Re: [Merkaartor] Final(?) point release of 0.15 next Sunday
On 17 March 2010 22:20, Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote: BTW join operation does not work obvious. I select two roads and click Join. It joins these two roads and also joins the end of the first road to the point of joining. Could you send me a screenshot, please I have a way to duplicate this: Download this area: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=53.3794lon=-8.9711zoom=14layers=B000FTF Join way_28530421 (waterway=river) to way_28530422 (waterway=stream) The end of the stream (at Augcloggen) will be joined to to river, rather than the closest node. Note that if you reverse the direction of the stream, then the correct node will attach to the river. Regards, Nick ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor
Re: [Merkaartor] Final(?) point release of 0.15 next Sunday
Thanks for your input regarding the join ways problem. This is now solved in trunk and 0.15-fixes. - Chris - ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor
Re: [Merkaartor] Final(?) point release of 0.15 next Sunday
Hello Chris, I two times tried to add large object today (river). Two times application was crashed. I was drawing a real river instead of thin ribbon here http://osm.org/go/0izxlGL Merkaator v.0.15.2 (release) On 15 March 2010 14:51, Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote: Hi All, Just to inform you (especially the packagers) that I plan to make a point release of 0.15 next Sunday, with the latest fixes. Unless blockers or serious enough bugs surface, this should be the last 0.15 release. If you still have serious bugs under your hood and didn't dare to report them, please do it now ;-) - Chris - ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor -- Овдиенко Дмитрий e-mail: dmitriy.ovdie...@gmail.com skype: dmitriy.ovdie...@gmail.com mobile: +38050-1909731 ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor
Re: [Merkaartor] Final(?) point release of 0.15 next Sunday
Could you at least vaguely tell me what operation you were doing at crash time? (I assume you are using Windows, otherwise please provide a backtrace) I'm pretty sure it has little to do with the fact you were drawing a river ;-) - Chris - On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:36, Dmytro Ovdiienko dmitriy.ovdie...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Chris, I two times tried to add large object today (river). Two times application was crashed. I was drawing a real river instead of thin ribbon here http://osm.org/go/0izxlGL Merkaator v.0.15.2 (release) On 15 March 2010 14:51, Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote: Hi All, Just to inform you (especially the packagers) that I plan to make a point release of 0.15 next Sunday, with the latest fixes. Unless blockers or serious enough bugs surface, this should be the last 0.15 release. If you still have serious bugs under your hood and didn't dare to report them, please do it now ;-) - Chris - ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor -- Овдиенко Дмитрий e-mail: dmitriy.ovdie...@gmail.com skype: dmitriy.ovdie...@gmail.com mobile: +38050-1909731 ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor
Re: [Merkaartor] Final(?) point release of 0.15 next Sunday
I just commited a patch that remove feature destructors cleanups (that
shouldn't be necessary anymore) that lead to those closing-time
crashes.
Could you please test and check for adverse effects.
Thanks
- Chris -
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 16:44, Nick Burrett n...@sqrt.co.uk wrote:
On 15 March 2010 16:56, Alberto Malagoli albem...@gmail.com wrote:
ok thanks.. i'll try use merkaartor with gdb activated in the next days an
hope (or not!) to have a crash..
Here's an example crash:
2010-03-16T15:38:32 -- Ending Merkaartor 0.16-svn(20381M)
pure virtual method called
terminate called without an active exception
Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
[Switching to Thread 0xb522a6c0 (LWP 6948)]
0xb7ef2410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb7ef2410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1 0xb555f085 in raise () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#2 0xb5560a01 in abort () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#3 0xb576f480 in __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler () from
/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
#4 0xb576cd05 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
#5 0xb576cd42 in std::terminate () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
#6 0xb576d605 in __cxa_pure_virtual () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
#7 0x081d1d2b in Relation::boundingBox (this=0xb4156690) at
Features/Relation.cpp:125
#8 0x081cffed in Relation::remove (this=0xb4156690, Idx=48) at
Features/Relation.cpp:331
#9 0x081cd080 in Relation::remove (this=0xb4156690, F=0xb4245cf0) at
Features/Relation.cpp:340
#10 0x081cb6a5 in ~Feature (this=0xb4245cf0) at Features/Feature.cpp:166
#11 0x081e2106 in ~Way (this=0xb4245cf0) at Features/Way.cpp:111
#12 0xb594dd2c in QObjectPrivate::deleteChildren (this=0x8bcce00) at
kernel/qobject.cpp:1978
#13 0xb59536e1 in ~QObject (this=0x86d14f8) at kernel/qobject.cpp:975
#14 0x08213da2 in ~Layer (this=0x86d14f8) at Layers/Layer.cpp:93
#15 0x08214171 in ~DrawingLayer (this=0x86d14f8) at Layers/Layer.cpp:524
#16 0x08075cab in ~MapDocumentPrivate (this=0x882b810) at Document.cpp:41
#17 0x08070ad1 in ~Document (this=0x86e8900) at Document.cpp:77
#18 0x08149f12 in ~MainWindow (this=0xbff2c9f4) at MainWindow.cpp:361
#19 0x0813597e in main (argc=Cannot access memory at address 0x1b24
) at Main.cpp:230
(gdb)
(gdb) list 123
118 if (p-Members.size() == 0)
119 BBox = CoordBox(Coord(0,0),Coord(0,0));
120 else
121 {
122 CoordBox Clip;
123 bool haveFirst = false;
124 for (int i=0; ip-Members.size(); ++i)
125 if (p-Members[i].second
!p-Members[i].second-notEverythingDownloaded()
!CAST_RELATION(p-Members[i].second)) {
(gdb) print p-Members[15].second
$3 = (class Feature *) 0xb4245cf0
(gdb) print *p-Members[15].second
$4 = {QObject = {_vptr.QObject = 0x8345848, static staticMetaObject
= {d = {superdata = 0x0, stringdata = 0xb59edec0 QObject,
data = 0xb59edf60, extradata = 0xb5a633c0}}, d_ptr = {d =
0xb4245d20}, static staticQtMetaObject = {d = {superdata = 0x0,
stringdata = 0xb59f6c00 Qt, data = 0xb59fa220, extradata =
0x0}}}, static staticMetaObject = {d = {superdata = 0x8491950,
stringdata = 0x83457d0 Feature, data = 0x83457e0, extradata =
0x0}}, p = 0xb4245d78, BBox = {BottomLeft = {Lat = 0, Lon = 0},
TopRight = {Lat = 0, Lon = 0}}, MetaUpToDate = true, m_references = 0}
(gdb) print *this
$5 = {Feature = {QObject = {_vptr.QObject = 0x8345a68, static
staticMetaObject = {d = {superdata = 0x0,
stringdata = 0xb59edec0 QObject, data = 0xb59edf60,
extradata = 0xb5a633c0}}, d_ptr = {d = 0xb4156708},
static staticQtMetaObject = {d = {superdata = 0x0, stringdata =
0xb59f6c00 Qt, data = 0xb59fa220, extradata = 0x0}}},
static staticMetaObject = {d = {superdata = 0x8491950, stringdata
= 0x83457d0 Feature, data = 0x83457e0, extradata = 0x0}},
p = 0xb4156760, BBox = {BottomLeft = {Lat = 635195284, Lon =
-74652190}, TopRight = {Lat = 636325205, Lon = -73125199}},
MetaUpToDate = false, m_references = 0}, static staticMetaObject =
{d = {superdata = 0x83457c0, stringdata = 0x83459dc Relation,
data = 0x8345a00, extradata = 0x0}}, p = 0xb41567e0}
(gdb)
I haven't been able to exactly reproduce what causes this though.
Alberto
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Nick Burrett n...@sqrt.co.uk wrote:
On 15 March 2010 16:29, Alberto Malagoli albem...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
i'm using Merkaartor 0.15.2-svn(20388) on Linux Mint 8, and sometimes it
exits with a segmentation fault (catched from terminal).
quite always this happens after an upload, but also on other situations,
and
i don't know how to reproduce it.
is there a way to have a debug mode or the debug log? so i can post it
here..
Yes. Just build from source and then type:
gdb ./binaries/bin/merkaartor
(gdb) run
When it crashes, you can type:
(gdb) thread apply
Re: [Merkaartor] Final(?) point release of 0.15 next Sunday
Chris, Thanks for response. Yes. I'm using Windows version. First time I performed rollback of the area border joining. Second time I was drawing the borders of the river. I can provide you with memory dump if you will send me binary with debug information. BTW join operation does not work obvious. I select two roads and click Join. It joins these two roads and also joins the end of the first road to the point of joining. On 17 March 2010 19:36, Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote: Could you at least vaguely tell me what operation you were doing at crash time? (I assume you are using Windows, otherwise please provide a backtrace) I'm pretty sure it has little to do with the fact you were drawing a river ;-) - Chris - On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:36, Dmytro Ovdiienko dmitriy.ovdie...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Chris, I two times tried to add large object today (river). Two times application was crashed. I was drawing a real river instead of thin ribbon here http://osm.org/go/0izxlGL Merkaator v.0.15.2 (release) On 15 March 2010 14:51, Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote: Hi All, Just to inform you (especially the packagers) that I plan to make a point release of 0.15 next Sunday, with the latest fixes. Unless blockers or serious enough bugs surface, this should be the last 0.15 release. If you still have serious bugs under your hood and didn't dare to report them, please do it now ;-) - Chris - ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor -- Овдиенко Дмитрий e-mail: dmitriy.ovdie...@gmail.com skype: dmitriy.ovdie...@gmail.com mobile: +38050-1909731 ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor -- Овдиенко Дмитрий e-mail: dmitriy.ovdie...@gmail.com skype: dmitriy.ovdie...@gmail.com mobile: +38050-1909731 ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor
Re: [Merkaartor] Final(?) point release of 0.15 next Sunday
BTW join operation does not work obvious. I select two roads and click Join. It joins these two roads and also joins the end of the first road to the point of joining. Could you send me a screenshot, please ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor
Re: [Merkaartor] Final(?) point release of 0.15 next Sunday
Hmmm... I didn't know about the TAB key option. Well, here are some bugs to the TAB option now that I've tried it. 1. Pressing the TAB key once disables any sort of multiple selection until you restart the browser. 2. In separate move mode, TAB key cannot help in moving that node since the object to be moved is completely separate from the selected object(s) and the object that can be moved is the object that is highlighted near the mouse pointer. On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote: Did you try the TAB key? Selecting an object, then pressing TAB cycle the features around the point you clicked... - Chris - On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 14:36, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote: Well, I have this general problem of having a hard time selecting nodes if there are a lot of other objects layered along with it (such as ways that don't include the node or relation bounding boxes). What happens is that the occluding way or relation bounding box gets highlighted on hover and I sometimes have to move the mouse pointer very slowly or zoom in too much to be able to select the node. I haven't filed the bug in trac yet since I couldn't find a way to reproduce the problem consistently. It happens in both 0.14 and 0.15. On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote: Hi All, Just to inform you (especially the packagers) that I plan to make a point release of 0.15 next Sunday, with the latest fixes. Unless blockers or serious enough bugs surface, this should be the last 0.15 release. If you still have serious bugs under your hood and didn't dare to report them, please do it now ;-) - Chris - ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor -- http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor -- http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor
Re: [Merkaartor] Final(?) point release of 0.15 next Sunday
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.comwrote: Hmmm... I didn't know about the TAB key option. Well, here are some bugs to the TAB option now that I've tried it. 1. Pressing the TAB key once disables any sort of multiple selection until you restart the browser. browser should be Merkaartor. And related to the above bug, the TAB key destroys any existing multiple selection. 2. In separate move mode, TAB key cannot help in moving that node since the object to be moved is completely separate from the selected object(s) and the object that can be moved is the object that is highlighted near the mouse pointer. On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote: Did you try the TAB key? Selecting an object, then pressing TAB cycle the features around the point you clicked... - Chris - On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 14:36, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote: Well, I have this general problem of having a hard time selecting nodes if there are a lot of other objects layered along with it (such as ways that don't include the node or relation bounding boxes). What happens is that the occluding way or relation bounding box gets highlighted on hover and I sometimes have to move the mouse pointer very slowly or zoom in too much to be able to select the node. I haven't filed the bug in trac yet since I couldn't find a way to reproduce the problem consistently. It happens in both 0.14 and 0.15. On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote: Hi All, Just to inform you (especially the packagers) that I plan to make a point release of 0.15 next Sunday, with the latest fixes. Unless blockers or serious enough bugs surface, this should be the last 0.15 release. If you still have serious bugs under your hood and didn't dare to report them, please do it now ;-) - Chris - ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor
Re: [Merkaartor] Final(?) point release of 0.15 next Sunday
On 15 March 2010 16:56, Alberto Malagoli albem...@gmail.com wrote:
ok thanks.. i'll try use merkaartor with gdb activated in the next days an
hope (or not!) to have a crash..
Here's an example crash:
2010-03-16T15:38:32 -- Ending Merkaartor 0.16-svn(20381M)
pure virtual method called
terminate called without an active exception
Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
[Switching to Thread 0xb522a6c0 (LWP 6948)]
0xb7ef2410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb7ef2410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1 0xb555f085 in raise () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#2 0xb5560a01 in abort () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#3 0xb576f480 in __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler () from
/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
#4 0xb576cd05 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
#5 0xb576cd42 in std::terminate () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
#6 0xb576d605 in __cxa_pure_virtual () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
#7 0x081d1d2b in Relation::boundingBox (this=0xb4156690) at
Features/Relation.cpp:125
#8 0x081cffed in Relation::remove (this=0xb4156690, Idx=48) at
Features/Relation.cpp:331
#9 0x081cd080 in Relation::remove (this=0xb4156690, F=0xb4245cf0) at
Features/Relation.cpp:340
#10 0x081cb6a5 in ~Feature (this=0xb4245cf0) at Features/Feature.cpp:166
#11 0x081e2106 in ~Way (this=0xb4245cf0) at Features/Way.cpp:111
#12 0xb594dd2c in QObjectPrivate::deleteChildren (this=0x8bcce00) at
kernel/qobject.cpp:1978
#13 0xb59536e1 in ~QObject (this=0x86d14f8) at kernel/qobject.cpp:975
#14 0x08213da2 in ~Layer (this=0x86d14f8) at Layers/Layer.cpp:93
#15 0x08214171 in ~DrawingLayer (this=0x86d14f8) at Layers/Layer.cpp:524
#16 0x08075cab in ~MapDocumentPrivate (this=0x882b810) at Document.cpp:41
#17 0x08070ad1 in ~Document (this=0x86e8900) at Document.cpp:77
#18 0x08149f12 in ~MainWindow (this=0xbff2c9f4) at MainWindow.cpp:361
#19 0x0813597e in main (argc=Cannot access memory at address 0x1b24
) at Main.cpp:230
(gdb)
(gdb) list 123
118 if (p-Members.size() == 0)
119 BBox = CoordBox(Coord(0,0),Coord(0,0));
120 else
121 {
122 CoordBox Clip;
123 bool haveFirst = false;
124 for (int i=0; ip-Members.size(); ++i)
125 if (p-Members[i].second
!p-Members[i].second-notEverythingDownloaded()
!CAST_RELATION(p-Members[i].second)) {
(gdb) print p-Members[15].second
$3 = (class Feature *) 0xb4245cf0
(gdb) print *p-Members[15].second
$4 = {QObject = {_vptr.QObject = 0x8345848, static staticMetaObject
= {d = {superdata = 0x0, stringdata = 0xb59edec0 QObject,
data = 0xb59edf60, extradata = 0xb5a633c0}}, d_ptr = {d =
0xb4245d20}, static staticQtMetaObject = {d = {superdata = 0x0,
stringdata = 0xb59f6c00 Qt, data = 0xb59fa220, extradata =
0x0}}}, static staticMetaObject = {d = {superdata = 0x8491950,
stringdata = 0x83457d0 Feature, data = 0x83457e0, extradata =
0x0}}, p = 0xb4245d78, BBox = {BottomLeft = {Lat = 0, Lon = 0},
TopRight = {Lat = 0, Lon = 0}}, MetaUpToDate = true, m_references = 0}
(gdb) print *this
$5 = {Feature = {QObject = {_vptr.QObject = 0x8345a68, static
staticMetaObject = {d = {superdata = 0x0,
stringdata = 0xb59edec0 QObject, data = 0xb59edf60,
extradata = 0xb5a633c0}}, d_ptr = {d = 0xb4156708},
static staticQtMetaObject = {d = {superdata = 0x0, stringdata =
0xb59f6c00 Qt, data = 0xb59fa220, extradata = 0x0}}},
static staticMetaObject = {d = {superdata = 0x8491950, stringdata
= 0x83457d0 Feature, data = 0x83457e0, extradata = 0x0}},
p = 0xb4156760, BBox = {BottomLeft = {Lat = 635195284, Lon =
-74652190}, TopRight = {Lat = 636325205, Lon = -73125199}},
MetaUpToDate = false, m_references = 0}, static staticMetaObject =
{d = {superdata = 0x83457c0, stringdata = 0x83459dc Relation,
data = 0x8345a00, extradata = 0x0}}, p = 0xb41567e0}
(gdb)
I haven't been able to exactly reproduce what causes this though.
Alberto
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Nick Burrett n...@sqrt.co.uk wrote:
On 15 March 2010 16:29, Alberto Malagoli albem...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
i'm using Merkaartor 0.15.2-svn(20388) on Linux Mint 8, and sometimes it
exits with a segmentation fault (catched from terminal).
quite always this happens after an upload, but also on other situations,
and
i don't know how to reproduce it.
is there a way to have a debug mode or the debug log? so i can post it
here..
Yes. Just build from source and then type:
gdb ./binaries/bin/merkaartor
(gdb) run
When it crashes, you can type:
(gdb) thread apply all backtrace
Regards,
Nick
___
Merkaartor mailing list
Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor
___
Merkaartor mailing list
Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor
Re: [Merkaartor] Final(?) point release of 0.15 next Sunday
Well, I have this general problem of having a hard time selecting nodes if there are a lot of other objects layered along with it (such as ways that don't include the node or relation bounding boxes). What happens is that the occluding way or relation bounding box gets highlighted on hover and I sometimes have to move the mouse pointer very slowly or zoom in too much to be able to select the node. I haven't filed the bug in trac yet since I couldn't find a way to reproduce the problem consistently. It happens in both 0.14 and 0.15. On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote: Hi All, Just to inform you (especially the packagers) that I plan to make a point release of 0.15 next Sunday, with the latest fixes. Unless blockers or serious enough bugs surface, this should be the last 0.15 release. If you still have serious bugs under your hood and didn't dare to report them, please do it now ;-) - Chris - ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor -- http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor
Re: [Merkaartor] Final(?) point release of 0.15 next Sunday
Did you try the TAB key? Selecting an object, then pressing TAB cycle the features around the point you clicked... - Chris - On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 14:36, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote: Well, I have this general problem of having a hard time selecting nodes if there are a lot of other objects layered along with it (such as ways that don't include the node or relation bounding boxes). What happens is that the occluding way or relation bounding box gets highlighted on hover and I sometimes have to move the mouse pointer very slowly or zoom in too much to be able to select the node. I haven't filed the bug in trac yet since I couldn't find a way to reproduce the problem consistently. It happens in both 0.14 and 0.15. On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote: Hi All, Just to inform you (especially the packagers) that I plan to make a point release of 0.15 next Sunday, with the latest fixes. Unless blockers or serious enough bugs surface, this should be the last 0.15 release. If you still have serious bugs under your hood and didn't dare to report them, please do it now ;-) - Chris - ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor -- http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor
Re: [Merkaartor] Final(?) point release of 0.15 next Sunday
hi, i'm using Merkaartor 0.15.2-svn(20388) on Linux Mint 8, and sometimes it exits with a segmentation fault (catched from terminal). quite always this happens after an upload, but also on other situations, and i don't know how to reproduce it. is there a way to have a debug mode or the debug log? so i can post it here.. thanks ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor
Re: [Merkaartor] Final(?) point release of 0.15 next Sunday
On 15 March 2010 16:29, Alberto Malagoli albem...@gmail.com wrote: hi, i'm using Merkaartor 0.15.2-svn(20388) on Linux Mint 8, and sometimes it exits with a segmentation fault (catched from terminal). quite always this happens after an upload, but also on other situations, and i don't know how to reproduce it. is there a way to have a debug mode or the debug log? so i can post it here.. Yes. Just build from source and then type: gdb ./binaries/bin/merkaartor (gdb) run When it crashes, you can type: (gdb) thread apply all backtrace Regards, Nick ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor
Re: [Merkaartor] Final(?) point release of 0.15 next Sunday
ok thanks.. i'll try use merkaartor with gdb activated in the next days an hope (or not!) to have a crash.. Alberto On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Nick Burrett n...@sqrt.co.uk wrote: On 15 March 2010 16:29, Alberto Malagoli albem...@gmail.com wrote: hi, i'm using Merkaartor 0.15.2-svn(20388) on Linux Mint 8, and sometimes it exits with a segmentation fault (catched from terminal). quite always this happens after an upload, but also on other situations, and i don't know how to reproduce it. is there a way to have a debug mode or the debug log? so i can post it here.. Yes. Just build from source and then type: gdb ./binaries/bin/merkaartor (gdb) run When it crashes, you can type: (gdb) thread apply all backtrace Regards, Nick ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor ___ Merkaartor mailing list Merkaartor@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor
