Re: [Marxism] Vietnamese demonstrate against Chinese imperialism

2018-06-21 Thread RKOB via Marxism

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

Thanks for this thoughtful and convincing observations!


Am 20.06.2018 um 17:37 schrieb mkaradjis:

The CPV has built "some relations" with the US, yes, but this is
exaggerated. If you read these articles carefully you will note that
despite their dispute over the islands, Vietnam has also maintained
strong relations with China. As I explained, the anti-Chinese
opposition calls the CPV government "communist traitors" for allegedly
selling out to China, which on the islands question is an absurd
charge, because the CPV strongly pushes Vietnam's claim, only
insisting. correctly, that no blood should be spilt over the fate of
uninhabited islands. Therefore, the anti-China nationalist opposition
implies that they advocate war to push for Vietnam's sovereignty over
the islands; and this can only mean support for a stronger alliance
with the US, which the CPV rejects. I don;t mean the broad movement
described here, because as I said, it is of very mixed consciousness
and has a strongly progressive thrust, but I mean the more
ideologically right-wing nationalist spokespeople.

Vietnam's policy is one of balance between the US and China. But what
is often overlooked is that, as a counterweight to both, Vietnam has
actually built up very strong relations with Russia. Given the Putin
regime's reactionary role in the world, that is certainly no better
than an alliance with the US, but geography matters; Vietnam is not
Syria or Ukraine. Where Vietnam is, the main danger is not the US or
Russia, but the gigantic Empire hovering right above it, on its land
and sea borders. For those of us awed by China's astonishing growth
and its enormous projection of power, like the trillion-dollar ''Belt
and Road Initiative' traversing Eurasia, imagine being a small country
like Vietnam under its shadow, when the colossus has already attacked
several times in living memory and lays claim to the entire sea up to
your coastline. But given  its own history with the US, naturally
Vietnam wants to avoid falling too much under a US shadow, even if it
is currently less dangerous than China. A Russian tilt is therefore a
pragmatic choice. So it is Russia that Vietnam  offers to build its
first nuclear plant; it is Russia that has been offered the rights to
develop Cam Ranh Bay, the former American base in the south during the
war; it is Russia that has sold Vietnam advanced submarines with the
capacity to do damage to the Chinese navy should it become necessary.


--
Revolutionär-Kommunistische Organisation BEFREIUNG
(Österreichische Sektion der RCIT, www.thecommunists.net)
www.rkob.net
ak...@rkob.net
Tel./SMS/WhatsApp/Telegram: +43-650-4068314


---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Marxism] Vietnamese demonstrate against Chinese imperialism

2018-06-20 Thread mkaradjis via Marxism
  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 6:42 PM, RKOB via Marxism
 wrote:

> I know that that Vietnam's CPV regime has built some relations with the U.S.
> as a counterweight to China (what an irony of history!)
> Do you know what is the sentiment among those anti-regime, anti-Chinese,
> partly anti-communist sectors of the population towards such a "flirt" of
> the regime with the other old enemy?
>

The CPV has built "some relations" with the US, yes, but this is
exaggerated. If you read these articles carefully you will note that
despite their dispute over the islands, Vietnam has also maintained
strong relations with China. As I explained, the anti-Chinese
opposition calls the CPV government "communist traitors" for allegedly
selling out to China, which on the islands question is an absurd
charge, because the CPV strongly pushes Vietnam's claim, only
insisting. correctly, that no blood should be spilt over the fate of
uninhabited islands. Therefore, the anti-China nationalist opposition
implies that they advocate war to push for Vietnam's sovereignty over
the islands; and this can only mean support for a stronger alliance
with the US, which the CPV rejects. I don;t mean the broad movement
described here, because as I said, it is of very mixed consciousness
and has a strongly progressive thrust, but I mean the more
ideologically right-wing nationalist spokespeople.

Vietnam's policy is one of balance between the US and China. But what
is often overlooked is that, as a counterweight to both, Vietnam has
actually built up very strong relations with Russia. Given the Putin
regime's reactionary role in the world, that is certainly no better
than an alliance with the US, but geography matters; Vietnam is not
Syria or Ukraine. Where Vietnam is, the main danger is not the US or
Russia, but the gigantic Empire hovering right above it, on its land
and sea borders. For those of us awed by China's astonishing growth
and its enormous projection of power, like the trillion-dollar ''Belt
and Road Initiative' traversing Eurasia, imagine being a small country
like Vietnam under its shadow, when the colossus has already attacked
several times in living memory and lays claim to the entire sea up to
your coastline. But given  its own history with the US, naturally
Vietnam wants to avoid falling too much under a US shadow, even if it
is currently less dangerous than China. A Russian tilt is therefore a
pragmatic choice. So it is Russia that Vietnam  offers to build its
first nuclear plant; it is Russia that has been offered the rights to
develop Cam Ranh Bay, the former American base in the south during the
war; it is Russia that has sold Vietnam advanced submarines with the
capacity to do damage to the Chinese navy should it become necessary.
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Vietnamese demonstrate against Chinese imperialism

2018-06-20 Thread RKOB via Marxism

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

Thanks for these interesting remarks and observations!

I know that that Vietnam's CPV regime has built some relations with the 
U.S. as a counterweight to China (what an irony of history!)


Do you know what is the sentiment among those anti-regime, anti-Chinese, 
partly anti-communist sectors of the population towards such a "flirt" 
of the regime with the other old enemy?



Am 19.06.2018 um 14:01 schrieb mkaradjis:

That's a good article, and I agree with its main message, that this
movement against granting 99 year leases to SEZ's is much, much more
than mere "anti-China nationalism." At the same time, that element is
there. Here is another in-depth article that stresses the
nationalistic element more, but is well worth reading:
http://chuangcn.org/2018/06/vn-sez-sinophobia/

It's a rather complex mix: China is an emerging imperialist power (and
even those who disagree will see it as sub-imperialist, or at least
much closer to being imperialist than Vietnam!); its companies play a
dominant and very exploitative role in Vietnam; much of the anti-China
sentiment among workers targets Chinese - *and Taiwanese* - companies
whose factory regimes are considered significantly more exploitative
and militaristic than either those western MNCs (who can afford a
little better) or, significantly, than local Vietnamese companies;
while no-one should ever consider going to war over rocky islands in
the South China Sea, the fact that it is the local superpower, China,
claiming the entire sea as its own, right up the virtual sea borders
of Vietnam, and acting aggressively on it (eg including ramming
Vietnamese fishing boats and kidnapping dirt-poor Vietnamese
fisherfolk); all these aspects mean that there is a certain
progressive and anti-imperialist, even anti-capitalist, thrust to
Vietnamese nationalism.

On the other hand, there *is* an ugly chauvinism as well brewing
behind some of this. Of course, this may draw on valid historical
issues (China ruled Vietnam for 1000 years, invaded in 1979, violently
seized the Paracel Islands in 1974 while Vietnam was still at war,
violently seized one third of the Spratley Islands (killing dozens of
Vietnamese soldiers) in 1988) - but of course an overly "historical"
discourse is associated with reactionary ideas (exactly as it is in
China, all the drawing of maps from the Sung Dynasty of 1000 years ago
to try to "prove" ownership of rocky islands etc - why not thereby
prove ownership of Vietnam!). And here is the interesting thing: in
China, the reactionary nationalism over dominating the South China Sea
marches in step with the CCP regime, but in Vietnam the more overtly
nationalistic anti-Chinese discourse is ideologically anti-communist
and very anti-CPV: their key discourse is that the CPV are "communist
traitors" trying to sell out the country to China!

Now, this itself has different elements. In claiming the CPV want to
betray to China on the question of the rocky islands can only be seen
as a right-wing revanchist view, because the CPV very much pushes
Vietnam's (just, in my view) claim to the islands, but simply stresses
that no Vietnamese blood must be spilt over unpopulated islands. The
implication is, therefore, that the anti-communist nationalists
advocate war with China over the islands; and the only way that could
even possibly be conceived of would be via bringing in the US. On the
other hand, where this movement claims the CPV regime is selling out
to *Chinese capital* by granting foreign (presumably Chinese) MNCs
99-year leases over significant pieces of real estate, this does have
a progressive character, as do the objections to Chinese (and
Taiwanese) industrial thuggery and environmental vandalism.

Even the last can have a double character; the extent to which some
elements are more guided by nationalism could well mean objecting to
the leases *because* they are Chinese rather than objecting to such
imperialist control in general; but I think that is greatly
exaggerated: while the fact that the expected benefactors are Chinese
may well have given the movement extra impetus, now when people are in
motion against giving up chunks of their country to foreign-controlled
SEZ's, this will tend to push the movement in the direction of
opposing any such sell-outs. If you look at the photos of the
demonstrations, we mostly see '99' crossed out, rather than anti-China
slogans.

Still another aspect is that many of those protesting today are also
objecting to a new government cyber security law, increasing state
online surveillance. Again, this tends to get associated with what the
opposition sees as the government's "too pro-China" policy, and can 

Re: [Marxism] Vietnamese demonstrate against Chinese imperialism

2018-06-19 Thread mkaradjis via Marxism
  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

That's a good article, and I agree with its main message, that this
movement against granting 99 year leases to SEZ's is much, much more
than mere "anti-China nationalism." At the same time, that element is
there. Here is another in-depth article that stresses the
nationalistic element more, but is well worth reading:
http://chuangcn.org/2018/06/vn-sez-sinophobia/

It's a rather complex mix: China is an emerging imperialist power (and
even those who disagree will see it as sub-imperialist, or at least
much closer to being imperialist than Vietnam!); its companies play a
dominant and very exploitative role in Vietnam; much of the anti-China
sentiment among workers targets Chinese - *and Taiwanese* - companies
whose factory regimes are considered significantly more exploitative
and militaristic than either those western MNCs (who can afford a
little better) or, significantly, than local Vietnamese companies;
while no-one should ever consider going to war over rocky islands in
the South China Sea, the fact that it is the local superpower, China,
claiming the entire sea as its own, right up the virtual sea borders
of Vietnam, and acting aggressively on it (eg including ramming
Vietnamese fishing boats and kidnapping dirt-poor Vietnamese
fisherfolk); all these aspects mean that there is a certain
progressive and anti-imperialist, even anti-capitalist, thrust to
Vietnamese nationalism.

On the other hand, there *is* an ugly chauvinism as well brewing
behind some of this. Of course, this may draw on valid historical
issues (China ruled Vietnam for 1000 years, invaded in 1979, violently
seized the Paracel Islands in 1974 while Vietnam was still at war,
violently seized one third of the Spratley Islands (killing dozens of
Vietnamese soldiers) in 1988) - but of course an overly "historical"
discourse is associated with reactionary ideas (exactly as it is in
China, all the drawing of maps from the Sung Dynasty of 1000 years ago
to try to "prove" ownership of rocky islands etc - why not thereby
prove ownership of Vietnam!). And here is the interesting thing: in
China, the reactionary nationalism over dominating the South China Sea
marches in step with the CCP regime, but in Vietnam the more overtly
nationalistic anti-Chinese discourse is ideologically anti-communist
and very anti-CPV: their key discourse is that the CPV are "communist
traitors" trying to sell out the country to China!

Now, this itself has different elements. In claiming the CPV want to
betray to China on the question of the rocky islands can only be seen
as a right-wing revanchist view, because the CPV very much pushes
Vietnam's (just, in my view) claim to the islands, but simply stresses
that no Vietnamese blood must be spilt over unpopulated islands. The
implication is, therefore, that the anti-communist nationalists
advocate war with China over the islands; and the only way that could
even possibly be conceived of would be via bringing in the US. On the
other hand, where this movement claims the CPV regime is selling out
to *Chinese capital* by granting foreign (presumably Chinese) MNCs
99-year leases over significant pieces of real estate, this does have
a progressive character, as do the objections to Chinese (and
Taiwanese) industrial thuggery and environmental vandalism.

Even the last can have a double character; the extent to which some
elements are more guided by nationalism could well mean objecting to
the leases *because* they are Chinese rather than objecting to such
imperialist control in general; but I think that is greatly
exaggerated: while the fact that the expected benefactors are Chinese
may well have given the movement extra impetus, now when people are in
motion against giving up chunks of their country to foreign-controlled
SEZ's, this will tend to push the movement in the direction of
opposing any such sell-outs. If you look at the photos of the
demonstrations, we mostly see '99' crossed out, rather than anti-China
slogans.

Still another aspect is that many of those protesting today are also
objecting to a new government cyber security law, increasing state
online surveillance. Again, this tends to get associated with what the
opposition sees as the government's "too pro-China" policy, and can be
twisted in an anti-communist fashion. Not entirely justified given
that the CPV does not need to the CCP to tell it to act repressively;
but by any comparison, the Chinese regime is significantly more
repressive in virtually all aspects, as well as being more efficient
about it (especially at online repression).

In other words, many object to what they see as China's influence
being both too capitalistic and too 

Re: [Marxism] Vietnamese demonstrate against Chinese imperialism

2018-06-19 Thread RKOB via Marxism

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

Confirming the same trend

http://www.atimes.com/article/vietnam-protests-bigger-than-anti-china-nationalism/ 




Am 19.06.2018 um 04:28 schrieb mkaradjis via Marxism:

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

Vietnam protesters clash with police over new economic zones:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-44428971

Video of the demonstration in Saigon on Sunday 10 June 2018 to protest
against the proposed law to lease 3 special economic zones to Chinese
developers for 99 years:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XEc1iHzo6s=share
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/aktiv%40rkob.net



--
Revolutionär-Kommunistische Organisation BEFREIUNG
(Österreichische Sektion der RCIT, www.thecommunists.net)
www.rkob.net
ak...@rkob.net
Tel./SMS/WhatsApp/Telegram: +43-650-4068314



---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

[Marxism] Vietnamese demonstrate against Chinese imperialism

2018-06-18 Thread mkaradjis via Marxism
  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

Vietnam protesters clash with police over new economic zones:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-44428971

Video of the demonstration in Saigon on Sunday 10 June 2018 to protest
against the proposed law to lease 3 special economic zones to Chinese
developers for 99 years:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XEc1iHzo6s=share
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com