Re: [lxc-devel] releasing 0.6.6 soon

2010-05-30 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 05/29/2010 01:15 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
 Daniel Lezcanodaniel.lezc...@free.fr  writes:

 I will release a 0.6.6 version.

 If someone noticed a bug or has a patch to send, please let me know
 before I put a tag.

 I'd really like to see some sort of signal forwarding in lxc-start, and
 waiting for feedback whether it's OK to reverse the logic (ie. don't
 catch and forward a specific small set only).  It should probably go
 together with a (tc)setpgrp as Greg suggested, even though we'd still
 want to forward other signals, and the container may even not have a
 controlling terminal at all.

Inverting the logic sounds good for me. And I agree with Greg too.


 Shall I quickly put something like this together, or is such stuff out
 of question for 0.6.6 anyway?

Send the patchset, so we can review and see we take it for a 0.6.6.
Otherwise I can take it for 0.6.7. IMO, the deliveries are too long and 
I would like to release more often now.

Thanks
   -- Daniel

--

___
Lxc-devel mailing list
Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel


Re: [lxc-devel] releasing 0.6.6 soon

2010-05-28 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr writes:

 I will release a 0.6.6 version.

 If someone noticed a bug or has a patch to send, please let me know 
 before I put a tag.

I'd really like to see some sort of signal forwarding in lxc-start, and
waiting for feedback whether it's OK to reverse the logic (ie. don't
catch and forward a specific small set only).  It should probably go
together with a (tc)setpgrp as Greg suggested, even though we'd still
want to forward other signals, and the container may even not have a
controlling terminal at all.

Shall I quickly put something like this together, or is such stuff out
of question for 0.6.6 anyway?
-- 
Cheers,
Feri.

--

___
Lxc-devel mailing list
Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel