Re: [Mav-user] PROPOSAL: Move java packaging to net.sf.mav.*
Mike Moulton wrote: I'm all for a repackaging. While were at it, are there any other changes that have been lingering that could get incorporated into a new release. Personally there are a few things I have intended to look into. Most notably I want to add support for Xalan's XSLTC in the XSL transforms. So I'm +0.5 too :-) If Scott's on-board too, then I'd suggest that we make these types of changes first, make a 2.2.1 release, and then bring out 2.3 immediately thereafter with just the package change. This gives the community access to the latest code and the opportunity to migrate at their leisure. Meanwhile, I just pinged Anthon about my FormProc patch, which would clear the way to committing the opt-formproc extension. -Ted. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf [INVALID FOOTER]
Re: [Mav-user] PROPOSAL: Move java packaging to net.sf.mav.*
+1. I've been traveling through California the last few days. - Original Message - From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 12:52 PM Subject: Re: [Mav-user] PROPOSAL: Move java packaging to net.sf.mav.* Mike Moulton wrote: I'm all for a repackaging. While were at it, are there any other changes that have been lingering that could get incorporated into a new release. Personally there are a few things I have intended to look into. Most notably I want to add support for Xalan's XSLTC in the XSL transforms. So I'm +0.5 too :-) If Scott's on-board too, then I'd suggest that we make these types of changes first, make a 2.2.1 release, and then bring out 2.3 immediately thereafter with just the package change. This gives the community access to the latest code and the opportunity to migrate at their leisure. Meanwhile, I just pinged Anthon about my FormProc patch, which would clear the way to committing the opt-formproc extension. -Ted. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf [INVALID FOOTER] --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf [INVALID FOOTER]
Re: [Mav-user] PROPOSAL: Add Ted Husted as committer
I have to agree with Ted on this one. It is a little longer, but much clearer, when we use .opt. - Original Message - From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 12:55 PM Subject: Re: [Mav-user] PROPOSAL: Add Ted Husted as committer Schnitzer, Jeff wrote: How about getting rid of the opt and just have packages like this: net.sf.mav.formproc.* I'd suggest keeping the opt. It's helpful to clearly delineate the Maverick core from packages like this, which extend the Controller core for a specialized use. One of the nice things about Maverick is that it is quite clear where the core ends, and these other things begin. -Ted. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf [INVALID FOOTER] --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf [INVALID FOOTER]
