Re: [Mageia-discuss] Mailing list migration: this list is closing

2013-04-09 Thread nicolas vigier
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013, andre999 wrote:

 I don't know if this is easily configurable, but the online documentation 
 for sympa 6.1 has an example that seems to permit filtering by multiple 
 addresses with ldap.
 see http://www.sympa.org/manual/authorization-scenarios#search_condition

That's for sending emails to the list only. But I think what Johnny is
asking is both for sending and receiving emails on multiple addresses.



Re: [Mageia-discuss] Mailing list migration: this list is closing

2013-04-09 Thread andre999

nicolas vigier a écrit :

On Sun, 07 Apr 2013, andre999 wrote:


I don't know if this is easily configurable, but the online documentation
for sympa 6.1 has an example that seems to permit filtering by multiple
addresses with ldap.
see http://www.sympa.org/manual/authorization-scenarios#search_condition


That's for sending emails to the list only. But I think what Johnny is
asking is both for sending and receiving emails on multiple addresses.



Right.  I hadn't considered receiving :/

--
André


Re: [Mageia-discuss] Mailing list migration: this list is closing

2013-04-08 Thread Ludovic Meyer
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 10:02:18PM -0400, andre999 wrote:
 nicolas vigier a écrit :

 
 The only way currently is to create an identity account for each address
 you want to use. We can look if it would possible to support an other
 way to do it, but I don't know if that's possible. And of course any
 suggestion about how sympa could be configured to manage multiple email
 addresses with only one ldap account is welcome.
 
 
 I don't know if this is easily configurable, but the online
 documentation for sympa 6.1 has an example that seems to permit
 filtering by multiple addresses with ldap.
 see http://www.sympa.org/manual/authorization-scenarios#search_condition
 
 Their example shows both
  sal...@cru.fr
 and
  o.sal...@cru.fr
 being accepted with the same filter, whereas only the first is coded
 as such.
 
 This seems to offer interesting possibilities, allowing users to
 have alternate email adresses with different prefixes of their ldap
 adresse.
 (by automatically adding * to the beginning of user ldap adresses.)
 The code could require a minimum length to minimise false positives,
 and/or add the * just before @.
 
 Would this work, and without too much effort ?

The goal of having 1 unified login is to reduce ( usually in a company ) the 
amount
of support of helpdesk, and the work of user because they need to have 1 
login/password.

This also prevent login conflict, since there is 1 single place where this is 
resolved 
for uniqueness.

Your suggestion will just increase the support time due to increased 
complexity, and so 
reduce the time avaliable for the sysadmin team, since from what I see, they 
are in 
charge of the servers, and the function of support.

So if you think they have no better way to spend their time and that this is so
business critical to permit to have a mess regarding who said what, sure, go 
ahead
and provides a patch. If I am not wrong, the configuration is on :
http://svnweb.mageia.org/adm/puppet/modules/sympa/

But if the only goal is to satisfy the special need of a few unique snowflakes, 
that's not really a
good move.

-- 
L.


Re: [Mageia-discuss] Mailing list migration: this list is closing

2013-04-08 Thread Pierre Jarillon
Le dimanche 7 avril 2013 23:48:35, Mageia Sysadmins a écrit :
 You can find more details about mailing lists subscription and available
 lists on this page :
 https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Mailing_lists

An easy way to know to which mailing-lists you have subscribed is to use this 
feature of sympa: 
mailto:sy...@ml.mageia.org?subject=WHICH

This is one one the benefits to use the subdomain ml.mageia.org.
The whole activity of this subdomain is routed to the sympa server which 
handles it. This is clean management.

-- 
Pierre Jarillon - http://pjarillon.free.fr/
Vice-président de l'ABUL : http://abul.org
Microsoft is for computers what McDonald is for French gastronomy


Re: [Mageia-discuss] Mailing list migration: this list is closing

2013-04-08 Thread andre999

Ludovic Meyer a écrit :

On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 10:02:18PM -0400, andre999 wrote:

nicolas vigier a écrit :




The only way currently is to create an identity account for each address
you want to use. We can look if it would possible to support an other
way to do it, but I don't know if that's possible. And of course any
suggestion about how sympa could be configured to manage multiple email
addresses with only one ldap account is welcome.



I don't know if this is easily configurable, but the online
documentation for sympa 6.1 has an example that seems to permit
filtering by multiple addresses with ldap.
see http://www.sympa.org/manual/authorization-scenarios#search_condition

Their example shows both
  sal...@cru.fr
and
  o.sal...@cru.fr
being accepted with the same filter, whereas only the first is coded
as such.

This seems to offer interesting possibilities, allowing users to
have alternate email adresses with different prefixes of their ldap
adresse.
(by automatically adding * to the beginning of user ldap adresses.)
The code could require a minimum length to minimise false positives,
and/or add the * just before @.

Would this work, and without too much effort ?


The goal of having 1 unified login is to reduce ( usually in a company ) the 
amount
of support of helpdesk, and the work of user because they need to have 1 
login/password.

This also prevent login conflict, since there is 1 single place where this is 
resolved
for uniqueness.


Apparently my comment wasn't clear.
It is not related to mageia identity login, which would remain unchanged.



Your suggestion will just increase the support time due to increased 
complexity, and so
reduce the time avaliable for the sysadmin team, since from what I see, they 
are in
charge of the servers, and the function of support.


It would be a one-shot change.  If it is properly commented, it 
shouldn't cause any support problems.

It is up to sysadmin to decide if they want to do it.
I was only reacting to the posts of solbu and boklm.
(boklm is on the sysadmin team.)



So if you think they have no better way to spend their time and that this is so
business critical to permit to have a mess regarding who said what, sure, go 
ahead
and provides a patch. If I am not wrong, the configuration is on :
http://svnweb.mageia.org/adm/puppet/modules/sympa/

But if the only goal is to satisfy the special need of a few unique snowflakes, 
that's not really a
good move.


Not very clear why you are taking offense.
We are talking about a minor change to solve a perceived need of a user.
More significant changes are being done all the time.
Maybe you should re-read my post ?

--
André


Re: [Mageia-discuss] Mailing list migration: this list is closing

2013-04-08 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 23:48:35 +0200
Mageia Sysadmins sysad...@group.mageia.org
wrote:
 When the Mageia project was started, it didn't have any server. Fortunatly
 people from zarb.org proposed to host the basic project infrastructure
 (mainly the website, wiki and mailing lists) until the project can have
 its own servers. Mageia.Org now have a few servers since October 2010
 (thanks to donations for the servers and Lost Oasis and Gandi for the
 hosting), but until now the existing mailing lists hosted by zarb.org
 had not been migrated to the Mageia mailing lists server. It is now time
 to do it and close this mailing list.

Does it apply to the gmane gateway (gmane.linux.mageia.user) too?

Regards

Antoine.




Re: [Mageia-discuss] Mailing list migration: this list is closing

2013-04-08 Thread Thomas Backlund

Antoine Pitrou skrev 8.4.2013 20:04:

On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 23:48:35 +0200
Mageia Sysadmins sysad...@group.mageia.org
wrote:

When the Mageia project was started, it didn't have any server. Fortunatly
people from zarb.org proposed to host the basic project infrastructure
(mainly the website, wiki and mailing lists) until the project can have
its own servers. Mageia.Org now have a few servers since October 2010
(thanks to donations for the servers and Lost Oasis and Gandi for the
hosting), but until now the existing mailing lists hosted by zarb.org
had not been migrated to the Mageia mailing lists server. It is now time
to do it and close this mailing list.


Does it apply to the gmane gateway (gmane.linux.mageia.user) too?



Gmane lists are transferred to use the new lists, and info has been sent 
to gmane admins about the change so they can do the matching

changes on their end.

--
Thomas




Re: [Mageia-discuss] Mailing list migration: this list is closing

2013-04-08 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:27:01 +0300
Thomas Backlund t...@mageia.org wrote:

 Antoine Pitrou skrev 8.4.2013 20:04:
  On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 23:48:35 +0200
  Mageia Sysadmins sysad...@group.mageia.org
  wrote:
  When the Mageia project was started, it didn't have any server. Fortunatly
  people from zarb.org proposed to host the basic project infrastructure
  (mainly the website, wiki and mailing lists) until the project can have
  its own servers. Mageia.Org now have a few servers since October 2010
  (thanks to donations for the servers and Lost Oasis and Gandi for the
  hosting), but until now the existing mailing lists hosted by zarb.org
  had not been migrated to the Mageia mailing lists server. It is now time
  to do it and close this mailing list.
 
  Does it apply to the gmane gateway (gmane.linux.mageia.user) too?
 
 
 Gmane lists are transferred to use the new lists, and info has been sent 
 to gmane admins about the change so they can do the matching
 changes on their end.

Ah, thank you!

Regards

Antoine.




Re: [Mageia-discuss] Mailing list migration: this list is closing

2013-04-07 Thread Johnny A. Solbu
On Sunday 7. April 2013 23.48, Mageia Sysadmins wrote:
 The new mailing list requires a Mageia Identity account

Why?
That will push away some users from subscribing, and some existing users might 
leave the list, because they have no intention of creating a mageia account, 
for whatever reason.

  - if you don't have an identity account yet, or with a different email
address, you need to manually subscribe to the new mailing list

What if we really do want to subscribe with an address not listed anywhere in 
the mageia account? Meaning, we intentionally do not want to use the email 
address listed in out account page?
I am one of them.

I have personally 100 -One Houndred- email aliases. Almost every time I need to 
register somewhere, I create a new alias. if the entity where I registered 
starts to misuse my address, I can easilly stop it by removing the alias.
It's also an easy way to sort incomming mail.
Many people do this.

-- 
Johnny A. Solbu
PGP key ID: 0xFA687324


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [Mageia-discuss] Mailing list migration: this list is closing

2013-04-07 Thread bschroeder
I'm afraid this move is sounding very Apple-ish or Microsoft-ish.  
It comes across as rude and arrogant towards anyone who does not want
to toe the company line for whatever reason.

Brian.

- Original Message -
From: Mageia general discussions 
To:
Cc:
Sent:Mon, 8 Apr 2013 00:38:47 +0200
Subject:Re: [Mageia-discuss] Mailing list migration: this list is
closing

 On Sunday 7. April 2013 23.48, Mageia Sysadmins wrote:
  The new mailing list requires a Mageia Identity account

 Why?
 That will push away some users from subscribing, and some existing
users might leave the list, because they have no intention of creating
a mageia account, for whatever reason.

  - if you don't have an identity account yet, or with a different
email
  address, you need to manually subscribe to the new mailing list

 What if we really do want to subscribe with an address not listed
anywhere in the mageia account? Meaning, we intentionally do not want
to use the email address listed in out account page?
 I am one of them.

 I have personally 100 -One Houndred- email aliases. Almost every time
I need to register somewhere, I create a new alias. if the entity
where I registered starts to misuse my address, I can easilly stop it
by removing the alias.
 It's also an easy way to sort incomming mail.
 Many people do this.

 -- 
 Johnny A. Solbu
 PGP key ID: 0xFA687324




Re: [Mageia-discuss] Mailing list migration: this list is closing

2013-04-07 Thread Doug Lytle

Johnny A. Solbu wrote:

That will push away some users from subscribing, and some existing users might 
leave the list, because they have no intention of creating a mageia account


And I am one of them. I have no intention on creating yet another account.

Doug


--
Ben Franklin quote:

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, 
deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.



Re: [Mageia-discuss] Mailing list migration: this list is closing

2013-04-07 Thread David W. Hodgins

On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 18:53:33 -0400, bschroe...@internode.on.net wrote:


I'm afraid this move is sounding very Apple-ish or Microsoft-ish. It comes 
across as rude and arrogant towards anyone who does not want
to toe the company line for whatever reason.

Brian.


The reason the mailing lists provided by the ml.mageia.org server
require the use of the identity account, is for security.

The passwords associated with the identity account are stored in
an ldap database, properly encrypted with a salt.

The old mailing lists used software that kept the password stored
in plain text, as you can tell from the monthly reminder messages
it sent out.

We don't want plain test passwords stored on our servers.

While it would have been possible to automatically generate identity
accounts from the registration information stored by the mailman
software, it's preferable to be up front an honest about what's being
done, and let people decide for themselves if they want to create such
an account.

Regards, Dave Hodgins


Re: [Mageia-discuss] Mailing list migration: this list is closing

2013-04-07 Thread Johnny A. Solbu
On Monday 8. April 2013 01.29, David W. Hodgins wrote:
 While it would have been possible to automatically generate identity
 accounts from the registration information stored by the mailman
 software, it's preferable to be up front an honest about what's being
 done, and let people decide for themselves if they want to create such
 an account.

Personally i don't have problem wit the requirement, i just wanted to know why 
the change in policy. And it apears sound.

But I have problems with the apparent abillity to no longer use any other 
address than the official one listed on my identity page.
Is threre a way to do that?
.
-- 
Johnny A. Solbu
PGP key ID: 0xFA687324


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [Mageia-discuss] Mailing list migration: this list is closing

2013-04-07 Thread nicolas vigier
On Mon, 08 Apr 2013, Johnny A. Solbu wrote:

 On Monday 8. April 2013 01.29, David W. Hodgins wrote:
  While it would have been possible to automatically generate identity
  accounts from the registration information stored by the mailman
  software, it's preferable to be up front an honest about what's being
  done, and let people decide for themselves if they want to create such
  an account.
 
 Personally i don't have problem wit the requirement, i just wanted to know 
 why the change in policy. And it apears sound.

Because it would be a mess to allow sympa to manage both ldap and
non-ldap accounts.

 
 But I have problems with the apparent abillity to no longer use any other 
 address than the official one listed on my identity page.
 Is threre a way to do that?

The only way currently is to create an identity account for each address
you want to use. We can look if it would possible to support an other
way to do it, but I don't know if that's possible. And of course any
suggestion about how sympa could be configured to manage multiple email
addresses with only one ldap account is welcome.



Re: [Mageia-discuss] Mailing list migration: this list is closing

2013-04-07 Thread andre999

nicolas vigier a écrit :

On Mon, 08 Apr 2013, Johnny A. Solbu wrote:


On Monday 8. April 2013 01.29, David W. Hodgins wrote:

While it would have been possible to automatically generate identity
accounts from the registration information stored by the mailman
software, it's preferable to be up front an honest about what's being
done, and let people decide for themselves if they want to create such
an account.


Personally i don't have problem wit the requirement, i just wanted to know why 
the change in policy. And it apears sound.


Because it would be a mess to allow sympa to manage both ldap and
non-ldap accounts.



But I have problems with the apparent abillity to no longer use any other 
address than the official one listed on my identity page.
Is threre a way to do that?


Would my suggestion below work for you ?



The only way currently is to create an identity account for each address
you want to use. We can look if it would possible to support an other
way to do it, but I don't know if that's possible. And of course any
suggestion about how sympa could be configured to manage multiple email
addresses with only one ldap account is welcome.


I don't know if this is easily configurable, but the online 
documentation for sympa 6.1 has an example that seems to permit 
filtering by multiple addresses with ldap.

see http://www.sympa.org/manual/authorization-scenarios#search_condition

Their example shows both
 sal...@cru.fr
and
 o.sal...@cru.fr
being accepted with the same filter, whereas only the first is coded as 
such.


This seems to offer interesting possibilities, allowing users to have 
alternate email adresses with different prefixes of their ldap adresse.

(by automatically adding * to the beginning of user ldap adresses.)
The code could require a minimum length to minimise false positives, 
and/or add the * just before @.


Would this work, and without too much effort ?

--
André