Re: [Marxism] Jeffery Webber and the "pink tide"

2017-04-27 Thread Louis Proyect via Marxism

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

On 4/27/17 12:35 PM, Michael Yates via Marxism wrote:

If it is true that Webber accuses Marta Harnecker of aiding and abetting a 
neoliberal con job in Latin America, then he has committed an unbelievable 
libel against a revolutionary writer and activist. We may disagree with Marta 
in one way or another. But, if true, this is beyond the pale.


I am working on an article now about Webber's book. He IMPLICITLY views 
Michael Lebowitz, Marta and anybody else who wrote positively about Hugo 
Chavez as an abettor. He is smart enough to credit Lebowitz as someone 
who viewed the mass movement as fundamental to change in Venezuela but 
the overall purpose of the book is to liken Chavez et al to Alex Tsipras.

_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


[Marxism] Jeffery Webber and the "pink tide"

2017-04-27 Thread Michael Yates via Marxism
  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

If it is true that Webber accuses Marta Harnecker of aiding and abetting a 
neoliberal con job in Latin America, then he has committed an unbelievable 
libel against a revolutionary writer and activist. We may disagree with Marta 
in one way or another. But, if true, this is beyond the pale.
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Jeffery Webber and the "pink tide"

2017-04-26 Thread Fred Murphy via Marxism
  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

Haven't read it yet but I heard Jeff speak on the same themes at NYU a
couple months back, and the Jacobin article is a good summary.  I concur
with Andrew's point - sorting out the gains and losses from the so-called
Pink Tide experience is a valuable contribution. Will await Lou's in-depth
article before I comment further.

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Louis Proyect via Marxism <
marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu> wrote:

>   POSTING RULES & NOTES  
> #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
> #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
> *
>
> On 4/26/17 1:32 PM, Andrew Pollack via Marxism wrote:
>
>> I've read about a third of the book and it's hardly the shrill told-you-so
>> caricature of Leninism which Louis makes it out to be.
>>
>
> As if the battle over control of Venezuela's state oil company in 2007 was
> between two neoliberal factions. Anyhow, I will be going into more depth
> tomorrow.
>
> _
> Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
> Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/opt
> ions/marxism/fred.r.murphy%40gmail.com
>
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Jeffery Webber and the "pink tide"

2017-04-26 Thread Louis Proyect via Marxism

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

On 4/26/17 1:32 PM, Andrew Pollack via Marxism wrote:

I've read about a third of the book and it's hardly the shrill told-you-so
caricature of Leninism which Louis makes it out to be.


As if the battle over control of Venezuela's state oil company in 2007 
was between two neoliberal factions. Anyhow, I will be going into more 
depth tomorrow.

_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Jeffery Webber and the "pink tide"

2017-04-26 Thread Andrew Pollack via Marxism
  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

Comrades should read this article by Jeffery "adapted from the book," as
Jacobin puts it.
I've read about a third of the book and it's hardly the shrill told-you-so
caricature of Leninism which Louis makes it out to be.
Rather, it's a mature, detailed demolition of the myths around the Pink
Tide, as well as an accurate assessment of the state of the various
movement and political forces, all of which IMO is a precursor to united
action.

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/04/lula-correa-rousseff-left-pink-tide/
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


[Marxism] Jeffery Webber and the "pink tide"

2017-04-26 Thread Louis Proyect via Marxism

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

Just finished Jeffery Webber's 300 page book on how the "pink tide" in 
Latin America was a neoliberal con job aided and abetted by Martha 
Harnecker. Will be writing something tomorrow for Counterpunch but will 
state at this point how sterile this exercise is. It reminds me of all 
those articles in the ISO press for the past 15 years based on 
interviews with Venezuelan "revolutionaries" who testified against the 
perfidy of the Chavistas. The problem is that pointing out the 
deficiencies of Morales, Chavez or Correa is relatively easy. The hard 
part is developing strategies that can lead to a socialist revolution 
and becoming part of an organized movement that can gain the allegiance 
of the masses. Whatever else you want to say about Morales, Chavez and 
Correa, they knew how to win people to their ideas. Unless the Marxist 
left can develop the same sort of abilities, it is next to useless. You 
should never forget that Lenin's polemics against the Mensheviks was 
only part of his legacy. For every article excoriating Martov, there 
were a dozen others with proposals on LEFT UNITY and STRATEGY. If you 
think that Leninism is the same thing as denouncing Morales for 
encouraging soybean farms in Bolivia, you really need to study Lenin 
more thoroughly.

_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com