Re: [Matplotlib-users] [matplotlib-devel] pyplot functions: do you rely on the hold kwarg?

2015-06-19 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
 Matplotlib's pyplot retains quite a few vestiges from its original
 Matlab-workalike heritage; we would like to gradually eliminate those
 that no longer make sense.  One such candidate is the hold kwarg that
 every pyplot function has, with a True default.  I don't think it
 serves any useful purpose now, and getting rid of it would allow
 considerable simplification to the code and, to a lesser extent, the
 documentation.  The default behavior would not change, only the ability
 to change that behavior via either the rcParams['axes.hold'] parameter
 or the hold kwarg in a pyplot function call.

 If you routinely use 'hold=False' and believe that removing it would be
 a mistake, please let us know.

I do actually use it with some regularity interactively, though I'm
not particularly attached to it. Is there some equivalent though, like
   plt.whatever(..., hold=False)
can become
   plt.clear(); plt.whatever(...)
? The semantics would be that the current figure remains the current
figure, but is reset so that the next operation starts from scratch. I
notice that plt.clear() does not exist, but maybe it has another
spelling :-).

(Basically the use case here is getting something like the
edit-and-rerun-a-cell workflow, but when using a classic interactive
REPL rather than the ipython notebook -- so I have a specific plot
window up on my screen at a size and place where I can see it, and
maybe some other plots in other windows in the background somewhere,
and I want to quickly display different things into that window.)

-n

-- 
Nathaniel J. Smith -- http://vorpus.org

--
___
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users


Re: [Matplotlib-users] [matplotlib-devel] pyplot functions: do you rely on the hold kwarg?

2015-06-07 Thread Eric Firing
On 2015/06/07 12:05 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
 On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
 Matplotlib's pyplot retains quite a few vestiges from its original
 Matlab-workalike heritage; we would like to gradually eliminate those
 that no longer make sense.  One such candidate is the hold kwarg that
 every pyplot function has, with a True default.  I don't think it
 serves any useful purpose now, and getting rid of it would allow
 considerable simplification to the code and, to a lesser extent, the
 documentation.  The default behavior would not change, only the ability
 to change that behavior via either the rcParams['axes.hold'] parameter
 or the hold kwarg in a pyplot function call.

 If you routinely use 'hold=False' and believe that removing it would be
 a mistake, please let us know.

 I do actually use it with some regularity interactively, though I'm
 not particularly attached to it. Is there some equivalent though, like
 plt.whatever(..., hold=False)
 can become
 plt.clear(); plt.whatever(...)

It's exactly equivalent to:
plt.cla(); plt.whatever(...)

 ? The semantics would be that the current figure remains the current
 figure, but is reset so that the next operation starts from scratch. I
 notice that plt.clear() does not exist, but maybe it has another
 spelling :-).

There are two types of clear:
plt.clf()  # clear the current Figure
plt.cla()  # clear the current Axes

Eric


 (Basically the use case here is getting something like the
 edit-and-rerun-a-cell workflow, but when using a classic interactive
 REPL rather than the ipython notebook -- so I have a specific plot
 window up on my screen at a size and place where I can see it, and
 maybe some other plots in other windows in the background somewhere,
 and I want to quickly display different things into that window.)

 -n



--
___
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users