Re: Formatting/Equation numbering
> There are two relevant document class options: > > * "fleqn" (flush left equation), which aligns the equation to the left. Used > by itself, though, it leaves the equation number on the right. > > * "leqno" (left equation number), which puts the equation number on the left. > Used by itself, it centers the equation still. > > BUT, if you use BOTH options, then you get what you want. > > How to do it in LyX? Look at Document> Settings> Document Class. The "Custom" > field allows you to enter class options. In your case, you could enter > "fleqn,leqno". Any class options can be entered here. > > However, LyX also has native support for this under Document> Settings> Math > Options. The Formula Numbering Side option is self-explanatory. You would > want "Left". This adds "leqno" behind the scenes. The other one is the Indent > Formulas checkbox. The tooltip explains what it does: It indents instead of > centering equations. So you can check that. If you leave it at "Default", > then it just adds "fleqn"; you can also, however, control the indent here by > selecting "Custom" and entering a length (which gets set as the \mathindent). > This excellent explanation was also very useful to me. Thanks, Hal -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Re: Formatting/Equation numbering
On 12/4/22 19:57, Dan wrote: I know how I can number equations, but I would like the equations to be in the following type of format: Eq. 1.1 (equation) Eq. 1.2 (equation) indented slightly. IMO I don't like having them centered like the usual Edit, Math, NumberWholeFormula method does. I know LaTeX supports defining a user formatting code but I don't know how to do that in LyX. There are two relevant document class options: * "fleqn" (flush left equation), which aligns the equation to the left. Used by itself, though, it leaves the equation number on the right. * "leqno" (left equation number), which puts the equation number on the left. Used by itself, it centers the equation still. BUT, if you use BOTH options, then you get what you want. How to do it in LyX? Look at Document> Settings> Document Class. The "Custom" field allows you to enter class options. In your case, you could enter "fleqn,leqno". Any class options can be entered here. However, LyX also has native support for this under Document> Settings> Math Options. The Formula Numbering Side option is self-explanatory. You would want "Left". This adds "leqno" behind the scenes. The other one is the Indent Formulas checkbox. The tooltip explains what it does: It indents instead of centering equations. So you can check that. If you leave it at "Default", then it just adds "fleqn"; you can also, however, control the indent here by selecting "Custom" and entering a length (which gets set as the \mathindent). This is all in the Math manual, under Help. Riki -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Formatting/Equation numbering
I know how I can number equations, but I would like the equations to be in the following type of format: Eq. 1.1 (equation) Eq. 1.2 (equation) indented slightly. IMO I don't like having them centered like the usual Edit, Math, NumberWholeFormula method does. I know LaTeX supports defining a user formatting code but I don't know how to do that in LyX. Thanks! -Dan -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Re: Equation numbering variants
Paul A. Rubin msu.edu> writes:
> I'm going to assume that you want the marked equations not to interrupt the
> equation numbering scheme. In other words, you want (2.3.3)DELTA consecutive
> between (2.3.2) and (2.3.4), rather than having both a (2.3.3) and a
> (2.3.3)DELTA.
>
> Create a math macro (Insert > Math > Macro), name it something like \mytag,
> and fill the TeX code slot with
>
> \stepcounter{equation}\tag{\theequation\Delta}
>
> and the LyX display slot with ?\Delta?. There's nothing sacred about what
> goes in the LyX slot; feel free to change it at will. More about that in a
> second.
>
> Then, in any equation you want to flag, just type \mytag in the equation
> body. LyX will display ?\Delta? (or whatever you substituted) in the
> equation, and will annotate the equation number correctly in the output. If
> you leave the LyX portion of the macro empty, LyX will expand the macro
> inside the equation. That still works, but it makes for some remarkably ugly
> equations in the LyX GUI.
>
> Paul
>
Thank you Paul!
I tried it and it works good. I see what you mean with the Lyx portion of
the macro - it is only for my reference.
But the DELTA is inside the round brackets. Is there a way to have it
outside the brackets?
Franci
Re: Equation numbering variants
Le 16/12/2015 23:05, Franci Žižek a écrit :
Paul A. Rubin msu.edu> writes:
I'm going to assume that you want the marked equations not to interrupt the
equation numbering scheme. In other words, you want (2.3.3)DELTA consecutive
between (2.3.2) and (2.3.4), rather than having both a (2.3.3) and a
(2.3.3)DELTA.
Create a math macro (Insert > Math > Macro), name it something like \mytag,
and fill the TeX code slot with
\stepcounter{equation}\tag{\theequation\Delta}
and the LyX display slot with ?\Delta?. There's nothing sacred about what
goes in the LyX slot; feel free to change it at will. More about that in a
second.
Then, in any equation you want to flag, just type \mytag in the equation
body. LyX will display ?\Delta? (or whatever you substituted) in the
equation, and will annotate the equation number correctly in the output. If
you leave the LyX portion of the macro empty, LyX will expand the macro
inside the equation. That still works, but it makes for some remarkably ugly
equations in the LyX GUI.
Paul
Thank you Paul!
I tried it and it works good. I see what you mean with the Lyx portion of
the macro - it is only for my reference.
But the DELTA is inside the round brackets. Is there a way to have it
outside the brackets?
Use \tag* instead: \stepcounter{equation}\tag*{(\theequation)\Delta}
Guillaume
Re: Equation numbering variants
> Use \tag* instead: \stepcounter{equation}\tag*{(\theequation)\Delta}
>
> Guillaume
>
Beautiful! Thank you Guillaume!
Best regards
Re: Equation numbering variants
Franci Žižek gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hi
>
> Can someone give me a hint how I could create a different equation numbering
> variant?
>
> Currently all my equations are numbered like: (2.3.2)
>
> For some select equations I would like this to change to: (2.3.3)Δ
> The counting is continuous, some equations just have an additional DELTA at
> the end.
>
> Any help is appreciated.
>
> Franci Žižek
I'm going to assume that you want the marked equations not to interrupt the
equation numbering scheme. In other words, you want (2.3.3)DELTA consecutive
between (2.3.2) and (2.3.4), rather than having both a (2.3.3) and a
(2.3.3)DELTA.
Create a math macro (Insert > Math > Macro), name it something like \mytag,
and fill the TeX code slot with
\stepcounter{equation}\tag{\theequation\Delta}
and the LyX display slot with ?\Delta?. There's nothing sacred about what
goes in the LyX slot; feel free to change it at will. More about that in a
second.
Then, in any equation you want to flag, just type \mytag in the equation
body. LyX will display ?\Delta? (or whatever you substituted) in the
equation, and will annotate the equation number correctly in the output. If
you leave the LyX portion of the macro empty, LyX will expand the macro
inside the equation. That still works, but it makes for some remarkably ugly
equations in the LyX GUI.
Paul
Equation numbering variants
Hi Can someone give me a hint how I could create a different equation numbering variant? Currently all my equations are numbered like: (2.3.2) For some select equations I would like this to change to: (2.3.3)Δ The counting is continuous, some equations just have an additional DELTA at the end. Any help is appreciated. Franci Žižek
automatic equation numbering
Hello, Is there an option to have all the equations automatically numbered if I only label some of them ? Thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France ===
Re: automatic equation numbering
On 2013-12-20, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
Is there an option to have all the equations automatically numbered if
I only label some of them ?
For this, I have in my latex preamble:
% Gleichungen
% ---
% Alle Gleichungen nummerieren
\renewcommand\[{\begin{equation}}
\renewcommand\]{\end{equation}}
And additionally to number by chapter (do not add this if you want
consecutive numbering over the whole document):
% Starte Gleichungsnummern für jedes Kapitel neu (mit AMS mathe)
\numberwithin{equation}{chapter}
Günter
automatic equation numbering
Hello, Is there an option to have all the equations automatically numbered if I only label some of them ? Thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France ===
Re: automatic equation numbering
On 2013-12-20, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
Is there an option to have all the equations automatically numbered if
I only label some of them ?
For this, I have in my latex preamble:
% Gleichungen
% ---
% Alle Gleichungen nummerieren
\renewcommand\[{\begin{equation}}
\renewcommand\]{\end{equation}}
And additionally to number by chapter (do not add this if you want
consecutive numbering over the whole document):
% Starte Gleichungsnummern für jedes Kapitel neu (mit AMS mathe)
\numberwithin{equation}{chapter}
Günter
automatic equation numbering
Hello, Is there an option to have all the equations automatically numbered if I only label some of them ? Thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France ===
Re: automatic equation numbering
On 2013-12-20, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
> Is there an option to have all the equations automatically numbered if
> I only label some of them ?
For this, I have in my "latex preamble":
% Gleichungen
% ---
% Alle Gleichungen nummerieren
\renewcommand\[{\begin{equation}}
\renewcommand\]{\end{equation}}
And additionally to number by chapter (do not add this if you want
consecutive numbering over the whole document):
% Starte Gleichungsnummern für jedes Kapitel neu (mit AMS mathe)
\numberwithin{equation}{chapter}
Günter
Re: Wrong equation numbering
On 2011-08-05, Richard Heck wrote: [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit --] On 08/04/2011 06:36 PM, ider ronneberger wrote: Hello, I am currently using lyx 2.0.0 for my thesis and have a very odd problem. The equation numbering on the lyx GUI is totally wrong though they are correct if I convert them View pdflatex. For example, equation is displayed as (561) on lyx, but the pdf output shows the correct numbering (1.1). What could be down to? Is there any setting option wrong? Looks like a version of bug #7531. But may be also configuration in the user preamble that LyX does not know of... Günter
Re: Wrong equation numbering
On 2011-08-05, Richard Heck wrote: [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit --] On 08/04/2011 06:36 PM, ider ronneberger wrote: Hello, I am currently using lyx 2.0.0 for my thesis and have a very odd problem. The equation numbering on the lyx GUI is totally wrong though they are correct if I convert them View pdflatex. For example, equation is displayed as (561) on lyx, but the pdf output shows the correct numbering (1.1). What could be down to? Is there any setting option wrong? Looks like a version of bug #7531. But may be also configuration in the user preamble that LyX does not know of... Günter
Re: Wrong equation numbering
On 2011-08-05, Richard Heck wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit --] > On 08/04/2011 06:36 PM, ider ronneberger wrote: >> Hello, >> I am currently using lyx 2.0.0 for my thesis and have a very odd problem. >> The equation numbering on the lyx GUI is totally wrong though they are >> correct if I convert them View pdflatex. >> For example, equation is displayed as (561) on lyx, but the pdf output >> shows the correct numbering (1.1). >> What could be down to? Is there any setting option wrong? > Looks like a version of bug #7531. But may be also configuration in the user preamble that LyX does not know of... Günter
Wrong equation numbering
Hello, I am currently using lyx 2.0.0 for my thesis and have a very odd problem. The equation numbering on the lyx GUI is totally wrong though they are correct if I convert them View pdflatex. For example, equation is displayed as (561) on lyx, but the pdf output shows the correct numbering (1.1). What could be down to? Is there any setting option wrong? regards, Ider
Re: Wrong equation numbering
On 08/04/2011 06:36 PM, ider ronneberger wrote: Hello, I am currently using lyx 2.0.0 for my thesis and have a very odd problem. The equation numbering on the lyx GUI is totally wrong though they are correct if I convert them View pdflatex. For example, equation is displayed as (561) on lyx, but the pdf output shows the correct numbering (1.1). What could be down to? Is there any setting option wrong? Looks like a version of bug #7531. rh
Wrong equation numbering
Hello, I am currently using lyx 2.0.0 for my thesis and have a very odd problem. The equation numbering on the lyx GUI is totally wrong though they are correct if I convert them View pdflatex. For example, equation is displayed as (561) on lyx, but the pdf output shows the correct numbering (1.1). What could be down to? Is there any setting option wrong? regards, Ider
Re: Wrong equation numbering
On 08/04/2011 06:36 PM, ider ronneberger wrote: Hello, I am currently using lyx 2.0.0 for my thesis and have a very odd problem. The equation numbering on the lyx GUI is totally wrong though they are correct if I convert them View pdflatex. For example, equation is displayed as (561) on lyx, but the pdf output shows the correct numbering (1.1). What could be down to? Is there any setting option wrong? Looks like a version of bug #7531. rh
Wrong equation numbering
Hello, I am currently using lyx 2.0.0 for my thesis and have a very odd problem. The equation numbering on the lyx GUI is totally wrong though they are correct if I convert them View pdflatex. For example, equation is displayed as (561) on lyx, but the pdf output shows the correct numbering (1.1). What could be down to? Is there any setting option wrong? regards, Ider
Re: Wrong equation numbering
On 08/04/2011 06:36 PM, ider ronneberger wrote: > Hello, > > I am currently using lyx 2.0.0 for my thesis and have a very odd problem. > The equation numbering on the lyx GUI is totally wrong though they are > correct if I convert them View pdflatex. > For example, equation is displayed as (561) on lyx, but the pdf output > shows the correct numbering (1.1). > What could be down to? Is there any setting option wrong? > Looks like a version of bug #7531. rh
Remove Chapter number from Equation numbering
Hello I want to remove chapter number from equation numbering when using Report Document class. I mean instead of having my equations numbered as (2.6) I want them simply to be numbered as (6) or instead having the chapter number beside the equation number I want to have the part number beside the equation number. Thanks in advance Best Regards Amir Fathi -- = Amir Fathi MS Student of Solid State Physics Semnan University, Semnan, Iran - - - - - - - - email1: philsa...@gmail.com email2: philsa...@aol.com email3: philsa...@yahoo.com email4: philsa...@live.com Skype:philsamir - - - - - - - - Cellphone: +989125465904 =
Re: Remove Chapter number from Equation numbering
On 08/12/2010 07:25 AM, Amir Fathi wrote:
Hello
I want to remove chapter number from equation numbering
when using Report Document class.
I mean instead of having my equations numbered as (2.6)
I want them simply to be numbered as (6) or instead having the
chapter number beside the equation number I want to have the part
number beside the equation number.
To do away with the chapter bit
\renewcommand\thetheorem{\arabic{theorem}}
But you probably want to change when the counters are reset, too. If you
want to do this by part, then copy the file theorems-sec.module to your
local LyX directory as theorems-part.module, open it, and make what will
be fairly obvious sorts of changes. I.e., change section to part in
a few places.
Richard
Re: Remove Chapter number from Equation numbering
Am 12.08.2010 15:33, schrieb Richard Heck: I want to remove chapter number from equation numbering when using Report Document class. I mean instead of having my equations numbered as (2.6) I want them simply to be numbered as (6) or instead having the chapter number beside the equation number I want to have the part number beside the equation number. This is described in the Math manual (that you find in LyX's Help menu) in section 19.4 User-defined Numbering. regards Uwe
Remove Chapter number from Equation numbering
Hello I want to remove chapter number from equation numbering when using Report Document class. I mean instead of having my equations numbered as (2.6) I want them simply to be numbered as (6) or instead having the chapter number beside the equation number I want to have the part number beside the equation number. Thanks in advance Best Regards Amir Fathi -- = Amir Fathi MS Student of Solid State Physics Semnan University, Semnan, Iran - - - - - - - - email1: philsa...@gmail.com email2: philsa...@aol.com email3: philsa...@yahoo.com email4: philsa...@live.com Skype:philsamir - - - - - - - - Cellphone: +989125465904 =
Re: Remove Chapter number from Equation numbering
On 08/12/2010 07:25 AM, Amir Fathi wrote:
Hello
I want to remove chapter number from equation numbering
when using Report Document class.
I mean instead of having my equations numbered as (2.6)
I want them simply to be numbered as (6) or instead having the
chapter number beside the equation number I want to have the part
number beside the equation number.
To do away with the chapter bit
\renewcommand\thetheorem{\arabic{theorem}}
But you probably want to change when the counters are reset, too. If you
want to do this by part, then copy the file theorems-sec.module to your
local LyX directory as theorems-part.module, open it, and make what will
be fairly obvious sorts of changes. I.e., change section to part in
a few places.
Richard
Re: Remove Chapter number from Equation numbering
Am 12.08.2010 15:33, schrieb Richard Heck: I want to remove chapter number from equation numbering when using Report Document class. I mean instead of having my equations numbered as (2.6) I want them simply to be numbered as (6) or instead having the chapter number beside the equation number I want to have the part number beside the equation number. This is described in the Math manual (that you find in LyX's Help menu) in section 19.4 User-defined Numbering. regards Uwe
Remove Chapter number from Equation numbering
Hello I want to remove chapter number from equation numbering when using "Report" Document class. I mean instead of having my equations numbered as "(2.6)" I want them simply to be numbered as "(6) or instead having the chapter number beside the equation number I want to have the "part" number beside the equation number. Thanks in advance Best Regards Amir Fathi -- = Amir Fathi MS Student of Solid State Physics Semnan University, Semnan, Iran - - - - - - - - email1: philsa...@gmail.com email2: philsa...@aol.com email3: philsa...@yahoo.com email4: philsa...@live.com Skype:philsamir - - - - - - - - Cellphone: +989125465904 =
Re: Remove Chapter number from Equation numbering
On 08/12/2010 07:25 AM, Amir Fathi wrote:
Hello
I want to remove chapter number from equation numbering
when using "Report" Document class.
I mean instead of having my equations numbered as "(2.6)"
I want them simply to be numbered as "(6) or instead having the
chapter number beside the equation number I want to have the "part"
number beside the equation number.
To do away with the chapter bit
\renewcommand\thetheorem{\arabic{theorem}}
But you probably want to change when the counters are reset, too. If you
want to do this by part, then copy the file theorems-sec.module to your
local LyX directory as theorems-part.module, open it, and make what will
be fairly obvious sorts of changes. I.e., change "section" to "part" in
a few places.
Richard
Re: Remove Chapter number from Equation numbering
Am 12.08.2010 15:33, schrieb Richard Heck: I want to remove chapter number from equation numbering when using "Report" Document class. I mean instead of having my equations numbered as "(2.6)" I want them simply to be numbered as "(6) or instead having the chapter number beside the equation number I want to have the "part" number beside the equation number. This is described in the Math manual (that you find in LyX's Help menu) in section 19.4 "User-defined Numbering". regards Uwe
Equation numbering
Hello, I'm currently writing my master's thesis with Lyx and I have a question : Is it possible to number the equations without the number of the section before ? For now, when I insert a new numbered formula, it is numbered like that : (4.13), meaning the 13th equation in the fourth section. But I want it in the following format : (13), meaning the 13th equation of all the document. For info, I use Lyx 1.6.6.1 and the AMSmath package. Thanks in advance for your help -- View this message in context: http://lyx.475766.n2.nabble.com/Equation-numbering-tp5282127p5282127.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Equation numbering
alpking alpking at hotmail.com writes: Hello, I'm currently writing my master's thesis with Lyx and I have a question : Is it possible to number the equations without the number of the section before ? For now, when I insert a new numbered formula, it is numbered like that : (4.13), meaning the 13th equation in the fourth section. But I want it in the following format : (13), meaning the 13th equation of all the document. For info, I use Lyx 1.6.6.1 and the AMSmath package. Thanks in advance for your help See you, please, if the module Number Equations by Section is loaded in Document Settings. Then you can try to delete it. Some document classes load some modules by default. Maybe you are using one of these classes, e.g. book(AMS) You can find a detailed info about Formula Numbering in the section 19 of the Math manual in the Help menu Regards Ignacio
Equation numbering
Hello, I'm currently writing my master's thesis with Lyx and I have a question : Is it possible to number the equations without the number of the section before ? For now, when I insert a new numbered formula, it is numbered like that : (4.13), meaning the 13th equation in the fourth section. But I want it in the following format : (13), meaning the 13th equation of all the document. For info, I use Lyx 1.6.6.1 and the AMSmath package. Thanks in advance for your help -- View this message in context: http://lyx.475766.n2.nabble.com/Equation-numbering-tp5282127p5282127.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Equation numbering
alpking alpking at hotmail.com writes: Hello, I'm currently writing my master's thesis with Lyx and I have a question : Is it possible to number the equations without the number of the section before ? For now, when I insert a new numbered formula, it is numbered like that : (4.13), meaning the 13th equation in the fourth section. But I want it in the following format : (13), meaning the 13th equation of all the document. For info, I use Lyx 1.6.6.1 and the AMSmath package. Thanks in advance for your help See you, please, if the module Number Equations by Section is loaded in Document Settings. Then you can try to delete it. Some document classes load some modules by default. Maybe you are using one of these classes, e.g. book(AMS) You can find a detailed info about Formula Numbering in the section 19 of the Math manual in the Help menu Regards Ignacio
Equation numbering
Hello, I'm currently writing my master's thesis with Lyx and I have a question : Is it possible to number the equations without the number of the section before ? For now, when I insert a new numbered formula, it is numbered like that : (4.13), meaning the 13th equation in the fourth section. But I want it in the following format : (13), meaning the 13th equation of all the document. For info, I use Lyx 1.6.6.1 and the AMSmath package. Thanks in advance for your help -- View this message in context: http://lyx.475766.n2.nabble.com/Equation-numbering-tp5282127p5282127.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Equation numbering
alpking hotmail.com> writes: > > > Hello, > > I'm currently writing my master's thesis with Lyx and I have a question : > > Is it possible to number the equations without the number of the section > before ? For now, when I insert a new numbered formula, it is numbered like > that : (4.13), meaning the 13th equation in the fourth section. But I want > it in the following format : (13), meaning the 13th equation of all the > document. > > For info, I use Lyx 1.6.6.1 and the AMSmath package. > > Thanks in advance for your help See you, please, if the module "Number Equations by Section" is loaded in "Document Settings". Then you can try to delete it. Some document classes load some modules by default. Maybe you are using one of these classes, e.g. book(AMS) You can find a detailed info about Formula Numbering in the section 19 of the Math manual in the Help menu Regards Ignacio
Re: Equation Numbering change in RTL languages
Am 17.05.2010 21:49, schrieb Nosrat Maghsoudi: Greetings, I am using LyX to typeset a book in Farsi. Equation numbers change when referenced. For example (2-12), becomes (21-2). Please help if you have a solution. Can you please provide a LyX example file? I tried to reproduce with the attached LyX file, but there it seems to work correctly. regards Uwe newfile3.lyx Description: application/lyx
Re: Equation Numbering change in RTL languages
Am 17.05.2010 21:49, schrieb Nosrat Maghsoudi: Greetings, I am using LyX to typeset a book in Farsi. Equation numbers change when referenced. For example (2-12), becomes (21-2). Please help if you have a solution. Can you please provide a LyX example file? I tried to reproduce with the attached LyX file, but there it seems to work correctly. regards Uwe newfile3.lyx Description: application/lyx
Re: Equation Numbering change in RTL languages
Am 17.05.2010 21:49, schrieb Nosrat Maghsoudi: Greetings, I am using LyX to typeset a book in Farsi. Equation numbers change when referenced. For example (2-12), becomes (21-2). Please help if you have a solution. Can you please provide a LyX example file? I tried to reproduce with the attached LyX file, but there it seems to work correctly. regards Uwe newfile3.lyx Description: application/lyx
Equation Numbering change in RTL languages
Greetings, I am using LyX to typeset a book in Farsi. Equation numbers change when referenced. For example (2-12), becomes (21-2). Please help if you have a solution. Thx, Nosrat
Equation Numbering change in RTL languages
Greetings, I am using LyX to typeset a book in Farsi. Equation numbers change when referenced. For example (2-12), becomes (21-2). Please help if you have a solution. Thx, Nosrat
Equation Numbering change in RTL languages
Greetings, I am using LyX to typeset a book in Farsi. Equation numbers change when referenced. For example (2-12), becomes (21-2). Please help if you have a solution. Thx, Nosrat
on equation numbering in an Appendix
I solved my problem by inserting ERT just before the appendix starts:
\renewcommand{\theequation}{A.\arabic{equation}}
\setcounter{equation}{0}
However, I would still like to do this with the features of Lyx, if
possible.
Thanks,
EK
Re: on equation numbering in an Appendix
E. Kaplan schrieb:
I solved my problem by inserting ERT just before the appendix starts:
\renewcommand{\theequation}{A.\arabic{equation}}
\setcounter{equation}{0}
However, I would still like to do this with the features of Lyx, if
possible.
Your solution is the only one.
regards Uwe
on equation numbering in an Appendix
I solved my problem by inserting ERT just before the appendix starts:
\renewcommand{\theequation}{A.\arabic{equation}}
\setcounter{equation}{0}
However, I would still like to do this with the features of Lyx, if
possible.
Thanks,
EK
Re: on equation numbering in an Appendix
E. Kaplan schrieb:
I solved my problem by inserting ERT just before the appendix starts:
\renewcommand{\theequation}{A.\arabic{equation}}
\setcounter{equation}{0}
However, I would still like to do this with the features of Lyx, if
possible.
Your solution is the only one.
regards Uwe
> on equation numbering in an Appendix
I solved my problem by inserting ERT just before the appendix starts:
\renewcommand{\theequation}{A.\arabic{equation}}
\setcounter{equation}{0}
However, I would still like to do this with the features of Lyx, if
possible.
Thanks,
EK
Re: > on equation numbering in an Appendix
E. Kaplan schrieb:
I solved my problem by inserting ERT just before the appendix starts:
\renewcommand{\theequation}{A.\arabic{equation}}
\setcounter{equation}{0}
However, I would still like to do this with the features of Lyx, if
possible.
Your solution is the only one.
regards Uwe
equation numbering in an appendix
I am using an article document class, and have equations in the body of the article and in the appendix. I would like the equations to be numbered sequentially, and the numbering restarted in the appendix and appear as: A1, A2, etc. How do I do that? I tried the various suggestions on the archive, but none worked. I do not really want to number all the equations by section, as provided in 1.6.5 by the new modules (that got the appendix equations to appear as .1, .2 etc.). Thanks, EK
equation numbering in an appendix
I am using an article document class, and have equations in the body of the article and in the appendix. I would like the equations to be numbered sequentially, and the numbering restarted in the appendix and appear as: A1, A2, etc. How do I do that? I tried the various suggestions on the archive, but none worked. I do not really want to number all the equations by section, as provided in 1.6.5 by the new modules (that got the appendix equations to appear as .1, .2 etc.). Thanks, EK
equation numbering in an appendix
I am using an article document class, and have equations in the body of the article and in the appendix. I would like the equations to be numbered sequentially, and the numbering restarted in the appendix and appear as: A1, A2, etc. How do I do that? I tried the various suggestions on the archive, but none worked. I do not really want to number all the equations by section, as provided in 1.6.5 by the new modules (that got the appendix equations to appear as .1, .2 etc.). Thanks, EK
custom equation numbering
How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen by default because it comes after (4). That's the correct normal behavior of course. However, I want to break briefly out of the default and number this one equation (3') because it is a variant of a previous equation numbered (3). Thanks! -Ivan
Re: custom equation numbering
Ivan Werning wrote: How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen by default because it comes after (4). That's the correct normal behavior of course. However, I want to break briefly out of the default and number this one equation (3') because it is a variant of a previous equation numbered (3). Well, \tag will work. Stick the cursor in the equation. If it's already being numbered, M-m n will remove the automatic number. Then enter '\tag' followed by space, which will create a widget. In the widget, type '\ensuremath' followed by a space to get a nested widget. Type 3' (or 3^\prime if you're a purist) in the inner widget (no parentheses). The display in the GUI is, ah, less than esthetically pleasing, but it comes out right in the DVI. The inner widget is needed to get you into math mode if you're going to use a superscript. I'm not sure if there's a more LyXish way to do it. HTH, Paul
Re: custom equation numbering
Hi Ivan, Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go one step further and make the equation number automatic. Suppose that you have equation (3) and you also have a rewritten form of that equation, call it (3'). Do all of the steps that Paul has indicated, except rather than putting in the number 3, click on the cross-reference tool in the LyX toolbar. Then select the equation of interest and then apply. To refer to equation 3' elsewhere in the paper is a little in-elegant -- insert the cross reference to point to the original form of the equation, then go into math mode (inline equation) right after the cross reference and insert the prime symbol. Now, if you add or delete equations before the original equation, all of the numbers automatically update. -Neil = Neil Hepburn, Economics Instructor Department of Social Sciences, Augustana Faculty University of Alberta 4901-46 Avenue Camrose, Alberta T4V 2R3 Phone (780) 679-1588 email nhepb...@augustana.ca On 14-Dec-08, at 9:24 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Ivan Werning wrote: How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen by default because it comes after (4). That's the correct normal behavior of course. However, I want to break briefly out of the default and number this one equation (3') because it is a variant of a previous equation numbered (3). Well, \tag will work. Stick the cursor in the equation. If it's already being numbered, M-m n will remove the automatic number. Then enter '\tag' followed by space, which will create a widget. In the widget, type '\ensuremath' followed by a space to get a nested widget. Type 3' (or 3^\prime if you're a purist) in the inner widget (no parentheses). The display in the GUI is, ah, less than esthetically pleasing, but it comes out right in the DVI. The inner widget is needed to get you into math mode if you're going to use a superscript. I'm not sure if there's a more LyXish way to do it. HTH, Paul
Re: custom equation numbering
Thanks Neil and Paul. Indeed, using the LaTeX command \tag seems like the best thing I could find---thanks for the specific tips regarding math modes and cross referencing, which I guess are good ideas, I had never thought of, in LaTeX editing as well. One of the greatest things of LyX is that it still allows entering LaTeX quite easily. I really value that. Although it would be nice for LyX to allow custom equation numbering natively, given how standard it is. -Ivan On Dec 14, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Neil Hepburn wrote: Hi Ivan, Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go one step further and make the equation number automatic. Suppose that you have equation (3) and you also have a rewritten form of that equation, call it (3'). Do all of the steps that Paul has indicated, except rather than putting in the number 3, click on the cross-reference tool in the LyX toolbar. Then select the equation of interest and then apply. To refer to equation 3' elsewhere in the paper is a little in-elegant -- insert the cross reference to point to the original form of the equation, then go into math mode (inline equation) right after the cross reference and insert the prime symbol. Now, if you add or delete equations before the original equation, all of the numbers automatically update. -Neil = Neil Hepburn, Economics Instructor Department of Social Sciences, Augustana Faculty University of Alberta 4901-46 Avenue Camrose, Alberta T4V 2R3 Phone (780) 679-1588 email nhepb...@augustana.ca On 14-Dec-08, at 9:24 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Ivan Werning wrote: How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen by default because it comes after (4). That's the correct normal behavior of course. However, I want to break briefly out of the default and number this one equation (3') because it is a variant of a previous equation numbered (3). Well, \tag will work. Stick the cursor in the equation. If it's already being numbered, M-m n will remove the automatic number. Then enter '\tag' followed by space, which will create a widget. In the widget, type '\ensuremath' followed by a space to get a nested widget. Type 3' (or 3^\prime if you're a purist) in the inner widget (no parentheses). The display in the GUI is, ah, less than esthetically pleasing, but it comes out right in the DVI. The inner widget is needed to get you into math mode if you're going to use a superscript. I'm not sure if there's a more LyXish way to do it. HTH, Paul
custom equation numbering
How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen by default because it comes after (4). That's the correct normal behavior of course. However, I want to break briefly out of the default and number this one equation (3') because it is a variant of a previous equation numbered (3). Thanks! -Ivan
Re: custom equation numbering
Ivan Werning wrote: How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen by default because it comes after (4). That's the correct normal behavior of course. However, I want to break briefly out of the default and number this one equation (3') because it is a variant of a previous equation numbered (3). Well, \tag will work. Stick the cursor in the equation. If it's already being numbered, M-m n will remove the automatic number. Then enter '\tag' followed by space, which will create a widget. In the widget, type '\ensuremath' followed by a space to get a nested widget. Type 3' (or 3^\prime if you're a purist) in the inner widget (no parentheses). The display in the GUI is, ah, less than esthetically pleasing, but it comes out right in the DVI. The inner widget is needed to get you into math mode if you're going to use a superscript. I'm not sure if there's a more LyXish way to do it. HTH, Paul
Re: custom equation numbering
Hi Ivan, Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go one step further and make the equation number automatic. Suppose that you have equation (3) and you also have a rewritten form of that equation, call it (3'). Do all of the steps that Paul has indicated, except rather than putting in the number 3, click on the cross-reference tool in the LyX toolbar. Then select the equation of interest and then apply. To refer to equation 3' elsewhere in the paper is a little in-elegant -- insert the cross reference to point to the original form of the equation, then go into math mode (inline equation) right after the cross reference and insert the prime symbol. Now, if you add or delete equations before the original equation, all of the numbers automatically update. -Neil = Neil Hepburn, Economics Instructor Department of Social Sciences, Augustana Faculty University of Alberta 4901-46 Avenue Camrose, Alberta T4V 2R3 Phone (780) 679-1588 email nhepb...@augustana.ca On 14-Dec-08, at 9:24 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Ivan Werning wrote: How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen by default because it comes after (4). That's the correct normal behavior of course. However, I want to break briefly out of the default and number this one equation (3') because it is a variant of a previous equation numbered (3). Well, \tag will work. Stick the cursor in the equation. If it's already being numbered, M-m n will remove the automatic number. Then enter '\tag' followed by space, which will create a widget. In the widget, type '\ensuremath' followed by a space to get a nested widget. Type 3' (or 3^\prime if you're a purist) in the inner widget (no parentheses). The display in the GUI is, ah, less than esthetically pleasing, but it comes out right in the DVI. The inner widget is needed to get you into math mode if you're going to use a superscript. I'm not sure if there's a more LyXish way to do it. HTH, Paul
Re: custom equation numbering
Thanks Neil and Paul. Indeed, using the LaTeX command \tag seems like the best thing I could find---thanks for the specific tips regarding math modes and cross referencing, which I guess are good ideas, I had never thought of, in LaTeX editing as well. One of the greatest things of LyX is that it still allows entering LaTeX quite easily. I really value that. Although it would be nice for LyX to allow custom equation numbering natively, given how standard it is. -Ivan On Dec 14, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Neil Hepburn wrote: Hi Ivan, Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go one step further and make the equation number automatic. Suppose that you have equation (3) and you also have a rewritten form of that equation, call it (3'). Do all of the steps that Paul has indicated, except rather than putting in the number 3, click on the cross-reference tool in the LyX toolbar. Then select the equation of interest and then apply. To refer to equation 3' elsewhere in the paper is a little in-elegant -- insert the cross reference to point to the original form of the equation, then go into math mode (inline equation) right after the cross reference and insert the prime symbol. Now, if you add or delete equations before the original equation, all of the numbers automatically update. -Neil = Neil Hepburn, Economics Instructor Department of Social Sciences, Augustana Faculty University of Alberta 4901-46 Avenue Camrose, Alberta T4V 2R3 Phone (780) 679-1588 email nhepb...@augustana.ca On 14-Dec-08, at 9:24 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Ivan Werning wrote: How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered (5) which is chosen by default because it comes after (4). That's the correct normal behavior of course. However, I want to break briefly out of the default and number this one equation (3') because it is a variant of a previous equation numbered (3). Well, \tag will work. Stick the cursor in the equation. If it's already being numbered, M-m n will remove the automatic number. Then enter '\tag' followed by space, which will create a widget. In the widget, type '\ensuremath' followed by a space to get a nested widget. Type 3' (or 3^\prime if you're a purist) in the inner widget (no parentheses). The display in the GUI is, ah, less than esthetically pleasing, but it comes out right in the DVI. The inner widget is needed to get you into math mode if you're going to use a superscript. I'm not sure if there's a more LyXish way to do it. HTH, Paul
custom equation numbering
How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered "(5)" which is chosen by default because it comes after "(4)". That's the correct normal behavior of course. However, I want to break briefly out of the default and number this one equation "(3')" because it is a variant of a previous equation numbered "(3)". Thanks! -Ivan
Re: custom equation numbering
Ivan Werning wrote: How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered "(5)" which is chosen by default because it comes after "(4)". That's the correct normal behavior of course. However, I want to break briefly out of the default and number this one equation "(3')" because it is a variant of a previous equation numbered "(3)". Well, \tag will work. Stick the cursor in the equation. If it's already being numbered, M-m n will remove the automatic number. Then enter '\tag' followed by space, which will create a widget. In the widget, type '\ensuremath' followed by a space to get a nested widget. Type "3'" (or "3^\prime" if you're a purist) in the inner widget (no parentheses). The display in the GUI is, ah, less than esthetically pleasing, but it comes out right in the DVI. The inner widget is needed to get you into math mode if you're going to use a superscript. I'm not sure if there's a more LyXish way to do it. HTH, Paul
Re: custom equation numbering
Hi Ivan, Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go one step further and make the equation number automatic. Suppose that you have equation (3) and you also have a rewritten form of that equation, call it (3'). Do all of the steps that Paul has indicated, except rather than putting in the number 3, click on the cross-reference tool in the LyX toolbar. Then select the equation of interest and then apply. To refer to equation 3' elsewhere in the paper is a little in-elegant -- insert the cross reference to point to the original form of the equation, then go into math mode (inline equation) right after the cross reference and insert the prime symbol. Now, if you add or delete equations before the original equation, all of the numbers automatically update. -Neil = Neil Hepburn, Economics Instructor Department of Social Sciences, Augustana Faculty University of Alberta 4901-46 Avenue Camrose, Alberta T4V 2R3 Phone (780) 679-1588 email nhepb...@augustana.ca On 14-Dec-08, at 9:24 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Ivan Werning wrote: How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered "(5)" which is chosen by default because it comes after "(4)". That's the correct normal behavior of course. However, I want to break briefly out of the default and number this one equation "(3')" because it is a variant of a previous equation numbered "(3)". Well, \tag will work. Stick the cursor in the equation. If it's already being numbered, M-m n will remove the automatic number. Then enter '\tag' followed by space, which will create a widget. In the widget, type '\ensuremath' followed by a space to get a nested widget. Type "3'" (or "3^\prime" if you're a purist) in the inner widget (no parentheses). The display in the GUI is, ah, less than esthetically pleasing, but it comes out right in the DVI. The inner widget is needed to get you into math mode if you're going to use a superscript. I'm not sure if there's a more LyXish way to do it. HTH, Paul
Re: custom equation numbering
Thanks Neil and Paul. Indeed, using the LaTeX command \tag seems like the best thing I could find---thanks for the specific tips regarding math modes and cross referencing, which I guess are good ideas, I had never thought of, in LaTeX editing as well. One of the greatest things of LyX is that it still allows entering LaTeX quite easily. I really value that. Although it would be nice for LyX to allow custom equation numbering natively, given how standard it is. -Ivan On Dec 14, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Neil Hepburn wrote: Hi Ivan, Just to follow up on Paul's solution, you can go one step further and make the equation number automatic. Suppose that you have equation (3) and you also have a rewritten form of that equation, call it (3'). Do all of the steps that Paul has indicated, except rather than putting in the number 3, click on the cross-reference tool in the LyX toolbar. Then select the equation of interest and then apply. To refer to equation 3' elsewhere in the paper is a little in-elegant -- insert the cross reference to point to the original form of the equation, then go into math mode (inline equation) right after the cross reference and insert the prime symbol. Now, if you add or delete equations before the original equation, all of the numbers automatically update. -Neil = Neil Hepburn, Economics Instructor Department of Social Sciences, Augustana Faculty University of Alberta 4901-46 Avenue Camrose, Alberta T4V 2R3 Phone (780) 679-1588 email nhepb...@augustana.ca On 14-Dec-08, at 9:24 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: Ivan Werning wrote: How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from forcing a particular number or symbol? That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex For example, I have an equation that is numbered "(5)" which is chosen by default because it comes after "(4)". That's the correct normal behavior of course. However, I want to break briefly out of the default and number this one equation "(3')" because it is a variant of a previous equation numbered "(3)". Well, \tag will work. Stick the cursor in the equation. If it's already being numbered, M-m n will remove the automatic number. Then enter '\tag' followed by space, which will create a widget. In the widget, type '\ensuremath' followed by a space to get a nested widget. Type "3'" (or "3^\prime" if you're a purist) in the inner widget (no parentheses). The display in the GUI is, ah, less than esthetically pleasing, but it comes out right in the DVI. The inner widget is needed to get you into math mode if you're going to use a superscript. I'm not sure if there's a more LyXish way to do it. HTH, Paul
Problems with equation numbering in appendix
Hi all, I find that in my document (with documentclass report), unless I disable numbering on all equations, I get the error \mathrm allowed only in math mode. Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get equation numbering working in the appendices? thanks, Manoj
Re: Problems with equation numbering in appendix
I should add that I can't reproduce this in a small test document. Has anyone experienced some change in settings or some latex code snippet import which has caused this? -- Manoj Manoj Rajagopalan wrote: Hi all, I find that in my document (with documentclass report), unless I disable numbering on all equations, I get the error \mathrm allowed only in math mode. Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get equation numbering working in the appendices? thanks, Manoj
Re: Problems with equation numbering in appendix
I fixed this by using the 'appendix' package. This is a hack. I wonder what caused latex to break in my appendices. -- Manoj Manoj Rajagopalan wrote: I should add that I can't reproduce this in a small test document. Has anyone experienced some change in settings or some latex code snippet import which has caused this? -- Manoj Manoj Rajagopalan wrote: Hi all, I find that in my document (with documentclass report), unless I disable numbering on all equations, I get the error \mathrm allowed only in math mode. Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get equation numbering working in the appendices? thanks, Manoj
Problems with equation numbering in appendix
Hi all, I find that in my document (with documentclass report), unless I disable numbering on all equations, I get the error \mathrm allowed only in math mode. Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get equation numbering working in the appendices? thanks, Manoj
Re: Problems with equation numbering in appendix
I should add that I can't reproduce this in a small test document. Has anyone experienced some change in settings or some latex code snippet import which has caused this? -- Manoj Manoj Rajagopalan wrote: Hi all, I find that in my document (with documentclass report), unless I disable numbering on all equations, I get the error \mathrm allowed only in math mode. Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get equation numbering working in the appendices? thanks, Manoj
Re: Problems with equation numbering in appendix
I fixed this by using the 'appendix' package. This is a hack. I wonder what caused latex to break in my appendices. -- Manoj Manoj Rajagopalan wrote: I should add that I can't reproduce this in a small test document. Has anyone experienced some change in settings or some latex code snippet import which has caused this? -- Manoj Manoj Rajagopalan wrote: Hi all, I find that in my document (with documentclass report), unless I disable numbering on all equations, I get the error \mathrm allowed only in math mode. Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get equation numbering working in the appendices? thanks, Manoj
Problems with equation numbering in appendix
Hi all, I find that in my document (with documentclass report), unless I disable numbering on all equations, I get the error "\mathrm allowed only in math mode". Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get equation numbering working in the appendices? thanks, Manoj
Re: Problems with equation numbering in appendix
I should add that I can't reproduce this in a small test document. Has anyone experienced some change in settings or some latex code snippet import which has caused this? -- Manoj Manoj Rajagopalan wrote: Hi all, I find that in my document (with documentclass report), unless I disable numbering on all equations, I get the error "\mathrm allowed only in math mode". Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get equation numbering working in the appendices? thanks, Manoj
Re: Problems with equation numbering in appendix
I fixed this by using the 'appendix' package. This is a hack. I wonder what caused latex to break in my appendices. -- Manoj Manoj Rajagopalan wrote: I should add that I can't reproduce this in a small test document. Has anyone experienced some change in settings or some latex code snippet import which has caused this? -- Manoj Manoj Rajagopalan wrote: Hi all, I find that in my document (with documentclass report), unless I disable numbering on all equations, I get the error "\mathrm allowed only in math mode". Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get equation numbering working in the appendices? thanks, Manoj
Equation numbering
Hi, I use Lyx 1.5.1 on Mac OS. Right now I have all my equations numbered but the label appears to the far right of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label appear at the far left of the equation. Thank you very much for your help, Paulina
Re: Equation numbering
HI Paula Piece of cake. In LyX, go into Document - Settings. On the Document Class page there is an area for class options. Put leqno in the custom options box and it will use the leqno LaTeX option which puts equations on the left. -Neil = Neil Hepburn, Economics Instructor Department of Social Sciences, Augustana Faculty University of Alberta 4901-46 Avenue Camrose, Alberta T4V 2R3 Phone (780) 679-1588 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 26-Nov-08, at 7:36 PM, Paulina Restrepo wrote: Hi, I use Lyx 1.5.1 on Mac OS. Right now I have all my equations numbered but the label appears to the far right of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label appear at the far left of the equation. Thank you very much for your help, Paulina
Equation numbering
Hi, I use Lyx 1.5.1 on Mac OS. Right now I have all my equations numbered but the label appears to the far right of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label appear at the far left of the equation. Thank you very much for your help, Paulina
Re: Equation numbering
HI Paula Piece of cake. In LyX, go into Document - Settings. On the Document Class page there is an area for class options. Put leqno in the custom options box and it will use the leqno LaTeX option which puts equations on the left. -Neil = Neil Hepburn, Economics Instructor Department of Social Sciences, Augustana Faculty University of Alberta 4901-46 Avenue Camrose, Alberta T4V 2R3 Phone (780) 679-1588 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 26-Nov-08, at 7:36 PM, Paulina Restrepo wrote: Hi, I use Lyx 1.5.1 on Mac OS. Right now I have all my equations numbered but the label appears to the far right of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label appear at the far left of the equation. Thank you very much for your help, Paulina
Equation numbering
Hi, I use Lyx 1.5.1 on Mac OS. Right now I have all my equations numbered but the label appears to the far right of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label appear at the far left of the equation. Thank you very much for your help, Paulina
Re: Equation numbering
HI Paula Piece of cake. In LyX, go into Document -> Settings. On the "Document Class" page there is an area for class options. Put leqno in the custom options box and it will use the leqno LaTeX option which puts equations on the left. -Neil = Neil Hepburn, Economics Instructor Department of Social Sciences, Augustana Faculty University of Alberta 4901-46 Avenue Camrose, Alberta T4V 2R3 Phone (780) 679-1588 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 26-Nov-08, at 7:36 PM, Paulina Restrepo wrote: Hi, I use Lyx 1.5.1 on Mac OS. Right now I have all my equations numbered but the label appears to the far right of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label appear at the far left of the equation. Thank you very much for your help, Paulina
Equation numbering
Hi: How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in LyX 1.6? Thanks! * Fernando Díaz H, Ph.D. * Profesor de Economía y Finanzas Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales Universidad de los Andes (56 2) 412-9650 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Avda. San Carlos de Apoquindo 2200, Las Condes, Santiago Chile
Re: Equation numbering
Right click and choose Toggle Labeling/Numbering On Nov 24, 2008, at 7:35 AM, FERNANDO DIAZ wrote: Hi: How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in LyX 1.6? Thanks! * Fernando Díaz H, Ph.D. * Profesor de Economía y Finanzas Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales Universidad de los Andes (56 2) 412-9650 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Avda. San Carlos de Apoquindo 2200, Las Condes, Santiago Chile
Re: Equation numbering
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in LyX 1.6? Normally (Insert Math numberedformula) gives the equation number, right justified, applicable in many journals and books. Maybe this is not what you want ? WAS
Re: Equation numbering
FERNANDO DIAZ wrote: Hi: How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in LyX 1.6? If you're getting equation numbers on the left side, try adding 'reqno' as a class option in Document - Settings... - Document Class. /Paul
Equation numbering
Hi: How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in LyX 1.6? Thanks! * Fernando Díaz H, Ph.D. * Profesor de Economía y Finanzas Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales Universidad de los Andes (56 2) 412-9650 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Avda. San Carlos de Apoquindo 2200, Las Condes, Santiago Chile
Re: Equation numbering
Right click and choose Toggle Labeling/Numbering On Nov 24, 2008, at 7:35 AM, FERNANDO DIAZ wrote: Hi: How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in LyX 1.6? Thanks! * Fernando Díaz H, Ph.D. * Profesor de Economía y Finanzas Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales Universidad de los Andes (56 2) 412-9650 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Avda. San Carlos de Apoquindo 2200, Las Condes, Santiago Chile
Re: Equation numbering
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in LyX 1.6? Normally (Insert Math numberedformula) gives the equation number, right justified, applicable in many journals and books. Maybe this is not what you want ? WAS
Re: Equation numbering
FERNANDO DIAZ wrote: Hi: How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in LyX 1.6? If you're getting equation numbers on the left side, try adding 'reqno' as a class option in Document - Settings... - Document Class. /Paul
Equation numbering
Hi: How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in LyX 1.6? Thanks! * Fernando Díaz H, Ph.D. * Profesor de Economía y Finanzas Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales Universidad de los Andes (56 2) 412-9650 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Avda. San Carlos de Apoquindo 2200, Las Condes, Santiago Chile
Re: Equation numbering
Right click and choose "Toggle Labeling/Numbering" On Nov 24, 2008, at 7:35 AM, FERNANDO DIAZ wrote: Hi: How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in LyX 1.6? Thanks! * Fernando Díaz H, Ph.D. * Profesor de Economía y Finanzas Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales Universidad de los Andes (56 2) 412-9650 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Avda. San Carlos de Apoquindo 2200, Las Condes, Santiago Chile
Re: Equation numbering
> How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in > LyX 1.6? Normally (Insert > Math > numberedformula) gives the equation number, right justified, applicable in many journals and books. Maybe this is not what you want ? WAS
Re: Equation numbering
FERNANDO DIAZ wrote: Hi: How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in LyX 1.6? If you're getting equation numbers on the left side, try adding 'reqno' as a class option in Document -> Settings... -> Document Class. /Paul
Re: Equation numbering
David Hewitt wrote: This was just discussed recently. Search the archives for display formula numbering and you'll get what you want. bigblop wrote: All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown correctly in the pdf. But why the same number for all equations in LyX? Ok I have now read that post and it seems that there is currently no solution to this problem and that its caused somewhere in the instant preview implementation, or have I misread the post? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Equation--numbering-tp16071319p16077712.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Equation numbering
You got it. bigblop wrote: David Hewitt wrote: This was just discussed recently. Search the archives for display formula numbering and you'll get what you want. bigblop wrote: All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown correctly in the pdf. But why the same number for all equations in LyX? Ok I have now read that post and it seems that there is currently no solution to this problem and that its caused somewhere in the instant preview implementation, or have I misread the post? - David Hewitt Virginia Institute of Marine Science http://www.vims.edu/fish/students/dhewitt/ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Equation--numbering-tp16071319p16078261.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Equation numbering
David Hewitt wrote: This was just discussed recently. Search the archives for display formula numbering and you'll get what you want. bigblop wrote: All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown correctly in the pdf. But why the same number for all equations in LyX? Ok I have now read that post and it seems that there is currently no solution to this problem and that its caused somewhere in the instant preview implementation, or have I misread the post? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Equation--numbering-tp16071319p16077712.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Equation numbering
You got it. bigblop wrote: David Hewitt wrote: This was just discussed recently. Search the archives for display formula numbering and you'll get what you want. bigblop wrote: All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown correctly in the pdf. But why the same number for all equations in LyX? Ok I have now read that post and it seems that there is currently no solution to this problem and that its caused somewhere in the instant preview implementation, or have I misread the post? - David Hewitt Virginia Institute of Marine Science http://www.vims.edu/fish/students/dhewitt/ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Equation--numbering-tp16071319p16078261.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Equation numbering
David Hewitt wrote: > > This was just discussed recently. Search the archives for "display formula > numbering" and you'll get what you want. > > > bigblop wrote: >> >> All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown >> correctly in the pdf. But why the same number for all equations in LyX? >> > > Ok I have now read that post and it seems that there is currently no solution to this problem and that its caused somewhere in the instant preview implementation, or have I misread the post? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Equation--numbering-tp16071319p16077712.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Equation numbering
You got it. bigblop wrote: > > > > David Hewitt wrote: >> >> This was just discussed recently. Search the archives for "display >> formula numbering" and you'll get what you want. >> >> >> bigblop wrote: >>> >>> All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown >>> correctly in the pdf. But why the same number for all equations in LyX? >>> >> >> > > Ok I have now read that post and it seems that there is currently no > solution to this problem and that its caused somewhere in the instant > preview implementation, or have I misread the post? > - David Hewitt Virginia Institute of Marine Science http://www.vims.edu/fish/students/dhewitt/ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Equation--numbering-tp16071319p16078261.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Equation numbering
All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown correctly in the pdf. But why the same number for all equations in LyX? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Equation--numbering-tp16071319p16071319.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Equation numbering
This was just discussed recently. Search the archives for display formula numbering and you'll get what you want. bigblop wrote: All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown correctly in the pdf. But why the same number for all equations in LyX? - David Hewitt Virginia Institute of Marine Science http://www.vims.edu/fish/students/dhewitt/ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Equation--numbering-tp16071319p16073725.html Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
