Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] Don't fail if libX11 isn't installed

2012-10-14 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi,

On 10 October 2012 01:07, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Oct 8, 2012 10:49 PM, Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com wrote:
 Wow, it's been like that since 2008.

 Reviewed-by: Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com

 Originally configure basically supported only GLX either through DRI or
 Xlib, so Xlib was basically required. Not so much nowadays.

 Reviewed-by: Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com

Thanks for the reviews - can someone please push this?

Cheers,
Daniel
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev


Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] Don't fail if libX11 isn't installed

2012-10-14 Thread Kenneth Graunke

On 10/14/2012 06:26 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:

Hi,

On 10 October 2012 01:07, Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com wrote:

On Oct 8, 2012 10:49 PM, Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com wrote:

Wow, it's been like that since 2008.

Reviewed-by: Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com


Originally configure basically supported only GLX either through DRI or
Xlib, so Xlib was basically required. Not so much nowadays.

Reviewed-by: Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com


Thanks for the reviews - can someone please push this?

Cheers,
Daniel


Pushed.  Sorry this got overlooked!

--Ken

___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev


Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] Don't fail if libX11 isn't installed

2012-10-09 Thread Dan Nicholson
On Oct 8, 2012 10:49 PM, Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
  configure.ac would previously refuse to complete if libX11 wasn't
  installed, even if we'd disabled GLX and weren't building an X11 EGL
  platform.  Make the check simply set the no_x variable that's used (but
  never set) immediately below for what looks like this very case.
 
  Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
  ---
   configure.ac |2 +-
   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
 
  diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
  index 72c2b8c..8b727c0 100644
  --- a/configure.ac
  +++ b/configure.ac
  @@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ if test x$enable_dri = xyes; then
   fi
 
   dnl Find out if X is available.
  -PKG_CHECK_MODULES([X11], [x11])
  +PKG_CHECK_MODULES([X11], [x11], [no_x=no], [no_x=yes])
 
   dnl Try to tell the user that the --x-* options are only used when
   dnl pkg-config is not available. This must be right after AC_PATH_XTRA.
  --
  1.7.10.4
 
  ___
  mesa-dev mailing list
  mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
  http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

 Wow, it's been like that since 2008.

 Reviewed-by: Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com

Originally configure basically supported only GLX either through DRI or
Xlib, so Xlib was basically required. Not so much nowadays.

Reviewed-by: Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev


[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] Don't fail if libX11 isn't installed

2012-10-08 Thread Daniel Stone
configure.ac would previously refuse to complete if libX11 wasn't
installed, even if we'd disabled GLX and weren't building an X11 EGL
platform.  Make the check simply set the no_x variable that's used (but
never set) immediately below for what looks like this very case.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
---
 configure.ac |2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 72c2b8c..8b727c0 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ if test x$enable_dri = xyes; then
 fi
 
 dnl Find out if X is available.
-PKG_CHECK_MODULES([X11], [x11])
+PKG_CHECK_MODULES([X11], [x11], [no_x=no], [no_x=yes])
 
 dnl Try to tell the user that the --x-* options are only used when
 dnl pkg-config is not available. This must be right after AC_PATH_XTRA.
-- 
1.7.10.4

___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev


Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] Don't fail if libX11 isn't installed

2012-10-08 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org wrote:
 configure.ac would previously refuse to complete if libX11 wasn't
 installed, even if we'd disabled GLX and weren't building an X11 EGL
 platform.  Make the check simply set the no_x variable that's used (but
 never set) immediately below for what looks like this very case.

 Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone dan...@fooishbar.org
 ---
  configure.ac |2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

 diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
 index 72c2b8c..8b727c0 100644
 --- a/configure.ac
 +++ b/configure.ac
 @@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ if test x$enable_dri = xyes; then
  fi

  dnl Find out if X is available.
 -PKG_CHECK_MODULES([X11], [x11])
 +PKG_CHECK_MODULES([X11], [x11], [no_x=no], [no_x=yes])

  dnl Try to tell the user that the --x-* options are only used when
  dnl pkg-config is not available. This must be right after AC_PATH_XTRA.
 --
 1.7.10.4

 ___
 mesa-dev mailing list
 mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Wow, it's been like that since 2008.

Reviewed-by: Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev