Re: Why does Lyx insert a \par in a center environment?

[David]

Am 14.12.2015 um 05:03 schrieb Robert Susmilch:
> David,
> 
> I’ve found for myself that if you need absolute control you need to use ERT. 
> I 
> was attempting to use LyX with the MLA style format (from the era of 
> typewriters, ugh) and had to use the following:
> 
> {\centering%
> INTRODUCTION\par}
> 
> Otherwise I would get additional space around the section titles.
> 
> Also, as noted here,
> http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/23650/when-should-we-use-begincenter-instead-of-centering
> you need a /par for it to work.
> 

Yes, that or local layout, which could solve my problem this time.

Re: Hunspell not found

[Kornel Benko]

Am Montag, 14. Dezember 2015 um 11:45:29, schrieb David 

> Dear list,
> 
> I'd like to use Hunspell as spellchecker in Lyx (2.1.4) but it seems
> that it is not found (see screenshot attached).
> 
> Hunspell is definitely installed on my system (Opensuse 13.1). For
> example, a
> 
> hunspell -D
> 
> on the command line prints the installed dictionaries. The log of the
> output of
> 
> lyx -dbg any
> 
> contains the following line
> 
> table[57]:  tag: `\hunspelldir_path'  code:57
> 
> but I don't know if it's relevant. Also, I tried a reconfigure.
> 
> On another that I use and which is running Ubuntu, Hunspell works in Lyx.
> 
> Any thoughts on this problem?

Your installed lyx seems to be compiled without hunspell support.

> Thanks,
> David

Kornel

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Hunspell not found

[David]

Am 14.12.2015 um 12:42 schrieb Cor Blom:

> 
> An up-to-date version of lyx for openSUSE 13.1 can be found here:
> 
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Publishing/openSUSE_13.1/
> 
> That one is complied with hunspell and enchant support (but without
> aspell).
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Cor
> 

Nice, thank you!

Re: Why does Lyx insert a \par in a center environment?

[David]

Am 14.12.2015 um 04:01 schrieb Richard Heck:

> There is an answer to this, but to be honest I do not remember what it
> is. It cannot be
> prevented, as it is hardcoded. But if you don't want it, you can always
> use ERT.
> 
> Richard
> 
> 


Ok, thanks!

Re: can see no bibliography in PDF

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

2015-12-14 10:22 GMT+01:00 Michael Berger :

> Moin Jürgen,
> As for Biber-Log I am not sure whether this is the correct file, sorry.
> If it is not, where can I search for it? Or is it contained in the
> Latex-Log?
> I am most grateful that you are prepared to attend to my problem.
> Meanwhile I have made an update and when this did not help a clear new
> installation of openSUSE 13.2 as well - all unsuccessful.
> I cannot imagine that it has to do with my file system switch from all
> EXT4 to BTRFS for root and XFS for home for everything else runs as
> perfectly as before that switch.
> I don't exactly remember when I did that. But I think I created the
> respective LyX-documents first and did the switch afterwards.
>

Are you sure this is the biber log produced with the minimal example you
submitted? The biber log reads

[206] Biber.pm:3130> INFO - Looking for bibtex format file 'referencs.bib'
[206] Utils.pm:137> DEBUG - Looking for file 'referencs.bib' via kpsewhich
[246] Utils.pm:141> DEBUG - kpsewhich returned error:  (Inappropriate
ioctl for device)
[246] Utils.pm:153> DEBUG - Could not find 'referencs.bib' via kpsewhich
[246] Utils.pm:185> ERROR - Cannot find 'referencs.bib'!

It is thus looking for a bibtex file called "referencs.bib" [sic!].
Check if you are loading this file (instead of the desired one) in
preamble via \bibliography or \addbibresource.

BTW you also seem to have a superfluous
\DeclareLanguageMapping{english}{english-plain}

in the preamble, presumably from a trial with biblatex-apa.

HTH

Jürgen


>
> Thanks and cheers,
> Michael Berger
>
>

Re: Hunspell not found

[Cor Blom]

Op 14-12-15 om 11:45 schreef David:

Dear list,

I'd like to use Hunspell as spellchecker in Lyx (2.1.4) but it seems
that it is not found (see screenshot attached).

Hunspell is definitely installed on my system (Opensuse 13.1). For
example, a

hunspell -D

on the command line prints the installed dictionaries. The log of the
output of

lyx -dbg any

contains the following line

table[57]:  tag: `\hunspelldir_path'  code:57

but I don't know if it's relevant. Also, I tried a reconfigure.

On another that I use and which is running Ubuntu, Hunspell works in Lyx.

Any thoughts on this problem?

Thanks,
David



An up-to-date version of lyx for openSUSE 13.1 can be found here:

http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Publishing/openSUSE_13.1/

That one is complied with hunspell and enchant support (but without aspell).

Regards,

Cor

Re: Hunspell not found

[David]

Am 14.12.2015 um 12:09 schrieb Stephan Witt:

> 
> In case of a self compiled LyX install the devel package for hunspell.
> Otherwise ask the packager of the LyX package you've installed.
> 
> Stephan

I built it myself. So that will be the reason. Thanks for your answers.

David

Re: can see no bibliography in PDF

[Michael Berger]

On 12/13/2015 11:36 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:

Am Donnerstag 10 Dezember 2015, 10:01:39 schrieb Michael Berger:

Dear friends of LyX,
I am completely lost re the subject and have no better idea left as to
ask for help.

openSUSE 13.2, 64bit, KDE 4.14.9
LyX 2.1.2-1.6
KBibTeX 0.6
LyX server pipe /home/mb39/.lyx/ same in both KBibTeX and Lyx.

I am working on quite a number of similar lyx-documents without facing
this problem.
The example attached is one out of five using biblatex (instead of
bibtex) and all five worked fine for a long time.
For reasons I do not know none of those five works anymore. All in a
sudden I have this deformation out of nowhere. All I am doing on a
regular basis is to keep my system up to date.
So this may have to do with one recent update!?

All my other lyx-documents using bibtex compile just as ever with some
using multiple (up to four) bibliographies.

Note: Scott Kostyshak found Bibtex Errors when compiling the attached
mini example.

Any hint, similar experience?

Please send the complete LaTeX and biber logs (you can access them in LyX via
Document > LaTeX Log. The biber log is in the "BibTeX" section.

Jürgen


Thank you,
Michael Berger


Moin Jürgen,
As for Biber-Log I am not sure whether this is the correct file, sorry.
If it is not, where can I search for it? Or is it contained in the 
Latex-Log?

I am most grateful that you are prepared to attend to my problem.
Meanwhile I have made an update and when this did not help a clear new 
installation of openSUSE 13.2 as well - all unsuccessful.
I cannot imagine that it has to do with my file system switch from all 
EXT4 to BTRFS for root and XFS for home for everything else runs as 
perfectly as before that switch.
I don't exactly remember when I did that. But I think I created the 
respective LyX-documents first and did the switch afterwards.


Thanks and cheers,
Michael Berger

[0] Config.pm:425> INFO - This is Biber 1.7 running in TOOL mode
[0] Config.pm:427> INFO - Config file is 
'/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.20.1/Biber/biber-tool.conf'
[0] Config.pm:428> INFO - Logfile is 'referencs.bib.blg'
[83] biber:252> INFO - === Sun Dec 13, 2015, 19:30:55
[84] Biber.pm:255> DEBUG - Adding 'entry' list 'tool' for pseudo-section 0
[112] Biber.pm:3118> DEBUG - Looking for directly cited keys:
[206] Biber.pm:3130> INFO - Looking for bibtex format file 'referencs.bib'
[206] Utils.pm:137> DEBUG - Looking for file 'referencs.bib' via kpsewhich
[246] Utils.pm:141> DEBUG - kpsewhich returned error:  (Inappropriate ioctl for 
device)
[246] Utils.pm:153> DEBUG - Could not find 'referencs.bib' via kpsewhich
[246] Utils.pm:185> ERROR - Cannot find 'referencs.bib'!
[246] Biber.pm:109> INFO - ERRORS: 1This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.5-1.40.14 (TeX Live 2013/TeX Live for SUSE 
Linux) (format=pdflatex 2015.12.7)  14 DEC 2015 09:22
entering extended mode
 restricted \write18 enabled.
 %&-line parsing enabled.
**mini_biblatex_oscola.tex
(./mini_biblatex_oscola.tex
LaTeX2e <2011/06/27>
Babel <3.9f> and hyphenation patterns for 78 languages loaded.

(/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrartcl.cls
Document Class: scrartcl 2012/07/29 v3.11b KOMA-Script document class (article)

(/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrkbase.sty
Package: scrkbase 2012/07/29 v3.11b KOMA-Script package (KOMA-Script-dependent 
basics and keyval usage)
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrbase.sty
Package: scrbase 2012/07/29 v3.11b KOMA-Script package (KOMA-Script-independent
 basics and keyval usage)
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/graphics/keyval.sty
Package: keyval 1999/03/16 v1.13 key=value parser (DPC)
\KV@toks@=\toks14
) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrlfile.sty
Package: scrlfile 2012/06/15 v3.12 KOMA-Script package (loading files)
Package scrlfile, 2012/06/15 v3.12 KOMA-Script package (loading files)
  Copyright (C) Markus Kohm

))) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/tocbasic.sty
Package: tocbasic 2012/04/04 v3.10b KOMA-Script package (handling toc-files)
)
Package tocbasic Info: omitting babel extension for `toc'
(tocbasic) because of feature `nobabel' available
(tocbasic) for `toc' on input line 115.
Package tocbasic Info: omitting babel extension for `lof'
(tocbasic) because of feature `nobabel' available
(tocbasic) for `lof' on input line 116.
Package tocbasic Info: omitting babel extension for `lot'
(tocbasic) because of feature `nobabel' available
(tocbasic) for `lot' on input line 117.

Class scrartcl Warning: You've used obsolete option `idxtotoc'.
(scrartcl)  Usage of this option indicates an old document and
(scrartcl)  changes compatibility level using
(scrartcl)  `index=totoc,version=first'.
(scrartcl)  If you don't want this, you should simply replace
(scrartcl)  usage of option `idxtotoc' by `index=totoc'.

Class scrartcl Info: Switching compatibility level to `first'.
Class 

Hunspell not found

[David]

Dear list,

I'd like to use Hunspell as spellchecker in Lyx (2.1.4) but it seems
that it is not found (see screenshot attached).

Hunspell is definitely installed on my system (Opensuse 13.1). For
example, a

hunspell -D

on the command line prints the installed dictionaries. The log of the
output of

lyx -dbg any

contains the following line

table[57]:  tag: `\hunspelldir_path'  code:57

but I don't know if it's relevant. Also, I tried a reconfigure.

On another that I use and which is running Ubuntu, Hunspell works in Lyx.

Any thoughts on this problem?

Thanks,
David

Re: Hunspell not found

[Stephan Witt]

Am 14.12.2015 um 11:45 schrieb David :

> Dear list,
> 
> I'd like to use Hunspell as spellchecker in Lyx (2.1.4) but it seems
> that it is not found (see screenshot attached).

That's the case for a LyX compiled without Hunspell support. 
Where did you get your LyX from?

> 
> Hunspell is definitely installed on my system (Opensuse 13.1). For
> example, a
> 
> hunspell -D
> 
> on the command line prints the installed dictionaries.

This is irrelevant for LyX.

> The log of the
> output of
> 
> lyx -dbg any
> 
> contains the following line
> 
> table[57]:  tag: `\hunspelldir_path'  code:57
> 
> but I don't know if it's relevant. Also, I tried a reconfigure.
> 
> On another that I use and which is running Ubuntu, Hunspell works in Lyx.
> 
> Any thoughts on this problem?

In case of a self compiled LyX install the devel package for hunspell.
Otherwise ask the packager of the LyX package you've installed.

Stephan