[Marxism-Thaxis] Paul Craig Roberts sees Marxism revivalVictor

2005-09-09 Thread Charles Brown
victor  :

Mr. Roberts should read some of this Marxist stuff.
In a developed state such as is the US (at least in theory in light of
recent events) the rate of profit is in a steady decline, first, by
replacement of productive labour by more developed, efficient? means of
production, and, second, by the rising costs of development in general.  The
decline in the sources of variable surplus value that characterises
developed industrial states forces them to look for new sources of the kind 
of surplus value that brings profits.  Cheap, well-trained Indian, Chinese,
Malayan labour is just what is needed to resuscitate the rate of profit for
serious capital enterprise.
Globalisation is exactly this process of transferring production from
expensive developed countries to cheap developing countries.  Need I add
that Marx told you so?

Victor


Victor,

Your analysis sounds good to me, but Roberts is also saying, in his own way,
that Marx told you so . But unlike u , Roberts is a rightwing ,
anti-Marxist, which makes it kind of noteworthy, no ?

Note the note at the beginning:

[Pretty remarkable column for a guy who was Assistant Secretary of the
 Treasury under Reagan.]

In the legal evidence, we call this a (sort of) declaration against
instance. When someone makes a statement that is against their own
interests, it is an indication of high veracity. Why would they lie about
something against their own interest, and in this case against his
ideological interest ?


Charles




- Original Message - 
From: Charles Brown cbrown at michiganlegal.org
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis 
To: 'Forum for the discussion of theoretical issues raised by Karl Marx 
andthe thinkers he inspired' marxism-thaxis at lists.econ.utah.edu
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis 
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 13:56
Subject: [Marxism-Thaxis] Paul Craig Roberts sees Marxism revival



 This is a forward from PEN-L

 CB

 ^


 * To: PEN-L at 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis  mailto:PEN-L
at DOMAIN.HIDDEN
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis 
 * Subject: Paul Craig Roberts sees Marxism revival
 * From: Carl Remick carlremick at xxx
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis 
 mailto:carlremick at DOMAIN.HIDDEN
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis  
 * Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 11:40:56 +

 

 [Pretty remarkable column for a guy who was Assistant Secretary of the
 Treasury under Reagan.]

 The Vicious Downward Cycle of the American Economy:
 Resurrecting Karl Marx

 By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS

 Libertarians and free trade economists don't realize it, but they are
 pulling Marx out of his grave


___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis


Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Paul Craig Roberts sees Marxism revivalVictor

2005-09-09 Thread Victor

CB
Your right on.  No arguments here.
Just finished reading Thompson's book Making of the English Working Class 
(origins of English working class consciousness from late 18th c. Jacobinism 
to the Reform movements of 1831-32).  It describes the critical period when 
mechanisation and the reorganization of labour transformed the medieval 
petty bourgeoisie (artisans, shop owners, and so on) along with what little 
remained of the poorer peasants into proletarians.  There are many parallels 
with the modern transition between nation based capitalist production and 
global capitalism; the importance of religion based solidarity for unity of 
the oppressed groups, the development of republicanist radicalism (the 
Jacobins in this case) associated with revolutionary developments, and so 
on.  It was a pretty wild period; lots of state suppression, lots of 
rebellions (some quite violent), and lots of switching around of positions 
both on the top and on the bottom (you can decide who belongs to which).


I agree with you that P C Roberts is hardly sympathetic to Marxian 
radicalism, but he certainly does sense the oncoming crisis. We shouldn't 
need him to tell us where we are going, but his statements are interesting 
because its an indication that certain conflicts within the ruling classes 
have reached a point where at least some partisans regard it necessary to 
expose the debates to the public.  Brook's recent commentary on the Bush 
administration is also relevant here.

Victor



- Original Message - 
From: Charles Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Forum for the discussion of theoretical issues raised by Karl Marx 
andthe thinkers he inspired' marxism-thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu

Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 23:52
Subject: [Marxism-Thaxis] Paul Craig Roberts sees Marxism revivalVictor



victor  :

Mr. Roberts should read some of this Marxist stuff.
In a developed state such as is the US (at least in theory in light of
recent events) the rate of profit is in a steady decline, first, by
replacement of productive labour by more developed, efficient? means of
production, and, second, by the rising costs of development in general. 
The

decline in the sources of variable surplus value that characterises
developed industrial states forces them to look for new sources of the 
kind
of surplus value that brings profits.  Cheap, well-trained Indian, 
Chinese,
Malayan labour is just what is needed to resuscitate the rate of profit 
for

serious capital enterprise.
Globalisation is exactly this process of transferring production from
expensive developed countries to cheap developing countries.  Need I 
add

that Marx told you so?

Victor


Victor,

Your analysis sounds good to me, but Roberts is also saying, in his own 
way,

that Marx told you so . But unlike u , Roberts is a rightwing ,
anti-Marxist, which makes it kind of noteworthy, no ?

Note the note at the beginning:

[Pretty remarkable column for a guy who was Assistant Secretary of the

Treasury under Reagan.]


In the legal evidence, we call this a (sort of) declaration against
instance. When someone makes a statement that is against their own
interests, it is an indication of high veracity. Why would they lie about
something against their own interest, and in this case against his
ideological interest ?


Charles




- Original Message - 
From: Charles Brown cbrown at michiganlegal.org

http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis 
To: 'Forum for the discussion of theoretical issues raised by Karl Marx
andthe thinkers he inspired' marxism-thaxis at lists.econ.utah.edu
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis 
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 13:56
Subject: [Marxism-Thaxis] Paul Craig Roberts sees Marxism revival




This is a forward from PEN-L

CB

^


* To: PEN-L at 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis 
mailto:PEN-L

at DOMAIN.HIDDEN
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis 

* Subject: Paul Craig Roberts sees Marxism revival
* From: Carl Remick carlremick at xxx

http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

mailto:carlremick at DOMAIN.HIDDEN

http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis  

* Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 11:40:56 +



[Pretty remarkable column for a guy who was Assistant Secretary of the
Treasury under Reagan.]

The Vicious Downward Cycle of the American Economy:
Resurrecting Karl Marx

By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS

Libertarians and free trade economists don't realize it, but they are
pulling Marx out of his grave



___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis





___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options