Re: [Mageia-discuss] Mageia 3 Beta 3 checksum
Hi, On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 20:23:15 +0100 Juergen Harms juergen.ha...@unige.ch wrote: I have now tried to download the x86-64 DVD iso of Beta 3 from two different mirrors. Each time, the md5 checksum I obtain by doing md5sum on the result of the download is 0f65c69c8b337e86ab315ee428c37f00, Same here :-( Regards Antoine.
Re: [Mageia-discuss] Mageia 3 Beta 3 checksum
On 12/03/13 19:57, Antoine Pitrou wrote: Hi, On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 20:23:15 +0100 Juergen Harms juergen.ha...@unige.ch wrote: I have now tried to download the x86-64 DVD iso of Beta 3 from two different mirrors. Each time, the md5 checksum I obtain by doing md5sum on the result of the download is 0f65c69c8b337e86ab315ee428c37f00, Same here :-( Regards Antoine. At the end of QA testing md5 was 36ff3dfaa8812e597ec32ff1b7d98e4f Mageia-3-beta3-x86_64-DVD.iso
Re: [Mageia-discuss] Mageia 3 Beta 3 checksum
Same here, probably related to? https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9351
Re: [Mageia-discuss] Mageia 3 Beta 3 checksum
On 03/12/2013 08:46 PM, Manuel Hiebel wrote: https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9351 but no admin response right now Thanks - given what Claire says that looks like the checksums from the end of QA testing were copied, but some last minute changes added to the isos. Since my 2 independant downloads both produced and md5 sum of 0f65c69c8b337e86ab315ee428c37f00 that is certainly the correct one and the download should be OK Juergen
Re: [Mageia-discuss] Mageia 3 Beta 3 checksum
Le 12/03/2013 20:23, Juergen Harms a écrit : I have now tried to download the x86-64 DVD iso of Beta 3 from two different mirrors. Each time, the md5 checksum I obtain by doing md5sum on the result of the download is 0f65c69c8b337e86ab315ee428c37f00, but the content of the checksum file at the mirror (Mageia-3-beta3-x86_64-DVD.iso.md5) is 36ff3dfaa8812e597ec32ff1b7d98e4f I obtain a similar discrepancy with sha1. Did I invent a clever way to get things wrong, or is there a problem with the contents of the mirror? Juergen There was indeed a problem on primary mirror during the copy. It should be fixed now. -- Anne http://mageia.org