Mersenne: Re: Mersenne Digest V1 #474

1998-11-30 Thread STL137

the PrimeNet list
Huh? What's that? Is there another PrimeNet list? If there is, please
point me
in the direction of how to sub scr-EYE-be. :-D
Thanks.
STL
(That word is spelled oddly up there so this mail doesn't get bounced. :-)



Mersenne: RE: Mersenne Digest V1 #474

1998-11-30 Thread Scott Kurowski

 p.s. Does this discussion really belong on the PrimeNet list rather
 than the mersenne list?

I agree.  I'm guessing few Mersenne list participants have a decided interest in
PrimeNet operations issues.  Perhaps it suffices to post a gentle reminder of
the PrimeNet list's address, as needed [EMAIL PROTECTED].


 Well, when I had thousands of new machines hitting Primenet back in May, it
 did cause problems...fortunately Scott got on the ball and got it going, and
 it was also related to the 5.2M+ problem, but there were also times (Scott,
 correct me if wrong) that Primenet was already maxed on connections and had
 to refuse other incoming connections.

Old news: Yup, PrimeNet saturated every 15 minutes or so.  It has a 64
concurrent clients limit, which normally never gets above 5 or 6, and nominally
hovered around 0.2 back then.  I recall something crazy like 20 clients/sec.

More old news: Aaron deployed an insufficiently tested first v16 NTPrime, which
misidentified itself as a v15 FFT client.  We got sloppy in the rush to get v16
done because the  5.26M exponents burned up *much* faster than anticipated.
(v16 Prime95 was well tested.)  Work had gone into the server's v16 assignments
code, assuming the v15 client base was a stable stream.  I ended up hacking the
server to catch and fix the misidentified packets.

(This is a good example of something for the primenet list.)

Regards,
scott




Mersenne: Double checked residues

1998-11-30 Thread Greg Hewgill

I was looking through the list of double checked exponents and their
residues (lucas_v.txt) and noticed four exponents near the bottom that only
had one listed residue:

5510339,tompete,Tom,WT1,1070460990F198F8
5704913,jhertel,hstar-sc,WT5,26CF19E736BD10DA
5704957,jhertel,hstar-wb,WT5,BFB8E1CF9DC6DE9C
5757253,jhertel,hstar-sv,WT5,E63F0DA56CB5B8E9

Why is this?

Greg Hewgill



Re: Mersenne: Double checked residues

1998-11-30 Thread George Woltman

At 07:56 AM 11/30/98 -0800, Greg Hewgill wrote:
I was looking through the list of double checked exponents and their
residues (lucas_v.txt) and noticed four exponents near the bottom that only
had one listed residue:

5510339,tompete,Tom,WT1,1070460990F198F8
5704913,jhertel,hstar-sc,WT5,26CF19E736BD10DA
5704957,jhertel,hstar-wb,WT5,BFB8E1CF9DC6DE9C
5757253,jhertel,hstar-sv,WT5,E63F0DA56CB5B8E9

Why is this?

A bug.  They were reported by the same user using two different computer Ids.
This was later detected and the duplicate removed.  I just fixed the program
that automatically moves items from the once tested to the double-checked
list to not do this if the same userid reported both residues.

Many thanks,
George