Another online survey

2005-05-09 Thread Dave Neary
http://www.desktoplinux.com/articles/AT2127420238.html
This one showing GNOME losing ground against KDE? which has 60% of the 
readership of the site in question.

Not a very healthy trend...
Dave.
--
David Neary
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list


Re: Another online survey

2005-05-09 Thread Claus Schwarm

Dave,

check the discussion. The poll has been advertised in the Yoper forums
and it showed in the results (18.3 %).

The organizers cleared the results from this, but it's not clear yet if
they also cleared the results of the other parts of the poll. Yoper is a
default KDE distribution so it probably affected the other parts as
well.

I already asked in the discussion forum if they cleared all parts, but
the page seems to be down right now, so I can't say what their answer
is.

Cheers, 
Claus


On Mon, 09 May 2005 11:56:46 +0200
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 http://www.desktoplinux.com/articles/AT2127420238.html
 
 This one showing GNOME losing ground against KDE? which has 60% of the
 
 readership of the site in question.
 
 Not a very healthy trend...
 
-- 
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list


Re: Another online survey

2005-05-09 Thread Simos Xenitellis

Dave,
In addition, the 2004 survey does not include Ubuntu Linux which comes
by default with GNOME. One can expect the link
distro-graphicalinterface.

The real fight to get GNOME even higher is to win more distros.

In the page they also mention the 2005 survey that will start soon...

Simos

 09//2005, 11:23, / 
Claus Schwarm :
 Dave,
 
 check the discussion. The poll has been advertised in the Yoper forums
 and it showed in the results (18.3 %).
 
 The organizers cleared the results from this, but it's not clear yet if
 they also cleared the results of the other parts of the poll. Yoper is a
 default KDE distribution so it probably affected the other parts as
 well.
 
 I already asked in the discussion forum if they cleared all parts, but
 the page seems to be down right now, so I can't say what their answer
 is.
 
 Cheers, 
 Claus
 
 
 On Mon, 09 May 2005 11:56:46 +0200
 Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  
  http://www.desktoplinux.com/articles/AT2127420238.html
  
  This one showing GNOME losing ground against KDE? which has 60% of the
  
  readership of the site in question.
  
  Not a very healthy trend...
  

-- 
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list


Re: Another online survey

2005-05-09 Thread Dave Neary
Hi,
Simos Xenitellis a crit :
The real fight to get GNOME even higher is to win more distros.
Right. Anyone have any idea how we can go about that? It would be nice 
to have a 5 minute pitch for distros... in fact, someone could try to 
come up with one and give it as a lightning talk at GUADEC (hint, hint).

Then we would need to get a list of decision makers in the distros that 
we can engage, and influence. Give them the pitch, collect their 
concerns if they're going against us (the only thing that we can't 
really address is KDE has more market share), and collect  collate 
the results.

Sounds like a nice, meaty time consuming effort with big rewards. Who's 
up for it?

Cheers,
Dave.
--
David Neary
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list


Re: Another online survey

2005-05-09 Thread Claus Schwarm
On Mon, 09 May 2005 13:59:44 +0200
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 Hi,
 
 Simos Xenitellis a écrit :
  The real fight to get GNOME even higher is to win more distros.
 
 Right. Anyone have any idea how we can go about that? 


Is the basic assumption correct? Given the political issues surrounding
the question (UserLinux rejecting KDE, Ubuntu adding Kubuntu), you'll
have a hard time trying to convince a distribution to change its
desktop default.

It seems more promising to promote GNOME to end users (institutional and
private), and feature those distributions that use GNOME as default. For
example, remember Davyd's blog entry about GetFootware:

  Some people from Gentoo and Mandriva were concerned that their
distributions were not on the list, but rest assured, now they are.

Indeed, they are: under Ships GNOME, too. Let users decide if they
want the hassle to change the default desktop.

IMHO, as long as there are visual differences in GNOME and KDE apps,
the default desktop will continue to increase as an important aspect of
user decisions, and thus as one of the main selling points of
distributions.


Cheers,
Claus
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list


Re: Another online survey

2005-05-09 Thread Steve George
Hi Dave,

I know you have distributions as one of your target customers and I
can see your thinking.  However, for those distributions that already
have a default desktop I think you have a difficult task.  From their
perspective if they add another desktop all they are looking at is a
more complexity and the associated cost with this.  There can't be a
distribution manager who doesn't know of GNOME, they're just making a
business decision that there isn't sufficent benefit.

My view would be that the way to get distributions to add or change
their default desktop is to get end-users giving them feedback that
they want GNOME.  Customer demand is one of their strongest drivers. 
So the message would be not just 'use gnome' but 'tell your
distribution to include gnome'.  It would be useful if there is some
differentiation in capability between GNOME  KDE in areas that meet
the distributions target customers needs - maybe someone knows some
features?

I'm about to go off topic.  I personally think that convincing
distributions directly is too difficult; you could market for enduser
feedback but I'm not sure how effective it would be.  And while GNOME
either loses penetration or has a perception of doing so you've got a
problem.  An alternative strategy would be to try and make inclusion
less important.  The old ximian packaging was extremely successful at
bypassing the distribution entirely.  Consequently, having an end-user
binary installation of the latest and greatest would enable you to
remove the distribution blockage.

I think that the third way would be best because it has positive
messages, makes GNOME more of a product (which is easier to market)
and improves end-user touchpoints.   Since this falls outside the
marketing list I'll leave this argument thread at this point.

Darn, what a classic this isn't a marketing problem it's systems
development issue email.

Cheers,

Steve

On 5/9/05, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 Claus Schwarm a écrit :
  On Mon, 09 May 2005 13:59:44 +0200
  Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Simos Xenitellis a écrit :
 The real fight to get GNOME even higher is to win more distros.
 Right. Anyone have any idea how we can go about that?
 
  Is the basic assumption correct?
 
 Yes. Most people get their desktop from a distro. Being on more distros
 means more users. More users means more happy users.
 
  Given the political issues surrounding
  the question (UserLinux rejecting KDE, Ubuntu adding Kubuntu), you'll
  have a hard time trying to convince a distribution to change its
  desktop default.
 
 That's not necessarily the goal - equal status would be a good improvement.
 
  It seems more promising to promote GNOME to end users (institutional and
  private), and feature those distributions that use GNOME as default.
 
 I disagree. Your target audience is much larger and more varied. We have
 a problem concentrating on a central message. Bigger target audiences
 (like institutional and private end-users) is a big part of that
 problem. Let's stop trying to be all things to all men.
 
  For
  example, remember Davyd's blog entry about GetFootware:
 
 Our goal should be to get all distros that matter on that list, and the
 bigger ones on the top part of it.
 
 Cheers,
 Dave.
 
 --
 David Neary
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 marketing-list mailing list
 marketing-list@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list

--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list


Re: Another online survey

2005-05-09 Thread Sriram Ramkrishna
BTW Lets not forget Foresight Linux which ships GNOME by default and
has been gaining in popularity.  In fact, Ken Vandine, the person
who built the distro is also a GNOME Journal contributor and a big
GNOME person..

I think we're going to see some good things from this distro.

http://www.foresightlinux.org/

I'd like to see livecd's of this and ubuntu and use them as what an
integrated GNOME solution would look like.  This would be a good sell
to enterprise customers.

Also, we should also push for some of the cool stuff like Galago/Presence
where you could hook that stuff to batch farms as way to do autoconfig
on when a machine could participate in a batch pool for whatever reason
kind of like SETI stuff but presence aware.  Putting these into 
things like Foresight Linux (which is about bleeding edge) would make
great technology demo.

sri
-- 
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list