[meteorite-list] cat mountain for classified NWA'S

2002-10-31 Thread Steve Arnold, Chicago!!!
Hello all. My last trade fell thru, so I'm offering this. My 4.4 gram cat
mountain slice for classified NWA's. I'm looking for at least 10 to 20
gram slices. The cat mountain worth is $660.00. Let me know. This is only
piece I'm trading this time.

steve arnold

=
Steve R.Arnold, Chicago, IL, 60120
I. M. C. A. MEMBER #6728
The Midwest Meteorite Collector!
Website url http://stormbringer60120.tripod.com

__
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



[meteorite-list] A Passing On

2002-10-31 Thread Jensan Scientifics/ Sci-Mall
Dear List Members,

I regret to inform you that my talented and amazing husband, David L.
Coleman passed away yesterday after a sudden stroke.  Davids talent went
beyond the scope of just loving science. With me he invented many
wonderful educational posters and geolgical study sets that changed the
way people at the sciences, such as astrogeology with our World Impact
Maps.

As most things are, his work will probably be more esteemed in death
than in his short life.

David was 48.

I will miss him terribly.

Sarah Kennedy-Coleman
Jensan Scientifics/ ScienceMall-USA

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] A Passing On

2002-10-31 Thread MARK BOSTICK
Hello Sharon,  Sorry to hear about your loss.While I have never personally met David, we have e-mailed a couple times and he seemed quite helpful and friendly. The posters you two made are very nice. Thank you and David, for your interest in our hobby.  Mark Bostick   - Original Message - From: Jensan Scientifics/ Sci-Mall Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 8:49 AM To: meteorite-list Subject: [meteorite-list] A Passing On Dear List Members,I regret to inform you that my talented and amazing husband, David L.Coleman passed away yesterday after a sudden stroke. Davids talent wentbeyond the scope of just loving science. With me he invented manywonderful educational posters and geolgical study sets that changed theway people at the sciences, such as astrogeology with our World ImpactMaps.As most things are, his work will probably be more esteemed in deaththan in his short life.David was 48.I will miss him terribly.Sarah Kennedy-ColemanJensan Scientifics/ ScienceMall-USA__Meteorite-list mailing list[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] A Passing On

2002-10-31 Thread John Gwilliam
Sarah,
I am saddened at the news of your husbands untimely death.  The 
contributions made to this world by your and David's efforts have made a 
profound impact on our scientific community, especially among the younger 
generations. Your work will live on in the great posters you have created.
Last Spring, one of my older daughters came home from college for a 
visit.  When she saw one of you Periodic Table in Earth and Sky posters on 
the wall in my office, she said that if science had been that cool when she 
was in high school she would have enjoyed it more and paid more attention.
My condolences to you Sarah, your collective family and friends.  Forty 
eight years is not nearly enough time for a creative mind to share his 
thoughts and dreams.

Best Regards,

John Gwilliam

At 08:29 AM 10/31/02 -0600, Jensan Scientifics/ Sci-Mall wrote:
Dear List Members,

I regret to inform you that my talented and amazing husband, David L.
Coleman passed away yesterday after a sudden stroke.  Davids talent went
beyond the scope of just loving science. With me he invented many
wonderful educational posters and geolgical study sets that changed the
way people at the sciences, such as astrogeology with our World Impact
Maps.

As most things are, his work will probably be more esteemed in death
than in his short life.

David was 48.

I will miss him terribly.

Sarah Kennedy-Coleman
Jensan Scientifics/ ScienceMall-USA

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



[meteorite-list] Happy Halloween Meteorite picture

2002-10-31 Thread Martin Horejsi
Happy Halloween!

http://aristotle.isu.edu/halloween.jpg

Martin


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] A Passing On

2002-10-31 Thread J. Fox
Dear Sarah,

My heart goes out to you, and I am so sorry for your loss.  Be assured
that those who knew David will continue to remember all that that he
did to bring his love of science to others.  We are all grateful for
his contributions to our lives, no matter how large or small they may
be, and we look forward to the continuation of this tradition through
your own efforts.

Sincerely,

Jon Fox

...Any man's death diminishes
me, because I am involved in mankind...

John Donne - 1573-1631



Jensan Scientifics/ Sci-Mall wrote:
 
 Dear List Members,
 
 I regret to inform you that my talented and amazing husband, David L.
 Coleman passed away yesterday after a sudden stroke.  Davids talent went
 beyond the scope of just loving science. With me he invented many
 wonderful educational posters and geolgical study sets that changed the
 way people at the sciences, such as astrogeology with our World Impact
 Maps.
 
 As most things are, his work will probably be more esteemed in death
 than in his short life.
 
 David was 48.
 
 I will miss him terribly.
 
 Sarah Kennedy-Coleman
 Jensan Scientifics/ ScienceMall-USA
 
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



[meteorite-list] Re: A Passing On

2002-10-31 Thread geoking
Dear Sarah:

I was terribly saddened by this morning's news about your husband -- 
and my friend -- Dave Coleman.

As Sarah knows, her husband and I worked on a series of web and 
photography projects together. Dave had a great scientific knowledge, 
and his friendly and jovial nature made him fun to be with, and to 
work with. We shared many a laugh by telephone and email.

Dave was a regular at meteorite-related social functions in Tucson, 
and elsewhere, and was well-liked and respected by the many members 
of the Meteorite List who were lucky enough to have know him. Dave 
was extremely knowledgeable about impact structures and didn't allow 
the fact that he needed crutches to get around, prevent him from 
doing field work: exploring craters, hunting for shattercones and so 
on, and I admired him immensely for that.

Last year, I sent Dave and Sarah some of my meteorite photographs for 
one of their Jensan Scientific projects. Dave was very taken with one 
Sikhote-Alin in my collection, and said it was the most oriented 
iron he'd ever seen. That particular piece has always been a great 
favorite of mine, so I was pleased that somebody else appreciated it. 
Jokingly, Dave said to me, Geoff, you should leave that Sikhote to 
me in your will. It was intended as a humorous comment, but Dave was 
so taken with the piece that I decided I actually would leave it to 
him. Unfortunately, I will now not have that opportunity.

Condolences to Sarah, Dave's family, and his many friends.

Sincerely,

Geoff Notkin

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Newspaper Article, 10-24-1897 Cape York

2002-10-31 Thread MARK BOSTICK
 Paper: New York Times  City: New York, NY Date: Sunday, October 24, 1897 Page: 5 DR. NANSEN IN NEW YORK The Norwegian Explorer in Welcomed by His Countrymen Here and by Americans HE TALKS ABOUT HIS PLANS The Geographical Society Gives a Reception in His Honor at Chickering Hall and the Cullum Medal Is Presented Him. Dr. Fridtjof Nanse, the Norwegian explorer, arrived in New York yesterday on the steamship Lucania, which was sighted off Fire Island at 1:40 P.M. at 4:30 PM the steamer Favorite, with the Nansen committee, composed of Scandinavians living in New York, went alongside and, amid cheers for the distinguished explorer, took him off and started with him back to the city. From the moment he went aboard the reception boat untill it reached West Thirty-fifth Street, Dr. Nansen was subjected to continuous congradulations at the hands of his countrymen. Karl G. M, Woxen, Consul for Norway and Sweden, made a speech in Norwegian, welcoming the explorer to America, to which Dr. Nansen responded in the same tougue. Prof. Libbev of Princeton delived a brief welcoming address, and Dr. Nansen replied in English, which he spoke with apparent case. Then a choral society sang Norwegian patriotic songs. The visitor was escorted to the Hotel Savoy, which will be his headquarters during his stay in New York. HE TALKS ABOUT ANDREE To the question, "Do you think Andree has been lost?" Dr. Nansen answered, "No, I don't think so. He may be lost, but there is no reason to assume so yet." "Do you think Andree's plan of reaching the pole by balloon possible." he has asked.  "Yes, it is possible," was his answer. Dr. Nansen was not impressed with Lieut. Preary's meteorite, about which so much has been said recently. "It is not a meteorite,"but merely telluric Iron, the same thing that Nordenskjold discovered." Concerning Peary's plan for reaching, the pole, he said he knew too little to express an opinion. As to his own plans, Dr. Nansen said he had none bearing arctic exploratio, "I have no idea of leading another expedition in search of the north pole." he said. "To the south pole? I do not know about that, I might possibly undertake some antarctic exploration at some time in the future, though I have no definite plans in that line now." Not After a Record. He said he did not expect to undertake the fixing of the northern boundary of Greenland, "though his former Captain, Sverdrup, was about to head an expedition for that purpose. "There is northing at the north pole to discover," said Dr. Hansen, "except a sea of ice. I have never taken any stock in the record-breaking business. In my recent expedition I was not striving to reach any precise mathematical point. My purpose was to explore the unknown arctic regions. In that I succeeded." "Would the discovery of the north pole be of any material use?" the explorer was asked. "Yes," he answered, "It would be of scientific use, and anything that is of value to science is of material value." Dr. Nansen is thirty-six years old, but looks younger. He is six feet tall, has light hair and mustache, blue eyes, and a fair complexion. When he appeared on the deck of the Lucania ready to come ashore he wore a tight-fitting double-breasted gray sack coat and a soft crush hat. At first glance he looked more like a big, healthy, sport-loving college boy that the world-famed scientist and explorer. There was an enthusiastic reception for Dr. Nansen in the evening at Chickering Hall, given by the American Geographical Society. The hall was filled with people, who rose to their feet and applauded the explorer as he came upon the platform. Lieut. Perry was there, as were Sergt. Long of the Greely expedition, and Capt. Brainerd, the partner of the ill-fated Lockword. Others on the platform were: Ex-Judge Charles P. Daly, President of the sociery; Paul du Challu, Henry Holt, ex-Judge Charles A. Peabody, Prof. J.H. Van Armringe, Gen. Egber. L Vicle, Capt. A.T. Mahan, Admiral Gherardi. Austen G. Fox, and Morris K. Jesup. Dr. Nansen was introduced by Judge Daly, who then presented to him the Cullum Geographical Medal, awarded by the council of the society. The metal bore the inscription; "Awarded to Frikijof Nansen for his voyage in the Fram and sledge journey on the Ice floes to 80 degrees 14 minues north. 1893-1896." After a lengthy presentation speech made by Judge Daly, Dr. Nansen expressed his thanks for the gift. "I more especially appreciate it," he said, in slightly broken English, "because it is given (to) me by nation which has had so many great explorers." He said he had not been aware that he was attend a meeting untill he stepped on shore, so that he was not prepared to make a long address.  The Object of His Trip "The main object of our expedition, "he said, "was to explore the polar region and make scientific observations on the way rather than the discovery of the pole. I believe that the deep sea, covered by a thin layer of ice, found all along our route, extends much further 

[meteorite-list] Newspaper Article, 04-18-1896 Cape York

2002-10-31 Thread MARK BOSTICK
 Paper: New York Times  City: New York City, NY.  Date: Saturday, April 18, 1896  Page: 1 Peary is Going North Again WASHINGTON, April 17. - The Navy Department is making a great mystery over its action in detaching Civil Enginer R. E. Peary from the Brooklyn Navy Yard and placing him on waiting orders. It was said yesterday that the order had been issued at Lieut. Peary's request, and that he gave no reason in his application. To-day, however, it was learned that Lieut. Peary contemplates another exploring expedition, and had so informed the department, but for some reason it was desired to keep this information secret.


[meteorite-list] Newspaper Article, 04-16-1897 Cape York

2002-10-31 Thread MARK BOSTICK
  New York Times New York City, NY. Friday, April 16, 1897 Page 7 LIEUT. PEARY'S NEW POST. Ordered to Mare Island - His Projected Polar Expedition May Be Affected. WASHINGTON, April 15. - The Navy Department is much exercised over an order to Lieut. Peary, the arctic explorer, to leave the New York navy yard and go to Mare Island, California. Lieut. Peary's friends and persons actively interested in polar explorations are raising a fund in New York to defray the expense of anotehr expedition to be conducted by Lieut. Peary into the far north. It is asserted that the detachment of the officer from New York now will involve the enterprise in failure. The Chief of Bureau of Yards and Docks is said to hold that the New York Navy Yard, which now employs four civil engineers can get along with three, wherefore it is proposed to sent Lieut. Peary to Mare Island. On the other side are the scientists urging Secretary Long to allow the officer to remain in New York for a time, and then to go on leave of obsence while conducting the polar expedition. The foregoing dispatch was show to Lieut. Peary last evening by a reporter from THE NEW YORK TIMES. "It is true." said the explorer, "that I have been ordered to Mare Island. The order can several days ago. But as to the other maters in the dispatch, I have no knowledge." Lieut. Peary refused to discuss further the efforts of his friends to keep him in Brooklyn or his plans for the immediate future. But he said that the funds to send out his expedition were assured. "I asked for $150,000 to equip an expedition for ten years," he said. "That sum is assured."


[meteorite-list] Meteor and Meteorite articles

2002-10-31 Thread MARK BOSTICK
Hello List and Eric,  I just sent a few more articles on Peary or the Cape York meteorite. The Cape York is one of my favorite irons and I will continue to try to find more papers that are related. I really enjoyed the chance to see the Cape Yorks on display at the AMNH.   I also wanted to thank Eric Hutton for sending me copies of his "Meteors and Meteorites: A Historic Archive of Articles, Books and Catalogues" CD's.Eric sent me free copies for my workin this field and I thank his for this act.I know from my own experience that Eric has put a lot of time and energy (not counting money) into these CD's and I appreciate the effort he has made. If you do not have them, you owe it to yourself to go to Martin Horejsi's link at the Meteorite Exchange and purchase them.   Thanks, Mark Bostick  


Re: [meteorite-list] A Passing On

2002-10-31 Thread Deborah Martin

Deepest sympathy for your loss.

Andre Bordeleau

At 09:04 AM 31/10/2002 -0600, you wrote:


- Original Message -
From: Jensan Scientifics/ Sci-Mall
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 8:49
AM
To: meteorite-list
Subject: [meteorite-list] A Passing On
 
Dear List Members,


I regret to inform you that my talented and amazing husband, David
L.
Coleman passed away yesterday after a sudden stroke. Davids
talent went
beyond the scope of just loving science. With me he invented many
wonderful educational posters and geolgical study sets that changed
the
way people at the sciences, such as astrogeology with our World
Impact
Maps.


As most things are, his work will probably be more esteemed in 
death
than in his short life.


David was 48.


I will miss him terribly.


Sarah Kennedy-Coleman
Jensan Scientifics/ ScienceMall-USA


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list






[meteorite-list] Halloween Asteroid (1997 XF11)

2002-10-31 Thread Ron Baalke

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2002/31oct_1997xf11.htm 
Halloween Asteroid
NASA Science News
October 31, 2002

Near-Earth asteroid 1997 XF11, which briefly scared astronomers five years
ago, passes by Earth again this week on Halloween.

Five years ago astronomers had a fright.

Jim Scotti, using the 36-inch Spacewatch telescope on Kitt Peak, spotted a
dim speck of light moving through the constellation Cancer. It was an
asteroid--dark, about 1 km wide, and it seemed to be heading for Earth. The
Minor Planet Center named it 1997 XF11.

Newspapers and magazines relayed the worst: 1997 XF11 might hit our planet
on Oct. 26, 2028. The impact, unleashing perhaps 2000 times more energy than
the most powerful nuclear weapon ever tested, would be a global catastrophe.

There is, however, an old amusement park proverb, Fear - Death = Fun. So
it proved for 1997 XF11. Additional measurements showed that the asteroid
would not hit Earth in 2028, although it will come close, about 2.5 lunar
distances (954,000 km) away.

A frisson of dread? Yes. A global catastrophe? No.

The asteroid moved away from Earth after 1997 and it has since been
generally forgotten. But the space rock hasn't really gone away. In fact,
it's back. 1997 XF11 is gliding by Earth today--on Halloween--for its
closest encounter until 2028.

On Oct. 31st, 1997 XF11 will pass 25 lunar distances (9.5 million km) from
Earth. It's closer than it was when it was discovered in 1997, says Jon
Giorgini, a member of JPL's Solar System Dynamics Group. There's nothing to
fear. On the contrary, astronomers welcome the encounter because it is a
good opportunity to study the asteroid up-close.

We started out knowing very little about this asteroid--only that it's
approximately 1 km wide. 1997 XF11 has been circling the Sun in total
anonymity for hundreds of millions of years. But now radar is revealing its
nature.

Giorgini is one of a team of astronomers led by JPL's Steve Ostro who are
pinging the asteroid using NASA's Goldstone radar in the Mojave desert.

The first radar measurement obtained last week, reports Giorgini, reduced
the uncertainty in the distance to the asteroid by a factor of 540 (from +/-
2210 miles to +/- 4 miles). We can now reliably predict Earth encounters for
an additional 107 years into the future--to the year 2209. There is no risk
of 1997 XF11 hitting Earth during that time.

The orbit of 1997 XF11 carries it from a point near the orbit of Venus out
to the asteroid belt and back again. One complete trip around the Sun takes
1.73 years. These frequent visits to the inner solar system make 1997 XF11
harder to predict than some other asteroids.

1997 XF11 has many encounters with Earth and Venus through the years, says
Giorgini. Gravitational nudges from the two planets perturb the asteroid's
orbit. For other asteroids one might obtain several centuries of
predictability from a single radar measurement, but for 1997 XF11 our
knowledge of its position is more quickly 'blurred.' The more radar data we
get ... the better, he says.

Giorgini and colleagues will continue observing through November. Radar data
accumulated over a period of time, says Giorgini, can be used not only to
measure orbits but also to create 3-dimensional maps of asteroids. Some have
weird forms: 216 Kleopatra, for example, looks like a dog bone. Learning the
shapes of asteroids helps scientists understand how they're put
together--valuable information in case we ever need to deflect one or blow
it apart.

Most asteroids (1997 XF11 included) are as dark as charcoal. They shine only
because they reflect a few percent of the sunlight that hits them. When 1997
XF11 is closest to Earth today, it will glow like a 13th magnitude star--too
faint to see with the unaided eye or even binoculars.

Nevertheless amateur astronomers using 10 telescopes and CCD cameras will
be able to detect 1997 XF11 as it glides through the constellation
Capricornus. Optical observations, notes Giorgini, can tell us a great deal
about the asteroid's rotation period and mineral composition. In 2028, when
1997 XF11 is only 2.5 lunar distances from Earth, optical telescopes will
play a greater role in its study. The asteroid will brighten to 8th
magnitude, which is within reach of binoculars.

There's still much to learn. One thing, however, is already clear: we're
safe from 1997 XF11 for at least another 200 years. This Halloween asteroid
is not so scary after all.

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



[meteorite-list] NWA482 Total Weight?

2002-10-31 Thread MARK BOSTICK
Hello list,  I am curiouswhen the lunar meteorite NWA482 was being offered around morocco it was 1278 grams and not 1015 as later reported. Most of us thought it was a eucrite and the asking price of $10.00 was too much, ala over $10,000. (Wish I would have known its real origin then). Anywaywhat happened to the other 250 grams? Was this cut off in Morocco and if so where is it now. A few small pieces were cut off in Morocco but what appeared missing was small enough that several photo angles could be taken and you not see the window or windows.   So either, there is two NWA482 stones, 250 grams got lost?, or the moroccans have a very bad scale. Does anyone else know more about this?  Mark


[meteorite-list] Tunguska Meteorite Fragments Must Be in a Different Place

2002-10-31 Thread Ron Baalke


http://english.pravda.ru/main/2002/10/31/38941.html  

Tunguska Meteorite Fragments Must Be in a Different Place
Pravda
October 31, 2002

Professor of physical chemistry from the Altay State University Vladislav
Batenkov thinks that traces of the Tunguska meteorite should not have been
searched for not directly under the meteorite's course, but rather in the
opposite direction.

Professor Batenkov graduated from the Chemistry Department of Tomsk State
University; he currently deals with transistor electrochemistry. He has
published several substantial monographs. Vladislav Batenkov is the creator
of 14 inventions. The professor said in an interview to the newspaper
Altayskaya Pravda: The mystery of the Tunguska meteorite can be solved with
the help of the physicochemical properties of water. The explanation is
based upon water's ability to decompose in oxygen and hydrogen at
temperatures of over 1000 degrees centigrade. At the temperature of 5000
degrees centigrade, the decomposition occurs with detonation. When the
temperature of the oxygen and hydrogen (the detonating mixture) drops below
1000 degrees centigrade, water is generated again together with the
detonation.

Calculations have revealed that total amount of heat necessary to turn 1 kg
of meteorite ice into decomposition products (warming of ice, ice melting,
water heating, water evaporation, heating of the steam, and decomposition of
water vapor) is about 30.000 kilojoule per one kilogram. The quantity of
heat exuded at the deceleration of a one-kilogram meteorite to the zero
speed will be equal to its initial kinetic energy. Let's assume that the
speed at which the meteorite hits the Earth is 20 km per second. Then, the
quantity of heat exuded at the deceleration will be about 200.000 kilojoule
per kilogram. This is seven times more than necessary for melting, heating,
evaporation, and decomposition of water for the initial components.

However, not the whole quantity of heat will be spent on the water's
decomposition; a considerable quantity of heat will quickly disperse in the
atmosphere because of the high difference between the temperatures and the
meteorite's high speed in the atmosphere. Obviously, only the front part of
the meteorite has all the conditions necessary for an increase of the
pressure and temperature enough for water decomposition.

So, the falling of the Tunguska meteorite was as follows. A huge chunk of
ice entered the atmosphere at an acute angle, and then it started
decelerating increasing in temperature. There is evidence proving that the
meteorite's glow was first noticed near the city of Vladivostok, and the
meteorite's deceleration was registered at 4,000 kilometers, near the
Podkamennaya Tunguska River basin. The ice chunk increased in temperature
along the way, especially the front of the meteorite. The meteorite started
splitting into separate fragments. That is why several differently glowing
objects could have been observed by the end of the deceleration. By that
moment, the gases reached a maximum compression, and fragments of the
meteorite increased in temperature to several thousand degrees. At the end
of the motion, the clouds of water decomposition products (detonating gas)
compressed as a result of the fragments' deceleration and increase in
temperature and detonated in the atmosphere after quick expansion and
cooling. Forest fires and concentric forest falls were the consequences of
the detonation. Dust particles melted and fell down in the form of small
beads. It is likely that when the gas detonated, some tail-end parts of the
ice lump were cast away in a different, south-east direction. Thus, the
remains of the meteorite should have been searched for not along the
meteorites course, but in the opposite direction.

Professor Vladislav Batenkov can provide calculations proving his
hypothesis. He stresses that the Tunguska meteorite mystery hasn't been
explained yet with water decomposition into components and explosion of
detonating gas. According to the professor, it is difficult to determine the
total scale of the meteorite's impact upon the atmosphere of the Earth,
because the initial mass of the meteorite and the speed at which it hit the
planet are unknown. If we assume that the speed was 20 kilometers per second
and consider an awful explosion equal to two thousands Hiroshimas, we can
estimate the mass of the Tunguska meteorite. According to Batenkov's
calculations, the mass of the meteorite made up 40,000 tons.

Translated by Maria Gousseva

Read the original in Russian:
http://science.pravda.ru/science/2002/6/20/56/2229_meteorit.html

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



[meteorite-list] Re: Tunguska Meteorite Fragments Must Be in a Different Place

2002-10-31 Thread Ron Baalke
Dust grains from the Tunguska event were found trapped in
tree sap.  The analysis of the dust grains showed they were
stony chondrites.  I remember reading out this in a
Sky  Telescope article.

Ron Baalke

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] A Passing On

2002-10-31 Thread Bernd Pauli HD
 I regret to inform you that my talented and amazing husband,
 David L. Coleman passed away yesterday after a sudden stroke.


Dear Sarah,

I am deeply saddened and shocked to hear of Dave's passing away
at such a young age. Shocked because, unfortunately I can relate.
Some list members will remember that my wife suffered and luckily
survived such a stroke in summer 1999.

On Wednesday, 30 January 2002, your beloved husband wrote these words:

 Sarah and I are people for whom study, dreaming,
 application and effort lead to excellence, which
 is the reward

These words describe Dave best !!!

We will cherish his memory and keep him in our hearts!

Pauline and Bernd

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] A Passing On

2002-10-31 Thread Michael Farmer
Sorry to hear about your loss Sarah, I thought that he was a very nice guy
and was happy to meet him the few times I did.
He wil be fondly remembered by all who know him.
God Bless

Mike Farmer
- Original Message -
From: Jensan Scientifics/ Sci-Mall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:29 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] A Passing On


 Dear List Members,

 I regret to inform you that my talented and amazing husband, David L.
 Coleman passed away yesterday after a sudden stroke.  Davids talent went
 beyond the scope of just loving science. With me he invented many
 wonderful educational posters and geolgical study sets that changed the
 way people at the sciences, such as astrogeology with our World Impact
 Maps.

 As most things are, his work will probably be more esteemed in death
 than in his short life.

 David was 48.

 I will miss him terribly.

 Sarah Kennedy-Coleman
 Jensan Scientifics/ ScienceMall-USA

 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] NWA482 Total Weight?

2002-10-31 Thread Michael Farmer



Wow Mark, you sure know alot for having been selling 
nothing but Penthouse porno mags back then. How did you see it if you have never 
been to Africa? That would be a neat trick. I have a sworn statement as to the 
weight by the man who sold it to Jim and I, sworn in front of the police in Er 
Rachidia Province of Morocco, filed in Rabat, Er Rachidia, and Erfoud. I have 
made a scan of this and will post it in a few hours to anyone who would like to 
see it. 
Mark, we all know that the rumors flew after the purchase 
of that rock, all coming from other dealers, most in Europe, who did not see or 
buy the stone, but needless to say, were not happy by Jim and I swooping in and 
buying up the second largest lunar meteorite ever found right from under their 
noses. Sounds like sour grapes to me. The Hupes are now trying to corner the 
market in Morocco, as they arrived there last Friday night as I was leaving 
Africa. In doing so, they are now it seems, trying to spread some dissent among 
my suppliers and customers. I hope they decide to call me ASAP while on their 
way back to Seattle, before I have to let out a little more damaging information 
tonight.
Mark, you and Dean need to get help, show us all your 
passport that shows you were in Morocco before Jan 2001, Ill bet you cant can 
you? It is easy to scan or photograph, if you cant, then I suggest you not lie 
about any knowledge of things like that. It could get you into heavy legal 
trouble. 
Mike Farmer


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  MARK 
  BOSTICK 
  To: Meteorite List 
  Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:26 
  AM
  Subject: [meteorite-list] NWA482 Total 
  Weight?
  
  Hello list,
  
  I am curiouswhen the lunar meteorite NWA482 was being offered around 
  morocco it was 1278 grams and not 1015 as later reported. Most of 
  us thought it was a eucrite and the asking price of $10.00 was too much, ala 
  over $10,000. (Wish I would have known its real origin then). 
  Anywaywhat happened to the other 250 grams? Was this cut off in 
  Morocco and if so where is it now. A few small pieces were cut off in 
  Morocco but what appeared missing was small enough that several photo angles 
  could be taken and you not see the window or windows. 
  
  So either, there is two NWA482 stones, 250 grams got lost?, or the 
  moroccans have a very bad scale. Does anyone else know more about 
  this?
  
  Mark


Re: [meteorite-list] NWA482 Total Weight?

2002-10-31 Thread Bernd Pauli HD
 before I have to let out a little
 more damaging information tonight.

Please, don't. It does not quite fit into the sympathies
and condolences we are expressing for the sad loss of
another list member.

Bernd

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] A Passing On

2002-10-31 Thread MuseumStore/NatureSource
Hello Sarah,
I was so saddened to hear of your loss.  I look with amazement and
appreciation every day at my Periodic Table in Earth and Sky.  It was
obviously a labor of love.

Each day I will look at it and hope you are finding strength and doing as
well as can be expected.  My thoughts and prayers are with you during this
incredibly difficult time.

With deepest sympathy
Jeanne Devon



-Original Message-
From: Jensan Scientifics/ Sci-Mall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, October 31, 2002 5:39 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] A Passing On


Dear List Members,

I regret to inform you that my talented and amazing husband, David L.
Coleman passed away yesterday after a sudden stroke.  Davids talent went
beyond the scope of just loving science. With me he invented many
wonderful educational posters and geolgical study sets that changed the
way people at the sciences, such as astrogeology with our World Impact
Maps.

As most things are, his work will probably be more esteemed in death
than in his short life.

David was 48.

I will miss him terribly.

Sarah Kennedy-Coleman
Jensan Scientifics/ ScienceMall-USA

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] NWA482 Total Weight?

2002-10-31 Thread Michael Farmer
I certainly agree with you Bernd, Sarah's loss is a tragedy, and rocks in
the big scheme of things, mean nothing. But you must admit, what Mark posted
was a huge attack at my integrity? If you think that can be ignored like all
the other useless attacks, you are mistaken. I take no pleasure in posting
this to the list, but If you go back over the years, you will NEVER find a
post from me so much as hinting at any animosity towards Mark Bostick. Why
he hit me today is beyond my comprehension.
Mike Farmer
- Original Message -
From: Bernd Pauli HD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: MARK BOSTICK [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Meteorite List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA482 Total Weight?


  before I have to let out a little
  more damaging information tonight.

 Please, don't. It does not quite fit into the sympathies
 and condolences we are expressing for the sad loss of
 another list member.

 Bernd



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



[meteorite-list] Esterville For Sale

2002-10-31 Thread Rob Wesel
The last trade did not fall through, it was cancelled by Mr. Arnold at the
11th hour. Might I suggest to the list that you take great care in
attempting to deal with this individual. Seems now that I have a 74.8 gram
piece of Esterville and no buyer. I will offer it to anyone interested for
$8 per gram.
http://photos.yahoo.com/bc/robandcolleen11197/lst?.dir=/Esterville.view=t
--
Rob Wesel
--
We are the music makers...and we are the dreamers of the dreams.
Willy Wonka, 1971






- Original Message -
From: Steve Arnold, Chicago!!! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 5:31 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] cat mountain for classified NWA'S


 Hello all. My last trade fell thru, so I'm offering this. My 4.4 gram cat
 mountain slice for classified NWA's. I'm looking for at least 10 to 20
 gram slices. The cat mountain worth is $660.00. Let me know. This is only
 piece I'm trading this time.

 steve arnold

 =
 Steve R.Arnold, Chicago, IL, 60120
 I. M. C. A. MEMBER #6728
 The Midwest Meteorite Collector!
 Website url http://stormbringer60120.tripod.com



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] Mystery

2002-10-31 Thread Michael L Blood
Hi Steve,
I have it on good authority a monitor cannot display finer than 72
dpi. However, you can SET the dpi to anything - and apparently, 300 dpi
is a good print level IF you are printing - but totally unnecessary for
web viewing and increasing the dpi WOULD increase download time.
In my instance, it was gif vs. jpg only. JPG is much faster.
Someone may know how high is best for printing, but I always assumed
it was the highest dpi obtainable.
Best wishes, Michael

on 10/30/02 6:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Michael and List,
 
 I'm not sure if this will help you or not. The photograph portion of the
 software I use (PhotoStudio 2000) for my meteorite website gave me the option
 of scanning photographs anywhere from a 75dpi resolution to 2400dpi
 resolution. I initially scanned the photos at about 600dpi. Little did I
 realize until I tried opening the website that it took many minutes for all
 of the pics to display. Needless to say at 600dpi, the images took up a
 tremendous amount of real estate. I re-scanned all of the pics again at
 75dpi, and there was really no discernible difference in picture quality. The
 pics loaded up at least 6-7 times as fast,  the website was much quicker to
 display...all was right with the world.
 
 Now, I don't a thing about digital cameras but I would surmise that if the
 cameras allowed the operator to determine the dpi / resolution, a lower
 resolution might work as long as it does not affect the image quality. Anyone
 else with a thought on this?
 My two dpi worth... ;-)
 
 Steven L. Sachs

Whenever I feel blue, I start breathing again.
--
Worth Seeing:
-  Earth at night from satelite:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0011/earthlights_dmsp_big.jpg
-Earth - variety of choices:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/earthview/vplanet.html
--
COLLEGE MONEY
CLICK HERE to search
600,000 scholarships!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/iZp8OC/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/jFYolB/TM
--
Michael Blood Meteorites  Didgeridoos for sale at:
http://www.michaelbloodmeteorites.com/




__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



[meteorite-list] Etching Portales Valley

2002-10-31 Thread Herbert Raab

Hello List,

I have a nice 16.4g complete slice of Portales Valley with some large 
metal veins and fusion crust. Now I am thinkling about etching the slice 
to bring out the Widmanstäten pattern in the metal. Is there anything 
special I need to care about when etching Portales Valley?

I have etched several of my iron meteorites, and even a large iron nodule 
in my 28g slice from the Estherville mesosiderite. But I have never etched 
a ordinary chondrite, so I though I rather ask...

Would the experts on this list also recommend to lacquer the slice after 
etching? My slice is currently not covered with lacquer, and there is not 
the slightest amount of rust visible now. But can the acid make the iron 
start to rust? Is there any danger that the nitol used for etching or the 
alcohol used for cleaning the specimen would destroy the thin fusion crust?

Thanks for your help,

  Herbert Raab
  Linz, Austria

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] NWA482 Total Weight?

2002-10-31 Thread MARK BOSTICK
Clam down a little Mike. Sorry, if you seen that as an attack against you Mike, it was just something I have wondered about for a while, something I have heard others wonder about as well...so I asked. I have no problem with you or Strope and I think you two have done a great jobon getting many of these African meteorite classified.Something we are all greatfull for.  The fact is however, the stone was offered to most of the people that deal in moroccan meteorites and it was reportably 1278 grams. I do not know anything about the deal you and the Hupes had in morocco and I do not claim to know. Also, I have not claimed to have been to morrocco before Jan. 2001, just that I was offered the stone, as was most of the people that have purchased meteorites from morocco were offered the stone and thatI was told itwas 1278 grams.Believe it or not, you do not have to go to Morocco to purchase from there. I do not know anything about troubles you and European dealers have had and I do not think that has anything to do with me. I have sold some penthouses on eBay, like the issue with Marilyn Monroes photos, but to say that Penthouse is all I was selling a year ago is quite far fetched.  I have met the Hupes on a couple occasions now and have e-mailed with them several times. I have purchasedfrom them and sold to them.They are probley the two most people excited by African meteorites and have put a lot of time, effort and money into their finds, the hobby is better off with them around I believe. When I first arrived at Blaine Reed's room in Denver, Adam took out his latest Mars rock and placed it in my hand. Being the largest piece of Mars I have ever touched I thought that was pretty cool.   NWA482is a very nice meteorite and most of your investors are quite happy so I think you can consider that a success. I purchased a 0.170 gram piece from Jim Strope many months ago and am quite happy with it. It has a glass vein and a bump on the crust from a flow line, what more could you ask for in a small specimen?  Not sure of any legal trouble I could get into asking a question and saying what I was told before you even had the stone. Unlike you own e-mail, I did not mention any dealer or person in a negative way. This ispossibly anerror or a misleading on a moroccan dealers part, however I do not feel wrong is asking from more information.  Mark Bostick  - Original Message - From: Michael Farmer Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 1:05 PM To: MARK BOSTICK; Meteorite List Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA482 Total Weight? Wow Mark, you sure know alot for having been selling nothing but Penthouse porno mags back then. How did you see it if you have never been to Africa? That would be a neat trick. I have a sworn statement as to the weight by the man who sold it to Jim and I, sworn in front of the police in Er Rachidia Province of Morocco, filed in Rabat, Er Rachidia, and Erfoud. I have made a scan of this and will post it in a few hours to anyone who would like to see it.  Mark, we all know that the rumors flew after the purchase of that rock, all coming from other dealers, most in Europe, who did not see or buy the stone, but needless to say, were not happy by Jim and I swooping in and buying up the second largest lunar meteorite ever found right from under their noses. Sounds like sour grapes to me. The Hupes are now trying to corner the market in Morocco, as they arrived there last Friday night as I was leaving Africa. In doing so, they are now it seems, trying to spread some dissent among my suppliers and customers. I hope they decide to call me ASAP while on their way back to Seattle, before I have to let out a little more damaging information tonight. Mark, you and Dean need to get help, show us all your passport that shows you were in Morocco before Jan 2001, Ill bet you cant can you? It is easy to scan or photograph, if you cant, then I suggest you not lie about any knowledge of things like that. It could get you into heavy legal trouble.  Mike Farmer   - Original Message -  From: MARK BOSTICK  To: Meteorite List  Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:26 AM Subject: [meteorite-list] NWA482 Total Weight?  Hello list,  I am curiouswhen the lunar meteorite NWA482 was being offered around morocco it was 1278 grams and not 1015 as later reported. Most of us thought it was a eucrite and the asking price of $10.00 was too much, ala over $10,000. (Wish I would have known its real origin then). Anywaywhat happened to the other 250 grams? Was this cut off in Morocco and if so where is it now. A few small pieces were cut off in Morocco but what appeared missing was small enough that several photo angles could be taken and you not see the window or windows.   So either, there is two NWA482 stones, 250 grams got lost?, or the moroccans have a very bad scale. Does anyone else know more about this?  Mark


Re: [meteorite-list] Etching Portales Valley

2002-10-31 Thread Michael Farmer
Herbert, there is nothing special you need to do to etch Portales Valley, it
etches like any other iron. You do not need to cover it with Lacquer, just
take care of it in your moist environment
Mike Farmer
- Original Message -
From: Herbert Raab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Meteorite List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:56 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Etching Portales Valley



 Hello List,

 I have a nice 16.4g complete slice of Portales Valley with some large
 metal veins and fusion crust. Now I am thinkling about etching the slice
 to bring out the Widmanstäten pattern in the metal. Is there anything
 special I need to care about when etching Portales Valley?

 I have etched several of my iron meteorites, and even a large iron nodule
 in my 28g slice from the Estherville mesosiderite. But I have never etched
 a ordinary chondrite, so I though I rather ask...

 Would the experts on this list also recommend to lacquer the slice after
 etching? My slice is currently not covered with lacquer, and there is not
 the slightest amount of rust visible now. But can the acid make the iron
 start to rust? Is there any danger that the nitol used for etching or the
 alcohol used for cleaning the specimen would destroy the thin fusion
crust?

 Thanks for your help,

   Herbert Raab
   Linz, Austria

 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] A Passing On

2002-10-31 Thread Walter Branch
Hello Sarah,

I am saddened to hear of your loss.  Being stuck as it were here in
Savannah, I never got the chance to get to know Dave personally but knowing
what little I did about him from his posts here to the list, emails we
exchanged, the products he produced and his interest in things scientific, I
think I would have called him a friend.  His presence will be missed and you
have my deepest condolences.

-Walter
---
Walter Branch, Ph.D.
Branch Meteorites
322 Stephenson Ave., Suite B
Savannah, GA  31405 USA
www.branchmeteorites.com
- Original Message -
From: MuseumStore/NatureSource [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Meteorite List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] A Passing On


 Hello Sarah,
 I was so saddened to hear of your loss.  I look with amazement and
 appreciation every day at my Periodic Table in Earth and Sky.  It was
 obviously a labor of love.

 Each day I will look at it and hope you are finding strength and doing as
 well as can be expected.  My thoughts and prayers are with you during this
 incredibly difficult time.

 With deepest sympathy
 Jeanne Devon



 -Original Message-
 From: Jensan Scientifics/ Sci-Mall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: meteorite-list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thursday, October 31, 2002 5:39 AM
 Subject: [meteorite-list] A Passing On


 Dear List Members,
 
 I regret to inform you that my talented and amazing husband, David L.
 Coleman passed away yesterday after a sudden stroke.  Davids talent went
 beyond the scope of just loving science. With me he invented many
 wonderful educational posters and geolgical study sets that changed the
 way people at the sciences, such as astrogeology with our World Impact
 Maps.
 
 As most things are, his work will probably be more esteemed in death
 than in his short life.
 
 David was 48.
 
 I will miss him terribly.
 
 Sarah Kennedy-Coleman
 Jensan Scientifics/ ScienceMall-USA
 
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] NWA 482 questions

2002-10-31 Thread Michael Farmer



Robert, that is simple, since the purchase of this 
meteorite, we have been hassled in public and private by a good number of 
people, many on the list, in the last two years! I am simply tired of this 
ugly rumor raising it's head every few months. Mark posted questions, that have 
been answered so many times, that I am now asking him to clarify how the stone 
was offered to him? He had never been to Morocco, and the stone came out just a 
few days before I bought it. So to me it is very funny that the stone was 
"offered" to everyone and his grandmother. Do you see my point? Mark was never 
offered the stone, no oneinMorocco ever knew his name, and 
stilldont, so that part of his post is what I called into question. 

I have never had a problem with Mark, but it is pretty 
easy to tell who he was directing that post to. 
Part2.
As for the Met Bul. The matter is the same as when first 
reported. The meteorite was purchased by a consortium of people, the hupes had 
the largest investment so they got the main mass., just under half. so they 
wanted the Bulletin updated. I feel the new one is misleading as it says that 
the Hupes owned the stone, the fact is that they owned, HALF the stone, the main 
mass. There are 10 other owners that are not mentioned. 
Either way, that is just semantics that the Hupes wanted. 
They made the change, there is no secret or surprises there. 

The fact of the whole matter is that I bought the 
stone, I have the receipt from the seller as to the weight, and the several 
people saw the stone in Tucson before cutting, so these rumors are nothing more 
than that, rumors spread by jeolous people who never owed and never even saw the 
stone.
I sincerely hope that this clarifies everything and can 
put an end to this garbage.

Mike Farmer

  - Original Message  - 
  From: 
  Matson, Robert 
  To: Meteorite List 
  Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 1:18 
  PM
  Subject: [meteorite-list] NWA 482 
  questions
  
  Mike,
  
  I don't know what your personal beef is 
  with Mr. Bostick and frankly don't
  care to know. Clearly you are reading a lot more into 
  his post about
  NWA 482 than was present in his 
  words. He made a statement (true or
  not) and asked a question. Stripping 
  out the extraneous 
  information
  about price and meteorite type, 
  it boiled down to this:
  
  "...when the lunar meteorite NWA482 was being offered 
  around morocco
  it was 1278 grams and not 1015 as later 
  reportedwhat happened to
  the other 250 grams?"
  
  Your name was not mentioned once, and you 
  were accused of nothing.
  And yet the mere asking of the above 
  question drove you to threaten
  legal action? That is not a rational 
  response, which is why one would
  have to assume there is some bad blood 
  between you two. The
  sensible response would have been, "The 
  stone weighed 1015 grams,
  no more -- I weighed it myself on my own 
  scale. Based on the
  meteorite's shape, there's no way it could 
  have once weighed 1278
  grams and then lost 20% of its mass 
  without it being obvious. Who
  is saying that it once weighed 1278 
  grams?"
  
  The burden of proof would then be on Mark 
  to produceevidence,
  photographic or otherwise,that 
  it ever weighed 25% more than 
  the
  published TKW.
  
  As long as we're on the subject of NWA 
  482, perhaps you or someone
  else can shed some light on the entry that appears in 
  Meteoritical
  Bulletin #86:
  
  "Northwest Africa 482, 
  correction
  From the day the meteorite was purchased 
  it belonged to Adam and
  Greg Hupe (Hupe) and they still hold the 
  main mass. The holder of
  the main mass listed in the Meteoritical 
  Bulletin, No. 85 was incorrect."
  
  The first sentence of the listing in 
  Meteoritical Bulletin #85 for NWA 482
  was, "A 1015 g stone was purchased on 2001 
  January 10 in Alnif,
  Morocco, by Michael Farmer." The 
  last sentence reads, "Specimens:
  half of the main mass is with Farmer; type 
  specimens, 24 g, UCLA,
  and 18 g, UAz."
  
  So, we're all left wondering: who 
  REALLY owns (or perhaps by now
  "owned") the main mass of NWA 482? Just so we're clear, there are no
  accusations here, only 
  questions. Anyone reading the Meteoritical Bulletins
  should be just as 
  perplexed as I. --Rob


Re: [meteorite-list] NWA 482 questions

2002-10-31 Thread Starbits
The first sentence of the listing in Meteoritical Bulletin #85 for NWA 482 was, A 
1015 g stone was purchased on 2001 January 10 in Alnif, Morocco, by Michael Farmer.  
The last sentence reads, Specimens: half of the main mass is with Farmer; type 
specimens, 24 g, UCLA, and 18 g, UAz.
   
  So, we're all left wondering:  who REALLY owns (or perhaps by now owned) the main 
mass of NWA 482? 

Hello Mark, Rob, and all

At the risk of stepping into the middle of a bar 
fight here is what I know.

I saw the stone in Tucson when Mike Farmer returned.  
At the time it was complete, whole and uncut except for 
a couple small chips which can be seen in the photos. 
It weighed 1015 grams.  
I was the one that cut it into slices for passing out 
to the various investors.  A large end cut was left 
uncut.  It weighed about 320 grams as I recall.  This 
large end cut went to the Hupes as they were the 
largest investor and this was their share of the 
purchase.  So the bulletin was correct on both 
accounts,  Mike Farmer did purchase the stone in Jan 2001 
and at the time of the classification had posession of 
the whole stone except for what had been send to UCLA 
and the U of Arizona.  After the distribution the Hupes 
were the owners of the largest piece.

Eric Olson
http://www.star-bits.com   

   

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] NWA 482 questions

2002-10-31 Thread fcressy
Hello all,

Rob asked:

So, we're all left wondering:  who REALLY owns (or perhaps by now
owned) the main mass of NWA 482?  Just so we're clear, there are no
accusations here, only questions.  Anyone reading the Meteoritical
Bulletins should be just as perplexed as I.  --Rob

The website set up by the Hupes, www.lunarrock.com, covers this. The main
mass is 312 grams, is owned by the Hupes, and I believe it is still on
display at the University of Washington in Seattle.

Hope this helps.

Incidently, several photos of the meteorite prior to cutting are displayed
on the above mentioned website. A small window maybe the size of a dime is
present. Certainly 250 grams was not lost. I suspect the 1278 gram figure
Mark alluded to came from the sellers antique postal scale. Guess there are
sellers weights and buyers weights. Either that or the broken scale Mark
salvaged from the trash last year in Tucson  was used ;-)

Regards,
Frank



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] NWA482 Total Weight?

2002-10-31 Thread Michael Farmer



 Mark, do you see my point, that out of 
the blue people keep dredging this up. This has gone on for too long. I have 
heard all of the rumors, and many more, such as that we never paid for the 
stone, we stole it, I went to jail in Morocco (Your bud Bessey posted that one) 
etc etc etc. See Mark? I dont like people saying such things. You claim to have 
been offered the stone, I do not believe that at all, only one other person saw 
that meteorite before we bought it. He was a German buyer. 
I just want to get this out once and for all Mark, your 
email hit me by surprise that is for sure. 
Let's continue to be friends, I have always considered you 
a friend, and hope that you will not help to spread and propagate rumors. 


Mike Farmer

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  MARK 
  BOSTICK 
  To: Michael Farmer ; Meteorite List 
  Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 1:15 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA482 
  Total Weight?
  
  Clam down a little Mike. Sorry, if you seen that as an attack 
  against you Mike, it was just something I have wondered about for a while, 
  something I have heard others wonder about as well...so I asked. I have 
  no problem with you or Strope and I think you two have done a great 
  jobon getting many of these African meteorite 
  classified.Something we are all greatfull for.
  
  The fact is however, the stone was offered to most of the people that 
  deal in moroccan meteorites and it was reportably 1278 grams. I do 
  not know anything about the deal you and the Hupes had in morocco and I do not 
  claim to know. Also, I have not claimed to have been to morrocco before 
  Jan. 2001, just that I was offered the stone, as was most of the people that 
  have purchased meteorites from morocco were offered the stone and thatI 
  was told itwas 1278 grams.Believe it or not, you do not have to go 
  to Morocco to purchase from there. I do not know anything about troubles you 
  and European dealers have had and I do not think that has anything to do with 
  me. I have sold some penthouses on eBay, like the issue with Marilyn 
  Monroes photos, but to say that Penthouse is all I was selling a year ago is 
  quite far fetched.
  
  I have met the Hupes on a couple occasions now and have e-mailed with 
  them several times. I have purchasedfrom them and sold to 
  them.They are probley the two most people excited by African meteorites 
  and have put a lot of time, effort and money into their finds, the hobby is 
  better off with them around I believe. When I first arrived at 
  Blaine Reed's room in Denver, Adam took out his latest Mars rock and placed it 
  in my hand. Being the largest piece of Mars I have ever touched I 
  thought that was pretty cool. 
  
  NWA482is a very nice meteorite and most of your investors are quite 
  happy so I think you can consider that a success. I purchased a 0.170 
  gram piece from Jim Strope many months ago and am quite happy with it. 
  It has a glass vein and a bump on the crust from a flow line, what more could 
  you ask for in a small specimen?
  
  Not sure of any legal trouble I could get into asking a question and 
  saying what I was told before you even had the stone. Unlike you own 
  e-mail, I did not mention any dealer or person in a negative way. This 
  ispossibly anerror or a misleading on a moroccan dealers part, 
  however I do not feel wrong is asking from more information.
  
  Mark Bostick
  
- Original Message -
From: 
Michael Farmer
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 1:05 
PM
To: MARK BOSTICK; Meteorite List
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA482 
Total Weight?




Wow Mark, you sure know alot for having been selling 
nothing but Penthouse porno mags back then. How did you see it if you have 
never been to Africa? That would be a neat trick. I have a sworn statement 
as to the weight by the man who sold it to Jim and I, sworn in front of the 
police in Er Rachidia Province of Morocco, filed in Rabat, Er Rachidia, and 
Erfoud. I have made a scan of this and will post it in a few hours to anyone 
who would like to see it. 
Mark, we all know that the rumors flew after the 
purchase of that rock, all coming from other dealers, most in Europe, who 
did not see or buy the stone, but needless to say, were not happy by Jim and 
I swooping in and buying up the second largest lunar meteorite ever found 
right from under their noses. Sounds like sour grapes to me. The Hupes are 
now trying to corner the market in Morocco, as they arrived there last 
Friday night as I was leaving Africa. In doing so, they are now it seems, 
trying to spread some dissent among my suppliers and customers. I hope they 
decide to call me ASAP while on their way back to Seattle, before I have to 
let out a little more damaging information tonight.
Mark, you and Dean need to get help, show us all your 
passport that 

[meteorite-list] NWA 482 questions

2002-10-31 Thread Matson, Robert



Hi 
Mike,

Robert, that is simple, since the purchase 
of this meteorite, we have been
 hassled in public and private by a good 
number of people, many on the list,
 in the last two years! I am simply 
tired of this ugly rumor raising it's head
 every few months. Mark posted questions, 
that have been answered so
 many times, that I am now asking him to 
clarify how the stone was offered
 to him?

I understand. Reading through all my 
filed emails on the subject of
NWA 482 over the last year and a half, I can 
see how frustrating
it is to have to keep answering the same 
dumb questions again and
again. The statement about a 
different, larger, mass was not one
I had seen before, though, so I thought that 
it would require just
a simple response. Fortunately, the meteorite had a rather 
distinct
shape, and there is no possible way that it could have at one 
time
been 25% heavier than 
its reported weight without it looking
likea peanut. So I think a good, 
if terse, response would have
been, "Anyone who says this meteorite once weighed 1278 
grams
obviously never saw it while it was whole."

As for the Met Bul. The matter is the same 
as when first reported. The
 meteorite was purchased by a consortium of 
people, the hupes had the
 largest investment so they got the main 
mass., just under half. so they
 wanted the Bulletin updated. I feel the 
new one is misleading as it says
 that the Hupes owned the stone, the fact 
is that they owned, HALF the
 stone, the main mass. There are 10 other 
owners that are not mentioned.
 
Either way, that is just semantics that 
the Hupes wanted. They made
 the change, there is no secret or 
surprises there.

In light 
of what the Hupes report on theirown website about the 
acquisition
of the 
stone, I have to agree with you that the new wording is even 
more
misleading than theoriginal.


"From the day the meteorite was purchased it belonged 
to Adam and
Greg Hupe (Hupe)"

This 
statement is patently false, and I'm surprised that the 
Meteoritical
Society would 
allow it. That's the main reason I said I was confused
by the 
incompatible wordings of Met. Bull. 85 and 86.

Best 
wishes,
Rob




Re: [meteorite-list] NWA 482 questions

2002-10-31 Thread MARK BOSTICK
Hello List,  Thank you Eric for your straight answer. I am sure many others had heard the same thing so if Iwas wrong for bringing it up, I apologize.   Also I would like to add to Mike, that my e-mail was not meant as an attack on you and I did not mean it to come off that way, if it did. There have been many rumors n the NWA482, this one I had heard several times so I was wondering and what better place to ask then the list? I am going to drop all of this, not that I was trying to start anything, for the benifit of the list.   Now to comment on Frank's e-mail  "Either that or the broken scale Mark salvaged from the trash last year in Tucson"  I forgot about that scale. That was funny. A scale of mine broke in Tuscon so we went out and purchased another one locally. During the last weekend of the meteorite part of the show, the Arizona Scale Police came by. Even though the scale was in the trash and broken, it was not an authorized scale. So they pulled it out of the trash and put a label on it that said among other things, that I could not dispose of the scale. So I couldn't throw it away legally in Arizona. Figure that one out.  Mark   - Original Message - From: fcressy Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 3:43 PM To: Meteorite List Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA 482 questions Hello all,Rob asked:So, we're all left wondering: who REALLY owns (or perhaps by now"owned") the main mass of NWA 482? Just so we're clear, there are noaccusations here, only questions. Anyone reading the MeteoriticalBulletins should be just as perplexed as I. --RobThe website set up by the Hupes, www.lunarrock.com, covers this. The mainmass is 312 grams, is owned by the Hupes, and I believe it is still ondisplay at the University of Washington in Seattle.Hope this helps.Incidently, several photos of the meteorite prior to cutting are displayedon the above mentioned website. A small window maybe the size of a dime ispresent. Certainly 250 grams was not lost. I suspect the 1278 gram figureMark alluded to came from the sellers antique postal scale. Guess there aresellers weights and buyers weights. Either that or the broken scale Marksalvaged from the trash last year in Tucson was used ;-)Regards,Frank__Meteorite-list mailing list[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NWA482 Total Weight?

2002-10-31 Thread tett
Mike,

I read Mark's posting and can't see why you are concerned and especially why
you think your integrity has been challenged.  I think all he is asking is
if there is another ~250 grams out there.

Am I missing something?

With Respect,

Mike Tettenborn
Owen Sound, Ontario

- Original Message -
From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bernd Pauli HD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: MARK BOSTICK [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Meteorite List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA482 Total Weight?


 I certainly agree with you Bernd, Sarah's loss is a tragedy, and rocks in
 the big scheme of things, mean nothing. But you must admit, what Mark
posted
 was a huge attack at my integrity? If you think that can be ignored like
all
 the other useless attacks, you are mistaken. I take no pleasure in posting
 this to the list, but If you go back over the years, you will NEVER find a
 post from me so much as hinting at any animosity towards Mark Bostick. Why
 he hit me today is beyond my comprehension.
 Mike Farmer
 - Original Message -
 From: Bernd Pauli HD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: MARK BOSTICK [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Meteorite List
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:12 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA482 Total Weight?


   before I have to let out a little
   more damaging information tonight.
 
  Please, don't. It does not quite fit into the sympathies
  and condolences we are expressing for the sad loss of
  another list member.
 
  Bernd
 


 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] NWA482 Total Weight?

2002-10-31 Thread Michael Farmer
Mike, I think my other emails explained that clearly. As you all on this
list know, I am a passionate person and tend to get riled up pretty easy.
That is my personality trait, and I cannot change it.
Mike Farmer
- Original Message -
From: tett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bernd Pauli HD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: MARK BOSTICK [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Meteorite List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA482 Total Weight?


 Mike,

 I read Mark's posting and can't see why you are concerned and especially
why
 you think your integrity has been challenged.  I think all he is asking is
 if there is another ~250 grams out there.

 Am I missing something?

 With Respect,

 Mike Tettenborn
 Owen Sound, Ontario

 - Original Message -
 From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Bernd Pauli HD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: MARK BOSTICK [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Meteorite List
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 2:22 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA482 Total Weight?


  I certainly agree with you Bernd, Sarah's loss is a tragedy, and rocks
in
  the big scheme of things, mean nothing. But you must admit, what Mark
 posted
  was a huge attack at my integrity? If you think that can be ignored like
 all
  the other useless attacks, you are mistaken. I take no pleasure in
posting
  this to the list, but If you go back over the years, you will NEVER find
a
  post from me so much as hinting at any animosity towards Mark Bostick.
Why
  he hit me today is beyond my comprehension.
  Mike Farmer
  - Original Message -
  From: Bernd Pauli HD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: MARK BOSTICK [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Meteorite List
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:12 PM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA482 Total Weight?
 
 
before I have to let out a little
more damaging information tonight.
  
   Please, don't. It does not quite fit into the sympathies
   and condolences we are expressing for the sad loss of
   another list member.
  
   Bernd
  
 
 
  __
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 




__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] NWA 482 questions answered

2002-10-31 Thread Michael Farmer
I couldn't have put it better myself Rob. 
thanks 
Mike
- Original Message - 
From: Matson, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 2:16 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] NWA 482 questions answered


 Thanks Eric for the very succinct explanation.  It puts to bed
 pretty much every issue about this amazing stone:
 
 1.  The mass was 1015 g, minus very small chips that could not
 have totalled anywhere near 250 grams.  The 1278 g figure is
 erroneous.  At best it is the weight of some other totally
 unrelated Moroccan meteorite.
 
 2.  Mike purchased NWA 482 in Morocco on behalf of many investors.
 
 3.  The Hupes provided the largest fractional share of investment
 capital, and thus received the main mass -- roughly 30% of the
 meteorite.
 
 Cheers,
 Rob
 
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] NWA 482 questions

2002-10-31 Thread Michael Farmer



He he, I never heard that story, but that is a good one. 
yep, Tucson is getting horrible when it comes to scales and the Gem show. 
Pathetic if you ask me. You should see the Moroccan scales, old levers with 
hand-made lead weights with gram weights on them. The oldest scam in the book, 
overweighing produce. That is why I now have left 2 digital scales in Morocco 
permanantly to have them when I am there, you should see the hassles trying to 
take digital scales through customs! If you want to use Moroccan scales, good 
luck and God be with you. 
Mike Farmer

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  MARK 
  BOSTICK 
  To: fcressy ; Meteorite List 
  Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 3:35 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA 482 
  questions
  
  Hello List,
  
  Thank you Eric for your straight answer. I am sure many others had 
  heard the same thing so if Iwas wrong for bringing it up, I 
  apologize. 
  
  Also I would like to add to Mike, that my e-mail was not meant as an 
  attack on you and I did not mean it to come off that way, if it did. 
  There have been many rumors n the NWA482, this one I had heard several times 
  so I was wondering and what better place to ask then the list? I am 
  going to drop all of this, not that I was trying to start anything, for the 
  benifit of the list. 
  
  Now to comment on Frank's e-mail
  
  "Either that or the broken scale Mark salvaged from the trash last year 
  in Tucson"
  
  I forgot about that scale. That was funny. A scale of mine 
  broke in Tuscon so we went out and purchased another one locally. During 
  the last weekend of the meteorite part of the show, the Arizona Scale Police 
  came by. Even though the scale was in the trash and broken, it was not 
  an authorized scale. So they pulled it out of the trash and put a label 
  on it that said among other things, that I could not dispose of the 
  scale. So I couldn't throw it away legally in Arizona. Figure that 
  one out.
  
  Mark
  
  
- Original Message -
From: 
fcressy
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 3:43 
PM
To: Meteorite List
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA 482 
questions
Hello all,Rob asked:So, we're all left 
wondering: who REALLY owns (or perhaps by now"owned") the main 
mass of NWA 482? Just so we're clear, there are noaccusations 
here, only questions. Anyone reading the MeteoriticalBulletins 
should be just as perplexed as I. --RobThe website set up by 
the Hupes, www.lunarrock.com, covers this. The mainmass is 312 grams, is 
owned by the Hupes, and I believe it is still ondisplay at the 
University of Washington in Seattle.Hope this 
helps.Incidently, several photos of the meteorite prior to cutting 
are displayedon the above mentioned website. A small window maybe the 
size of a dime ispresent. Certainly 250 grams was not lost. I suspect 
the 1278 gram figureMark alluded to came from the sellers antique postal 
scale. Guess there aresellers weights and buyers weights. Either that or 
the broken scale Marksalvaged from the trash last year in Tucson 
was used 
;-)Regards,Frank__Meteorite-list 
mailing 
list[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] A Passing On

2002-10-31 Thread SSachs9056
Sarah and Family,
My deepest condolences for you and your family at this time.
Steven L. Sachs

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: [meteorite-list] Mystery

2002-10-31 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Screen resolution for a Macintosh computer is 72 dpi, and for a PC is 75
dpi. You don't need to set the resolution of your image to anything higher
than that. It will not look any better, and if on a web page it will just
take longer to download.

To print an image, set the resolution to double the screen lines (linature)
at which you are going to print (usually 300 dpi is more than enough for
high resolution printing of continuos tone images = photographs) anything
more than that is just a waste.

An image at a resolution of 72 dpi will never print right, that's why web
image are useless for printing. If you want to have the best of both worlds,
display the 72 dpi picture on your web page and link it to a higher
resolution image (the 300 dpi one) that will only load if you click on it.

Meteorites is just a passtime as I walk the arid dessert on the south coast
of Peru hunting for fossils and shark teeths (mainly Megalodon's and Great
White's), my real job is as a graphic designer for commercial printing and
web design.

My 2 cents.

Javier Castagnetto
Lima, Peru

 De: Michael L Blood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Fecha: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:32:46 -0800
 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Asunto: Re: [meteorite-list] Mystery
 
 Hi Steve,
 I have it on good authority a monitor cannot display finer than 72
 dpi. However, you can SET the dpi to anything - and apparently, 300 dpi
 is a good print level IF you are printing - but totally unnecessary for
 web viewing and increasing the dpi WOULD increase download time.
 In my instance, it was gif vs. jpg only. JPG is much faster.
 Someone may know how high is best for printing, but I always assumed
 it was the highest dpi obtainable.
 Best wishes, Michael
 
 on 10/30/02 6:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hi Michael and List,
 
 I'm not sure if this will help you or not. The photograph portion of the
 software I use (PhotoStudio 2000) for my meteorite website gave me the option
 of scanning photographs anywhere from a 75dpi resolution to 2400dpi
 resolution. I initially scanned the photos at about 600dpi. Little did I
 realize until I tried opening the website that it took many minutes for all
 of the pics to display. Needless to say at 600dpi, the images took up a
 tremendous amount of real estate. I re-scanned all of the pics again at
 75dpi, and there was really no discernible difference in picture quality. The
 pics loaded up at least 6-7 times as fast,  the website was much quicker to
 display...all was right with the world.
 
 Now, I don't a thing about digital cameras but I would surmise that if the
 cameras allowed the operator to determine the dpi / resolution, a lower
 resolution might work as long as it does not affect the image quality. Anyone
 else with a thought on this?
 My two dpi worth... ;-)
 
 Steven L. Sachs
 
 Whenever I feel blue, I start breathing again.
 --
 Worth Seeing:
 -  Earth at night from satelite:
 http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0011/earthlights_dmsp_big.jpg
 -Earth - variety of choices:
 http://www.fourmilab.ch/earthview/vplanet.html
 --
 COLLEGE MONEY
 CLICK HERE to search
 600,000 scholarships!
 http://us.click.yahoo.com/iZp8OC/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/jFYolB/TM
 --
 Michael Blood Meteorites  Didgeridoos for sale at:
 http://www.michaelbloodmeteorites.com/
 
 
 
 
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



[meteorite-list] bottom line nwa482

2002-10-31 Thread aziz habibi
hello list hello all.
nwa482 ,,to be or not to be??? ,,this is the question???.
this week i was visited by mike farmer and jim stroope
jim stroope is a good mature sage guy.sincerly
they ask me in my house what you have for sell i show them
what i have , include what you bought from me.
mike apoligises to have attack me in the list ; he told me
i do not want that amerecains come and buy in morroco but i
have to much respect for habibi.
i sad to jim stroope you are a respectable guy and i have a
lot of respect for you, and i will not answer mike farmer
in the list. i m the kind of guy who respect first himself.
i do not fight in the road , and i will not fall down in
the street, for dollars.
i forget everything while many dealers asked me stone
upfront to send stone and to get money later .
ididnt answer, why
i m a third world dealers no one can believe me , i put
ouzina wich is real and they told me its not ouzina.
a week later adam and greg hupe visited in erfoud with mr
donahue from portland a writer from outside us magasine and
asked me what hapenned i say i do not know its may be some
storys.
he told me your ouzina was true and you others stone was
perfect and its advertising you to make you fall down.
i sad i have many good collectors friend and it working
well.
he told me that you are going to be pubelished in this
magasine for a millions copies.
i sad why im a poor guy what for.
he told me here is a problem.
what do you think nwa482 was 1015gr or more i sad all the
dealers sad it was 1278gr and mike payed 13000$ 10$ per gr.
this is exactley the wiegth.
all the dealer of morroco sad ir was 1278 gr
from amouri he sad i asked mike 10$ to falsifecate the
document , mike gived me 6500$ to falsifecate the document.
amouri was riped of before as they promess to amouri a
bonus that he never get.
mike was in my house with jim and i get dinner with them ,
they never told me abaout that.
the hupe brother come to erfoud , hello habibi welcome
what hapennd i sad here is all the dealer ask yourself.
all the dealer sad mike was falsifieng document with med.
the writer donahue heard all the story and it was to late
to resolve any.
i sad to greg hupe please , its too bad for morroco this
story and he sad , i want the justice for all the investors.
i could not say anything else.
the writer told me did mike told you anything abaout nwa482
i sad its not posssible the hupe brother are my friend
however we have a problem of account; mike know that they
was my friend.he could not asked me that.
adam hupe told me in my house , we do not want to have
trouble( adam is the best collecetors i ever know he is
fair and honnest and i have lurn with him stones)).
but mike has stoled us and we are going to take him to
court of justice.
we spend a night with this incredible writer it was to late
to resolve anything, all the morrocan dealer had sad it was
1278gr.
i told greg , hey man , its possible by geothecnique to
reconsturct the stone and then to put in a a graduate
cubique cm3 box and make the diffrence and multiplie by the
density , you have all the mass.by exact gr.
he told me scinetist are doing the same.
i told to greg all this is too bad for morroco, and for us
he told me its time to explain to collectors the thrued.
i sad mike was with me last week he was stressed but
ididnt understand , in real all the story i heard from
nomade collectors and all the rest from lats year
by mistake i told the hupe brother nwa482 was 1278 gr where
is the rest they told me how, and i close it up i stoped as
i ididnt understand.
i know that amouri sad it was 1278 gr the guy who sell it
to mike .
i konw that sallem brahim sell it for 1278 gr.
i know that aid sad it was1278 gr
i know that i have it for a month , i was playing golf
with??.
its an unresolved question.
scientist must do more.
if you take a stone iregular and you want to have volume
cm3
you put in a gradute cm3 box water and you make the
difrence.
this what i heard i have nothing against anyone.
nwa482 is 99% 1278 gr scientist can proofe that.
i think that i have a responsbilty of the trued agains this
list this what i think its up to scientist to make the
difrence.

all the best
habibi
nb: its up to mike to proofe if its true or not , how???





_
Gagne une PS2 ! Envoie un SMS avec le code PS au 61166
(0,35€ Hors coût du SMS)




Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite's Location Found In Siberia

2002-10-31 Thread almitt
Hi Ron and all,

Ron Baalke wrote:

I once took a number of meteorites to a store that sold metal detectors to test out.
I tried out various types meteorites with about a dozen different metal detectors.
They all had no problem with the irons and stony-irons. However, all of the metal
detectors had problems detecting stony meteorites.  I had to play with the detectors to
fine-tune it to a particular stony meteorite, but once it was fined tuned for
one meteorite, it would tend to ignore a lot of the other stony meteorites.

I have been to metal detector clubs, talking about meteorites and what Ron has said 
rings true
when we have experimented with various detectors on various stony meteorites. It seems 
that
you can peak them for certain stones but then others won't register. Perhaps there is 
some
detector that can be useful over a wider range but I think hunting by eyesight (and on 
hoof)
may well still be the best method.

Nininger once said, any considerable search over a considerable area WILL yield a 
meteorite.
The
more eyes, hands and feet you can get out there hunting the better your chances of 
finding
material.
All my best!

--AL




__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Fwd: [meteorite-list] Tough day...bottom line nwa482

2002-10-31 Thread SSachs9056
To the list, 
I don't know about everyone else, but I'm having to take some deep breaths 
getting through these postings. 

First, we lose a fellow meteorite-list member, colleague, and that in itself 
should give us all time to pause and reflect. 

Second, is the deal that tanked with Steve Arnold, and it's aftermath with 
another list member.

Third, is the exchange regarding the NWA 482, and now this posting which, if 
it reads correctly, poses some extremely damaging information, which I 
frankly think should have been posted a bit more privately---or at the very 
least, put on the back burner for a short time. 

All this on Halloween. Damn! This day is going to be one tough-mother to 
close out on a more upbeat note.

Here's Hoping and Praying for a better day tomarrow to all list members

Steven L. Sachs   IMCA # 9210


---BeginMessage---
hello list hello all.
nwa482 ,,to be or not to be??? ,,this is the question???.
this week i was visited by mike farmer and jim stroope 
jim stroope is a good mature sage guy.sincerly
they ask me in my house what you have for sell i show them 
what i have , include what you bought from me.
mike apoligises to have attack me in the list ; he told me 
i do not want that amerecains come and buy in morroco but i 
have to much respect for habibi.
i sad to jim stroope you are a respectable guy and i have a 
lot of respect for you, and i will not answer mike farmer 
in the list. i m the kind of guy who respect first himself. 
i do not fight in the road , and i will not fall down in 
the street, for dollars.
i forget everything while many dealers asked me stone 
upfront to send stone and to get money later .
ididnt answer, why
i m a third world dealers no one can believe me , i put 
ouzina wich is real and they told me its not ouzina.
a week later adam and greg hupe visited in erfoud with mr 
donahue from portland a writer from outside us magasine and 
asked me what hapenned i say i do not know its may be some 
storys.
he told me your ouzina was true and you others stone was 
perfect and its advertising you to make you fall down.
i sad i have many good collectors friend and it working 
well.
he told me that you are going to be pubelished in this 
magasine for a millions copies.
i sad why im a poor guy what for.
he told me here is a problem.
what do you think nwa482 was 1015gr or more i sad all the 
dealers sad it was 1278gr and mike payed 13000$ 10$ per gr.
this is exactley the wiegth.
all the dealer of morroco sad ir was 1278 gr
from amouri he sad i asked mike 10$ to falsifecate the 
document , mike gived me 6500$ to falsifecate the document.
amouri was riped of before as they promess to amouri a 
bonus that he never get.
mike was in my house with jim and i get dinner with them , 
they never told me abaout that.
the hupe brother come to erfoud , hello habibi welcome 
what hapennd i sad here is all the dealer ask yourself.
all the dealer sad mike was falsifieng document with med.
the writer donahue heard all the story and it was to late 
to resolve any.
i sad to greg hupe please , its too bad for morroco this 
story and he sad , i want the justice for all the investors.
i could not say anything else.
the writer told me did mike told you anything abaout nwa482
i sad its not posssible the hupe brother are my friend 
however we have a problem of account; mike know that they 
was my friend.he could not asked me that.
adam hupe told me in my house , we do not want to have 
trouble( adam is the best collecetors i ever know he is 
fair and honnest and i have lurn with him stones)).
but mike has stoled us and we are going to take him to 
court of justice.
we spend a night with this incredible writer it was to late
to resolve anything, all the morrocan dealer had sad it was 
1278gr.
i told greg , hey man , its possible by geothecnique to 
reconsturct the stone and then to put in a a graduate 
cubique cm3 box and make the diffrence and multiplie by the 
density , you have all the mass.by exact gr.
he told me scinetist are doing the same.
i told to greg all this is too bad for morroco, and for us 
he told me its time to explain to collectors the thrued.
i sad mike was with me last week he was stressed but 
ididnt understand , in real all the story i heard from 
nomade collectors and all the rest from lats year
by mistake i told the hupe brother nwa482 was 1278 gr where 
is the rest they told me how, and i close it up i stoped as 
i ididnt understand.
i know that amouri sad it was 1278 gr the guy who sell it 
to mike .
i konw that sallem brahim sell it for 1278 gr.
i know that aid sad it was1278 gr
i know that i have it for a month , i was playing golf 
with??.
its an unresolved question.
scientist must do more.
if you take a stone iregular and you want to have volume 
cm3
you put in a gradute cm3 box water and you make the 
difrence.
this what i heard i have nothing against anyone.
nwa482 is 99% 1278 gr scientist can proofe that.
i think that i have a 

[meteorite-list] membrane and small holders

2002-10-31 Thread Steve Arnold, Chicago!!!
Hi there list. Could someone please tell me where I can buy membrane or
small holders for my micro/macro collection?

  steve

=
Steve R.Arnold, Chicago, IL, 60120
I. M. C. A. MEMBER #6728
The Midwest Meteorite Collector!
Website url http://stormbringer60120.tripod.com

__
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



Re: Fwd: [meteorite-list] Tough day...bottom line nwa482

2002-10-31 Thread aziz habibi
hello list hello steven
i agree with you its not the day,
my sincer condoleances for sarah and his family.

steven , what i sad today will be published next week in
the outssiking us magasine.
mr donahue has heard everthing , there is nothing to save.
i tryed in morroco , to told him no , no way nothing.
he is asking only bad question.
did he ask abaout meteorite , no;
ididnt understand , why a writer come from usa to write
abaout this garbage, why not abaout the stone.
its just to crasy .
he was serious enough to understand that he will write and
publish everthing.
i met him very late in the day, he has spend already two
days in the desert with dealers and nomade.
no matter how , no way.
what is done is already done.
he know everthing, and you will see in one week or two you
will read what he wrote.

again my sincer condoleances for sarah and all the
meteorite comunity.
habibi
 ---Message d'origine---
 De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date : 01/11/102 04:23:36

 To the list,
 I don't know about everyone else, but I'm having to take
some deep breaths
 getting through these postings.

 First, we lose a fellow meteorite-list member, colleague,
and that in itself
 should give us all time to pause and reflect.

 Second, is the deal that tanked with Steve Arnold, and
it's aftermath with
 another list member.

 Third, is the exchange regarding the NWA 482, and now
this posting which, if
 it reads correctly, poses some extremely damaging
information, which I
 frankly think should have been posted a bit more
privately---or at the very
 least, put on the back burner for a short time.

 All this on Halloween. Damn! This day is going to be
one tough-mother to
 close out on a more upbeat note.

 Here's Hoping and Praying for a better day tomarrow to
all list members

 Steven L. Sachs IMCA # 9210


 hello list hello all.
 nwa482 ,,to be or not to be??? ,,this is the question???.
 this week i was visited by mike farmer and jim stroope
 jim stroope is a good mature sage guy.sincerly
 they ask me in my house what you have for sell i show
them
 what i have , include what you bought from me.
 mike apoligises to have attack me in the list ; he told
me
 i do not want that amerecains come and buy in morroco but
i
 have to much respect for habibi.
 i sad to jim stroope you are a respectable guy and i have
a
 lot of respect for you, and i will not answer mike farmer
 in the list. i m the kind of guy who respect first
himself.
 i do not fight in the road , and i will not fall down in
 the street, for dollars.
 i forget everything while many dealers asked me stone
 upfront to send stone and to get money later .
 ididnt answer, why
 i m a third world dealers no one can believe me , i put
 ouzina wich is real and they told me its not ouzina.
 a week later adam and greg hupe visited in erfoud with mr
 donahue from portland a writer from outside us magasine
and
 asked me what hapenned i say i do not know its may be
some
 storys.
 he told me your ouzina was true and you others stone was
 perfect and its advertising you to make you fall down.
 i sad i have many good collectors friend and it working
 well.
 he told me that you are going to be pubelished in this
 magasine for a millions copies.
 i sad why im a poor guy what for.
 he told me here is a problem.
 what do you think nwa482 was 1015gr or more i sad all the
 dealers sad it was 1278gr and mike payed 13000$ 10$ per
gr.
 this is exactley the wiegth.
 all the dealer of morroco sad ir was 1278 gr
 from amouri he sad i asked mike 10$ to falsifecate
the
 document , mike gived me 6500$ to falsifecate the
document.
 amouri was riped of before as they promess to amouri a
 bonus that he never get.
 mike was in my house with jim and i get dinner with
them ,
 they never told me abaout that.
 the hupe brother come to erfoud , hello habibi welcome
 what hapennd i sad here is all the dealer ask
yourself.
 all the dealer sad mike was falsifieng document with med.
 the writer donahue heard all the story and it was to late
 to resolve any.
 i sad to greg hupe please , its too bad for morroco this
 story and he sad , i want the justice for all the
investors.
 i could not say anything else.
 the writer told me did mike told you anything abaout
nwa482
 i sad its not posssible the hupe brother are my friend
 however we have a problem of account; mike know that they
 was my friend.he could not asked me that.
 adam hupe told me in my house , we do not want to have
 trouble( adam is the best collecetors i ever know he is
 fair and honnest and i have lurn with him stones)).
 but mike has stoled us and we are going to take him to
 court of justice.
 we spend a night with this incredible writer it was to
late
 to resolve anything, all the morrocan dealer had sad it
was
 1278gr.
 i told greg , hey man , its possible by geothecnique to
 reconsturct the stone and then to put in a a graduate
 cubique cm3 box and make the diffrence and multiplie by
the
 density , you have all the mass.by exact 

[meteorite-list] RECTIFICATION NWA 482.

2002-10-31 Thread aziz habibi
hello list
when i sad that ; that mean that amouri sad mike gived him
6500$. not to me habibi.
mike never talk to me about nwa482, and has never say
anthing abaout that.
what i repeort here is what the daelers sad , not me.
i hope i m clear , mike never talk to me abaout that and
never propose money to me.
its a confusion, amouri sad that. not me.HABIBI

from amouri he sad i asked mike 10$ to falsifecate
the
document , mike gived me(this mean amouri)? 6500$ to
falsifecate the document.
amouri was riped of before as they promess to amouri a
bonus that he never get
_
Gagne une PS2 ! Envoie un SMS avec le code PS au 61166
(0,35€ Hors coût du SMS)




Re: [meteorite-list] A Passing On

2002-10-31 Thread Impactika
In a message dated 10/31/2002 7:50:15 AM Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


I will miss him terribly.

Sarah Kennedy-Coleman


Sarah,

I am sure we will all miss him.

I thought maybe, in about a month, I would get another cryptic e-mail from Dave trying to buying a piece of jewelry from me, without you finding out. And I was already looking forward to seeing both of you again in Tucson, and maybe finding the time to talk a bit longer. And now it won't be.

I looked through my pictures and I found this one, taken in February 2000, in Tucson, at the Birthday Party. I moved it to this address on my site, for all the list members who never had the occasion to meet Dave:
 www.impactika.com/SarahDave.jpg
 
Take care of yourself.
Sincerely.


Anne Black
IMCA #2356
www.IMPACTIKA.com
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[meteorite-list] Archive: (meteorobs) Meteoroid heating: Ram pressure, friction or both?

2002-10-31 Thread Robert Verish
The following FWD messages are for archival purposes,
and as a reference for the FAQ web page:

--
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 19:25:43 -0500
From: Lew Gramer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: (meteorobs) Meteoroid heating: Ram pressure,
friction or both?

I had the pleasure to browse an excellent page today
by Dr. Phil Plait, Webmaster  principle debunker of
the revered http://badastronomy.com . In particular,
I followed a link found on Joe Rao's interesting site
10 confounding cosmic questions, at:
  http://www.msnbc.com/news/825959.asp?pne=msn
(This is a great site, by the way, Joe! And as we'd
expect from Joe, comets, artificial satellites, and
meteor showers all figure among the cosmic
questions!)


From there I got to Dr. Plait's Top 5 Cosmic Myths:
 
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/top5_myths_020903-1.html

The Good News (:) is that TWO of Phil's top 5 myths
have to do with meteors and meteorites. The particular
one that sparked my email today is Myth # 4, entitled
Meteors are heated by friction as they pass through
the atmosphere. (Again, this is labeled a Myth!)

In that page, Phil states, In reality, it isn't
friction, but *ram pressure* that heats meteoroids.
When a gas is compressed it gets hot, like when a
bicycle pump is vigorously used to inflate a tire.
A meteoroid, moving at 33,500 mph (15 kilometers a
second) or more compresses the air in front of it
violently. The air itself gets very hot, which is
what heats the meteoroid. That's fact, not friction.

What a fine pun! :) But on to that QUESTION: I can
recall reading in Oepik's Physics of Meteor Flight
in the Atmosphere, that the formation of a pocket
of compressed air under a meteoroid critically de-
pends on the SIZE (cross-section) of that particle:
below a certain cross-section, the particle would
in fact (per Professor O) NOT create it's own air
shield, and so would be directly impacted by air
molecules throughout it's flight... And of course,
we can assume that particles which are JUST large
enough to form air shields, might still experience
occasional but significant direct molecule impacts.

So the question is, Which is really more important
for the average *visible* meteor: the ram pressure
Phil describes so well, or direct impact friction?

Last but not least, I noticed that Phil specially
mentions the figure 15 km/s or more, as the point
at which ram pressure will cause rapid heating. Is 
this in fact some sort of theoretical cutoff? I.e.,
for meteoroids moving at 11-14 km/s (like those of
Summer's June Bootids), is the physics different?


(I know, I know: three weeks before the Leonids is
not the BEST time to bring this up... But I was so
curious - and I thought some of us could use a wee
break from Leonid fever for a while, anyway. :)

Clear skies and happy pondering!

Lew Gramer (GRALE), IMO, NAMN
Webmaster: http://www.meteorobs.org
Webmaster: http://www.visualdeepsky.org
Assistant: http://www.namnmeteors.org

The archive and Web site for our list is at
http://www.meteorobs.org
--

Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:53:45 -0700
From: Jim and Jan Gamble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (meteorobs) 
Meteoroid heating: Ram pressure, friction or both?

 May we entertain the theory that many meteors
illuminate our skies in much the same fashion as good
old lightning. Think about it, calculations as to how
much visible energy can be released due to heating of
a spec of dust no bigger than that of the head of a
straight pin frequently don't match up with how much
light is actually emitted. Can heat alone really cause
a rock to burn brighter than our sun. Electrical
discharges are among the brightest visible energy
sources in the universe.
  This certainly is not to say heat is not involved,
but is it heat ALONE?
Regards,
Jim Gamble
El Paso, Tx Station-Sandia Meteor Detection Network
All Sky Camera System
31.47N 106.18W
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geocities.com/desert_lights


The archive and Web site for our list is at
http://www.meteorobs.org
--


__
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC  Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list