Re: [Marxism] Review of two books on the Syrian war.
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * Actually Lou, that would not be a safe assumption. The geopolitics are against any motion in Syria. That could only be settled by regional considerations. This was my report a month ago, http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/vijay-prashad-on-the-syrian-conflict- alqaeda-and-isis/article7206649.ece. Here is the final paragraph: In a recent paper, Omar Dahi argues that when the 2011 uprising in Syria took to the gun, this became ³the main conduit by which Turkey and the Arab Gulf states ‹ under cover of the exiled Syrian opposition ‹ hijacked the movement inside Syria.² These outside powers continue to set the pace for the chaos in the country. In March 2012, the International Crisis Group warned that the entry of Gulf Arab influence would ³plunge the nation even deeper into a bloody civil war without prospects for a resolution in the foreseeable future, and almost certainly trigger counter-steps by regime allies, thus intensifying the budding proxy war.² This is precisely what has happened. To believe that greater influence and military support by Turkey and the Gulf Arab states as well as Iran would help bring peace in Syria is a cruel creed. The US training of 90 rebel fighters in Jordan is both ineffective and dangerous most of its previous fighters have joined up with one or the other al-Qaeda backed group. The appetite for a political solution is neither visible amongst the fighters nor amongst their backers. The only power in the region that seems to want calm ‹ for reasons having to do with the P5+1 nuclear deal is Iran. But trust between Iran and its Arab adversaries are at low ebb. It will take a great deal more than rhetoric to bring the regional powers to the table. Trust in the United Nations is also low. Despite the fact that the former UN envoy to Yemen, Jamal Benomar, was ready to announce a deal, Saudi Arabia began its bombing runs. Trust in the UN envoy to Syria, Steffan de Mistura, is at historic lows. Other ways shall have to be found. The message that Qatar, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the United States are unwilling to digest is that the conflict in Syria, as in Yemen, advantages al-Qaeda and ISIS. That is the cold-hearted reality.² Omar¹s paper is in the current issue of MERIP. It is unlikely that a regional solution will result in ³a cleaned up Baathist entity.² By all accounts, the Baathist grouping is long ago fragmented, having been reformed into a much more narrow clique over the past few years. A national unity government will have to include currents that are far outside Baathism. Warm regards, Vijay. On 6/25/15, 9:08 PM, Louis Proyect l...@panix.com wrote: On 6/25/15 3:53 PM, Prashad, Vijay via Marxism wrote: These books reflect the general tenor of my own reporting from the region, One can safely assume that Vijay no longer believes that a regional big-power peace conference is some sort of panacea. It is more likely that a global thermonuclear Armageddon will take place before Russia and its adversaries can cook up some compromise that will leave a cleaned up Baathist entity in place. _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] If Greece Defaults, Imagine Argentina, but Much Worse
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * And another thing: one of the consistent but under-reported fronts in this battle is the attempted privatization of the ports (with China being the most powerful pursuer of their assets). Dockworkers have militantly resisted this, not only out of fear for their jobs, but also from recognizing the immense wealth contained in the industry. Syriza supporters thought their votes were stopping these bargain-basement sales, and are furious at the party's backtracking. On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Andrew Pollack acpolla...@gmail.com wrote: Offense taken. Useless? Are the billions leaving the country my imagination (and by the same token Are the billions which escaped South Africa, mentioned by Patrick in his wonderful article just posted by you, just his imagination)? Are the billions which could be made available by seizing the banks, by taxing the rich, of no value? What precisely are you objecting to? On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Louis Proyect l...@panix.com wrote: On 6/26/15 11:23 AM, Andrew Pollack wrote: I mean for goodness' sake most of it's not rocket science; the billions which Greek capitalists want to take out of the country must be seized, their income taxed at confiscatory levels, the banks nationalized, etc. As for what sectors the everyday economy can be based on: yes, there's not much there, but neither was there in Nicaragua (or Albania or Yugoslavia for fucks sake). Andrew, no offense but this kind of back-of-the-envelop recipe is useless. _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] If Greece Defaults, Imagine Argentina, but Much Worse
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * Yes, it's not a solution: it's just a stop gap to stop further capital flight, and to ensure continued financing of economic operations while the economy is restructured. And yes, as I said myself, the (relatively) tiny Greek economy can't make it in isolation. But those million umbilical cords will not all be cut (just as the Soviets maintained right from the start their own connections - but under government control - with foreign capitalists). Furthermore, tiny and dependent as it is, a real, semi-autonomous Greek economy exists - how do you think the Greek bourgeoisie (both town and country) survived all those decades, on foreign aid? On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Louis Proyect l...@panix.com wrote: You don't seem to get my point. Seizing the banks is not a solution. Greece has a dependent economy. It is connected through a million umbilical cords to the European economy. If the USSR in the 1920s could barely keep going with all its resources, how is a socialist Greece with a population about the size of New York and a GDP just a bit larger than Volkswagen sales supposed to survive? On 6/26/15 11:35 AM, Andrew Pollack wrote: Are the billions which could be made available by seizing the banks, by taxing the rich, of no value? _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] If Greece Defaults, Imagine Argentina, but Much Worse
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * On 6/26/15 11:52 AM, Andrew Pollack wrote: Furthermore, tiny and dependent as it is, a real, semi-autonomous Greek economy exists - how do you think the Greek bourgeoisie (both town and country) survived all those decades, on foreign aid? It survived because it was no threat to the capitalist status quo. My argument is with Callinicos, Alan Woods, and company who don't seem to have the slightest grasp of what a socialist Greece would have to deal with. This is not to speak of those on the Keynesian left who assure us that Grexit will be as successful as Argentina's default in 2001. I have seen what suffering a peripheral, radical economy can be subject to as someone very involved with the Sandinista experiment. If Nicaragua was poorer than Greece, at least it had social democratic support in Europe. The only hope for Greece is a continent-wide rejection of austerity and the election of friendly governments in Spain, Scotland and elsewhere. A lot of the left advice about a Grexit remind me of what I heard from Trotskyists in 1989 when Nicaragua was trying to keep its economy afloat. They said that the big estates should have been divided up even if that would have had reduced the exports necessary for foreign exchange. As I have stated before, Marx, Engels, Lenin, Trotsky, Rosa Luxemberg et al favored world revolution. How Trotskyists today become advocates of building socialism in a single country mystifies me. _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Fwd: World Political Economy Meets South Africa’s Many Marxisms » CounterPunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * Really interesting article by Patrick Bond. http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/06/26/world-political-economy-meets-south-africas-many-marxisms/ _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] If Greece Defaults, Imagine Argentina, but Much Worse
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * I thought we'd been through this already weeks ago but apparently not. Yes, Argentina -- and the extractivist pseudo-socialist regimes in Latin America today -- had and have advantages (ecologically and time-constrained though they may be) that Greece doesn't have. But ANY country in a state of complete or even partial dependence on richer ones will face economic blackmail and sabotage if it moves against capital before the revolution happens in the richer ones. The question is always: can it move quickly and broadly enough, and with sufficient worker involvement, to sustain itself before being attacked militarily? I mean for goodness' sake most of it's not rocket science; the billions which Greek capitalists want to take out of the country must be seized, their income taxed at confiscatory levels, the banks nationalized, etc. As for what sectors the everyday economy can be based on: yes, there's not much there, but neither was there in Nicaragua (or Albania or Yugoslavia for fucks sake). On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Louis Proyect via Marxism marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu wrote: POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * (Can someone explain to me how a socialist Grexit will avoid an economic catastrophe? Argentina was an export-oriented nation that took advantage of a commodity boom while Greece relies on imports. I have yet to see an answer to this, including from Left Platform luminaries--the KKE and Alex Callinicos are hardly worth mentioning. Yanis Varoufakis understands this but the ultraleft can't be bothered with what he says because he stays at fancy hotels apparently. What a fucked up situation.) NY Times, June 26 2015 If Greece Defaults, Imagine Argentina, but Much Worse By JAMES B. STEWART There may be a one-word explanation for why Greece will ultimately capitulate to European demands for more austerity: Argentina. Greece is hardly the first nation to face the prospect of defaulting on its sovereign debt obligations. Argentina has defaulted on its external debt no fewer than seven times since gaining independence in 1816, most recently last year. But it’s Argentina’s 2001 default on nearly $100 billion in sovereign debt, the largest at the time, that poses a cautionary example for Greece. Should Greece default, “Argentina is an apt analogy,” said Arturo C. Porzecanski, a specialist in international finance at American University and author of numerous papers on Argentina’s default. But for Greece, “It would likely be worse. Argentina was comparatively lucky.” Daniel Gros, director of the Center for European Policy Studies in Brussels and the author of “A Tale of Two Defaults,” a paper comparing Greece and Argentina, agreed. “Default would be much worse for Greece than it was for Argentina,” he said. Like Greece today, Argentina had endured several years of hardship and austerity by 2001. It borrowed heavily from the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and the United States, all of which demanded unpopular spending cuts. The I.M.F. withheld payments when Argentina (like Greece) failed to meet its deficit targets. A bank run led the government to freeze deposits, which set off riots and street demonstrations. There were deadly confrontations between police and demonstrators in the heart of Buenos Aires, and the president at the time, Fernando de la Rúa, fled the country by helicopter in December. In the last week of 2001, Argentina defaulted on $93 billion in sovereign debt and subsequently sharply devalued the peso, which had been pegged to the dollar. In addition to social unrest and a wave of political instability (at one point, the country had three presidents in four days), Argentina’s economy plunged into depression. Tens of thousands of the unemployed scavenged the streets collecting cardboard, an enduring image that gave rise to the term “cartoneros.” Dollar-denominated deposits were converted to pesos, wiping out over half their purchasing power. The country became the epicenter of Europe’s debt crisis after Wall Street imploded in 2008. Now, it is struggling to pay its debt, and its people and creditors are growing restive. Despite this trauma, the Argentine economy stabilized in 2002. The country was able to repay the I.M.F. in full by 2006. But the country has never re-entered the international debt markets. It has
Re: [Marxism] If Greece Defaults, Imagine Argentina, but Much Worse
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * Offense taken. Useless? Are the billions leaving the country my imagination (and by the same token Are the billions which escaped South Africa, mentioned by Patrick in his wonderful article just posted by you, just his imagination)? Are the billions which could be made available by seizing the banks, by taxing the rich, of no value? What precisely are you objecting to? On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Louis Proyect l...@panix.com wrote: On 6/26/15 11:23 AM, Andrew Pollack wrote: I mean for goodness' sake most of it's not rocket science; the billions which Greek capitalists want to take out of the country must be seized, their income taxed at confiscatory levels, the banks nationalized, etc. As for what sectors the everyday economy can be based on: yes, there's not much there, but neither was there in Nicaragua (or Albania or Yugoslavia for fucks sake). Andrew, no offense but this kind of back-of-the-envelop recipe is useless. _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] AP: Supreme Court extends gay marriage nationwide
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * The Supreme Court declared Friday that same-sex couples have a right to marry anywhere in the United States, a historic culmination of decades of litigation over gay marriage and gay rights generally. http://bigstory.ap.org/article/9e1933cd1e1a4e969ab45f5952bbb45f/supreme-court-extends-same-sex-marriage-nationwide -- Hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre, mod sceal þe mare, þe ure mægen lytlað. _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Fwd: Report on the Chicago Conference and LeftElect Network Update: June 22, 2015
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * Forwarded Message Subject:Report on the Chicago Conference and LeftElect Network Update: June 22, 2015 Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:14:05 -0500 From: LeftElect Conference leftel...@gmail.com To: leftel...@gmail.com *_Report on the Chicago Conference and LeftElect Network Update: June 22, 2015 _* Seven weeks have passed since the May 3-4 Future of Left/ Independent Electoral Action Conference. We value your interest and would like to offer a report on the conference and next steps for the network. Some 200 political activists from around the country and from a variety of independent political organizations, as well as individual activists, carried out a rich discussion and an amicable debate about how to collaborate in the work of building a large political alternative to the left of the Democratic Party. Participating in the Future of the Left/Independent Politics Conference http://leftelect.org/, in an unprecedented spirit of cooperation, national, state, and local candidates and activists, as well as elected officials from the Green Party, the Peace and Freedom Party, the Richmond Progressive Alliance, Socialist Alternative, Progressive Dane, and the Vermont Progressive Party discussed the challenges of campaigning and the difficulties of actually holding office while trying to both build movements and push progressive policies. Also at the conference were members of the International Socialist Organization, the Justice Party, and many other organizations. Thanks to numerous contributions and hardworking volunteers, conference costs were kept low, and the conference brought in more than it cost. The surplus will be seed money for the new network! For additional reports see /New Politics/: http://newpol.org/content/left-independent-political-action-conference-unprecedented-cooperationand The North Star http://www.thenorthstar.info/?p=12264 To view the conference livestream archive see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6M57pSRjRk Responding to the country’s pervasive economic and social crisis many leaders of the movements Occupy, Black Lives Matters, and Fight for $15 were in attendance. While this was a conference focused primarily on electoral action, the organizers made it clear through panels on the Black Lives Matter movement and the Fight for $15 that politics must be about building and giving voice to such movements. The conference was historic not only for its agenda but the spirit of mutual respect, cooperation, and solidarity that the conference engendered. The organizing committee—which includes leading members of the Green Party as well as representatives of the the Peace and Freedom Party, International Socialist Organization (ISO), Socialist Alternative, Solidarity, the Black Agenda Report, and Richmond Progressive Alliance—announced that a continuations committee would take up the question of now to keep alive the network established by the conference. They also recognized the need for greater diversity, for greater involvement of African American and Latino activists, and for simply casting a wider net and drawing in others involved in such political campaigns. The Future of the Left/Independent Politics Conference represented an important step forward not only for independent politics but also for cooperation on the left. There were many suggestions presented for the organizations and individuals involved in this conference to keep alive the network we have founded, while continuing our work in local movements and independent political campaigns. The continuations committee is meeting by email and telephone. We hope to *continue to use the website* at leftelect.org http://leftelect.org/as a place to share information on important electoral campaigns, upcoming events, as well as to link to sites of dialogue and comradely debate. We encourage activists and candidates to use the website to contribute their thoughts on these topics. We have started the transformation of the website from a conference focus to reflect this goal. We wish to thank everyone who planned, participated, contributed and attended the conference and hope that you will continue to interact and plan with the continuations committee. If you or your organization would like to suggest someone for the planning committee contact us at leftel...@gmail.org mailto:leftel...@gmail.org For the Future of Left-Independent Political Action, The Continuations Committee: Kali Akuno, Robert Caldwell, Todd Chretien, Bruce Dixon, Howie Hawkins, Bryan Koulouris, Dan La Botz, Gloria Mattera, Gayle McLaughlin, Joanna Misnik, Debra Reiger, Lance Selfa, Jill Stein, Linda Thompson
[Marxism] Ramzy Baroud on Syria
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * How long did the Syria conflict carry on before the western ‘left’ began to formulate a stance? Months. The conflict was just too involved, and initially removed from western engrossment that only few knew what to think. Only when western governments began pondering war, urged on by their regional allies, did the left began to formulate a position around the same old discourse. While the West and their allies had their own sinister reasons to get involved in Syria, the war in Syria, as the war in Libya before it, was not as simple as picking and choosing the good guys versus the bad guys. While vehemently rejecting western military crusades that have wreaked havoc is an admirable act, TURNING LOCAL DICTATORS INTO MODERN-DAY CHE GUEVARAS REFLECTS RECKLESSNESS, NOT CAMARADERIE. full: http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/06/26/the-western-left-and-its-sterile-field-of-ideas/ _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] On the brink of Grexit?
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * On the brink of Grexit? by Socialist Resistance, June 26 http://socialistresistance.org/7565/on-the-brink-of-grexit (This piece has been written as an editorial for the forthcoming issue of Socialist Resistance) As we go to press, deadlock over the Greek debt crisis remain unresolved, despite three emergency EU summits over the past few days. Greece, therefore, remains not only on the verge of defaulting on its debt to the IMF but of crashing out of the Eurozone –a so-called Grexit – if a deal is not reached in the next few days. A week ago the Greek government announced that it had run out of money and was unable to pay the €1.6bn due to the IMF by the June 30 deadline. The EU was withholding the final €7.1bn tranche of bailout money until Greece agreed to accept further stringent austerity measures. This money, due under the third bailout agreement was the only way that the debt to the IMF could be paid The Troika (the IMF the ECB and the European Commission) were demanding further deep cuts to pensions, a substantial rise in VAT, and the liberalisation of labour laws. The consequences and nature of the debt has been spelled out clearly by the Truth Committee on Public Debt set up by the speaker of the Greek Parliament Zoi Konstantopoulou (a leading member of Syriza) in April. It includes a number of left wing and Marxist economists from across Europe including Eric Toussaint from CADTM and Özlem Onaran, a supporter of SR in Britain. Its first report concludes not only that is Greece unable to pay but that it should not pay because the debt is ‘illegal, illegitimate, and odious’. It says the following: “All the evidence we present in this report shows that Greece not only does not have the ability to pay this debt, but also should not pay this debt first and foremost because the debt emerging from the Troika’s arrangements is a direct infringement on the fundamental human rights of the residents of Greece. Hence, we came to the conclusion that Greece should not pay this debt because it is illegal, illegitimate, and odious.” It concludes that “the increase in debt was not due to excessive public spending, which in fact remained lower than the public spending of other Eurozone countries, but rather due to the payment of extremely high rates of interest to creditors, excessive and unjustified military spending, loss of tax revenues due to illicit capital outflows, state recapitalization of private banks, and the international imbalances created via the flaws in the design of the Monetary Union itself.” But last week the question posed was which side would blink first. Unfortunately it was the Greek government. On Sunday June 21 the Greek cabinet decided to make major concessions. They agreed a package that did not give the Troika everything it was demanding—there was still around a €2bn gap between the two sides—but it was a dangerous compromise. The 11 page package included a VAT increase, though not on electricity as demanded by the Troika. It included reduction in pensions expenditure by increasing contributions from better-off pensioners and reduced early retirement rights—but not a cut in the rates paid as the Troika was demanding. It also proposed raising corporate taxes. The biggest concession, however, appears to be on debt reduction. The Greek Government has always insisted that any deal must include immediate measures to cut the debt. Now it appeared prepared to accept a pledge to address this in the future. It was clearly austerity, though not in the shape (or as severe) the Troika wanted it. They wanted to target the poor more and the employers less and they wanted to totally humiliate the Syriza leadership in the process. The EU elites applied huge pressure on the Greek government to bring about this climb down. They talked of the imminent collapse of the banking system and speculation as to when the ATMs would close down resulting in riots on the streets. Billions of Euros haemorrhaged from the Greek banks and the ECB was threatening to withdraw support facilities. Climb down is no answer. It will resolve nothing. Even if there is a ‘settlement’ now, further debt major repayments are due to the IMF in July and August. At first the creditors welcomed the proposals, and European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker described the package as “a major step forward”. The mood then changed. When the Troika met, they rejected the package. Led by Christine Legarde of the IMF, they tabled a heavily revised version reintroducing their hard line demands. In particular they were not prepared to accept the Greek proposals to raise pension contributions, but insisted on a
Re: [Marxism] On the brink of Grexit?
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * The editorial (whether as copied here or on the SR site) seems to be missing something at the end. A lost concluding paragraph? ps The Guardian's live updates today are definitely worth following: http://www.theguardian.com/business/blog/live/2015/jun/26/greece-crisis-markets-to-open-lower-ahead-of-weekend-talks-live On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Dayne Goodwin via Marxism marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu wrote: POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * On the brink of Grexit? by Socialist Resistance, June 26 http://socialistresistance.org/7565/on-the-brink-of-grexit (This piece has been written as an editorial for the forthcoming issue of Socialist Resistance) As we go to press, deadlock over the Greek debt crisis remain unresolved, despite three emergency EU summits over the past few days. Greece, therefore, remains not only on the verge of defaulting on its debt to the IMF but of crashing out of the Eurozone –a so-called Grexit – if a deal is not reached in the next few days. A week ago the Greek government announced that it had run out of money and was unable to pay the €1.6bn due to the IMF by the June 30 deadline. The EU was withholding the final €7.1bn tranche of bailout money until Greece agreed to accept further stringent austerity measures. This money, due under the third bailout agreement was the only way that the debt to the IMF could be paid The Troika (the IMF the ECB and the European Commission) were demanding further deep cuts to pensions, a substantial rise in VAT, and the liberalisation of labour laws. The consequences and nature of the debt has been spelled out clearly by the Truth Committee on Public Debt set up by the speaker of the Greek Parliament Zoi Konstantopoulou (a leading member of Syriza) in April. It includes a number of left wing and Marxist economists from across Europe including Eric Toussaint from CADTM and Özlem Onaran, a supporter of SR in Britain. Its first report concludes not only that is Greece unable to pay but that it should not pay because the debt is ‘illegal, illegitimate, and odious’. It says the following: “All the evidence we present in this report shows that Greece not only does not have the ability to pay this debt, but also should not pay this debt first and foremost because the debt emerging from the Troika’s arrangements is a direct infringement on the fundamental human rights of the residents of Greece. Hence, we came to the conclusion that Greece should not pay this debt because it is illegal, illegitimate, and odious.” It concludes that “the increase in debt was not due to excessive public spending, which in fact remained lower than the public spending of other Eurozone countries, but rather due to the payment of extremely high rates of interest to creditors, excessive and unjustified military spending, loss of tax revenues due to illicit capital outflows, state recapitalization of private banks, and the international imbalances created via the flaws in the design of the Monetary Union itself.” But last week the question posed was which side would blink first. Unfortunately it was the Greek government. On Sunday June 21 the Greek cabinet decided to make major concessions. They agreed a package that did not give the Troika everything it was demanding—there was still around a €2bn gap between the two sides—but it was a dangerous compromise. The 11 page package included a VAT increase, though not on electricity as demanded by the Troika. It included reduction in pensions expenditure by increasing contributions from better-off pensioners and reduced early retirement rights—but not a cut in the rates paid as the Troika was demanding. It also proposed raising corporate taxes. The biggest concession, however, appears to be on debt reduction. The Greek Government has always insisted that any deal must include immediate measures to cut the debt. Now it appeared prepared to accept a pledge to address this in the future. It was clearly austerity, though not in the shape (or as severe) the Troika wanted it. They wanted to target the poor more and the employers less and they wanted to totally humiliate the Syriza leadership in the process. The EU elites applied huge pressure on the Greek government to bring about this climb down. They talked of the imminent collapse of the banking system and
[Marxism] Fwd: Gunther Schuller Dies at 89; Composer Synthesized Classical and Jazz | Louis Proyect: The Unrepentant Marxist
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * The NY Times obituary for Gunther Schuller is must-reading for anybody interested in contemporary music. It pays tribute to him both as an avant-garde composer of atonal music but also as a pioneer of what was known as the “Third Stream” in the 1950s and 60s, an attempt to bridge the gap between classical music and jazz that was epitomized by the Modern Jazz Quartet. To some extent, Schuller was merely expanding upon earlier works of synthesis such as George Gershwin’s “Rhapsody in Blue”, Igor Stravinsky’s “Ebony Concerto” that was written for Woody Herman, and Darius Milhaud’s “Creation of the World”, a ballet score that the composer wrote after being exposed to jazz in Harlem in the 1920s. Although I have no deep insights about Schuller’s politics except that he hated racism, the MJQ saw the Third Stream as a way of breaking with the notion that jazz was “entertainment” served up for white audiences as some kind of “jungle music”. Ironically, Duke Ellington, one of the men most responsible for attempting to bridge the gap between classical and jazz, performed “jungle music” in the 1920s himself. Who said that popular culture and race were not complicated matters? full: http://louisproyect.org/2015/06/26/gunther-schuller-dies-at-89-composer-synthesized-classical-and-jazz/ _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Greece: Tsipras calls referendum over Troika's 'blackmailing' deal
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras announced on June 26 that a referendum will be called over the bailout deal being proposed for the country by Greece's creditors. the deal is pushed by the Troika of the European Union, International Monetary Fund and European Central Bank. https://www.greenleft.org.au/node/59324 -- “Disobedience, in the eyes of anyone who has read history, is humanity’s original virtue. It is through disobedience that progress has been made, through disobedience and through rebellion.” — Oscar Wilde, Soul of Man Under Socialism “The free market is perfectly natural... do you think I am some kind of dummy?” — Jarvis Cocker _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] The Lucky Country: transcript and audio
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * From Australian to Scotland. Here's the transcript and audio of my recent podcast on Australian racism which goes out in a regular SSP Socialist Voices' package. http://leftclickblog.blogspot.com.au/2015/06/the-lucky-country.html The SSP media site is here: https://www.scottishsocialistparty.org/category/media/ In today’s Socialist Voices, we have SSP Co Spokes people, Sandra Webster and Colin Fox, Sandra on Paisley’s Sma Shot and Colin on the SNP’s strange relationship with the monarchy. We have Don Mackeen on racism in the USA, the confederate flag and of course the awful terrorist events in Charleston last week. We have Dr Bruce Scott speaking about Mental distress from a socialist perspective; We have blogger and transgender woman, Amber Daniels on her experiences, Matthew Geraghty on our democratic deficit, Australian Socialist Alliance member Dave Riley on “the Lucky Country,” SNP activist, Debra Torrance with a very emotional plea about the terrible events in the Mediterranean, Calum Martin on the SSP alternative to the Council Tax – the much fairer Scottish Service Tax and Aiden O’Rourke with a suggestion for the SSP… dave riley _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] Greece: Tsipras calls referendum over Troika's 'blackmailing' deal
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * In addition to the Green Left Weekly report and text of Tsipras' 1am speech on Greek television, both at link below provided by Stuart, here are five current reports in three English language Greek news media sources (link at second one, from Greek Reporter, gives text of the last creditors' proposal that Syriza expects will be voted on) - 1) Greece to Hold Referendum on Bailout Agreement by Anastasios Papapostolou The Greek Reporter, June 26 http://greece.greekreporter.com/2015/06/26/greece-to-hold-referendum-on-bailout-agreement Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras announced that Greece will hold a referendum on July 5 to ask the Greek people if they approve of a bailout deal with the country’s creditors. In a speech on national TV, Tsipras said his government had been asked to accept “unbearable” austerity measures. He said German Chancellor Angela Merkel and European Central Bank chief Mario Draghi have been informed of the plan, and he’ll request an extension of Greece’s existing bailout, due to end June 30, by a few days to permit the vote without having to introduce capital controls in the Greek banks. A Greek government source said the country’s banks will open on Monday and no capital controls are planned. The referendum is expected to ask Greek citizens if they approve the proposed bailout agreement with Greece’s foreign creditors without touching upon a possible Grexit that could follow if the nation votes no on the deal. Greece’s State Minister Nikos Pappas said that he expects the Greek people to vote no on the “humiliating” deal the creditors have offered the Greek government. “Those who are rushing to connect the referendum’s outcome with Greece’s stay in the Eurozone are pro-memoranda political forces that favor austerity” stated the Greek minister. German Chancellor Angela Merkel urged Greece to accept the deal [creditors' proposal], describing it as “extraordinarily generous”. On Saturday the Greek parliament will convene to approve the referendum, as it is required by Greek law. 2) Greece Referendum: This is the Bailout Deal Greeks Will Vote On by Anastasios Papapostolou Greek Reporter, June 26 http://greece.greekreporter.com/2015/06/26/greece-referendum-this-is-the-bailout-deal-greeks-will-vote-on As Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras announced that Greece will hold a referendum to ask the Greek people if they approve of a bailout deal with the country’s creditors, here is a final draft of the creditors proposal for Greece, as it was obtained by the Financial Times. The referendum, to be conducted on July 5th, will ask the Greek citizens if they approve a deal based on the following document the Greek government has already described as “humiliating” since it includes more austerity for the country. See the proposal [here] http://greece.greekreporter.com/2015/06/26/greece-referendum-this-is-the-bailout-deal-greeks-will-vote-on 3) PM Tsipras calls referendum on bailout on July 5 Times of Change, Greece, June 27 (Reuters) http://www.thetoc.gr/eng/news/article/pm-tsipras-calls-referendum-on-bailout-on-july-5 Late Friday night, Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras called a referendum on July 5 whether the country should accept or reject a bailout agreement offered by creditors. These proposals, which clearly violate the European rules and the basic rights to work, equality and dignity show that the purpose of some of the partners and institutions was not a viable agreement for all parties, but possibly the humiliation of an entire people, Tsipras said in a televised address to the nation. He made the comments hours after flying back from Brussels, where European and IMF creditors offered Greece a deal that his government rejected as inadequate. Athens will ask for an extension of its bailout agreement, which ends on June 30, by a few days in light of the referendum, he said. Greek State Minister Nikos Pappas, a senior aide to Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras, said he believed Greeks would vote to reject a bailout agreement offered by creditors in a referendum called on July 5. Right-wing junior government coalition partners Independent Greeks party will urge voters to reject a bailout agreement when they vote in a referendum on July 5, the party's leader said on Saturday. Just like in 1940 when Greek people decided to say no to foreign armies, as president of the Independent Greeks party I call for all of the party to participate in this big celebration of democracy called a referendum and to vote 'No' - no to handing away our independence, Panos Kammenos, whose party is the junior partner in Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras's coalition, told Greek television.
[Marxism] saving capitalism from the capitalists
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * Michael Roberts' blog on the *Inclusive Capitalism* conference sponsored by Lady Rothschild was a good read (as usual). The last paragraph struck me as particularly interesting Both Lady Rothschild and Thomas Piketty believe in capitalism. Both reckon that capitalists can be made to or persuaded to act to reduce inequality, create a better environment and adopt moral policies in investment. Piketty wants more and higher taxes to do this; Lady Rothschild wants shareholder power. But ‘responsible’ or ‘inclusive’ capitalism won’t and can’t deliver. It is the phenomenon that Piketty and the good Lady represent that interests me. I think they are like the canaries in the 19thC coal mine. They are flopping about , showing signs of distress and in so doing presaging a tremendous explosion. The distress of the canaries is genuine, but it does nothing to halt the build up of methane. Truly, the strength of the forces at work in today's world is such that it seems that agency has made way for structure. The assaults on the poor and the ecosystem are remorseless. The crucifixion of Greece, for instance, is a species of madness. None of it makes economic or moral sense, as Habermas points out. But it is not only the canaries like Prince Charles and Lady Rothschild that are getting alarmed. For every beautiful soul anguished by the spread of inequality, there are plenty of hard men and women who are determined to do whatever it takes to protect existing capitalist social relations. And that means that if Greece needs to be sacrificed to act as a warning to Podemos and Sinn Fein, then so be it. In the coming struggle, the beautiful souls will have no role to play. Only the courage and strength and solidarity of the working class can save us. comradely Gary _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Fwd: ‘The spectre’ of communism or Mozgovoy as Che Guevara for Tolikenists | Ukraine solidarity campaign солідарність України кампанія
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * Che Guevara is first and foremost a widely advertised commercial image that has little to do with the real Commandante. And we all are obliged to love that image; except for raging anti-communists who go rabid at the sight of anything red. On 18th February 2014 when the first clashes in Kyiv began, I met a man near the already smoking Party of Regions office. The man was holding a Cuban flag with Che’s portrait on it in his hand. Those symbols suddenly stood out in the general blue-and-yellow and occasionally red-and-black background so I asked the ‘Cuban’ why he chose them. The answer was simple yet ingenious: ‘I chose this flag because I protest. Because I am a patriot of Ukraine!’ And then some year later in one of Kyiv’s hostels the Cuban flag and Che’s portrait was peacefully side by side with symbols of the Right Sector. The latter too is thoughtlessly used by people who have no idea of the real ideology of that organisation. That hostel by the way housed displaced people from Donbas. The first lines about Mozgovoy as a new Che were written by Boris Kagarlitsky. Boris Yuliyevitch is rather clever especially if one is to consider that for many years now for the left he managed to be the mouthpiece of Kremlin and that he still was not caught red-handed, neither were there attempts to beat him up. Thence we shall certainly lend him an ear. Leeching off the trust of the left, including the Western, Kagarlitsky knows perfectly well their psychological makeup as well as knowing perfectly what makes a good ‘Che’. full: http://ukrainesolidaritycampaign.org/2015/06/18/the-spectre-of-communism-or-mozgovoy-as-che-guevara-for-tolikenists/ _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Marxism] If Greece Defaults, Imagine Argentina, but Much Worse
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Louis Proyect via Marxism marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu wrote: (Can someone explain to me how a socialist Grexit will avoid an economic catastrophe? Argentina was an export-oriented nation that took advantage of a commodity boom while Greece relies on imports. I have yet to see an answer to this, including from Left Platform luminaries--the KKE and Alex Callinicos are hardly worth mentioning. Yanis Varoufakis understands this but the ultraleft can't be bothered with what he says because he stays at fancy hotels apparently. What a fucked up situation.) Breaking Greece by Paul Krugman, June 25, 2015 7:22 am June 25, 2015 7:22 am New York Times, June 25 http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/breaking-greece [GRAPH] I’ve been staying fairly quiet on Greece, not wanting to shout Grexit in a crowded theater. But given reports from the negotiations in Brussels, something must be said — namely, what do the creditors, and in particular the IMF, think they’re doing? This ought to be a negotiation about targets for the primary surplus, and then about debt relief that heads off endless future crises. And the Greek government has agreed to what are actually fairly high surplus targets, especially given the fact that the budget would be in huge primary surplus if the economy weren’t so depressed. But the creditors keep rejecting Greek proposals on the grounds that they rely too much on taxes and not enough on spending cuts. So we’re still in the business of dictating domestic policy. The supposed reason for the rejection of a tax-based response is that it will hurt growth. The obvious response is, are you kidding us? The people who utterly failed to see the damage austerity would do — see the chart, which compares the projections in the 2010 standby agreement with reality — are now lecturing others on growth? Furthermore, the growth concerns are all supply-side, in an economy surely operating at least 20 percent below capacity. Talk to IMF people and they will go on about the impossibility of dealing with Syriza, their annoyance at the grandstanding, and so on. But we’re not in high school here. And right now it’s the creditors, much more than the Greeks, who keep moving the goalposts. So what is happening? Is the goal to break Syriza? Is it to force Greece into a presumably disastrous default, to [dis]courage the others? At this point it’s time to stop talking about “Graccident”; if Grexit happens it will be because the creditors, or at least the IMF, wanted it to happen. Gerassimos Moschonas: Syriza and the EU after the first long battle—the balance sheet of the negotiations by Miri Davidson, for Verso blog, June 23 http://www.versobooks.com/blogs/2055-gerassimos-moschonas-syriza-and-the-eu-after-the-first-long-battle-the-balance-sheet-of-the-negotiations Gerassimos Moschonas, author of In the Name of Social Democracy, reflects on Syriza's strategy over the course of the negotiations, including what its achievements and failures reveal about possibilities for challenging European austerity. May 19, 2015. . . . In the negotiations the Greek government has—on the whole—adopted an appropriate orientation. The central pillar of this strategic approach has a name: moderation. Ultimately, what Syriza was asking for in early February was a very gradual and very controlled transition from the Troika regime and brutal austerity to a greater economic autonomy and a reasoned growth policy. It had already (without doubt temporarily or tactically) abandoned its objectives concerning the restructuring of the debt (but also the goal of an international conference on debt) practically right from the moment that the negotiations officially began. So after five years of sharp recession, it was proposing an extremely prudent political turn. By the standards of its pre-electoral promises, Syriza could not have been any more moderate. All the rest is just ideological chatter—or ignorance. The second pillar of Syriza’s strategic orientation was determination. A powerful accompaniment to this pillar called determination, particularly evident and active when the negotiations between Greece and the other Eurozone governments ground to a halt, was the fact that it remained vague as to its ultimate objectives. The formulation used by Euclides Tsakalotos—currently the lead Greek negotiator—can hardly be understood otherwise. We deliberately create uncertainty among our partners as to what our intentions are. Otherwise we can’t negotiate. Rupture? Well, it’s a possibility! (TV Star, 27 March 2015). Moderation + determination + maintaining the uncertainty over whether there
[Marxism] The Paris Commune
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * London Review of Books, Vol. 37 No. 13 · 2 July 2015 Globalisation before Globalisation by Philippe Marlière Massacre: The Life and Death of the Paris Commune of 1871 by John Merriman Yale, 324 pp, £20.00, October 2014, ISBN 978 0 300 17452 6 Communal Luxury: The Political Imaginary of the Paris Commune by Kristin Ross Verso, 148 pp, £16.99, March, ISBN 978 1 78168 839 7 Lenin, it’s said, danced in the snow once the Bolshevik government had lasted a day longer than the Paris Commune. He was in awe of the Communards, and his tomb is still decorated with red banners from the Commune, brought for his funeral by French communists. Though it lasted only 72 days, the Commune was a defining moment for the European left, though not an uncontroversial one. Marx praised it in The Civil War in France (1871) – ‘Its martyrs are enshrined in the great heart of the working class’ – but in 1872 in a new preface to The Communist Manifesto he wrote: ‘The working class cannot simply lay hold of the ready-made state machinery and wield it for their own purpose.’ The Communards, he believed, had made a crucial error by seeking to reform, rather than abolish, the state. Engels agreed, calling the Commune the first ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’, a state run by workers in their own interest. The argument about its political nature still hasn’t been settled 144 years after the Commune itself was crushed. Some see it as the first self-consciously socialist uprising: a popular rebellion, unlike the liberal and nationalist Revolutions of 1830 and 1848. Others describe it as one among many manifestations of French republicanism. The Yale historian John Merriman’s new book concentrates on the chain of events that created the Commune, and the main players behind its formation. He opens with a description of Paris in 1870: its western side a playground for the rich, the east an overpopulated slum. The class divide was deep and class consciousness entrenched. In July that year, Napoleon III, desperate for military glory, declared war on Prussia, his generals having assured him that France would win easily. They were wrong. As soon as the fighting started, Prussian troops routed the French and on 2 September captured the emperor together with 100,000 troops in Sedan. There were mass demonstrations on the streets of Paris demanding the overthrow of the empire, and its replacement with a democratic republic. Moderate republicans were terrified and on 4 September established a new republic. The s0-called Government of National Defence promised not to cede an inch of territory to the Prussians; but it feared the radicalised working class in the capital even more, and decided that it would be wise to surrender to Bismarck as soon as possible. Secret negotiations were opened soon after the Prussians laid siege to Paris on 19 September. As the weeks went by, hostility to the new government grew. On 28 October, news reached Paris that the 160,000 soldiers at Metz had surrendered. On 31 October, 15,000 demonstrators gathered at the Hôtel de Ville in Paris calling for the resignation of the government and the establishment of a Commune and a Committee of Public Safety, such as there had been in 1792. Food was running out and so was money; on 29 January the government surrendered, as it had been planning to do since the beginning of the siege. The right-wing député Adolphe Thiers was appointed president by the National Assembly and given a mandate to accept and implement the harsh terms imposed, which included ceding Alsace and Lorraine to Prussia. In March, the Prussians paraded through Paris. They occupied part of the city for two days, then withdrew. The surrender to the Prussians and the threat of monarchist restoration led to a transformation of the National Guard. A Central Committee of the Federation of National Guards was elected, comprising 215 battalions, equipped with 2000 cannons and 450,000 firearms. Thiers’s new government embodied a conservative brand of republicanism. He had been prime minister under Louis-Philippe’s July Monarchy in 1836, 1840 and 1848, and was later a fierce opponent of Napoleon III. He was far from being the kind of leader the Parisian militants wanted in power. Thiers had promised the conservative députés in the National Assembly that the monarchy would be restored. His first task was to undermine the newly empowered National Guard, which had the militants’ support and controlled the city’s 2000 cannons. For Thiers and the national army amassing in Versailles, this represented a grave threat to the new order. On 18 March
[Marxism] Chicago teachers contract talks break down: Impending strike?
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * https://uk.news.yahoo.com/chicago-teachers-contract-talks-break-down-impending-strike-155928308.html#GOyznnu _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] 5 British U.S. mainstream media reports on Greece referendum move
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * Greece's Tsipras calls referendum to break bailout deadlock by Lefteris Papadimas and Renee Maltezou Reuters, June 27 http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/06/27/us-eurozone-greece-idUSKBN0P40EO20150627 ATHENS/BRUSSELS - Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras called a referendum on bailout demands from foreign creditors on Saturday, rejecting an ultimatum from lenders and putting a deal that could determine Greece's future in Europe to a risky popular vote. After a week of acrimonious talks in Brussels, where Tsipras dismissed proposals from the lenders as blackmail, the 40-year-old prime minister said parliament would meet on Saturday to approve holding a referendum on July 5. Our responsibility is for the future of our country. This responsibility obliges us to respond to the ultimatum through the sovereign will of the Greek people, Tsipras said in a televised address in the early hours of Saturday. The call marked the most dramatic twist yet in long-running negotiations between Greece and its lenders that have left the cash-strapped nation to the threshold of a bankruptcy and put the country's future in the euro in doubt. Tsipras said the creditors' proposals clearly violate European social rules and fundamental rights and would asphyxiate Greece's flailing economy. The euro zone had offered to release billions in frozen aid if Greece accepted and implemented pension and tax reforms that are anathema to its leftist government, elected in January on a promise to end austerity. Without the bailout funds, Athens is set to default on 1.6 billion euros in repayments to the International Monetary Fund on Tuesday, pushing Greece closer to being forced out of the euro, causing chaos for its economy and financial markets. Tsipras said he would ask for an extension of the bailout ending June 30 by a few days to accommodate the referendum. Soon after the televised address in the early hours of the morning, lines of up to 10 people were seen forming to withdraw cash from automated teller machines in at least three different parts of Athens. Small groups of anti-establishment protesters threw petrol bombs and stones at police in a central Athens neighborhood where protests are common. Tsipras spoke with European Central Bank President Mario Draghi to discuss the referendum, and senior government officials were due to meet the ECB chief later on Saturday. With Greece's stricken banking sector dependent on central bank funds to remain afloat, the ECB will play a vital role in keeping the system on its feet over the next few days. But despite fears of a surge in deposit outflows from banks, a deputy minister said there were no plans to impose capital controls and banks would open as normal on Monday. [Text: Greek Prime Minister Tsipras announces bailout referendum] http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/06/27/us-eurozone-greece-tsipras-text-idUSKBN0P700T20150627?mod=relatedchannelName=ousivMolt Tsipras said the creditor demands appeared to be aimed at the humiliation of Greece, and ministers called on voters to reject the package but opposition parties attacked the government. Tsipras brought the country to a total deadlock. Between an unacceptable agreement and a euro exit, former conservative Prime Minister Antonis Samaras said. The referendum question was effectively a yes or no to Europe, he said. German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Francois Hollande had earlier met Tsipras on the sidelines of an EU summit to coax him to accept an offer to fill Athens' empty coffers until November in return for painful reforms. But after months of fruitless wrangling, the patience of European partners with the leftwing government in Athens had grown thin and officials had indicated that there was little more room to maneuver. Merkel said she and Hollande had urged him in a 45-minute private meeting to accept the creditors' generous offer. We have taken a step toward Greece, she said. Now it is up to the Greek side to take a similar step. Both she and Hollande said Saturday's meeting of euro zone finance ministers would be the decisive moment for a deal since time was running out to secure German parliamentary approval in time to release funds needed to avert a Greek default. The creditors laid out terms in a document handed to Greece on Thursday. It said Athens could have 15.5 billion euros in EU and IMF funding in four installments to see it through to the end of November, including 1.8 billion euros by Tuesday as soon as the Greek parliament approved the plan. The total is barely more than what Greece needs to service its debts over the next six months and contains no new money. Further
[Marxism] Forty European groups call for Greek debt relief
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * https://www.greenleft.org.au/node/59322 -- “Disobedience, in the eyes of anyone who has read history, is humanity’s original virtue. It is through disobedience that progress has been made, through disobedience and through rebellion.” — Oscar Wilde, Soul of Man Under Socialism “The free market is perfectly natural... do you think I am some kind of dummy?” — Jarvis Cocker _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Guardian: Greece Greece's rich: insulated against an EU exit
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * Greek CEOs joined the ranks of demonstrators fearful of departing the eurozone, but many of the country’s wealthy have already moved to cut their losses http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/25/greeces-rich-insulated-against-an-eu-exit _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Marxism] Fwd: Turning Oppressive Reality Into Great Art » CounterPunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names
POSTING RULES NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. * n 1956, when I was 11 years old, I saw my first Japanese film or more accurately a parody of a Japanese film shown on the Sid Caesar show. Called “U-Bet-U”, it was obviously a take-off on “Ugetsu Monogatari”, a 1953 film that along with “Rashomon” helped introduce Japanese films to American audiences. Three years later I saw the original at a special screening at my local high school one evening. My mother had heard that it was a masterpiece and brought me there to see an alternative to Martin and Lewis comedies and John Wayne westerns. I can’t say that I understood “Ugetsu” but it was my first inkling that a hipper world existed. The appearance of the SUNY New Paltz film professor who came there to introduce the film made more of an impression on me than the movie. With the suede patches on his tweed sports jacket and his closely cropped beard, he was the first bohemian I had ever laid eyes on. Fast forward two years later and I am a freshman at Bard deeply immersed in some of the greatest films I have ever seen, including masterpieces made by Akira Kurosawa who was in his prime. Ever since those days, Japanese films have remained the gold standard for me, joined in later years by those made in China and Korea. I was never quite convinced that Andre Gunder Frank’s “Re-Orient” was correct in its projections that the East would become a global hegemon just as it was before Europe’s rise in the 15th century, but when it comes to film, I need no convincing—most often after I have seen some of the films offered at the annual New York Asian Film Festival whose latest installment runs from June 26th to July 11th (http://www.subwaycinema.com/nyaff15/). The four films under review below should persuade anybody in the greater New York area to check the schedule and buy some tickets. If the term “race to the bottom” is most often associated with factories moving to Asia, suffice it to say that it is just as applicable to the current morass in a bottom-line oriented Hollywood. full: http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/06/26/turning-oppressive-realing-into-great-art/ _ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com