical Notation. Tutzing: Hans Schneider, 1997.

El-Shawan, Salwa. ³Traditional Arab ensembles in Egypt since 1967: ³The Continuity of 
Tradition within a Contemporary Framework?², Ethnomusicology, 1984, 271-287. 

Farmer, H. G. A History of Arabian Music. London: Luzac  Co., 1929.

Racy, Ali Jihad. Making Music in the Arab World : The Culture and Artistry of Tarab. 
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 

Sawa, George. ³The Survival of Some Aspects of Medieval Peformance Practice², 
Ethnomusicology, vol. 15, no. 1, 1981, 73-86.

Shedadi, Fadlou. Philosophies of Music in Medieval Islam. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1995.

Shiloah, Amnon. ³The Epistle on Music of the Ikhwan al-Safa², in The Dimension of 
Music in Islamic and Jewish Culture. Ashgate: Brookfield, Vt., 1993, 3-73.

___. ³The Ud and the Origin of Music², in The Dimension of Music in Islamic and 
Jewish Culture. Ashgate: Brookfield, Vt., 1993, 395-407.

___. The Dimension of Music in Islamic and Jewish Culture. Ashgate