Re: Open-source version of LiveCode

2013-05-09 Thread FlexibleLearning.com

Bj?rnke von Gierke wrote: 

 On 09.05.2013, at 04:51, J. Landman Gay wrote:
  This list is pretty much deserted now. 
 
 I'm a tumbleweed!
 
 
 *wheee*


Me 3

Hugh Senior
FLCo

___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: Building MetaCard 6.0 OSS

2013-04-13 Thread FlexibleLearning.com
 On 04/13/2013 07:34 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
  On 4/13/13 8:12 AM, Richmond wrote:
  Having tried this using Jacque's tried and tested
  stack I got an error message on trying to open
  the new version of MC:
 
  object:  stack /.../.../MC6_OPEN/mchome.mc
 
  Line: 31  Column: 20  Processing Token:
 
  Richmond.
 
  The number of volunteers available to maintain the MC IDE is low. What
  do you need to do in MC that can't be done in LC?  Maybe there's a
  most cost-effective way to achieve your goal within LC.
 

 Nothing at all; but I still don't know why people climb Mount Everest :)

 Richmond.

I have to agree with Richmond. The non-impacting MC IDE works for me; the LC
IDE does not. I guess I shall have to await the commercial release of LC
(when my 3yr licence kicks in from kickStarter) to find out if we can
continue with our old friend in this brand new world. Meanwhile, I so most
sincerely hope we shall be able to maintain compatibility.

Hugh Senior
FLCo


___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard