Re: cmake build with qt6 (macos) does not include "plugins"
Am Sat, 4 Nov 2023 18:05:42 +0100 schrieb pdv : > On 04/11/2023 17:55, pdv wrote: > > On 21/03/2023 19:27, Kornel Benko wrote: > >> Am Tue, 21 Mar 2023 15:27:41 +0100 > >> schrieb pdv : > >> > >>> On 21/03/2023 11:00, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Mon, 20 Mar 2023 20:05:32 +0100 > schrieb pdv : > > It's within the first if() else(), that's thus for qt6(see below). I > > suppose this should work for all platforms, but I checked it on macos > > only. Your patch is limited to APPLE and also works for me; If this > > problem doesn't occur for other platforms, it's ok for me of course. > > Probably no one else is using the bundle option (-DLYX_BUNDLE=ON). > > If you could try to use cmake without this option, I'd be interested > if it works for > you too. > >>> > >>> Apparently no problem. -DLYX_BUNDLE=OFF works too for me. > >>> > In this case we could get rid of it (probably). > > Kornel > > >>> > >>> > >> > >> Good, so I will disable this option for lyx2.5 then. > >> > >> Kornel > >> > >> > > I have build the latest lyx-master and I still need my (previous) patch > > to build a LyX.app which includes all required Qt6 frameworks (I want a > > stand-alone app). > > > > I'm using a recent version of CMake and apparently versions older than > > 3.5 will not longer be supported. To get rid of the annoying warnings > > I've upped the minimum version from 3.1 to 3.5 (new patch included). > > > > pdv > > > Sorry, forgot to include the patch. Will be done for 2.4.x versions. Also for other CMakeLists.txt's in the lyx-sources. Kornel pgpqLBFtd8Hso.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: cmake build with qt6 (macos) does not include "plugins"
On 04/11/2023 17:55, pdv wrote: On 21/03/2023 19:27, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Tue, 21 Mar 2023 15:27:41 +0100 schrieb pdv : On 21/03/2023 11:00, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Mon, 20 Mar 2023 20:05:32 +0100 schrieb pdv : It's within the first if() else(), that's thus for qt6(see below). I suppose this should work for all platforms, but I checked it on macos only. Your patch is limited to APPLE and also works for me; If this problem doesn't occur for other platforms, it's ok for me of course. Probably no one else is using the bundle option (-DLYX_BUNDLE=ON). If you could try to use cmake without this option, I'd be interested if it works for you too. Apparently no problem. -DLYX_BUNDLE=OFF works too for me. In this case we could get rid of it (probably). Kornel Good, so I will disable this option for lyx2.5 then. Kornel I have build the latest lyx-master and I still need my (previous) patch to build a LyX.app which includes all required Qt6 frameworks (I want a stand-alone app). I'm using a recent version of CMake and apparently versions older than 3.5 will not longer be supported. To get rid of the annoying warnings I've upped the minimum version from 3.1 to 3.5 (new patch included). pdv Sorry, forgot to include the patch.diff --git a/3rdparty/dtl/CMakeLists.txt b/3rdparty/dtl/CMakeLists.txt index f757b26b17..9b78cf4c0f 100644 --- a/3rdparty/dtl/CMakeLists.txt +++ b/3rdparty/dtl/CMakeLists.txt @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.1) +cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.5) set(LYX_IPO_SUPPORTED FALSE) if (POLICY CMP0069) diff --git a/3rdparty/mythes/CMakeLists.txt b/3rdparty/mythes/CMakeLists.txt index 869bee7c93..d2175d4167 100644 --- a/3rdparty/mythes/CMakeLists.txt +++ b/3rdparty/mythes/CMakeLists.txt @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.1) +cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.5) set(LYX_IPO_SUPPORTED FALSE) if (POLICY CMP0069) diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt index 38e11b8a0b..c4c19ed17c 100644 --- a/CMakeLists.txt +++ b/CMakeLists.txt @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ # Copyright (c) 2006-2011 Peter Kümmel, # Copyright (c) 2008-2020 Kornel Benko, -cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.1.0) +cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.5.0) set(LYX_PROJECT LyX) # Instruct cmake to not use gnu extensions, -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: cmake build with qt6 (macos) does not include "plugins"
On 21/03/2023 19:27, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Tue, 21 Mar 2023 15:27:41 +0100 schrieb pdv : On 21/03/2023 11:00, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Mon, 20 Mar 2023 20:05:32 +0100 schrieb pdv : It's within the first if() else(), that's thus for qt6(see below). I suppose this should work for all platforms, but I checked it on macos only. Your patch is limited to APPLE and also works for me; If this problem doesn't occur for other platforms, it's ok for me of course. Probably no one else is using the bundle option (-DLYX_BUNDLE=ON). If you could try to use cmake without this option, I'd be interested if it works for you too. Apparently no problem. -DLYX_BUNDLE=OFF works too for me. In this case we could get rid of it (probably). Kornel Good, so I will disable this option for lyx2.5 then. Kornel I have build the latest lyx-master and I still need my (previous) patch to build a LyX.app which includes all required Qt6 frameworks (I want a stand-alone app). I'm using a recent version of CMake and apparently versions older than 3.5 will not longer be supported. To get rid of the annoying warnings I've upped the minimum version from 3.1 to 3.5 (new patch included). pdv -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: [BUG] Debian 12, LyX 2.3.7, SIGSEGV
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 10:24:50 +0100 Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 09:58:24AM +0200, Folsk Pratima wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 17:26:35 +0100 > > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > > The blasted logs got wrapped tell me if you need them intact I will > > send as attachments. > > Thanks, not much revealing unfortunately. > > If you are willing to spend more time on debugging and provide us > with better backtrace, I can give more complex instructions. > > But I am somewhat sceptic how much it will be helpful, this smells > like there is some miscom between xcb and Qt and that would be harder > to address on LyX's level... > > Do another Qt applications run fine on your system? > Pavel Man I reported it for God's sake, honestly, I do not even use fluxbox nor have I ever used it before. pcmanfm-qt, qt5c, qpdfview all work fine. Can't think of any other qt applications I might have. You *can* give me more complex instructions just do not expect me to send the results yesterday. Also, the bug is very likely to be reproducible, so if there is any single person willing to undertake this he really only needs to install fluxbox which is as small and lightweight as it gets. -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
